I have carefully studied the covid “vaccines”(see below**) and many things about

them are very concerning to me:

First of all, up until this point there has never been a successful vaccine for
coronaviruses in humans due to a problem typical of coronavirus vaccine development
called antibody dependent enhancement or ADE.[1] In preliminary animal trials for
previous coronavirus vaccines (SARS and MERS), animals were vaccinated and seemed
to exhibit a robust antibody response, but upon exposure to the wild virus, they
developed a paradoxical immune enhancement leading to severe organ inflammation
(especially lungs), and they died.[2][3][61][63][64][65] Paradoxical immune
response in respiratory virus vaccines has also taken place in human trials, which
occurred during testing of the failed RSV vaccines of the 1960s.[4][69] Alarmingly,
there are some statistical indications of ADE in covid vaccine trials, but there is
no way to know for sure because many key signifiers of ADE weren’t specifically
addressed.[5][66][67] Due to emergency protocol, the usual method of testing
animals prior to humans was bypassed, limited animal testing occurred in parallel
with humans, and the potential for ADE was not comprehensively assessed.[6][7][54]
Historical precedent would suggest, however, that ADE is a distinct possibility,
and we may not know the true negative effects until years from now when vaccinated
persons are exposed to SARS-CoV-2 or genetically similar versions of coronavirus.
[8][62][68][70]

Second, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles that are
“PEGylated”, meaning the nanoparticles are coated with PEG (polyethylene glycol).
[9] PEGs can lead to life threatening anaphylaxis or other conditions such as
thrombocytopenia.[10][50] Such reactions are already occurring during the initial
rollout and PEGs are the most likely culprit.[11] Approximately 72% of the US
population have PEG antibodies, with 8% having extremely elevated levels (more than
500 ng/mL), putting them at risk for severe allergic reaction and/or future
autoimmune disorders.[12] These reactions were totally predictable, with many
experts warning of the danger posed by PEGs[13][14][15][55], yet participants with
a history of severe allergic reaction were excluded from the trials, serving to
obscure the actual negative impact PEGs will have now that these injections are
being given to members of the public who have not been screened for PEG antibodies.
[16][53] Also, there is some worrying evidence to suggest that PEGs cross the
blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brain, possibly causing inflammation
and/or autoimmune conditions, a fact gleaned from previous animal studies on mRNA
vaccines. PEGs were found to be distributed across a spectrum of tissues including
the brain.[52] Additionally, nanoparticles (such as PEGylated hydrogel) are known
components for state of the art medical interventions, including biosurveillance
technology currently being developed by DARPA and companies like Profusa Inc.[17]
[18][19][20][21] The secretive nature of this technology necessitates a knowledge
gap between developers and the general public, so although my research efforts have
yet to verify a direct functional relationship between PEGylated nanoparticles used
in covid injections and biosurveillance, I personally do not relish the prospect of
being injected with such given their association with biosurveillance technology of
the military industrial complex.

Third, it is impossible to ascertain long term safety because of the foreshortened

timeframe of Operation Warp Speed.[22] Vaccines should be tested for multiple years
to adequately assess their longterm effects.[23] Short term safety is questionable
too, as much of the data are still unavailable, and the current reports on safety
and efficacy essentially amount to self-reported press releases from these
companies themselves.[24]

Fourth, the efficacy number of 90% for Pfizer and 94% for Moderna is statistically
misleading, reporting a relative reduction instead of absolute reduction of risk*.
Also, the trials only assessed these vaccines’ ability to prevent mild symptoms and
NOT their ability to prevent transmission.[25] If they don’t prevent people from
transmitting the virus (especially when safer, cheaper drugs like Ivermectin do)
[26][27][58] what’s the point?

Fifth, these are NOT vaccines in the normal sense. They are mRNA vaccines, which
utilize a completely different process for achieving disease protection**; mRNA
vaccines seek to introduce synthetic messenger RNA into the body in order to
“trick” cells into producing immunogens, which then stimulate an immune response.
[28] These vaccines are the first of their kind ever to gain authorization.[29]
Current vaccinations are essentially an extension of phase 3 of the trials.[30]
Because of the lack of long term safety assessment and the new nature of this
technology, people are participating in a mass human experiment with no way of
knowing the long term health effects these could cause. Many problems from vaccines
are known to have an incubatory period and do not manifest until much later, which
is why testing needs to occur for multiple years in order to adequately assess
risk. [31] One such problem currently being discussed is the mRNA technology’s
possible impact on female fertility, as it encourages the production of antibodies
against a laboratory stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that contains a very
similar protein crucial for the development of placenta called syncytin-1. This
could interfere with the reproductive process by encouraging the immune system to
react against syncytin-1, thereby disrupting placental development.[32] The
vaccines’ impact on fertility is currently unknown as animal reproductive toxicity
studies have not been completed.[33]

Sixth, there was a signature for many different problems seen in the various trials
and initial rollout for these vaccines, problems that are concurrent with commonly
documented vaccine injuries. Injuries reported in the various trials/rollout have
included, but are not limited to, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, transverse myelitis,
multi-system inflammatory syndrome, flash pulmonary edema, miscarriage, dyskinesia,
myalgic encephalomyelitis, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, and death. [34][35]
[36][37][50][51][56][59]

Seventh, and perhaps most importantly, the movement toward potential vaccine
mandates or other coercive policies violates humanity’s most universally accepted
principles of human rights and medical ethics, especially for a medical
intervention with so many known and unknown safety/efficacy concerns. The absolute
bedrock of medical ethics is the right to informed consent, as individuals must be
made fully aware of all the potential benefits and risks associated with a medical
intervention, while still maintaining the right to decline that intervention should
they so choose.[41] Mandates or coercive measures fundamentally violate historical
safeguards humanity has put in place to protect us from the ever present threat of
medical tyranny, including the Nuremberg Code, the United Nations’ International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on
Bioethics and Human Rights.[42][43][49] Such would also be in violation of the
Hippocratic Oath, for not only do oath keepers pledge first to do no harm, but also
to treat the needs of the patient.[44] This implies that a doctor’s duty primarily
pertains to the needs of the individual before the needs of the collective, a vital
distinction made by Hippocrates and understood for nearly 2 millennia.[45][46]
Privileging the needs of the collective is a “fallacy of misplaced concreteness”.
[47] While individual need is directly apprehensible and consensual, collective
need is an abstract, subjective concept not easily defined. And yet who usually
gets to define this concept? Such is most often defined by those in power with the
most means to influence institutional narratives, turning medical professionals who
treat the needs of the collective according to this definition into mere extensions
of that power at the expense of individual informed consent.

* Regarding the reporting on the reduction of relative risk instead of absolute

risk, in the phase 3 trial of the Pfizer vaccine, for example, 22,000 people were
vaccinated and 22,000 were given placebo, for a total of 44,000 trial participants.
Of those 44,000, just 170 were clinically diagnosed as having covid-19 post-
vaccination. Of those 170, it was reported that 8 received the vaccine and 162
received the placebo. From this ratio it was inferred that the vaccine would
prevent 154 out of 162 from getting the disease for an efficacy of greater than
90%. But even as the British Medical Journal explained, “A relative risk reduction
is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than
1%.”[39] The supposed sterling efficacy touted by both Pfizer and Moderna are great
for instilling confidence in their product, yet they were based on figures derived
from only a small fraction of trial participants (just 0.38% of total participants
in the Pfizer trial, and the same misleading statistical reporting seen in the
Moderna trial as well).[40]

** Labeling the mRNA technology employed by Pfizer and Moderna a “vaccine”

stretches the term’s definition beyond reasonable limits. Although it is claimed
that such an intervention fulfills the purpose of vaccination by encouraging
antibodies against an infectious disease, such does not contain any attenuated
biologics typical of traditional vaccination, nor has it been proven to prevent
infection, transmission, or community circulation; it may be more accurate,
therefore, to label such as a “synthetic pathogen delivery device” constituting a
form of “gene therapy”.[57]

Links are at pastebin dot com /4ayU63tp

Links:
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody-dependent_enhancement
[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
[3]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-trial-
pathogenic-priming/
[4] https://cvi.asm.org/content/23/3/189
[5] https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
[6] https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/11/researchers-rush-to-start-moderna-
coronavirus-vaccine-trial-without-usual-animal-testing/
[7] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186?via%3Dihub
[8]https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/12/06/susceptibility-of-people-to-pathogenic-
priming-is-a-prime-reason-to-eschew-covid19-vaccine-mandates/
[9]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/fda-ignores-rfk-jr-s-pleas-for-
vaccine-safety-oversight-concerning-peg-suspected-to-cause-anaphylaxis/
[10]https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/symptoms-causes/syc-
20351468
[11]https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN28J1D1
[12]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27804292/
[13]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2020-10-25_Hahn-Marks-
Email-from-RFK-Jr.pdf
[14]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/RFK_Jr_Letter_toFDA-
_CBER-9-25-20.pdf
[15]https://www.bitchute.com/video/256BhchLR0R6/
[16]https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/world/u-k-to-refine-allergy-warning-on-pfizer-
vaccine-sparked-by-two-adverse-reactions-1.5223107
[17]https://www.mintpressnews.com/darpa-covid-19-vaccine-implant-mrna/271287/
[18]https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/coronavirus-gives-dangerous-boost-
darpas-darkest-agenda/
[19]https://www.mddionline.com/implants/early-warning-system-detecting-infections-
being-studied
[20]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/military-
vaccines/microchips-nanotechnology-and-implanted-biosensors-the-new-normal/
[21]https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2020/03/military-funded-biosensor-could-
be-future-pandemic-detection/163497/
[22] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/how-fda-approved-pfizer-covid-
vaccine-warp-speed/
[23] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-risks-of-rushing-a-covid-19-
vaccine/
[24] https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-
biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
[25] https://lbry.tv/@joe-plummer:b/fauci-happy-if-vaccine-permits-infection:5
[26] https://www.bitchute.com/video/NSil15MibqlM/
[27] https://www.bitchute.com/video/pZWlFbhngLAH/
[28] https://youtu.be/KMc3vL_MIeo
[29] https://www.bitchute.com/video/256BhchLR0R6/
[30] https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-
11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
[31] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/transcripts/how-will-we-know-that-a-covid-
19-vaccine-is-safe/
[32] https://www.globalresearch.ca/dr-wodarg-dr-yeadon-request-stop-all-corona-
vaccination-studies-call-co-signing-petition/5731458
[33]https://pastebin.com/t1SxR18Y
[34] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/alaska-healthcare-workers-
allergic-reactions-pfizer-covid-vaccine/
[35] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/alaska-healthcare-workers-
allergic-reactions-pfizer-covid-vaccine/
[36] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-trial-
pathogenic-priming/
[37] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/transverse-myelitis-gardasil-vaccine-
video/
[38] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-participant-develops-
neurological-symptoms-astrazeneca-pauses-trial/
[39]https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/11/26/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-
effective-vaccines-lets-be-cautious-and-first-see-the-full-data/
[40] https://thehighwire.com/videos/how-effective-is-the-covid-19-vaccine/
[41] https://www.halt.org/the-medical-ethics-of-informed-consent/
[42] http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
[43] https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx
[44] http://rjoy4u.org/modernhippocraticoath.pdf
[45] https://patient.info/doctor/Medical-Ethics
[46] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
[47] https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Reification_(fallacy)
[48] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483554/#B16
[49] http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-
URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
[50]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/healthy-florida-doctor-dies-after-
pfizer-covid-vaccine/
[51] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/china-health-experts-suspension-
covid-vaccines-norway/
[52] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/#!po=0.510204
[53] https://www.pandata.org/letter-to-peter-marks-fda/
[54] https://www.pandata.org/science-review-denis-rancourt/
[55] https://jermwarfare.com/blog/mike-yeadon-vaccine-covid#
[56] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/329-deaths-9516-other-injuries-
reported-following-covid-vaccine-cdc/?itm_term=home
[57] https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/ExpertInterviewTranscripts/DrMercola-
JudyMikovits-COVID-19-Vaccination.pdf
[58] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/new-york-times-explains-lack-
covid-treatments/?itm_term=home
[59] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-injuries-following-covid-
vaccine-cdc/?itm_term=home
[60] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/webinar/the-covid-vaccine-on-trial-if-you-
only-knew/
[61] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28817732/
[62] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8?ref=theprepping-com
[63] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19122397/
[64] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2154621/
[65] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6754243/
[66] https://brocku.ca/media-room/2020/08/20/brock-researchers-stress-importance-
of-properly-developed-covid-19-vaccine/
[67] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311339/#!po=2.00000
[68] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/potential-covid-vaccine-related-
ticking-time-bomb/?itm_term=home
[69] https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/89/4/449/198872?
redirectedFrom=fulltext
[70] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/