Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MATH Reinforced Concrete Design 02
MATH Reinforced Concrete Design 02
Two-way Slab
When a rectangular reinforced-concrete slab is supported on all four sides, reinforcement placed
perpendicular to the side may be assumed effective in the two directions. These slabs are known as
two-way slabs. The bending on these slabs occurs in both directions. However, if a rectangular slab is
supported in all four sides but the long side is two or more times the short side, the slab will, for all
practical purposes, act as a one way slab, with bending occurring in the short direction.
The code specifies two methods of designing two-way slabs. These are the direct design method (Section
5.13.6) and equivalent frame method (Section 5.13.7). However, there are other methods that can be
used. These include the strip method and moment coefficients method (Method 2).
When the design moments have been determined by either the direct design method or equivalent
frame method, the moments are distributed across each panel. The panel is divided into column and
middle strips. Column strip is a design strip with a width on each side of a column centerline equal to
0.25 x L2 or 0.25 x L1, whichever is less. Column strip includes beams, if any. The middle strip is a design
strip bounded by two column strips.
MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS (SECTION 5.9.5.3.2)
The minimum thickness of slabs without interior beams spanning between the supports shall be in
accordance with the provisions of Table 10.1 and shall not be less the following values:
(1) For values of reinforcement yield stress between 275 and 415 MPa minimum thickness shall be
obtained by linear interpolation.
(2) Drop panel is defined in Sections 5.13.4.7.1 and 5.13.4.7.2.
(3) Slabs with beams between columns along exterior edges. The value of α for the edge beam shall
not be less than 0.8.
The minimum thickness of slabs with or without beams spanning between the supports on all sides and
having a ratio of long to short span not exceeding 2 shall be
Ln ( 800+0.73 f y )
h=
36,000+5,000 β ¿ ¿
Eq. 10-1
Ln (800+0.73 f y )
h=
36,000+ 9,000 β
Eq. 10-2
Ln (800+0.73 f y )
h=
36,000
Eq. 10-3
the values obtained from Eq. 10-1, Eq. 10-2, or Eq. 10-3 shall be modified as required by Sec. 5.9.5.3.4
and Sec. 5.9.5.3.5 but in no case shall the thickness be less than
Section 5.9.5.3.4: For slabs without beams, but with drop panels extending in each direction from
centerline of support a distance not less than one-sixth the span length in that direction measured
center-to-center of supports, and projection below the slab at least one-quarter the slab thickness
beyond the drop, thickness required by Eq. 10-1, Eq. 10-2, or Eq. 10-3 may be reduced by 10%.
Section 5.9.5.3.5: At discontinuous edges, an edge beam shall be provided with a stiffness ratio α not
less than 0.80; or the minimum thickness required by Eq. 10-1, Eq. 10-2, or Eq. 10-3, shall be increased
by at least 10% in the panel with a discontinuous edge.
where:
Ln= length of clear span in long direction of two-way construction, measured face-to-face of supports in
slabs without beams and face-to-face of beams or other supports in other cases.
Ecb I b
α=
Ecs I s
Eq. 10-4
Section 5.13.2.4: For monolithic or fully composite construction, a beam includes that portion of slab on
each side of the beam extending a distance equal to the projection of the beam above or below the slab,
whichever is greater, but not greater than four times the slab thickness.
The student may find this Code procedure in solving the minimum slab thickness very tedious, but for
slabs up to 8 m in length and with beams in all four sides having almost the same size, the minimum slab
thickness is usually not governed by Eq. 10-1.
and shall not be less than 0.2 nor greater than 5.0.
where: L1= length of span in direction that moments are being determined, measured center-to-center
of supports.
L2= length of span transverse to L1, measured center-to-center of supports. See also Figure
10.2.
The total moment that is resisted by the slab equals absolute sum of positive and average negative
factored moments in each direction shall not be less than
(W u L2 ) Ln2
M o=
8
Eq. 10-6
If the transverse span of panels on either side of the centerline of supports varies, L2 in Eq. 10-6 shall be
taken as the average of adjacent transverse spans. When the span adjacent and parallel to an edge is
being considered, the distance from edge to panel centerline shall be substituted for L2 in Eq. 10-6.
Clear span Ln shall extend from face to face columns, capitals, brackets, or walls. Value of Lnused in Eq.
10-6 shall not be less than 0.65 L1. Circular or regular polygon shaped supports shall be treated as square
supports with the same area.
Negative factored moments shall be located at face of rectangular supports. Circular or regular polygon
shaped supports shall be treated as square supports with the same area.
B. In an end span, total factored static, moment M o shall be distributed as given in Table 10.2.
1 2 3 4 5
Slab without
Slab with beams between
Exterior edge beams interior Exterior edge fully
unrestrained between all supports restrained
supports Withou With
t edge edge
beam* bea
m
Interior negative 0.75 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.65
factored moment
Positive factored 0.63 0.57 0.52 0.50 0.35
moment
Exterior negative 0 0.16 0.26 0.30 0.65
factored moment
*See Sec. 5.13.6.3.6
Negative moment sections shall be designed to resist the larger of the two interior negative factored
moments determined for spans framing into a common support unless an analysis is made to distribute
the unbalanced moment in accordance with stiffness of adjoining elements.
Edge beams or edged of slab shall be proportioned to resist in torsion their share of exterior negative
factored moments.
For moment transfer between slab and an edge column, column strip nominal moment strength
provided shall be used as the transfer moment for gravity load.
Column strips shall be proportioned to resist the following portions in percent of interior negative
factored moments:
Table 10.3
Column strips shall be proportioned to resist the following portions in percent of exterior negative
factored moments:
Table 10.5
Column strips shall be proportioned to resist the following portions in percent of positive factored
moments:
Table 10.6
For slabs with beams between supports, the slab portion of column strips shall be proportioned to resist
that proportion of column strip moments not resisted by beams.
Beams between supports shall be proportioned to resist 85 percent of column strip moments if (
α 1 L2 / L1 ¿ is equal to or greater than 1.0. for values of (α 1 L2 / L1 ¿ between 1.0 and zero, proportion of
column strip moments resisted by beams shall be obtained by linear interpolation between 85 and zero
percent.
Negative and positive factored moments may be modified by 10 percent provided the total static
moment for a panel in the direction considered is not less than that required by Eq. 10-6.
Beams with (α 1 L2 / L1) equal to or greater than 1.0 shall be proportioned to resist shear caused by
factored loads on tributary areas bounded by 45° lines drawn from the corners of the panels and the
center-lines of the adjacent panels parallel to the long sides. Beams with (α 1 L2 / L1 ¿ less than 1.0 may
be proportioned to resist shear obtained by linear interpolation, assuming beams carry no load at α = 0.
ILLUSTRATIVE PROBLEMS
Problem 9.1
A square column footing is to support a 400-mm square tied column that carries a dead load of 880 kN
and a live load of 710 kN, the column is reinforced with 8-25mm bars. The base of the footing is 1.50 m
below the natural grade where the allowable soil pressure is 235 kPa. The soil above the footing has a
weight of 15.6 kN/m3. Assuming fy = 27.5 MPa, fc = 27.5 MPa, and unit weight of concrete as 23.50
kN/m3, design the footing. Use 25 mm main bars.
Solution
Our first task in the design of footing is the determination of its depth. This requires several cycles of
trial and error procedure because its value affects the effective soil bearing capacity. There are several
rules of thumb used by designers for making initial thickness estimates, such as 20% of the footing width
plus 75mm. However, with the aid of computer (available at GERTC), this will become easier.
Factored load
q u=
Area of Footing
1.4 ( 880 ) +1.7(710)
¿ =311.1 kPa
2.8( 2.8)
q u=0.3111 MPa
V u=ϕ v c
871.08(1200- d) = 0.85(2447.2d)
1200 – d = 2.388d
d= 354.2 mm
Based on the two-way or punching shear:
V u=qu A shaded
= (0.3111)[(2800)² - (400 + d)²]
= 0.3111 (2800² - 160000 – 800d - d²)
V u=0.3111(7,680,000−800 d−d2 )
1
V c= √ f ' c b o d
3
b o=4 ( 400+ d )
1
V c = √ 27.5 [ 4 ( 400+d ) ] d
3
V c =6.99( 400 d +d 2 )
[V ¿ ¿u=ϕ v c ]¿
0.3111(7,680,000 – 800d - d²) – 0.85[6.99(400d + d²)]
7,680,000 – 800d - d² - 7639d + 19d²
2
−8439 ± √ ( 8439 ) −4 ( 20 ) (−7,680,000)
d=
2(20)
d= 443.6 mm say 445 mm
6 2
627.18 x 10 −0.9 R u ( 2800 ) ( 445 )
Ru=1.26 MPa
0.85 f ' c
ρ=
fy [√
1− 1−
2 Ru
0.85 f ' c ]
=
0.85(27.5)
275 [√ 1−
2(1.26)
0.85(27.5) ]
ρ = 0.00471
1.4 1.4
ρmin = =
f y 275
ρmin =0.005091
Use ρ = 0.005091
A s=ρbd
= 0.005091(2800)(445)
A s=6,343 mm2
Development Length:
l db=0.02 Ab f y / √ f ' c
π
l db= 0.02 x ( 25 )2 (275)/ √ 27.5 = 515 mm
4
or l db=0.06 d b f y =0.06 ( 25 )( 275 ) = 412.5 mm
Furnished Ld - 1200 – 75 – 1125 mm > 515 mm (OK)
Use 2.8 m x 2.8 m footing with an effective depth to top bars of 445 mm (total depth = 560 m), with 13-
25 mm bars on each side of the footing, and at least two column bars (25-mm as given) must be
extended into the footing.