Rule 111: Prosecution of Civil Action

AUG. 14, 2020

A. Institution of Criminal and Civil Actions
1. Chiok vs. People, G.R. Nos. 179814 & 180021, December 7,
2015; BAIRD
2. Bernardo vs. People, G.R. No. 182210, October 5, 2015; CHUA
3. Standard Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Cuaresma G.R. No. 200055,
Sept. 10, 2014; CRUZ
4. Heirs of Simon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 157547; GENON
5. Heirs of Burgos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 169711, February
8, 2010. HALID

B. When separate civil action is suspended

6. Co. vs. Muñoz, Jr. G.R. No. 181986, December 4, 2013; JAAFAR
7. Domingo vs. Colina, G.R. 173330, June 17, 2013; LAKBAO
8. Ching vs. Nicdao, G.R. No.141181, April 27, 2007. LEDESMA

C. When civil action may proceed independently

9. Lim vs. Kuo Co Ping, G.R. No. 175256 & 179160, August 23,
2012; LIM
10. Casupanan vs. Laroya G.R. 145391. August 26, 2002; MUSA
11. Cabuago vs. People, G.R. Nos. 163879 & 165805, July 30,
2014. OCENA

D. Effect of Death on Civil Actions

12. People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, April 20, 2016; REYES
13. Asilo, Jr. vs. People G.R. Nos. 159017-18 & 159059, March 9,
2011; RIZON
14. People vs. Bayot, G.R. No. 200030, April 18, 2012.
SABTALUH

E. Judgment in Civil Action not a bar

15. Madarang vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143044, July 14,
2005. SALINAS

F. Suspension by reason of Prejudicial Question

16. Ty-de Zuzuaregui vs. Villarosa et.al. G.R. No. 183788, April 5,
2010. SALVADOR

Page 1 of 3
G. Elements of Prejudicial Question
17. People vs. Arambulo, Jr. G.R. 186597, June 17, 2015; TAN
18. San Miguel Properties Inc. vs. Perez G.R. No. 166836,
September 4, 2013; TORIBIO
19. Spouses Gabitano vs. San Miguel Corporation G.R. No.
188767, July 24, 2013; BAIRD
20. Pimentel vs. Pimentel G.R. No. 172060, September 13,
2010;CHUA
21. Dreamwork Construction Inc., vs. Janiola, G.R. No. 184861,
June 30, 2009 CRUZ

H. Criminal & Civil Prosecution of B.P. 22

I. Other Cases
22. Cabaero vs. Cantos, 271 SCRA 391; GENON
23. Hyatt Industrial Manufacturing vs. Asia Dynamix Electrix, 465
SCRA 454; HALID
24. People vs. Bayotas, 236 SCRA 239; JAAFAR
25. People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, April 20, 2016. LAKBAO

Ateneo de Zamboanga University

College of Law
Criminal Procedure- Rule 112: Preliminary Investigation
August 21, 2020
(5:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.)

J. Definition; when required

26. Mendoza vs. People, G.R. No. 197293, April 21, 2014; LEDESMA
27. Callo-Claridad vs. PEsteban, G.R. No. 191567, March 20, 2013; LIM
28. Uy vs. Javellana, A.M. No. MTJ-07-1666, Sept. 5, 2012; MUSA
29. Arroyo vs. DOJ et. Al., G.R. Nos. 199082,199085 and 199118, September 18,
2012. OCENA

K. Nature
30. Bautista vs. Court of Appeals, 330 SCRA 618; REYES
31. Santos vs. Bernardo, 559 SCRA 310; RIZON
32. Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No.212140-40, January 21,
2015.SABTALUH

L. Officers authorized to conduct Preliminary Investigation

33. Mangila vs. Pangilinan, G.R. No. 160739, July 17, 2013; SALINAS
34. Yambot vs. Armivit G.R. 145391 565 SCRA 177; SALVADOR
35. Honasan II vs. The Panel of Investigating Prosecutors of the DOJ, 427 SCRA
46; TAN
36. Alawiya vs. Datumanong, 585 SCRA 267 TORIBIO

Page 2 of 3
  A.M. No. 05-0826-SC (Amendment of Rules 112 and 114 of the
Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure by removing the conduct of
P.I. from Judges of the First Level Courts)

M. Preliminary Investigation vs. Preliminary Examination

N. Doctrine of Non-Interference
37. Tetangco vs. Ombudsman, 479 SCRA 249; BAIRD
38. Ledesma vs. Court of Appeals 278 SCRA 656.CHUA

O. Procedure
39. Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman G.R. Nos. 212140-41, January 21,
2015; CRUZ
40. Artillero vs. Casimiro, G.R. No. 190569, April 24, 2012 GENON
 Sections 32 and 33, RA No. 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act
of 2006) A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC (Revised Rule on children in conflict
with the Law)

P. Resolution of Investigating Prosecutor and its review

41. Quisay vs. People, G.R. No. 216920, Jan. 13, 2016; HALID
42. De Lima vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 209330, January 11, 2016; JAAFAR
43. Tolentino vs. Pacqueo, Jr., 523 SCRA 377. LAKBAO
 DOJ Circular No. 70, July 3, 2000 (2000 NPS Rule on Appeal);
 DOJ Circular No. 70-A, July 10, 2000 (Delegation of authority to
Reg’l prosecutors to Resolve Appeal;s in certain cases);
 DOJ Circular No. 3, January 13, 2016 (Automatic Review of
Dismissed Cases Involving RA No. 9165);

Q. Resolution of Investigating Judge and Its Review

44. Mangila vs. Pangilinan, G.R. No. 160739, July 17, 2013. LEDESMA

R. Remedy to adverse resolution of the Secretary of the DOJ

S. When warrant of arrest may issue

45. Hao vs. People, G.R. No. 183345, September 17, 2014; LIM
46. Marcos vs. Cabrera-Faller, A.M. No. RTJ-16-2427, January 24, 2017.MUSA

T. When accused lawfully arrested without warrant

47. Ladlad vs. Velasco, G.R. Nos. 172070-72, 172074-76, 175013, June 1,
2007.OCENA

U. Records
48. People vs. Grey et. al. G.R. No. 180109, July 26, 2010. REYES

V. Cases not requiring P.I. nor covered by the rule on Summary Procedure
49. Victoria Milling Co. Inc. vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 156963, October 6, 2008; RIZON
50. Borlongan, Jr. vs. Peña, 538 SCRA 221. SABTALUH
W. Others

Page 3 of 3