Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ITIL Practice Infrastructure and Platform Management
ITIL Practice Infrastructure and Platform Management
ITIL Practice Infrastructure and Platform Management
management
ITIL® 4 Practice Guide
AXELOS.com
28th
February
2020
Contents
1 About this document 3
2 General information 4
3 Value streams and processes 14
4 Organizations and people 21
5 Information and technology 26
6 Partners and suppliers 29
7 Important reminder 31
8 Acknowledgments 32
2 General information
2.1 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION
Key message
The purpose of the infrastructure and platform management practice is to oversee the
infrastructure and platforms used by an organization. When carried out properly, this practice
enables the monitoring of technology solutions available to the organization, including the
technology and external service providers.
The infrastructure and platform management practice ensures that the organization has a high-
quality IT infrastructure that efficiently meets its current and anticipated needs. ‘IT
infrastructure’ as a concept includes all of the hardware, software, networks, and facilities that
are required to develop, test, deliver, monitor, manage, and support IT services.
Depending on the architecture of the organization’s IT infrastructure, this practice may focus on
the management of the physical environment, physical equipment, or digital infrastructure
solutions, which may be the organization’s own resources or services provided by suppliers and
partners. Often, IT infrastructure solutions are managed as services; in these cases, the
infrastructure and platform management practice may include dedicated teams acting as service
providers for the application and/or product teams within the organization. If this approach is
taken, it is important to ensure that the infrastructure and platform teams are closely involved in
the overall service delivery activities of the organization and follow the ITIL principles focus on
value, think and work holistically, and collaborate and promote visibility. Members of these teams
should understand the wider context of the organization and its service value system (SVS).
This practice covers all stages of the infrastructure solutions lifecycle, from ideation and gathering
requirements to delivery and support. At every stage, it is used in conjunction with other practices
(including the business analysis, architecture management, service design, availability
management, capacity and performance management, service continuity management,
information security management, risk management practices, and others). The importance of
high-quality infrastructure and platforms for service delivery cannot be overstated; this practice is
vital for the success of the organization’s digital services and digitized business processes.
Definition: IT infrastructure
All of the hardware, software, networks, and facilities that are required to develop, test, deliver,
monitor, manage, and support IT services.
A wide range of activities are used to run and manage IT infrastructure effectively. These
activities range from understanding organization’s requirements and developing and planning
infrastructure and platforms, to performing routine maintenance and overseeing infrastructure
performance.
Definition: Operation
The routine of running and managing an activity, product, service, or other configuration item.
A large portion of the operational activities can be automated. Automation tools can monitor the
environment, identify changes, distribute patches and other updates, provide asset inventory, and
schedule and automate jobs.
To ensure alignment to the overall architectural model, standardized infrastructure and platform
solutions are defined to meet the organization’s needs in a repeatable manner, to simplify delivery
and ongoing management for these services. Standardized services allow for efficient provisioning
through repeatability and automation. Many infrastructure services are designed to enable speed
and agility. Self-service capabilities leverage automation capabilities to allow for users or other IT
staff to request and receive items without manual steps behind the scenes. This should account for
the majority of the services that are in utilized in the environment. Examples of standardized
solutions may include storage systems, application servers, database platforms, authentication
systems, single-sign-on, and others.
In integration with the architecture management the practice, the infrastructure and platform
management practice should ensure development or outsourcing and cost-efficient operation of
flexible and compatible core infrastructure and platform solutions, that should be easily
deployable and easily configured or merged to support the organization’s services or products,
serving as building blocks for the complex solutions, products, and services. One of the examples
of implementing such approach is usage of microservices, that are “small in size, messaging-
enabled, bounded by contexts, autonomously developed, independently deployable, decentralized
and built and released with automated processes”. 1
When the standard solution does not align with the business, a tailored or customized solution
must be developed. The selection of a non-standard service delays the delivery of the solution and
increases the ongoing effort and cost to the business for support for the solution. These non-
standard solutions should be deployed and managed as an exception due to the additional
overhead it requires.
In cases where the technology is not currently in place, the solution must be designed together
with the architecture management and service design practices for conceptual and detailed
design. During design, the infrastructure and platform management practice, business, and
technical requirements are aligned and the recommended infrastructure and platform solutions
are determined. As the solution is not currently available within the environment, additional steps
are taken to address the procurement, build, sourcing, and support of the solution. The solution
should be evaluated by infrastructure and enterprise architecture to determine if this should be
offered to additional consumers or to remain as an exception to the existing documented
standards.
1
Nadareishvili, I., Mitra, R., McLarty, M., Amundsen, M., Microservice Architecture: Aligning Principles, Practices, and
Culture, O’Reilly 2016
When an organization needs an infrastructure and platform solution, infrastructure and platform
management practice ensures that a solution is designed and delivered to meet the organization’s
requirements. There are several ways to provide a solution. For requests that can be fulfilled using
documented standard packages, the solution is provided through defined provisioning methods.
Virtualization allows for additional systems to be built on the physical system. Virtualization
software runs on the hardware and allows for additional operating systems that are isolated and
separated to be installed, creating multiple servers residing on the physical server. All virtual
systems may run on the same or different hardware, but the virtual capabilities allow for dynamic
workload placement and other capabilities; it also allows for better utilization of the hardware.
The logical structure that connects the virtual servers and the physical servers should be
accounted for in the configuration management database (CMDB). Additional capabilities that
allow for dynamic moving of workloads should also be represented in the data model.
Virtualization has greatly improved provisioning, performance, capacity, and availability for
solutions. Further development in the virtualization direction is the usage of infrastructure-as-code
(IaC) solutions. IaC is a way of managing and provisioning IT infrastructure and platforms by using
machine-readable definition files rather than physically configuring hardware components. IaC
solutions significantly speed up design (including hypothesis testing), development, building,
provisioning and changing the infrastructure and platform solutions. Such solutions also usually
make the infrastructure more reliable and fault resistant.
There are many models for providing infrastructure and platform solutions, ranging from in-house
dedicated data centres to fully out-sourced cloud environments. Many organizations continue to
provide and support infrastructure residing in their internal data centres. They can also use
solutions external to their organization. Cloud solutions provide offerings that allow systems and
applications to run in internal and external data centres. Most enterprises use public cloud
providers for at least part of their infrastructure. Cloud providers offer many solutions based on
the expected needs of the business. An application may be accessed through the cloud, leaving
infrastructure management activities beyond connecting to the cloud to be done externally by the
application provider. Cloud offerings can include platforms for application development and
infrastructure specific services like storage or backup as a service.
There is usually a mix of public and private cloud services in any organization. Both cloud services
and outsourcing can provide infrastructure and platform services. Cloud services provide technical
capabilities whereas outsourcing performs IT functions in a similar manner to internal teams. The
contract defines the outsourcing scope and service levels. Instead of managing technology
directly, internal IT teams focus on managing the contractual obligations and interactions with
internal teams in an outsourced environment.
Along with a focus on development from a system perspective, many organizations have also
moved into models that blend development and infrastructure capabilities on one team to provide
coverage throughout the lifecycle. DevOps and site reliability engineering (SRE) are examples of
these models.
Specifically, DevOps brings a robust landscape of tools to automate the tracking, building, and
deploying of small, agile-based releases. Agile is a development framework, but DevOps includes
the infrastructure components and operational activities. DevOps focuses on the opportunities
across all technology components and drives automation to enable rapid system updates.
Infrastructure can now fully benefit from structured development practices.
By accounting for the end-to-end development and management of the solution, this approach
allows for operational improvements to be included in the development releases. Machine
learning and AIOps leverages data collected on solutions to automate, address issues, or manage
requests without development. Through operational visibility and development capabilities, the
overall system is managed in a more comprehensive and consistent manner through automation.
When using DevOps for infrastructure and platform management, special attention must be paid to
obsolete systems and monolithic solutions that require manual operation and, therefore, slow
down all management processes and changes. There should be a clear roadmap of
decommissioning and replacing such solutions or replacing the manual activities with automation.
One of the ways to do this is have an SRE team to run operations.
SRE is a discipline that incorporates aspects of software engineering and applies them to
infrastructure and operations problems with the goal of creating ultra-scalable and highly reliable
solutions. SRE is an approach that tries to bridge the gap between development and operations and
find a consensus of their opposite objectives, which is to develop and release solutions fast and
have a stable solution to support. SRE teams usually have software developers who must support
the solutions they develop, and this stimulates them to automate most of the manual support and
management tasks (in the course of reducing toil: manual, repetitive, automatable, non-creative
work). With this, infrastructure and platform solutions become more manageable, require less
manual work, and gain agility in changes, delivery, and support. Probably one of the most
important gains of SRE operations is that infrastructure scale-out doesn’t lead to according linear
growth of the team size, as it often happens in classical operations.
Key message
The practice is involved throughout the lifecycle of product and services. Figure 2.1 from “The Site
Reliability Workbook” by Google, illustrates how SRE teams are involved during the lifecycle. With
minor variations, this illustration is applicable to other approaches to infrastructure and platform
management.
Figure 2.1 Infrastructure and platform management during product and service lifecycle
Reliability is designed with the system. Reliability requirements are aligned to the uptime and
performance requirements, defined by the capacity and performance management practice.
These requirements ensure the solutions are built in to support the organization’s requirements.
For example, this may include high availability or redundant network connectivity.
Definition: Reliability
The ability of a product, service, or other configuration item to perform its intended function for a
specified period of time or number of cycles.
Maintainability of a system should be addressed during the design of a new system and tested
before being transitioned to production. There could be rules agreed for an infrastructure and
platform solution, ensuring maintainability based on the organization’s requirements and industry
practices. One example is the existence of a monitoring tool to identify issues, or general
monitorability of the solution planned at the design phase. Other examples could be the existence
of tools used to configure, deploy, and provision the solutions. These rules could also be used to
manage partners and suppliers responsible for infrastructure and platform service components.
Definition: Maintainability
The ease with which a service or other entity can be repaired or modified.
If maintainability is not addressed during the initial design and as part of daily operations, higher
support costs, extended outages, and negative impacts to performance will affect the production
environment. Maintainability is improved through appropriate monitoring configurations,
automation, and utilization of standards.
Another aspect of maintainability involves ensuring the solution is recoverable to meet availability
targets. This aspect is tightly aligned with the service continuity management. Maintainability
ensures that infrastructure and platform solutions can be recovered to meet availability targets.
This may mean, for example, ensuring that the hardware contract supports on-site replacements
within a set timeframe. It may also cover having on-site resources performing the repair. When
committing to availability targets, the parts and resources needed to restore service need to be
factored in and be in place throughout the solution lifecycle. The infrastructure and platform
management practice requires that the right pieces are in place to diagnose, repair, and recover in
order to restore services on time.
Automation is also used to improve a system’s maintainability. Repeatable actions are excellent
candidates for automation. Software development and management tools and techniques, such as
Agile and DevOps, can be applied to infrastructure and platform management to drive frequent
updates to systems and configurations. By addressing opportunities as they are identified and
implementing solutions in small releases, benefits are realized quickly.
2.3 SCOPE
The scope of the infrastructure and platform practice includes:
● activities used to plan, design, develop, deliver, maintain, and support infrastructure and
platform technology
● infrastructure and platform technology including:
● hardware (servers, desktops, routers, switches, storage, cabling, and data centre)
● software (operating systems, desktop applications, and middleware)
● management tools (monitoring, management tools, deployment, inventory)
● web hosting
● cloud infrastructure and platform
● identification systems and single sign-on (SSO).
● infrastructure and platform management skills, including:
● technical architecture and engineering
There are many activities and areas of responsibility that are not included in the infrastructure
and platform management practice, although they are still closely related to infrastructure and
platform management. These are listed in Table 2.1, along with references to the practices in
which they can be found. It is important to remember that ITIL practices combine value chain
activities through value streams to deliver value.
Table 2.1 Activities related to the infrastructure and platform management practice described in
other practice guides
A complex functional component of a practice that is required for the practice to fulfil its purpose.
A practice success factor (PSF) is more than a task or activity; it includes components from all four
dimensions of service management. The nature of the activities and resources of PSFs within a
practice may differ, but together they ensure that the practice is effective.
To properly design these solutions, teams delivering infrastructure and platform change must be
aware of new technologies and techniques. The evolution of technology can be seen in examples
like email, virtual server farms, storage arrays, single sign-on, and cloud platforms. When solutions
are identified based on requirements, requests are promptly fulfilled. With virtual server
technology that is used both internally and for cloud offerings, the turnaround time for requests
can be reduced to minutes. Technological progress, such as virtualization, containers, continuous
integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD), and IaC, significantly impacts the rate of change and
innovation.
Organizations that deliver and support infrastructure and platform solutions have evolved through
models, such as DevOps and SRE; they eliminate the use of traditional waterfall techniques in
favour of end-to-end development and management within one team. Crucially, the organization’s
structure and technology components must align with its overall strategic direction in order to
ensure the consistent delivery and support of infrastructure and platform solutions. Components
must align with the overall strategic direction to ensure consistent delivery and support of
infrastructure and platform solutions.
It is important to plan how infrastructure and platform teams will identify, design, and introduce
innovation into the environment at the solution and strategic levels. Depending on the current
needs, infrastructure and platform management might need initial research and testing so that,
when the need is presented, there is a clear plan of action. If the need is pressing, the technology
may be selected, purchased, designed, and configured before any official requests are received.
The infrastructure and platform management practice should ensure that the infrastructure and
platforms are built to promote experimentation, quick technology adoption, the ability to test
theories and hypotheses, change the infrastructure and platform iteratively with feedback, fail
fast, and learn from experience and errors in a safe environment. Each organization should define
its innovation and risk appetite and consider their financial constraints for innovation in the
infrastructure and platforms areas.
2.4.2 Ensuring that the infrastructure and platform solutions meet the
organization’s current and anticipated needs
The main focus of the infrastructure and platform management practice should be ensuring that
stakeholders receive value throughout the infrastructure and platform solution lifecycle.
Stakeholders must be engaged from the initiation of a request or project until the solution’s
retirement. Understanding stakeholder expectations, from design to the ongoing management and
support of the solutions, is an essential aspect of delivering infrastructure and platform solutions.
This ongoing relationship will drive improvement opportunities and ensure value continues to be
co-created as the solution evolves.
When the organization needs a technical solution, requirements are defined in order to ensure that
the solution meets the organization’s needs. The solution design should include technical and
Where possible, the infrastructure and platform management practice ensures that standards can
be defined and utilized in order to simplify the management of infrastructure and platform
solutions. The enforcement of these standards ensures the reliability and maintainability of
solutions. Standards enable efficient and effective operations and may include the hardware and
software versions, configuration settings, management and monitoring tools, and support
structures. Through standards, solutions are easier to operate, monitor, and upgrade.
Designs should be assessed against current and planned standards and validated against the current
and anticipated levels of availability, performance, capacity, information security, and so on.
Management practices supporting these should have active involvement.
Standard infrastructure solution packages should be utilized wherever possible. Any portion of the
solution that is not standard increases cost, delays delivery, and requires customized support
throughout the life of the solution. Exceptions to standards may result in extended downtime or
other impacts to the customer. They may also delay teams responsible for performing other
activities for other infrastructure and platform solutions.
If there are multiple exceptions to a standard, a review should be conducted to ensure that the
standard still meets the organization’s needs. If it does not, a new standard should be designed
and its implementation should be planned. Retiring the standard may include planning the removal
of current systems that were installed as part the retired offering in order to reduce technical
debt and the potential risk to the environment. The development and maintenance of the
standards and standard packages are also within the scope of the infrastructure and platform
management practice.
Part of the practice’s focus is to manage risk to the organization throughout the infrastructure and
platform. As part of this effort, input from practices such as information security, service
continuity, and risk management are taken to ensure that risks are managed throughout the
lifecycle of the solution. This ongoing management includes, for example, ensuring that network
devices are configured based on defined security policies, controls are tested periodically, and
risks are identified and effectively managed. Requirements are handled on an ongoing basis to
prevent adverse impacts, such as extended service downtime or a security breach of confidential
information.
The overall management of infrastructure and platform solutions often includes internal and third-
party solutions and components. Understanding the overall structure of these solutions and
ensuring that the overall level of service provided meets customer expectations is critical.
Management need visibility to validate that solutions are performing at acceptable levels and to
highlight opportunities. These may include addressing any issues and identifying areas that could
be improved. The infrastructure and platform management practice should provide visibility to
stakeholders in performance and improvement plans. This practice interacts with other practices
to ensure that any issues or requests on solutions are resolved promptly. For this reason, the
practice participates in agreeing targets for incident response, restoration, and request fulfilment
times to align with customer expectations. This practice may include managing and reporting on
the ability of solutions to meet targets. This visibility also provides an opportunity to improve
performance in this area through automation or process refinement.
This practice also contributes to ensure that the agreed-upon levels of service is met. The scope of
this effort includes any internal or external components used in the solution. Third-party services
must align with customer expectations, or the expectations must be reset. External providers must
meet the service levels in their contracts. By managing performance levels across internal and
external services, the practice is able to report performance and other outcomes to the business.
The infrastructure and platform management practice ensures that solutions within its scope
effectively contribute to overall financial targets. Infrastructure and platform solutions should be
benchmarked against cloud offerings and external provider solutions. From a technology
perspective, automation, consolidation, and standardization simplify the infrastructure and
platforms and release resources, which can then be used to drive value. The current and potential
partnerships with external providers can also be evaluated and existing agreements optimized.
Key metrics for infrastructure and platform management are mapped to its PSFs. They can be used
as KPIs in the context of value streams to assess the contribution of the practice to the
effectiveness and efficiency of those value streams. Some examples of key metrics are given in
Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Examples of key metrics for the practice success factors
Ensuring that the infrastructure ● Stakeholder satisfaction with infrastructure and platform
and platform solutions meet the solutions
organization’s current and ● Number and impact of infrastructure incidents
anticipated needs ● Number and impact of constraints imposed by infrastructure
and platform solutions
● Number and impact of deviations from the agreed approach
The correct aggregation of metrics into complex indicators will make them easier to use for the
ongoing management of value streams and for the periodic assessment and continual improvement
of the infrastructure and platform management practice. There is no single best solution. Metrics
will be based on the overall service strategy and priorities of an organization, as well as on the
goals of the value streams to which the practice contributes.
The contribution of the infrastructure and platform management practice to the service value
chain is shown in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1 Heat map of the contribution of the infrastructure and platform management practice
to value chain activities
3.2 PROCESSES
Each practice may include one or more processes and activities that may be necessary to fulfil the
purpose of that practice.
Definition: Process
A set of interrelated or interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs. A process takes
one or more defined inputs and turns them into defined outputs. Processes define the sequence of
actions and their dependencies.
There are numerous models to structure activities of the infrastructure and platform management
practice. These span several decades and range from waterfall and manual, to iterative and
incremental.
This practice is one of the two ITIL practices (the other is the software development and
management practice) where activities do not always form processes that could be described as
sequences at the level of detail appropriate to this guide. This is because the infrastructure and
platform management activities are always performed in a context of one or another value stream,
and always in conjunction with other practices. However, activities of this practice can be
categorized in three groups:
● technology planning
● product development
● technology operations.
Activity Example
Analyse the IT Leaders of the organization analyse the organization’s strategy,
organization’s strategy architecture road map, and portfolios and define requirements to the
and architecture infrastructure and platform management approach.
Develop and agree the Business analysts, architects, product owners, and infrastructure
infrastructure and experts agree and communicate an infrastructure and platform
platform management approach, including scope, sourcing strategy, methods and techniques,
approach procedures, and responsibilities.
Review the Based on infrastructure review reports, periodic reviews, and audit
infrastructure and reports, product owners and infrastructure experts review the
platform management effectiveness of the infrastructure and platform management approach
approach and provide input to the analyse the organization and requirements
activity, and/or initiate required changes.
This group includes the activities outlined in Table 3.3 and transforms the inputs into outputs.
The focus of technology delivery and engineering is on designing, building, and transitioning
infrastructure and platform services. These activities may vary, depending on how the services
will be delivered and how the organization applies these steps, as is outlined in Table 3.4.
Product development activities ensure the delivery of a supportable solution that meets the
organization’s needs and agreed SLOs. Even if an external provider provides a solution, steps are
taken to ensure it fits into the overall delivery and support model.
This group includes the following activities, and transforms the following inputs into outputs:
Activity Example
Manage queues of queries and Infrastructure management teams and tools process incoming
events queries and events, ensuring timely and successful resolution of
detected incidents, alerts, and other events requiring a response.
Logs and reports reflecting this activity are created as agreed in
the infrastructure and platform management approach and
solution documentation.
Patch and update the system Patches and system updates are released to the environment in a
structured manner. Typically, patches deployed to the lower
environments for testing and then deployed to production.
The technology operation activities ensure that solutions are available and functioning as designed
from acceptance into the live environment through retirements. Technical experts and technical
coordinators perform the activities in this process.
Roles are described in the context of processes and activities. Each role is characterized with a
competency profile based on the model shown in Table 4.1.
Table 4.2 Examples of the roles involved in infrastructure and platform management activities
Technology planning
Understanding of the
current infrastructure
architecture and
architecture roadmap
Analytical skills
Develop and agree the Architects, business TLMC Good knowledge of the
infrastructure and analysts, product organization and its
platform management owners, infrastructure environment, portfolios,
approach specialists, consultants products, resources, and
customers
Excellent knowledge of
current and available
infrastructure and platform
solutions
Good knowledge of
infrastructure and
technology services
suppliers and market
Understanding of the
current infrastructure
architecture and
architecture roadmap
Analytical skills
Product development
management approach
Technology operations
Communication and
coordination skills
reliability engineers
Technical knowledge
Those distinctions are defined by the organization’s size and structure, but the general set of
competencies are similar, and usually includes:
● technology subject matter expertise
● good understanding of the organization’s architecture
● knowledge of the frameworks and techniques adopted by the organization
● knowledge of organization’s products and services
● service mindset
● good knowledge of organization’s operating model and value streams.
Examples of other roles which can be involved in infrastructure and platform management
activities are listed in Table 4.2, together with the associated competency profiles and specific
skills.
Key message
(…) Ideally, both product development and SRE teams should have a holistic view of the stack—the
frontend, backend, libraries, storage, kernels, and physical machine—and no team should jealously
own single components. It turns out that you can get a lot more done if you “blur the lines”11 and
have SREs instrument JavaScript, or product developers qualify kernels: knowledge of how to make
changes and the authority to do so are much more widespread, and incentives to jealously guard
any particular function are removed.”
This quote from “The Site Reliability Workbook” by Google refers specifically to SRE teams.
However, it is valid for any other approach to infrastructure and platform management.
The infrastructure and platform management practice needs to allow for organization variations
while ensuring some level of consistency across infrastructure teams. The teams may be split by
geography, type of technology, or business service. Having an overall structure to manage practice
changes and communication is important to keep the overall service functioning in an optimal
manner. This may be done with an overall governance group or through representation in an
infrastructure committee.
Technology planning
Knowledge
management tools
Product development
Create a basic solution Workflow tools Ability to assign design High
design including task tasks and approval for
assignment, routing, planning activities,
approvals, tracking, including status tracking,
and notifications notifications, and
reporting to ensure
actions are on task and
the design is approved
Create a detailed solution Workflow tools Ability to assign tasks High
design including task and approval for
assignment, routing, planning activities,
approvals, tracking including status tracking,
and notifications, notifications, and
contract management reporting to ensure
with templates, actions are on task
approvals, and review
schedules
Source/develop/configure Automated Ability to receive High
the components provisioning, building, approved request and to
and configuring tools build a solution with no
or limited manual
intervention ensuring
consistent and timely
delivery
Source/build/configure the Automated Ability to receive High
solution provisioning, building, approved request and to
and configuring tools build a solution with no
or limited manual
intervention ensuring
consistent and timely
delivery
Support validation and Automated testing and Automated testing, High
testing defect tracking reporting, and logging
into the defect
management system
Support deployment and Deployment tools Automated deployment High
release from testing to
implementation,
including submission of
change request
Review solution Workflow tools Dashboards and reports, Medium to high
development and including task trend analysis
implementation assignment, routing,
approvals, tracking,
and notifications
System health
monitoring and
reporting tools
Technology operation
Manage queues of queries Automated request Ability to close repeat High
and events provisioning, tickets automatically and
automated resolution, assign the tickets
ChatOps, AIOps, automatically to the correct
group without manual triage
steps
Workflow tools
Task assignment, routing,
approvals, tracking and
notifications
The infrastructure and platform management practice allows for many outsourcing options both
from an activity perspective as well as from a technology perspective. Table 6.1 provides
examples of areas that are candidates for outsourcing.
Support Restoration and prevention of incidents Support for the entire capability may be
for in-scope technologies outsourced or focused on specific roles.
Providers should adhere to standard
service desk processes for a consistent
customer experience. This works well for
remote sites, especially for desktop
support.
Operations center Outsourcing the operations center This reduces internal staffing
function reduces the need to ensure requirements. This function must be well
adequate coverage with internal staff, documented, have adequate access and
especially if it is provided at all times. frequent touchpoints are recommended to
This function can provide monitoring, understand any open issues or
systems management, job scheduling, or improvement opportunities.
other activities
Backup/restore Provider configures and manages backup Providers may leverage internal backup
jobs and repositories, addresses backup tools or may include backup solutions and
failures, and restores files as needed storage as part of the agreement.
Systems management, Manage systems to keep up to date for Standards and configurations must be well
patching, or other versions, configurations, and patches documented, and access provided.
updates Access to management tools is required.
Technology ownership Technology can be leased through With cloud offerings, this is a prominent
subscription services, reducing the capital trend in the industry. This allows for
required to implement and maintain service levels and capabilities to be
technology delivered without the overhead of building
and supporting technology internally.
With a large amount of opportunity within this space, understanding and managing outsourcing
risks is an important activity to ensure that services meet customer expectations. This should be
done in a close conjunction with other practices, such as the risk management and supplier
management practices.
Although all functions can be outsourced, it is recommended to retain oversight and architecture
functions. Oversight ensures providers are delivering to their committed levels and allows insight
into potential improvements to the existing agreement. To effectively support and continue to
deliver services, the knowledge of how solutions connect across providers must be well understood
by the internal team. As the specific knowledge in specific technologies moves to the provider,
there should be an architectural role internally that understands the design and operations of the
infrastructure environment.
7 Important reminder
Most of the content of the practice guides should be taken as a suggestion of areas that an
organization might consider when establishing and nurturing their own practices. The practice
guides are catalogues of topics that organizations might think about, not a list of answers. When
using the content of the ITIL practice guides, organizations should always follow the ITIL guiding
principles:
● focus on value
● start where you are
● progress iteratively with feedback
● collaborate and promote visibility
● think and work holistically
● keep it simple and practical
● optimize and automate.
More information on the guiding principles and their application can be found in section 4.3 of ITIL
Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition.
8 Acknowledgments
AXELOS Ltd is grateful to everyone who has contributed to the development of this guidance.
These practice guides incorporate an unprecedented level of enthusiasm and feedback from across
the ITIL community. In particular, AXELOS would like to thank the following people.
8.1 AUTHORS
Angie Pederson.
8.2 REVIEWERS
Dinara Adyrbayeva, Akshay Anand, Peter Farenden, Roman Jouravlev, Vernon Lloyd.