Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit IV Business Performance Management Systems
Unit IV Business Performance Management Systems
Unit IV Business Performance Management Systems
BPM is more holistic than methodologies like Lean and Six Sigma, which focus
solely on process improvement. BPM’s goal is to manage – not just improve
the process. (However, the two processes can be used in tandem to help
eliminate issues in specific processes).
The six phases of business process management, as identified in Villanova’s
Essentials of BPM course, are Assess, Design, Model, Implement, Monitor and
Modify.
According to the Essentials of BPM course, the goal of the assessment phase is
to sketch the process flow in its current state and enable stakeholders to
review the data. This should also include any errors and potential
consequences to show business impact.
The value chain processes are a strategic asset of the organization, so they
must be documented, measured, improved (when necessary), and managed
like any other asset. By following the methodology outlined, managers have
the added advantage of using enabling technology to help execute these
processes more efficiently and effectively.
A simplified version of the BPM life cycle features the following steps:
modeling, implementation, execution, monitoring, and optimization.
Organization profiling
Identifying primary, management, and support processes
Noting key performance indicators (KPIs)
Preparing for process analysis
Process analysis
In the analysis stage, one needs to observe the process as it is currently
practiced in order to get a complete picture. It has to necessarily precede
modeling if effective changes are to be introduced.
Based on the nature of the processes, the method of analysis chosen may be
qualitative or quantitative. In general, however, the analysis includes
interviewing process performers, analyzing available process documentation,
and arriving at a complete picture of how processes are being executed.
Process design
Observations from process analysis are put to use in the design stage. At this
point, you should have awareness of bottlenecks, lags, and delays in detail.
The choice between the two types depends on the nature of the business
process and resources available to the organization.
However, the goal remains the same–to put into practice the workflow
designed in the previous stage.
Process monitoring
In this stage, previously identified KPIs are monitored to ensure that the
process is aligning with the organization’s overarching goals. Here, one would
typically be tracking, measuring, and controlling on a continuous basis.
Some common KPIs that are monitored include the duration of the process,
cost of the process, capacity or how much the process can produce, and errors
or issues that adversely affect customer satisfaction.
Information gained during process monitoring will help you gauge if the
process needs any changes or tweaks and the redesigned process is meeting
goals and objectives.
Process refinement
In the refinement stage, one makes the effort to close the gap between
current performance and the modeled process with carefully measured
changes.
The BPM life cycle is based on the notion of continuous process improvement.
The cycle is repeated as the organization attempts to enhance performance
and boost growth. Here is a 5-step guide to increase process efficiency.
To get a broad view of business processes in line with the value chain at this
stage we need to examine all available documentation and assimilate how the
processes are aligned to the services provided, customer service, support and
sales management.
It is with this analysis of the present moment that you can understand what
could be improved, targeting the following phases of the BPM lifecycle.
See also Understand and apply the business process analysis methodology
3- Process Design
This is the time to make decisions about everything that was detected in the
previous AS-IS phase.
Now that you are aware of bottlenecks, failures, delays and other
shortcomings from the reporting process (with the greatest possible detail), it
is now time to align with the strategic goals of the company and design a new
process. For this, one can not fail to make simulations based on scenarios and
include the necessary improvements.
Implementation is a phase of the BPM life cycle that can be performed in two
ways. Through a systemic implementation, i.e. with the aid of specific software
and technologies, or non-systemic implementation, without these types of
BPM tools.
Regardless of which is used, the goal is the same: to enable and put into
action process implementation as defined and documented in the form of
a workflow.
5- Process Monitoring
Every company has strategic goals. And it is at this stage of the BPM life cycle
that you can find out if the processes are aligned with these objectives or not,
by monitoring appropriate indicators to assess the results obtained.
6 – Process Refinement
This is why the whole chain of activities is called the BPM life cycle: it always
returns to the beginning!
Now that everything is in place and progressing, analyze the processes again,
ensure they are aligned with the strategic goals and continue refining, always
with the goal of delivering the highest perceived value to the customer, which
generates more profit for the company!
Value for money – is the organisation achieving results in the most cost-
effective manner?.
# How organizations need to define the key performance indicators (KPIs) for
their performance management system
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Definition
So what is the definition of KPI? What does KPI mean? What does KPI stand
for? Here are a couple other definitions:
Now that we know KPI stands for key performance indicator it is only as
valuable as the action it inspires. Too often, organizations blindly adopt
industry-recognized KPIs and then wonder why that KPI doesn't reflect their
own business and fails to affect any positive change.
One of the most important, but often overlooked, aspects of KPIs is that they
are a form of communication. As such, they abide by the same rules and best-
practices as any other form of communication. Succinct, clear and relevant
information is much more likely to be absorbed and acted upon.
In terms of developing a strategy for formulating KPIs, your team should start
with the basics and understand what your organizational objectives are, how
you plan on achieving them, and who can act on this information.
This should be an iterative process that involves feedback from analysts,
department heads and managers. As this fact finding mission unfolds, you will
gain a better understanding of which business processes need to be measured
with a KPI dashboard and with whom that information should be shared.
2. How to define a KPI
As an example, let’s say your objective is to increase sales revenue this year.
You’re going to call this your Sales Growth KPI. Here’s how you might define
the KPI:
The SMART criteria can also be expanded to be SMARTER with the addition
of evaluate and reevaluate. These two steps are extremely important, as they
ensure you continually assess your KPIs and their relevance to your business.
For example, if you've exceeded your revenue target for the current year, you
should determine if that's because you set your goal too low or if that's
attributable to some other factor.
. How to write and develop KPIs
When writing or developing a KPI, you need to consider how that KPI relates to
a specific business outcome or objective. KPIs need to be customized to your
business situation and should be developed to help you achieve your goals.
Follow these steps when writing a KPI:
Write a clear objective for your KPI
Writing a clear objective for your KPI is one of the most important – if not THE
most important – part of developing KPIs.
A KPI needs to be intimately connected with a key business objective. Not just
a business objective, or something that someone in your organization might
happen to think is important. It needs to be integral to the organization’s
success.
Otherwise you are aiming for a target that fails to address a business outcome.
That means that, at best, you’re working towards a goal that has no impact for
your organization. At worst, it will result in your business wasting time, money
and other resources that would have best been directed elsewhere.
The key takeaway is this: KPIs need to be more than just arbitrary numbers.
They need to express something strategic about what your organization is
trying to do. You can (or should be able to) learn a lot about a company’s
business model just by looking at their KPIs.
Without writing out a clear objective, all of this will be lost.
Share your KPI with stakeholders
Your KPI is useless if it doesn’t get communicated properly. How are your
employees – the people tasked with carrying out your vision for the
organization – supposed to follow through on your goals if they don’t know
what they are? Or perhaps worse: Not sharing your KPI risks alienating and
frustrating your employees and other stakeholders who are unable to see the
direction in which your organization is heading.
But sharing your KPIs with your stakeholders is one thing (though even this is
something that too many organizations fail to do). More than that, though,
they need to be communicated in the right away.
KPIs need context to be effective. This can only be accomplished if you explain
not just what you’re measuring, but why you’re measuring it. Otherwise they
are just numbers on a screen that have no meaning to you or your employees.
Explain to your employees why you’re measuring what you’re measuring.
Answer questions about why you’ve decided on one KPI over another. And
most important of all? Listen. KPIs aren’t infallible. Nor will they necessarily be
obvious to all involved. Listening to your employees will help you identify
where your organization’s underlying goals aren’t being communicated
properly
Say you’re getting lots of questions about why profit isn’t a KPI for your
company. It’s a reasonable belief for your employees to have. Making money
is, after all, an essential part of what any business does. But maybe revenue
isn’t the be all and end all for your organization at a given time. Maybe you’re
looking to make major investments into research and development or are on a
major acquisition spree. Getting lots of questions like this is a sign you need to
do a better job of communicating your KPIs and the strategic goals behind
them.
And who knows: Your employees might even give you some ideas on how to
improve your KPIs.
Review the KPI on a weekly or monthly basis
Checking in on your KPIs regularly is essential to their maintenance and
development. Obviously tracking your progress against the KPI is important
(what else would be the point of setting it in the first place?) But equally
essential is tracking your progress so you can assess how successful you were
in developing the KPI in the first place.
Not all KPIs are successful. Some have objectives that are unachievable (more
on that below). Some fail to track the underlying business goal they were
supposed to achieve. Only by checking in regularly can you decide if it’s time to
change your KPIs.
Make sure the KPI is actionable
Making your KPIs actionable is a five-step process:
1. Financial Perspective
2. Customer Perspective
3. Internal Business Process Perspective
4. Learning and Growth Perspective
These four key areas of your business are intertwined and all must be aligned.
When one is impacted, there is impact on another, in other words, there will
be a trade off.
Step 3: Putting your BSC strategy framework into action with OKRs
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) strategy suggests that for each perspective you
develop objectives, measures (KPIs), set targets (goals), and initiatives
(actions). A more recent framework that is getting popularized is the OKR
Framework. Popularized by its use at Google, the OKR (objectives and key
results) framework is used to define and track objectives and their outcomes.
Many would argue that this framework sits in between a KPI strategy and the
Balanced Scorecard approach.
OKRs are used as a performance tool that sets, communicates, and monitors
goals in an organization so that all employees are focused in the same
direction. The system encourages employee success through clear work
objectives and desired key results. The beauty of the system is that it provides
a simple, practical, and straightforward framework for defining, tracking, and
measuring goals, both as something to aspire to and as something that can be
measured.
Step 4: Monitoring with a KPI Dashboard
A KPI dashboard provides you with an at-a-glance view of your business
performance in real-time so you can get a better picture on how the entire
organization is doing.
Common terms found in these frameworks that are worth understanding
include:
Key risk indicator (KRI): a measure used in management to indicate how risky
an activity is. Key risk indicators are metrics monitored by organizations to
provide an early warning of increasing risk exposures in various areas of the
business.
Critical success factor (CSF): is a management term for an element that is
necessary for an organization to achieve its mission. Critical success factors
should not be confused with success criteria. Success criteria is most
commonly used in project management to determine if the project was a
success or not. Success criteria are defined with the objectives and can be
quantified by using KPIs.
Performance metrics: measure an organization's behavior, activities, and
performance at the individual level and not organizational level. For example,
an individual who works in a call centre may have performance metrics such as
Number of Calls Answered, Average Wait Time, Number of Successful Calls
Processed, and Average Length of Call.
Creating good KPIs for your organization is an iterative process.
Here are the three main ways that adopting some KPIs can help your
organization build a better team.
They get everyone pulling in the same direction
Scorecard
This is a framework that is used to align an organization’s strategies with its
objectives by monitoring major metrics based on customer information,
desired growth, financial information, and business processes. It is important
in the integration of points of control, revising strategies as well as sharpening
processes.
Six Sigma, in its most simple form, is a methodology that allows you to test
your process management, innovation, and improvement, using both empirical
and statistical methods. It emerged out of the quality movement, and takes a
deep look at processes and products and how you can improve them. Six
Sigma helps organize a hierarchy of ‘process experts’ for every level of the
production cycle. If a company uses the Six Sigma methodology, they adhere to
a series of steps that will help them reach one specific goal, like “decrease
amount of material used” or “lower production cost”.
Six Sigma helps organizations:
Or, maybe you’re a delivery company, so you want to focus on the quickest
way to move packages from your facility to their final destination. In that case,
you’d focus on mapping out routes so the drivers would stop at fewer lights,
make fewer left-hand turns, etc.
Analyze their operational strategy, which allows them to identify and focus on
the true drivers of long-term success.
Turn strategy into action by taking four unique perspectives into account,
instead of only paying attention to the financial perspective.
Align their measures with their mission in order to avoid strategic missteps
that can easily happen when short term measures crowd out long term goals.
BSC is a framework which allows the use of other frameworks within it. It helps
you describe your strategy and assess what you’re doing in an organization and
makes sure all of the elements that make up your organization are working
together efficiently and effectively. When scorecarding is correctly
implemented, organizations will often see better departmental and
organizational alignment with their goals and mission.
Despite their differences, these two unique frameworks are not incompatible.
There are organizations that use both—Six Sigma to improve key internal
processes, and the Balanced Scorecard to manage the strategy. Of course,
some practitioners argue that Six Sigma is an be-all, end-all solution, while
others have the same argument for the BSC.
As with anything, HOW you use the tools is almost as important as WHAT tools
you use. Let’s say you let the team tasked with implementing Six Sigma run
around your organization and improve every process they can identify. Not
only is that going to cost you a great deal, but it’s also irrational, because the
team could be improving a process that isn’t strategic. Or that you created a
Balanced Scorecard then never got around to improving broken processes.
Most likely nothing ever got done.
That being said, it is my opinion (and the opinion of many others) that you can
use both of these frameworks together to create an “ultimate” management
solution. For example, Six Sigma deals almost exclusively with internal
processes, which happens to be one of the four perspectives that the Balanced
Scorecard examines. Therefore, the BSC could be used to identify which
processes are important, and Six Sigma could be used to improve those broken
processes.