Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accelerated Lab Rubric
Accelerated Lab Rubric
Hypothesis (5 %)
2.1 • Is clear, concise and represents an appropriate “educated guess.”
2.2 • Can be tested.
2.3 • Has supportive reasoning for the prediction.
Procedure (10 %)
3.1 • Is presented as a narrative (in paragraph form).
3.2 • Describes the method of data collection or product design.
3.3 • Mentions any equipment, chemicals and software used.
3.4 • Is concise, but explained in enough depth that the experiment could be replicated.
Conclusion (40%)
5.1 • The purpose and hypothesis are revisited with a discussion of underlying presumptions (on
what chemical basis did you make your original hypothesis?)
5.2 • The hypothesis is assessed (supported or not) with a direct link to relevant data/findings.
5.3 • Data analysis values (sec 4.6) are referred to in order to discuss precision and accuracy error.
5.4 • Valid sources of error, including procedural sampling and measurement error, are discussed
Human error (speculated mistakes or calculation error) is NOT included as a valid source.
5.5 • The cited error sources can be used to explain your results relative to the expected results.
5.6
• Recommendations are offered for future modifications/adjustments of the experimental
design based on the error sources.
5.7
• Any assigned Lab Questions are answered.
5.8
• The lab is tied in with other chemical applications (concepts or common everyday uses).
5.9
5.10
• Relevant Chemical Themes (from class flowcharts) are discussed.
• The discussion is focused, sequential, and eloquent.
Note that not ALL of the above sections will apply to ALL labs.
Also, please invest efforts according to the % values given!