Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exam
Exam
Cross-Functional Coordination
Market-oriented organizations are compelling in getting all business
capacities to cooperate to give superior value to customers. These
businesses are fruitful in expelling the barriers between business marketing
functions with manufacturing and finance.
Performance Implications
Market-oriented companies start strategic analyses with an entering
perspective available and the competition. Besides, a growing collection of
research discoveries points to a solid connection between market-oriented
and superior value.
Coordination of Activities
Coordination of activities across business functions is facilitated by the
point-to-point business model. The high aircraft utilization, simplification of
functions, and limited passenger services enable the airline to manage the
activities very efficiently and to provide on-time point-to-point services
offered on a frequent basis.
Assets
Southwest’s key assets are very low operating costs, loyal customer base,
and high employee esprit de corps
Classifying Capabilities
The process capabilities differ in purpose and focus. The outside-in processes
connect the organization to the external environment, providing market feedback
and forging external relationships. The inside-out processes are the activities
necessary to satisfy customer value requirements (e.g.,
manufacturing/operations). The outside-in processes play a key role in offering
direction for the spanning and inside-out capabilities, which respond to the
customer needs and requirements identified by the outside-in processes. Market
sensing, customer linking, channel bonding (e.g., producer/retailer relationships),
and technology monitoring provide vital information for new product
opportunities, service requirements, and competitive threats.
Capabilities and Customer Value
Value for buyers consists of the benefits and costs resulting from the
purchase and use of products. Value is perceived by the buyer. Superior
value occurs when there are positive net benefits. A company needs to
pursue value opportunities that match its distinctive capabilities. A market-
oriented company uses its market sensing processes, shared diagnosis, and
cross-functional decision making to identify and take advantage of superior
value opportunities. Management must determine where and how it can
offer superior value, directing these capabilities to customer groups
(market segments) that result in a favorable competency/value match.
Corporate:
Corporate strategy is a unique plan or framework that is long-term in nature,
designed with an objective to gain a competitive advantage over other market
participants while delivering both on customer/client and stakeholder promises
(i.e., shareholder value). Corporate strategy consists of the decisions made by top
management and the resulting actions taken to achieve the objectives set for the
business.
Resources
It is important to place a company’s strategic focus on its resources—
assets, skills, and capabilities. These resources may offer the organization
the potential to compete in different markets, provide significant value to
end-user customers, and create barriers to competitor duplication
Business Composition
Defining the composition of the business provides direction for both
corporate and marketing strategy design. In single-product fi rms that serve
one market, it is easy to determine the composition of the business. In
many other fi rms it is necessary to separate the business into parts to
facilitate strategic analyses and planning. When fi rms are serving multiple
markets with different products, grouping similar business areas together
aids decision-making.
A business segment, group, or division is often too large in terms of
product and market composition to use in strategic analysis and planning,
so it is divided into more specific strategic units. A popular name for these
units is the Strategic Business Unit (SBU).
Strategic Marketing
Marketing strategy consists of the analysis, strategy development, and
implementation of activities in: developing a vision about the market(s) of
interest to the organization, selecting market target strategies, setting objectives,
and developing, implementing, and managing the marketing program positioning
strategies designed to meet the value requirements of the customers in each
market target.
Strategic marketing is a market-driven process of strategy development, taking
into account a constantly changing business environment and the need to deliver
superior customer value. The focus of strategic marketing is on organizational
performance rather than a primary concern about increasing sales. Marketing
strategy seeks to deliver superior customer value by combining the customer-
influencing strategies of the business into a coordinated set of market-driven
actions. Strategic marketing links the organization with the environment and
views marketing as a responsibility of the entire business rather than a specialized
function.
Product-Market Structure
Purpose of Analysis
If management is deciding whether or not to exit from a business, primary
emphasis may be on financial performance and competitive position. Detailed
analysis of the product market may not be necessary. In contrast, if the objective
is finding one or more attractive market segments to target in the product-
market, a much more penetrating analysis is necessary.
Environmental Influences
The fi nal step in building customer profi les is to identify the external
environmental factors that infl uence buyers and thus impact the size and
composition of the market over time. These infl uences include government
actions (e.g., tax cuts), social change, economic shifts, technology, and other
factors that may alter buyers’ needs and wants
Building Customer Profiles
Describing customers begins with the generic product-market. At this level
customer profi les are likely to describe the size and general composition of the
customer base. The product-type and variant profi les are more specifi c about
customer characteristics such as needs and wants, use situations, activities and
interests, opinions, purchase processes and choice criteria, and environmental
influences on buying decisions
Analyzing Competition
Competitor analysis considers the companies and brands that compete in the
productmarket of interest. Step 1 we determine the competitive arena in which
an organization competes and describe the characteristics of the competitive
space. Steps 2 and 3 identify, describe, and evaluate the organization’s key
competitors. Steps 4 and 5 anticipate competitors’ future actions and identify
potential competitors that may enter the market.
Defining the competitive Arena:
Competition often includes more than the fi rms that are direct competitors, like
Coke and Pepsi. The product variant is the most direct type of competition. Since
competition often occurs within specifi c industries, study of the industry
structure is useful in defi ning the competitive arena, recognizing that more than
one industry may be competing in the same product-market, depending on the
complexity of the product-market structure.
Indystry analysis:
the industry analysis is horizontal and covers similar types of fi rms (e.g., soft drink
producers), whereas the value chain analysis considers the vertical network of fi
rms that supply materials and/ or parts, produce products (and services), and
distribute the products to end-users. The industry analysis includes:
(1) industry characteristics and trends, such as sales, number of fi rms, and
growth rates; and
(2) operating practices of the fi rms in the industry, including product mix, service
provided, barriers to entry, and geographical scope.
The industry identifi cation is based on product similarity, location at the same
level in the value chain (e.g., manufacturer, distributor, retailer) and geographical
scope. The industry analysis considers:
• Industry size, growth, and composition.
• Typical marketing practices.
• Industry changes that are anticipated (e.g., consolidation trends).
• Industry strengths and weaknesses.
• Strategic alliances and potential mergers/acquisitions among competitors.
Competitive Forces
Different competitive forces are present in the value-added chain. The traditional
view of competition is expanded by recognizing Michael Porter’s fi ve competitive
forces that impact industry performance:
1. Rivalry among existing fi rms.
2. Threat of new entrants.
3. Threat of substitute products.
4. Bargaining power of suppliers.
5. Bargaining power of buyers.
The first force recognizes that active competition among industry members
helps determine industry performance, Rivalry may occur within a market
segment or across an entire product-market.
The secondly, Existing firms may try to discourage new competition by
aggressive expansion and other types of market entry barriers.
The third force considers the potential impact of substitutes. New
technologies that satisfy the same customer value requirement are
important sources of competition.
The fourth force, Companies may pursue vertical integration strategies to
reduce the bargaining power of suppliers. Collaborative relationships are
useful to respond to the needs of both partners.
Finally, buyers may use their purchasing power to infl uence their
suppliers. Wal-Mart, for example, has a strong infl uence on the suppliers of
its many products. Understanding which organizations have power and infl
uence in the value chain provides important insights into the structure of
competition.
Key Competitor Analysis
Competitor analysis is conducted for the fi rms directly competing with each
other (e.g., Nike and Reebok) and other companies that management may
consider important in strategy analysis (for example, potential market entrants).
We now look at two major aspects of competitor analysis:
(1) preparing a descriptive profi le for each competitor; and
(2) evaluating the competitor’s strengths and weaknesses
Analyzing Competition
1 and 2 Describing and Evaluating the Competitor
A key competitor is any organization going after the same market target as the fi
rm conducting the analysis. American and Southwest Airlines are key competitors
on many U.S. routes. Key competitors are brands that compete in the same
product-market or segment(s) within the market (Motorola, Nokia, and Samsung
cell phones). Different product types that satisfy the same need or want may also
actively compete against each other.
It is important to gain as much knowledge as possible about the background,
experience, qualifi cations, and tenure of key executives for each major
competitor. This information includes the executives’ performance records, their
particular areas of expertise, and the fi rms where they were previously
employed. These analyses may suggest the future strategic initiatives of a key
competitor.
Business scope and objectives
Management experience, capabilities, and weaknesses
Market position and trends
Market target(s) and customer base
Positioning strategy for each target
Distinctive capabilities
Financial performance (current and historical)
how well competitors meet customer value requirements requires finding out
what criteria buyers use to rate each supplier Measurement methods include
customer comparisons of value attributes of the firm versus itscompetitors,
customer surveys, loyalty measures.
Business research
Business research can be described as a systematic and organized effort to
investigate a specific problem encountered in the work setting, which needs a
solution. It comprises a series of steps that are designed and executed with the
goal of finding answers to the issues that are of concern to the manager in the
work environment. This means that the first step in research is to know where the
problem areas exist in the organization, and to identify as clearly and specifically
as possible the problems that need to be studied and resolved. Once the problem
is clearly defined, steps can be taken to determine the factors that are associated
with the problem, gather information, analyze the data, develop an explanation
for the problem at hand and then solve it by taking the necessary corrective
measures. The entire process by which we attempt to solve problems is called
research.
Research encompasses the processes of inquiry, investigation, examination, and
experimentation. These processes have to be carried out systematically,
diligently, critically, objectively, and logically. The expected end result would be a
discovery that helps the manager to deal with the problem situation. Identifying
the critical issues, gathering relevant information, analyzing the data in ways that
help decision making, and implementing the right course of action, are all
facilitated by understanding business research. After all, decision making is simply
a process of choosing from among alternative solutions to resolve a problem and
research helps to generate viable alternatives for effective decision making.
We can now define business research as an organized, systematic, data‐based,
critical, objective, inquiry or investigation into a specific problem, undertaken
with the purpose of finding answers or solutions to it.
In essence, research provides the necessary information that guides managers to
make informed decisions to successfully deal with problems. The information
provided could be the result of a careful analysis of primary data gathered first‐
hand or of secondary data that are already available (in the company, industry,
archives, etc.). These data can be quantitative (quantitative data are data in the
form of numbers as generally gathered through structured questions) or
qualitative (qualitative data are data in the form of words) as generated from the
broad answers to questions in interviews, or from responses to open‐ended
questions in a questionnaire, or through observation, or from already available
information gathered from various sources such as the Internet.
Managers are responsible for the final outcome by making the right
decisions at work.
Knowledge of research heightens the sensitivity of managers to the
innumerable internal and external factors operating in their work and
organizational environment. It also helps to facilitate effective interactions
with consultants and comprehension of the nuances of the research
process.
A multitude of instruments and theories, (big) data, and sophisticated
technology is available to model and analyze a wide range of issues such as
business processes, consumer behavior, investment decisions, and the like.
Even superficial knowledge of research helps the manager to deal with the
consultant/researcher in a mature and confident manner, so that dealing
with “experts” does not result in discomfort.
Remaining objective, focusing on problem solutions, fully understanding
the recommendations made, and why and how they have been arrived at,
make for good managerial decision making.
Scientific research
Scientific research focuses on solving problems and pursues a step‐by‐step logical,
organized, and rigorous method to identify the problems, gather data, analyze
them, and draw valid conclusions from them. Thus, scientific research is not
based on hunches, experience, and intuition (though these may play a part in final
decision making), but is purposive and rigorous. Because of the rigorous way in
which it is done, scientific research enables all those who are interested in
researching and knowing about the same or similar issues to come up with
comparable findings when the data are analyzed. Scientific research also helps
researchers to state their findings with accuracy and confidence.
Scientific investigation
scientific investigation tends to be more objective than subjective, and helps
managers to highlight the most critical factors at the workplace that need specific
attention so as to avoid, minimize, or solve problems. Scientific investigation and
managerial decision making are integral aspects of effective problem solving. The
term scientific research applies, therefore, to both basic and applied research.
Secondary data are data that have been collected by others for another
purpose than the purpose of the current study. Some secondary sources of data
are statistical bulletins, government publications, published or unpublished
information available from either within or outside the organization, company
websites, and the Internet. The nature and the value of secondary data should be
carefully evaluated before it is used.
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING SECONDARY DATA
Timeliness of the data. When were the data collected? It is important that the
data are up‐to‐date. Check the dates on all of your secondary data to make sure
that you have the newest information available.
Accuracy of the data. What was the purpose of (presenting) the data? Web
pages are created with a specific purpose in mind. Commercial organizations
often post information online that might favor them in some way or represent
their own interests. Who collected the data? How were the data collected?
What is the author’ s credentials on this subject? Th e accuracy of data can be
impacted by who collected it and how the data were collected. Are the data
consistent with data from other sources? If specific information varies from
source to source, you need to find out which information is more accurate.
Relevance of the data. Not all of the secondary data you find will be relevant to
your particular needs. Data may be accurate and up‐to‐date but not applicable to
your research objective(s) and research questions.
Costs of the data. H ow much do the data cost? Do the benefits outweigh the
costs? Are you better off collecting other data? Are you better off using other
(primary?) methods of data collection?
The collection of secondary data is very often quite helpful in the early stages of
the research process, but in some cases, information is best obtained by other
methods such as interviewing people, observation, or by administering
questionnaires to individuals. Such data that the researcher gathers first hand for
the specific purpose of the study are called primary data. Four principal
methods of primary data collection (interviews, observation, administering
questionnaires, and experiments)
Information on the topic or subject area
The literature – the body of knowledge available to you as a researcher – may also
help you to think about and/ or better understand the problem. This helps you to
structure your research on work already done and to develop the problem
statement with precision and clarity.
Characteristics:
A problem statement is relevant if it is meaningful from a managerial
perspective, an academic perspective, or both.
A good problem statement is relevant but also feasible. A problem
statement is feasible if you are able to answer the research questions
within the restrictions of the research project.
A third characteristic of a good problem statement is that it is interesting to
you. Research is a time‐consuming process and you will go through many
ups and downs before you present the final version of your research report.
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS
Managers sometimes look at the symptoms in problematic situations and treat
them as if they are the real problems, getting frustrated when their remedies do
not work.
Managers’ inputs help researchers to define the broad problem area and to
narrow down the broad problem into a feasible topic for research. Managers who
realize that correct problem definition is critical to ultimate problem solution do
not begrudge the time spent in working closely with researchers, particularly at
this stage.
A well‐developed research proposal allows managers to judge the relevance of
the proposed study. However, to make sure that the objectives of the study are
actually being achieved, managers must stay involved throughout the entire
research process. Information exchange between the manager and the researcher
during all the important stages of the research process will definitely enhance the
managerial relevance and the quality of the research effort.
Service Orientation – (i.e., services to customers) the very basis of supply chains
have been to provide superior customer service. Service is all about the value that
the customer gets, which in turn depends upon his own perception about what
constitutes value. The design, the alignment, the integration of the companies on
the supply chain and the co-ordination between them are all for the customer-
the ultimate customer, and these are performed as such.
System Orientation- system orientation is at the existence of any supply chain.
Synergy due to co- operation and coordination is the main gain of a supply chain.
This entails that while getting optimal results for the chain as a whole, results for
the partners on the chain may not necessarily be optimal, these could be less than
optimal.
Competitiveness and Efficiency – Supply chain is a business organization. It
provides value to the customers while being competitive. Competitiveness is
essential for it to healthy sustain itself in order to be able to provide increasing
value to its customer. Efficiency is an important element of competitiveness.
Minimizing the time – efficient supply chain is an organization reduces the time
required for converting orders into cash. So, there is minimal time lag and
increase in productivity of the organization.
Minimizing Work in Progress- supply chain minimizes total work in process in
supply chain.
Improving Pipeline Visibility – efficient supply chain improves the visibility of
each one of the activities of the supply chain by each one of the partners.
Improving visibility Demand- Efficient supply chain improves visibility of demand
by each one of the partners.
Improving Quality- Efficient supply chain management helps in improving the
quality of operation of the organization. TQM has become a major commitment
throughout all facet of industry. Overall commitment to TQM is one of the major
commitments throughout all facets of industry.
Inventory management
Transportation management
Customer order processing
Relationship management
Push/Pull View
Categorizes processes in a supply chain based on whether they are initiated in
response toa customer order (pull) or in anticipation of a customer order (push).
Categorization is based on the timing of process execution relative to end
customer demand.
At the time of execution of a pull process customer demand is known with
certainty. In case of push process at the time of execution of a process demand is
not known and must be forecasted.
Hence,
Pull process – reactive process
Push process – speculative process
Push/pull boundary in a supply chain separates push process from pull process.
Very useful when considering strategic decisions relating to supply chain. Forces
more global consideration of supply chain processes as they relate to a customer
order. More the pull process better the supply chain.