Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economical Carparks: A Design Guide
Economical Carparks: A Design Guide
A Design Guide
Economical Carparks
A Design Guide
2nd Edition
Published by:
OneSteel Market Mills
November 2004
Economical Carparks i
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Disclaimer:
This publication has been prepared by OneSteel Market Mills an operating business group of which OneSteel Manufacturing Pty
Limited ABN 42 004 651 325 is a part. Please note that any specifications or technical data referred to in this publication are subject
to change and/or variation or improvement without notice and no warranty as to their suitability for any use is made. Users of this
publication - to ensure accuracy and adequacy for their purposes - are requested to check the information provided in this
publication to satisfy themselves as to its appropriateness and not to rely on the information without first doing so. Unless required
by law, the company cannot accept any responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting from the use of this
publication.
Photographs shown are representative only of typical applications, current at November 2004.
This publication is not an offer to trade and shall not form any part of the trading terms in any transaction.
©Copyright 2004. OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Limited ABN 42 004 651 325
Registered Trademarks of OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Limited ABN 42 004 651 325: 300PLUS®
Edition 2 November 2004
Economical Carparks ii
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ........................................................ iv APPENDICES
F. EXAMPLES OF RAMP
CONFIGURATIONS ...................................... 52
Economical Carparks iv
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Steel Carparks
This Design Guide has been prepared to assist Since 1985 well in excess of 100 carparks have
engineers, architects, quantity surveyors, builders been constructed in Australia and New Zealand
and developers produce and cost preliminary using structural steelwork. Advantages associated
designs for steel carparks. with steel carpark construction include:
Eleven carpark schemes utilising re-entrant profiled Earlier Occupation: Repetition from bay to bay and
steel decking on structural steel are presented with floor to floor leads to reduced time in the production
extensive information given for each scheme of shop drawings, fabrication of connections and
including: the erection of steelwork. The time-savings offered
by a steel solution results in reduced financial
• slab details; holding costs and hence provides an earlier return
• beam and column sizes; on investment.
• number of shear connectors;
• connection details; Reduced Exposure to on-site risks: Off-site
• corrosion protection details; and fabrication reduces the on-site labour, which
• cost indicators reduces the cost of amenities and the amount of
on-site supervision. The reduction in the on-site
These schemes can be used to produce designs workforce, delays due to weather and the on-site
for most carpark building layouts. Over the last two congestion reduces the exposure to on-site risk.
years there have been a number of new profiled
steel decks launched into the Australian market Greater Space Utilisation: The sizes of steel
which has provided many new alternative layouts. columns are small compared with other forms of
Nonetheless the schemes presented in this Guide carpark construction and this results in a more
provide an excellent starting point for the preliminary functional carpark. The column free space offered
design, which may then be fine-tuned as required by the long spanning capability of structural steel
and in some cases, utilise the new profiled steel reduces the number of columns required and in
decks. some of the schemes eliminates all internal
columns.
The use of the above information is illustrated by
means of some worked examples, demonstrating Future Proof Investment: Columns are easily
some of the advantages associated with steel strengthened and additional connections can be site
construction for carpark buildings. welded to the existing steel structure providing
flexibility for vertical or horizontal extension.
The Appendices in this Design Guide give the
detailed structural design criteria adopted for design Reduced Foundation Costs: The reduced dead
solutions, information on designing for durability, load associated with structural steel results in
costing data, a survey of existing carparks and smaller foundations.
examples of ramp configurations.
Economical Carparks 1
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
1.2 Layouts 1.2.1 Column Location
The Australian/New Zealand Standard The location of the columns is one of the most
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 provides guidance and critical decisions in achieving an economical and
minimum requirements for the design and layout of functional carpark.
off-street parking facilities including multi-storey
carparks. It classifies car parking facilities according Construction using large clear spans offers the
to the type of use as shown in Table 1. Parking following benefits:
space and aisle widths are also given for each class.
The nominal length of a parking space is 5.4m. • improved visibility;
• increased interior lighting efficiency;
The following discussion covers some of the major • ease of cleaning and maintenance;
requirements of the code which have a significant • better security; and
impact on the design of a multi-storey carpark. • greater number of cars per unit area of available
floor space.
Economical Carparks 2
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
1.2.2 Headroom
Close end of space
200
550
200 With a steel carpark, sprinklers, lights, etc. can be
placed within the depth of the steel beams. This
not only protects these items, but also means that
these items do not control the floor-to-floor height.
Therefore the critical height clearance dimension
is to the bottom of the steel beams. Figure 2 – Example of a Ramp Arrangement
300 300
1900 and Circulation
1.2.3 Ramps & Circulation
One-way ramps should be at least 3m wide between
Ramps play a major role in the efficient circulation kerbs, while two-way ramps should be a minimum
of traffic through a carpark allowing traffic to flow of 5.5m between kerbs. For minimum width of ramps
from one level to the next. Ramps can be designed on curve refer to Clause 2.5.2(b) of AS/NZS
in various configurations to facilitate the required 2890.1:2004.
1000 5400 circulation of traffic. A typical example of a ramp
arrangement and circulation for a split system 1.2.4 Gradients (Excluding Ramps)
carpark is shown in Figure 2. Additional common
ramp configurations for both one-way and two-way
The maximum gradient within a parking module is:
750 traffic flow are presented in Appendix F.
Measured parallel to the angle of
The Australian/New Zealand Standard
300 Space width from Table 1 300 parking - 1 in 20
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004, Clause 2.5.3 provides details
Dimensions in Millimetres Measured in any other direction - 1 in 16
on allowable gradients on ramps. For straight ramps
in public carparks, not part of a parking module,
Figure 1 – Design Envelope, Parking spaces for people with disabilities the
from one level to the next the maximum gradient is:
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 maximum gradient should not exceed - 1 in 40
Where clear span construction is not practical, the Ramps longer than 20m - 1 in 6
The minimum recommended gradients to allow the
columns should be carefully located so as to cause Ramps up to 20m - 1 in 5
floor to drain adequately are:
minimal interference with traffic circulation, parking
manoeuvres and driver visibility. Figure 1 gives the For further details refer to Clause 2.5.3 of
Outdoor area floor - 1 in 100
design envelope around a parked vehicle which AS/NZS 2890.1:2004.
Covered area floor - 1 in 200
shows a shaded area where columns, walls and
other obstructions should be placed.
Economical Carparks 3
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
1.3 Parking Modules This configuration is considered to cover most
practical cases, and allows the designs and costs
A parking module is defined in AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 given in Section 2 to be quickly and accurately
as a parking aisle together with a single row of adopted at an early stage of a project. It is noted
parking spaces on one or both sides. In this that the new Class 3A in the latest edition of
document only parking on both sides of the aisle is AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 exceeds the dimensions of
considered. The parking module excludes any this adopted module, and the designs should be
ramps or circulation roadways which take off within adjusted accordingly. As the design progresses, the
the module. beams and columns would of course be designed
for the actual layout of the project. The costs per
Many variations could be developed for the different square metre are generally not very sensitive to
classes of carpark to cover all situations. In this small changes in dimensions.
document, a user Class 3 module for parking at the
preferred angle of 90o to the aisle is considered. The other major simplifying assumption is a
The standard module in this publication consists standard allowance for a column width of 300mm.
of: Whilst this is usually adequate, a small number of
Parking space width 2.6m columns exceed this dimension at the bottom of an
Parking space length 5.4m eight level carpark and this would need to be
Aisle width 5.8m allowed for in the final design. Alternatively, the
Parking module length 16.6m (2x5.4 + 5.8) columns could be redesigned to fit within the 300mm
width.
SCHEME NUMBER
Module Type Scheme Description Bay Width
2 car 3 car 4 car 5 car
SINGLE Internal and edge columns, - S1A S1B S1C
Figure 3(a)
Internal columns and cantilever edges - S2 - -
Figure 3(b)
Clear span with edge columns, S3A S3B S3C -
Figure 3(c)
MULTIPLE Internal and edge columns, - S4A S4B S4C
Figure 5(a)
Internal columns and cantilever edges - S5 - -
Figure 5(b)
Note: Refer to Section 2 for full details of each of the schemes.
Economical Carparks 4
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Carpark layouts can be divided into single and
multiple module designs:
Bay Width
16600mm, Single Module
Economical Carparks 5
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
1.3.2 Multiple Module Schemes
Economical Carparks 6
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
2. CARPARK SCHEMES AND
COSTING
2.1 Schemes
Eleven carpark schemes, as shown in Figure 6,
have been designed and costed. The engineering
drawings for each of thses schemes are given in
Section 2.3.
Economical Carparks 7
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
SCHEME 1: SINGLE MODULE SCHEME 2: SINGLE MODULE - CANTILEVER
Scheme S1A: 3 car spaces per module width Scheme S2: 3 car spaces per module width
Refer to Drawing 1A (page 11) Refer to Drawing 2 (page 14)
Economical Carparks 8
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
SCHEME 3: SINGLE MODULE SCHEME 4: MULTIPLE MODULE SCHEME 5: MULTIPLE MODULE - CANTILEVER
Scheme S3A: 2 car spaces per module width Scheme S4A: 3 car spaces per module width Scheme S5: 3 car spaces per module width
Refer to Drawing 3A (page 15) Refer to Drawing 4A (page 18) Refer to Drawing 5 (page 21)
Scheme S3B: 3 car spaces per module width Scheme S4B: 4 car spaces per module width
Refer to Drawing 3B (page 16) Refer to Drawing 4B (page 19)
Scheme S3C: 4 car spaces per module width Scheme S4C: 5 car spaces per module width
Refer to Drawing 3C (page 17) Refer to Drawing 4C (page 20)
Economical Carparks 9
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
2.2 Costing 2.3 Engineering Drawings
The cost of each of the eleven schemes has been The schemes have been designed in accordance
calculated on a square metre rate for 2, 4, 6 and 8 with the criteria given in Appendix A.
storey high carparks. The results are presented in
Table 4.
Scheme Description Floor Costs Column Costs TOTAL COST (Floor and Columns)
$/m2 $/m2 for No. of Storeys $/m2 for No. of Storeys
Beams Decking Slab TOTAL 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8
SINGLE MODULES
S1A 3 Spaces/Bay 83 40 55 178 12 15 17 19 190 193 195 197
S1B 4 Spaces/Bay 81 40 55 176 9 12 15 17 185 188 191 193
S1C 5 Spaces/Bay 101 40 55 195 9 12 14 17 204 207 209 212
S2 Cantilever 3 Spaces/Bay 94 40 55 189 10 11 12 15 199 200 201 204
S3A 2 Spaces/Bay 73 49 58 180 22 19 24 25 202 199 204 205
S3B 3 Spaces/Bay 132 40 55 226 8 10 12 14 234 237 239 240
S3C 4 Spaces/Bay 135 40 55 230 7 9 10 13 237 239 240 243
MULTIPLE MODULES
S4A 3 Spaces/Bay 84 39 55 177 9 12 15 19 187 190 192 196
S4B 4 Spaces/Bay 80 39 55 174 8 11 15 18 182 185 189 192
S4C 5 Spaces/Bay 97 39 55 191 8 10 14 16 199 201 205 207
S5 Cantilever 3 Spaces/Bay 87 39 55 181 9 10 12 15 190 191 193 195
Notes:
1. The values in the table have been rounded to the nearest dollar prior to totalling
2. Costs for all schemes are based on the use of the coating system specified in Table B2 for the Atmospheric Corrosivity Category C
Economical Carparks 10
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 11
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 12
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 13
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 14
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 15
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 16
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 17
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 18
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 19
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 20
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 21
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 22
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 23
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 24
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 25
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Economical Carparks 26
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
3. DESIGN EXAMPLES
Figures 6(a) & (b) show a flowchart outlining the
typical steps involved in arriving at a suitable
preliminary design.
Economical Carparks 27
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Is it a
stand alone
open-deck* or NO
STEP 1
sprinklered*
carpark? Refer to Appendix C, Section C2
Then use the appropriate
YES sections of the guide & if required
determine extent of fire protection
Is it a
STEP 2 single
module?
YES NO
Are Are
STEP 3 there edge there edge
columns? columns?
YES NO YES NO
Design Constraints
PB2 PB1 PB1 PB1 PB2
2
C
C
Bay Width
B2
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B2
PB2 PB1 PB1 PB1 PB2
2
C
C
4150mm 8300mm 8300mm 8300mm 4150mm
33200mm
Economical Carparks 29
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
3.2 Example 2
Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2 Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2
Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 1/4 Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 2/4
Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98 Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98
Design Constraints
Preliminary design (see flow chart in Figure 6a)
A developer requires a carpark to suit the following criteria:- However if maximum flexibility is desired then the no internal columns
• 4 suspended levels. would be the preferred option. In this example we are looking for the
• Site is 34m x 75m with 3% fall across the 34m. most economical option therefore the internal column schemes will
• Facade to be out of light weight steel up to barrier height only ∴open deck be considered.
carpark.
• Surface treatment to be appropriate for atmospheric Category C with top coat STEP 4 Schemes S1A, S1B and S1C are therefore appropriate.
varying in colour for each floor.
• 1 circular penetration per primary beam. STEP 5 Design as a 4 suspended level carpark. Refer to drawings 1B, C1
and S1.
Economical Carparks 30
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2 Project Name: Carpark Design Guide Job No: CDG2
Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 3/4 Subject: EXAMPLE 2 Page: 4/4
Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98 Designed: AN Date: 1/10/98
C2
2
2
PB2 PB1 PB2 PB2 PB1 PB2
C
C
1 250UC89.5 200UC59.5
2 250UC89.5 200UC59.5
Bay Width
10700m
2/B1
3 200UC46.2 150UC37.2
B2
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B1
B2
4 200UC46.2 150UC37.2
2
2a
C
C
C
STEP 8 Design and cost all other elements not covered in this Guide, eg stairs,
ramps, lateral bracing systems etc.
Economical Carparks 31
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Appendix A A. STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA A.3 Floors
The following principles guided the selection of the A.3.1 Use of Unpropped Construction
structural systems given in this publication for the
various schemes. It is preferable not to prop the beams or slabs for
speed of construction, to keep an open working
Simple details were adopted wherever possible to space and also to minimise concrete cracking
minimise fabrication costs and to allow fast erection problems. Hence, for all cases except Scheme S3A,
of the steelwork on-site. secondary beams are spaced at about 2.8m
centres. This spacing was considered to correspond
A.1 Building Regulations to the maximum spanning distance for 1.0mm re-
entrant profiled steel sheeting (continuous over a
The modular carpark designs given in this minimum of three spans) to achieve aesthetically
publication comply with the provisions of the acceptable deflections. Alternative sheeting profiles
Building Code of Australia (Australian Building Code can be used in accordance with A.3.3.
Board, 2004) for stand alone open-deck and closed
carparks with sprinklers. The companion to this With Scheme S3A, where the beams are spaced
document “Economical Carparks - A Guide to Fire at 5.2m centres, it was not considered economical
Safety” (Bennetts, Poh & Thomas, 2001) explains to provide intermediate secondary beams. So for
the fire protection requirements in more detail for this case only, the profiled steel sheeting (0.75mm
both stand alone carparks as well as carparks within Bondek) is propped during construction.
mixed occupancy buildings.
A.3.2 Beams
A.2 Design Loads
The beams were designed to AS 2327.1-2003 and
The carparks have been designed for the following AS 4100-1998. The beams are cambered for the
loads: weight of the wet concrete, except when the camber
is less than the straightness tolerance specified in
Superimposed dead loads - 0.1 kPa AS 4100 (lesser of length/1000 and 10mm).
Live load - AS/NZS 1170.1:2002 - 2.5 kPa Vibration in the carparks that have been constructed
(with no reduction for tributary area) previously has not been identified as a problem and
this was confirmed in checks carried out using the
A lightweight self-supporting steel facade and methods proposed by Murray, Allen & Ungar (1997).
guardrail have been assumed to exist along the
perimeter of the carpark. If a concrete or other heavy The limit state design models proposed by Hogan
facade is adopted, the edge beams and supporting & Thomas (1994) were generally adopted for the
columns will need to be designed for the heavier design of connections. The number of bolts is often
loads. less than that given in the third edition of the AISC
Standardised Structural Connections (Australian
Economical Carparks 32
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Institute of Steel Construction, 1985), which was these trapezoidal decks are not covered by an moment redistribution, while AS 3600-2001 permits
based on the working stress steel code, AS 1250- Australian Standard, designers are left with the the redistribution of moments with grade N500 bars
1981. 8mm steel flat was adopted as the standard option to use the respective manufacturer’s but not with cold-reduced mesh. Therefore the bar
web-side-plate in order to avoid the need to stock recommendations or an International Standard with reinforcement specified on the drawings in Section
plates of different thickness. Dimensions such as design to engineering principles, or a combination 2.3 cannot be directly substituted with mesh of
edge distances, bolt size and pitch are generally in of these. equivalent area.
accordance with the recommendations by Hogan
& Thomas (1994). A.3.4 Slabs Scheme S3A has been designed as simply
supported for the strength limit state, with crack
The primary beams have been checked in The composite slabs have been designed using a width and deflection checked at serviceability load
accordance with Chick, Dayawansa & Patrick partial shear connection strength theory levels. All the other schemes have been designed
(1998) for a 200mm diameter unstiffened circular (BlueScope, 2003). Grade N500 reinforcing bars for the bending moments and shear derived from
web penetration. Larger penetrations, either have been adopted in lieu of mesh as this is believed an elastic analysis.
unstiffened or stiffened, and end notches can be to be more economical. In addition, no special
provided, but would need to be designed. Pipes details are required to avoid overlapping layers of Reinforcement intensity is typically 6.5-7.5 kg/m2
should be designed to run under or between the mesh. It should be noted that Scheme S3A utilises for each of the 11 schemes contained in this Guide.
secondary beams.
Economical Carparks 33
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Refer to Appendix B on durability for details of
shrinkage-and-temperature and other crack-control
reinforcement.
6mm Pressed
Floor Plate
A.4 Columns
The columns have been designed in accordance Tubular 40 Typ.
with AS 4100-1998. Allowance has been made for Handrail 125
pattern loading and a maximum floor-to-floor height 40 Typ.
The columns have been designed for the vertical Pressed Steel
Plate Concrete
loads of an eight level carpark. The designs can be Filled
used for carparks with fewer levels by using size Support Landing
corresponding to the top levels e.g. for a two level Stringer on Steelwork or
Hang from above
carpark, the appropriate columns are those required 200x100 Flat or
200PFC
for levels 7 and 8. Whilst the column size is given
in increments of 2 levels, it may be more economical
in some cases to remove the column splice(s) and
run the heavier column all the way up. The practical
Pressed
limit for this approach is 6 levels. This is discussed Steel Plate
in more detail in D.5.
Edge columns in single module schemes have only 5mm Pressed Plate
Fill with Concrete
been designed for that situation. Where two
modules abut (for example combination single
modules - see Figure 4 - for Scheme S1A, S1B &
125
S1C) the columns common to two modules take
twice the vertical load. These columns can be
conservatively designed as internal columns.
Economical Carparks 34
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
A.5 Lateral Load Resisting Systems /www.onesteel.com/productspecs.asp?specID=54
The designs in this Guide only cover vertical BlueScope Steel 2003, Using BONDEK - Design &
loadings. Lateral load-resisting systems can utilise Construction Guide, BlueScope Steel Limited,
ramps, shear walls and steel moment or braced Available: http://www.bluescopesteel.com.au
frames. Generally, braced frames are more (registration required)
economical than moment frames. Braced frames
can be located along the perimeter of a carpark or Chick, C. G., Dayawansa, P. H. & Patrick, M. 1998,
along the column lines. “Structural Design of Simply-supported Composite
Beams with Large Steel Web Penetrations”,
Australasian Structural Engineering Conference,
A.6 Stairs Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 159-166
To match the speed of construction offered by steel, Hogan, T. J. & Thomas, I. R. 1994, Design of
it is common practice to adopt steel stair systems. Structural Connections, 4th edn, Australian Institute
These fall into two categories viz.: of Steel Construction, North Sydney
• Formwork systems such as Stairmetal Formwork Murray, T. M., Allen, D. E. & Ungar, E. E. 1997, Floor
(Aus Iron Industries Pty Ltd, Melbourne - Vibrations due to Human Activity, Steel Construction
http://www.ausironindustries.com.au). Guide Series 11, AISC/CISC, Chicago
• Steel stairs as shown in Figure A2. These allow
safe access to all floors during construction, as Standards Australia 1981, AS 1250-1981
well as providing permanent access. They are (superceded) SAA Structural Steel Code, SAI,
often fully assembled in the fabrication shop and Sydney
lifted directly into place on site.
Standards Australia 2003, AS 2327.1-2003
References Composite structures - Simply supported beams,
SAI, Sydney
Australian Building Code Board 2004, Building
Code of Australia, Volume 1: Class 2 to Class 9 Standards Australia 2001, AS 3600-2001 Concrete
Buildings, ABCB, Canberra structures, SAI, Sydney
Australian Institute of Steel Construction 1985, AISC Standards Australia 1998, AS 4100-1998 Steel
Standardized Structural Connections, 3rd edn, AISC, structures, SAI, Sydney
North Sydney
Economical Carparks 35
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Appendix B B. DURABILITY
Supercast Rearguard S
B.1 Slabs
The slabs have been designed and detailed for a
maximum Exposure Classification of B1 (near
coastal) in accordance with AS 3600-2001. Less
severe classifications may be appropriate for fully
enclosed carparks or for carparks in cities away
from the coast.
Economical Carparks 37
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
functional system where aesthetics are less
important; Proe, D. J., Patrick, M. & Goh, C. C. 1997,
• Class 2.5 blast clean followed by 50µm epoxy “Simplified Design of Continuous Composite Slabs
zinc and 50µm 2 pack acrylic (epoxy cross linked including Moment Redistribution and Crack
catalysed acrylic) to provide an architectural finish Control”, Fifteenth Australasian Conference on the
in a range of colours Mechanics of Structures and Materials, Melbourne,
pp. 147-152
Szokolik (1997) has shown that a single coat of
water borne inorganic zinc silicate will out perform Standards Australia 1997, AS 1627.0-1997 Metal
multi-coat systems. However the multi-coat system finishing - Preparation and pretreatment of surfaces
is given for situations where a different colour top - Method selection guide, SAI, Sydney
coat is desired.
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2002,
Table B2 is a guide only. The corrosion protection AS/NZS 2312:2002 Guide to the protection of
system should be designed in accordance with AS/ structural steel against atmospheric corrosion by
NZS 2312:2002. Labour rather than material cost the use of protective coatings, SAI, Sydney
drives the applied cost of coating systems. Often
similar corrosion resistance can be achieved Szokolik, A. & Rapattoni, F. 1997, “Single-coat
independent of aesthetics. Inorganic Zic Silicate. Is this the Definitive Answer
for Surface Protection of Steel Bridges?”,
Reference should be made to Appendix D for costs Preceedings of the 1997 Bridge Conference,
of alternate coating systems Sydney
B.4 Monitoring
In accordance with normal practice, an inspection
would be undertaken towards the end of the
contract defects-liability period. This should identify
items which require ongoing monitoring such as
expansion joints.
References
Adam, J. C. & Patrick, M. 1998, Crack-control
Investigation for Steel-framed Carparks, BHPR/N/
1998/098, BHP Research - Melbourne
Laboratories, Melbourne
Economical Carparks 38
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Atmospheric Description
Corrosivity
Category
Category A: Very low Environments in this category are most commonly found inside heated or air conditioned buildings with clean atmospheres, such as most commercial buildings. They may also
be found in semi-sheltered locations remote from marine or industrial influence and in unheated or non-air conditioned buildings. The only external environments in Australia or
New Zealand are some alpine regions although, generally these environments will extend into Category B.
Category B: Low Environments in this category include dry, rural areas as well as other regions remote from the coast or sources of pollution. Most areas of Australia and New Zealand beyond
at least 50 kilometres from the sea are in this category, which can however, extend as close as 1 kilometre from seas that are relatively sheltered and quiet. Typical areas
occur in arid and rural inland regions, most inland cities and towns such as Canberra, Ballarat, Toowoomba, Alice Springs and Hamilton, NZ and suburbs of cities on sheltered
bays, such as Melbourne, Hobart, Brisbane and Adelaide (except areas within 3 to 6 kilometres of the coast near Adelaide). Unheated or non-airconditioned buildings where
some condensation may occur, such as warehouses and sports halls, can be in this category. Proximity to the coast is an important factor.
Category C: Medium This category mainly covers coastal areas with low salinity. The extent of the affected area varies significantly with factors such as winds, topography and vegetation. Around
sheltered seas, such as Port Philip Bay, Category C extends beyond about 50 metres from the shoreline to a distance of about one kilometre inland. For a sheltered bay or
gulf, such as near Adelaide, this category extends from the shoreline to about 3 to 6 kilometres inland. Along ocean front areas with breaking surf and significant salt spray, it
extends from about 1 kilometre inland to between 10 to 50 kilometres inland, depending on the strength of prevailing winds and topography. Much of the metropolitan areas of
Wollongong, Sydney, Newcastle, the Gold Coast, Auckland and Wellington are in this category. In South Australia, the whole of the Yorke peninsula falls within this or a more
severe category, and in the south-east of the state, from Victor Harbour to the Victorian border, this category extends between 30 and 70 kilometres inland. Such regions are
also found in urban and industrial areas with low pollution levels and although uncommon in Australia and New Zealand, exist for several kilometres around major industries,
such as smelters and steelworks, and in the geothermal areas of New Zealand. Micro-environmental effects, such as result from proximity to airports and sewage treatment
works, may also place a site into this category. Interior environments with Category C corrosivity can occur in humid production rooms, such as food-processing plants,
laundries, breweries, printing works and dairies.
Category D: High This category occurs mainly on the coast. Around sheltered bays, Category D extends up to 50 metres inland from the shoreline. In areas with rough seas and surf, it extends
from about several hundred metres inland to about one kilometre inland. As with Categories B and C, the extent depends on winds, wave action and topography. Industrial
regions may also be in this category, but in Australia and New Zealand these are only likely to be found within 1.5 kilometres of the plant. This category extends inside the plant
where it is best considered as a micro-environment. Damp, contaminated interior environments such as occur with swimming pools, dye works, paper manufacturers,
foundries, smelters and chemical processing plants may also extend into this category.
Category E: Very High This category is common offshore and on the beachfront in regions of rough seas and surf beaches. The region can extend inland for several hundred metres. (In some areas
E-I: Industrial of Newcastle, for example, it extends more than half a kilometre from the coast.) This category may also be found in aggressive industrial areas, where the environment may
E-M: Marine be acidic with a pH of less than 5. For this reason, Category E is divided into Marine and Industrial for purposes of coating selection. Some of the damp and/or contaminated
interior environments in Category D may occasionally extend into this category.
Category F: Inland A tropical environment is found in coastal areas of north Queensland, Northern Territory, north-west Western Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Islands, except
Tropical where affected by salinity. Corrosivity in inland regions is generally low (similar to that of Category B), but the aggressiveness of the environment to organic coatings means
special protection is required.
Note:If a site is considered to be in more than one category, for example an industry on the coast in a tropical region, then a selected coating should be capable of resisting the most severe of the
environments involved.
Economical Carparks 39
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Appendix C C. FIRE-RESISTANCE C2 Not Open-deck and Not
REQUIREMENTS Sprinklered Carparks
C.1 Open-deck or Sprinklered The designs in this publication are also applicable
to carparks that are not open-deck or are not
Carparks sprinklered, however some fire protection of
structural elements may be required. The BCA
According to the Building Code of Australia (2004), carparks provisions including those for non-
open-deck and sprinklered carparks can be sprinklered, non-open deck carparks are described
constructed from bare steel construction provided in detail in the OneSteel publication “Economical
that the columns and beams achieve certain Carparks – A Guide to Fire Safety” (Bennetts, Poh
requirements with respect to their surface-area-to- & Thomas, 2001). This document should be
mass ratio. consulted to determine the extent of protection
required.
The BCA defines an open-deck carpark as a carpark
which is cross ventilated using two approximately
opposite sides. The sides that provide ventilation References
must be at least 1/6 of the area of any other side
and the opening must be at least 1/2 of the wall Australian Building Code Board 2004, Building
area (see Figure C1). Code of Australia, Volume 1: Class 2 to Class 9
Buildings, ABSB, Canberra
o p e n in g a r e a
³ 0 .5 w a ll a r e a
c ro s s
v e n tila tio n
Economical Carparks 40
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
D. COSTING • allows reliable determination of contract variation
costs.
Appendix D
D.1 Methodology
A Microsoft Excel 7.0 spreadsheet program was
The costing of the different carpark schemes is used to determine the costs of each of the carpark
based on a rational costing method, proposed by schemes using the above methodology. Each
Watson et al. (1996), which divides the costs up scheme is costed on a separate sheet and this
into the following components. information is brought together on a summary sheet.
The costs are based on data given by Watson et al.
Steel Supply (1996) with an updated fabrication hourly rate of
Steel sections are costed in dollars per lineal metre, $60 and 2004 supply costs.
whereas plate and profiled sheeting are costed in
dollars per square metre. The accuracy of these costs has also been verified
independently by a number of fabricators. As
Fabrication significant attention has been given to minimise the
This item covers shop drawings and transport, as cost of the details recommended for use, the cost
well as the fabrication activity. It is an activity-based of the fabrication is sometimes less than the
costing system. The time to undertake each activity fabricator’s initial approximation. However, a more
has been derived from a detailed survey of practices detailed examination reveals that the costs are
within the Australian fabrication industry. realistic.
Economical Carparks 41
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Scheme Floor Costs Column Costs TOTAL COSTS D.2.2 Schemes with a Cantilever Edge
$/m2 $/m2 for (Floor and Columns) $/m2 for (Schemes S2 & S5)
No. of storeys No. of storeys
Beams Decking Slab TOTAL 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 This layout is only given for a 3 car space scheme
as the cantilever size proved uneconomical for
1A 83 40 55 178 12 15 17 19 190 193 195 197
larger module widths. The steel supply cost was
1B 81 40 55 176 9 12 15 17 185 188 191 193
only slightly more than for the edge column solution.
1C 101 40 55 195 9 12 14 17 204 207 209 212
However, the fabrication costs increased
2 94 40 55 189 10 11 12 15 199 200 201 204
considerably with the moment connections. For the
3A 73 49 58 180 22 19 24 25 202 199 204 205
multiple module Scheme S5, this additional cost is
3B 132 40 55 226 8 10 12 14 234 237 239 240
spread over a greater floor area and hence is not
3C 135 40 55 230 7 9 10 13 237 239 240 243
as obvious as the single module Scheme S2 which
4A 84 39 55 177 9 12 15 19 187 190 192 196
has two cantilevers in a single module.
4B 80 39 55 174 8 11 15 18 182 185 189 192
4C 97 39 55 191 8 10 14 16 199 201 205 207
5 87 39 55 181 9 10 12 15 190 191 193 195
D.2.3 Scheme with a Clear Span
(Scheme S3A, S3B &S3C)
NOTE: To obtain the total cost of the carpark floor and columns, multiply the cost for the relevant number of storeys by the total area.
Clear span solutions offer a very efficient layout with
Table D1 - Summary of Indicative Costs (Surface treatment: Refer to Table B2 Category C) more car spaces in a given footprint. These
schemes are also very appealing to the user as
supply cost for Schemes S1A & S4A is $35 per the end splice, erection costs and surface treatment there are no internal columns that are a potential
square metre whereas for schemes S1B & S4B it costs. It can be seen from Table D1, that the column source of damage to cars. For this reason they are
is $40 per square metre. However, with these cost per square metre for the 4 car space schemes popular in carparks with high turnover, particularly
schemes there is the same amount of fabrication is less than that for their respective 3 car space in shopping centres.
and erection per module. Yet the module area for scheme.
the 4 car space module is one third larger than the The total cost of Scheme 3A is very sensitive to the
3 car space module. Therefore, the additional The 5 car space schemes suffer a significant cost component cost of propping the slab during
supply cost for the beams in the 4 car space scheme penalty of up to $20 per square metre over the 4 construction, however if this is well managed the
is offset by the reduced fabrication costs and the car space schemes. This is largely due to the more efficient usage of space almost pays for the
total cost for the beams is the same. In addition, increase in steel supply cost of $10 per square additional cost over the schemes that are not clear
with the 4 car space schemes there are fewer metre. The remainder is made up of increased span.
members to erect for a given carpark and hence fabrication and surface treatment costs due to the
construction speed is increased. larger members and connections. The additional cost of schemes 3B and 3C are
generally accepted by owners on the basis of the
The cost for the beams includes allowance for the Schemes S1B, S1C, S4B and S4C offer a small additional appeal it offers the users of the carpark.
cost of the connections to the columns. Therefore improvement in utilisation of the floor area (see
the column costs include only the supply cost of Table 3) which should be taken into account when
the column, the fabrication costs associated with comparing the different schemes.
Economical Carparks 42
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Scheme Protection System Costs $/m2 D.3 Different Surface Treatment
Atmospheric Corrosivity Category Add. Top Add. Top Hot-dip Systems
A B C D/F E Coat A1 Coat Oth Galvanized
2
Economical Carparks 43
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
and $800. Therefore, in general it is better to
minimise the number of splices rather than the mass
of the column.
References
Watson, K. B., Dallas, S. van der Kreek, N. & Main,
T. 1996, “Costing of Steelwork from Feasibility
through to Completion”, Journal of Australian
Institute of Steel Construction, vol. 30, no. 2
Economical Carparks 44
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Appendix E E. SURVEY OF EXISTING
CARPARKS
There have been a significant number of steel
carparks constructed in Australia and New Zealand
of various configurations in plan and elevation. This
appendix lists many of these carparks.
Economical Carparks 45
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
between Columns
No of Car Spaces
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
ACT
Dickson Shopping Centre, Dickson, Canberra 4 326 z z 1996 Precast 3 Scheme S1A
Woden Valley Hospital, Woden Valley 2 350 z z 1994 Tensioned slab 3
on steel columns
Manuka Carpark, Corner Furneau & Bouganville Road, Manuka 1½ 170 z z 1993 Composite 3 Scheme S1A
ANU Carpark, ANU, Canberra 3 330 z z 1985 Precast 3 Scheme S1A
National Gallery of Australia, Parkes Place, Canberra 1 z z 1974 Cast in-situ rc slab
City West Carpark, Civic, Canberra 5 1100 z z Composite
Northern Territory
K- Mart, Palmerston, Darwin 1 400 z z 1998 Composite
Queensland
Gary Crick Auto 1 150 z z 2003 Composite Continuous
composite beams
Capalaba Shopping Centre, Capalaba, Brisbane 1 200 z z 1995 Composite 3
Petrie Rail Interchange, Petrie 1 270 z z 1993 Precast 3 Scheme S2
St Andrews Hospital, North St, Spring Hill 1 42 z z 1993 Precast 3 Scheme S1A
City Centre Plaza, Rockhampton 2 330 z z 1990 Composite
Mal Burke, Southport 1 90 z z 1988 Precast 2
Rockhampton Shopping Centre 1 300 z z 1987 Composite 3
Sunnybank Hills Shoppingtown, Sunnybank Hills 3 1600 z z 1987 Composite 3
Valley Centre, Fortitude Valley 2 130 z z 1978 Cast in-situ rc slab 2
Economical Carparks 46
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
between Columns
No of Car Spaces
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
New South Wales
Nowra Fair Shopping Centre, Haigh St, Nowra 1 80 z z 2000Composite 3
Cowra Carpark, Busby Place, Cowra 1 70 z z Composite 3
Westfields Hornsby Carpark Extension 1 150 z z 2001 Composite inf
Albury Commercial Club Carpark, Albury 2 160 z z 2001 Composite 3
TNT Office Carpark, Mascot 3 200 z z 2000 Composite 4 Scheme S1B.
Parramatta RSL Carpark, Parramatta 3 190 z z 2000 Composite 4 Scheme S1B.
Prince of Wales Carpark, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2 270 z z 1998 Composite 3
Big W Retail Carpark, Griffith 1 360 z z 1997 Composite 3
King Street Carpark, King Street, Newcastle 3.5 160 z z 1997 Composite 3 Scheme S4A
Mascot Airport Carpark -Stage 4, Keith Smith Avenue, Domestic Terminal, Mascot 4 z z 1997 Stressed concrete slab 2
HIA Building & Renovata Supa Centre, Homebush Bay 2 190 z z 1996 Composite 3
Liverpool Hospital Carpark, Liverpool 3 456 z z 1995 Precast 3
Thornleigh Railway Station, Yarrara Street, Thornleigh 2 z z 1994 Precast - untopped 3
Murwillumbah Hospital Carpark, Murwillumbah 2 80 z z 1991 Precast 3 Scheme S1A
Bankstown City Council Carpark, Brandon Avenue, Bankstown 3 240 z z 1988 Composite 2 Scheme S3
Blacktown City Council Carpark, Nelson Lane, Blacktown 4 500 z z 1987 Cast in situ rc slab 2
IBM Carpark, Coonara Avenue, West Pennant Hills 8 630 z z 1987 Cast in situ rc slab 2
Novotel Hotel Carpark, Darling Harbour 4 1800 z z 1987 Composite 2 Scheme S3
Forest Centre Carpark - Stage 3, Forest Way Shopping Centre, Frenchs Forest 1 80 z z 1986 Composite 2 Scheme S3
Pender Place Shopping Centre Carpark, Maitland 2 113 z z 1985 Composite
West Terrace Carpark, West Terrace, Bankstown 2 200 z z Stage 1-1978 Cast in situ rc slab 5 Scheme S4A
Stage 2-1984
Mascot Airport Carpark, Keith Smith Avenue, Domestic Terminal, Mascot 3 3000 z z Stage 1-1970 Cast in-situ rc slab. 2
Stage 2-1976
Forest Centre Carpark - Stage 2, Forest Way Shopping Centre, Frenchs Forest 1 100 z z 1972 Composite 2 Scheme S3
Ward Street Carpark, Ward Street, North Sydney 3 z z 1970 Composite 3
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
South Australia
Mt Barker Carpark, Cnr. Druids Ave & Adelaide Rd 1 286 z z z 2003 Composite 3 W-deck
The Royal Adelaide Hospital Carpark 9 1440 z z 2002 Composite 3 W-deck
Mill Street Auto Park 8 519 z z 2001 Composite & non-composite 2
Christian Brothers Sport Centre, Flinders St 1 120 z 1998 Composite/precast
EDS, North Terrace, Adelaide 4 245 z z 1998 Composite 4
Mt Gambier 1 302 z 1998 Composite 3
Salvation Army, Pirie St z 1998 Composite
Adelaide University, Frome St, Adelaide 6 500 z z 1997 Composite 3
Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 125 z z 1995 Composite 3
Hindley Plaza, Clubhouse Lane 6 294 z z 1995 Composite 3
2 Floor Extension, Grenfell St 2 120 1992 Composite 3
Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 4 420 z z 1991 Composite 2
Blyght St 5 z z 1990 Composite
Childrens Hospital, Kermode St, Nth Adelaide 5 400 z z 1989 Composite 3
Playhouse Lane, Light Sq. 7 375 z z 1989 Composite 2
Wyatt St 4 760 z z 1989 Precast 2
Roper St 7 644 z z 1988 Precast 2 Ramped
Southgate, South Terrace, Adelaide 4 320 z z 1987 Composite 2
Miller Anderson, Hindley St 3 z z 1986 Composite 3
Pirie St 4 590 z z 1986 Precast 2&3 Ramped
Central Market, Grote St 2 1090 z z 1982 Precast 3&4
Cnr Rundle St & Poulterny St 7 850 z z 1974 Composite 4 Castellated Beams
Economical Carparks 48
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
between Columns
No of Car Spaces
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
Victoria
Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 z z 2003 Composite str. steel 3 Add-a-top West
Federation Square Russell St Extn, Melbourne 3 z z 2003 Composite str. steel
Little Lonsdale St, Melbourne AddaTop 6 z z 2003 Composite str. steel
Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 z z 2003 Composite str. steel 3 Add-a-Top
Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood 3 z z 2002 Composite str. steel 3 Add-a-top East
Grocon QV Tentants BHP Billiton, Melbourne 5 z 2002 Composite str. steel 3
Klopfer & Dobos Waverley Rd, Glen Waverley 1 15 z 2002 Composite str. steel
Monash University, Clayton Campus North West Section 1 2 z z 2001 Composite str. steel 3
Pran Central Wattle St, Prahran 2 z 2001 Composite str. steel
Hickory Developments Cnr Smithfield & Epsom Rds, Kensington 1 36 z z 2001 Non composite
Salta Properties Cook St, Port Melbourne 2 z 2001 Composite str. steel
209 Kings Way South, Melbourne 6 z z 2001 Composite str. steel
Blakford 370 Queen St, Melbourne 2 z 2001 Composite str. steel
Deakin University, Burwood Hwy, Burwood 2 587 z z 1998 Composite
Blessed Sacrament Fathers - St Francis 312, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 6 530 z z 1992 Non composite Sprinklered
Maroondah Hospital, Mt Dandenong Rd, Ringwood 1 z z 1992 Non composite
Heidelberg City Council, 21 Yarra Bvd, Heidelberg 1 z z 1991 Composite
Watt Street Carpark, Watt St, Box Hill 4 z z 1991 Composite
624 Bourke Street, Melbourne 4 z z 1990 Composite Sprinklered
Austrailian Customs Service, 414 Latrobe St, Melbourne 3 81 z z 1990 Composite Sprinklered
Chandler Hwy, Northcote 1 200 z z 1990 Non composite Sprinklered
Endeavour Hills Shopping Centre, Mathew Flinders Ave, Endeavour Hills 1 z z 1990 Non composite Sprinklered
Flinders Gate, 172 Flinders St, Melbourne 12 1100 z z 1990 Non composite Sprinklered
Frankston City Council, Ross Smith Ave, Frankston 3 z z 1990 Composite Sprinklered
Glenferrie Road, Malvern 2 50 z z 1990 Composite
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
Victoria (Contd.)
Grand Mercure Hotel, 333 Collins St, Melbourne 5 364 z z 1990 Composite Sprinklered
Macedon Square Shopping Centre, Manningham Rd, Templestowe Lower 1 z z 1990 Composite Sprinklered
17 Burgundy St, Heidelburg 1 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
9 Porter St, Dandenong 2 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
Burwood Highway, Knoxfield 1 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia, Lonsdale St, Melbourne 3 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
Jolimont St, East Melbourne 1 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
Mt Eliza Way & Canadian, Mt Eliza 1 z z 1989 Composite Sprinklered
Carlton & United Breweries, Flockhart St, Abbotsford 4 450 z z 1988 Composite
Cnr Kooyong & High Sts, Armadale 1 z z 1987 Composite
Victorian Operative Bricklayers Society, Bary St, Carlton 6 z z 1987 Composite
Chambers St, South Yarra 2 20 z z
Tasmania
Hobart City Council, Argyle St Carpark Extension, Hobart 2 z z 1994 Composite
Launceston City Council, Paterson St West Carpark, Launceston 6 z z
Western Australia
Collie Street, Fremantle 9 split level 448 z z 2003 Composite 2 Clear span, Scheme S3
Call Centre, Bunbury 1 z z z 2003 Composite 3 Scheme S4A
Melville Plaza Carpark 1 231 z z 2002 Precast 3 Structure erected in 9-days
Coles Myer, Kalgoorlie 1 142 z z 1997 Ultrafloor 3
Karrinyup Shopping Centre, Francis St, Karrinyup 1 218 z z 1997 Precast 3
Curtin University - Carpark 2, Dumas St, Bentley 1 290 z z 1996 Precast 3
48 Mount Street, Perth 1 24 z z 1993 Precast 3
St Quentins, 337-339 Stirling Hwy, Claremont 2 175 z z 1991 Composite 2 Scheme S3
Table E5 – Survey of Existing Carparks – Victoria (Contd.), Tasmania and Western Australia
Economical Carparks 50
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
between Columns
No of Car Spaces
No of Car Spaces
No of Suspended
Name / Location Carpark Type
Steel Carpark
Floor System
Construction
Standalone
Comments
Multiuse
Closed
Year of
Levels
Open
New Zealand
St Mathews Carpark, Hobson St, Auckland 4 131 z z 1996 Speedfloor trusses with 90 mm conc 3
Teachers College Carpark, Union St East, Dunedin 2 3000 z z 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75 bmt Decking 2
Newmarket Carpark, Broadway, Auckland 6 507 z z 1996 130mm slab on HiBond 0.75 bmt Decking 4
Arthur Barnetts, George St, Dunedin 4 456 z z 1996 130 mm topping on 0.95mm HiBond 3
Watt St Carpark, Watts St, Auckland 3 99 z z 1995 Speedfloor trusses with 90 mm conc 3
Great King St Carpark, Great King St, Dunedin 4 360 z z 1994 130 topping on HiBond 4
Skycity Carpark, Hob St, Auckland 5 1998 z z 1994 130 -200 mm topping on 0.75mm HiBond 3
Wakefield Street, Wakefield St, Auckland 6 350 z z 1986 HiBond 3
Economical Carparks 51
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
Appendix F F. EXAMPLES OF RAMP
CONFIGURATIONS
Common ramp configurations for both one-way and
two-way traffic flow are presented in this appendix
(a) One way traffic flow - Fast exit (b) One way traffic flow - Scissor ramp
Economical Carparks 52
A Design Guide - 2nd Edition
FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
ONESTEEL DIRECT
39-45 Flagstaff Road Port Kembla NSW 2505
Locked Bag 8825 South Coast Mail Centre NSW 2521
Phone: 1800 1 STEEL (1800 1 78335) Fax: 1800 101 141
E-mail: onesteeldirect@onesteel.com
Website: www.onesteel.com
9
320075
041700
This publication has been prepared by OneSteel Market Mills, (OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Limited ABN 42 004 651 325). Please note that the specifications and technical data are subject to change without notice and to ensure accuracy users of this publication are requested to check the
information to satisfy themselves and not to rely on the information without first doing so. Unless required by law, the company cannot accept any responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting from the use of this publication. Photographs shown are representative only of typical
applications, current at November 2004. Issue 2. This brochure is not an offer to trade and shall not form any part of the trading terms in any transaction.Copyright 2004. OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Limited ABN 42 004 651 325 - Registered Trademarks; 300PLUS® Issue 2 November 2004; BC0166