Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

WORKING MEMORY MODEL

 Badeley and Hitch’s working memory model replaced the idea that the short term memory is a unitary memory store
 Believes the short term memory store is more active and complex

AO1:
The central executive (CE): The phonological loop (PL):
 The most important component – the master component  Codes information acoustically and has two parts

 Involves higher mental processes such as decision making Primary acoustic store (PAS)
 Also known as the ‘inner ear’
 Pays attention to incoming information and directs the information to  Stores acoustically coded information for a limited duration (1-2 seconds)
other ‘slave’ systems for further processing
Articulatory process (AP)
 Works modality free  Also known as the ‘inner voice’
 Deals with speech production and acts as a verbal rehearsal loop when
 There is a limited capacity and can process information from the senses preparing to speak
 Allows sub vocal rehearsal of things stored in the phonological store
 Limited capacity of 2 seconds
The visuo spatial sketchpad (VSSP): The episodic buffer:
 Known as the ‘inner eye’  Baddeley added the episodic buffer after observing that some amnesiac
 There is a limited capacity of 3-4 objects patients who could not form long term memories could recall
complicated stories
Visual cache
 Passively stores visual information  The store integrates and holds information, both visual and acoustic
information from other components
Inner scribe
 Processes spatial and movement information  Has a limited capacity of four chunks of information

AO2/AO3:
 Research support from  Supporting research ー The central executive is ー Refuting evidence from ー Doesn’t account for all
dual tasks from brain studies oversimplified the case of EVR types of memory
P There is research to P There is research to P A weakness of the notion P There is research to P Research has criticised
support the idea that the support the roles and of the central executive criticise the unitary view the working memory
STM consists of individual existence of the (CE) is that it is of the CE as suggested by model for failing to
separate stores each with phonological loop and the oversimplified and not the WMM account for musical
their own limited capacity visual-spatial sketch pad very well understood E For example, the case memory
E For example, Baddeley (VSSP) E There is not enough study of EVR where EVR E Berz found participants
and Hitch found that E Cohen et al. found brain detail about how the had a tumour removed. were able to listen to
participants could do two activity was higher in the central executive actually EVR performed well on instrumental music
different tasks that used Broca’s area (responsible controls the entire WWM tests requiring reasoning, without impairing
two different stores (i.e. for speech production) or how it works modality which suggested his CE performance on other
visual and verbal). They when participants were free was intact. However, he acoustic tasks. However,
found that when completing a verbal task. E The central executive is had poor decision making according to WMM,
participants were asked Additionally, regions of the master component in skills listening to instrumental
to complete a verbal task the occipital lobe the working memory E The central executive is music should occupy the
in the articulatory loop (responsible for visual model. Yet, there isn’t involved in higher mental PAS’s limited capacity,
and a separate task in the processing) were sufficient detail to explain processes, i.e. reasoning making it difficult to carry
central executive, recall activated when how the central executive and decision-making. out other acoustic tasks
was not affected. participants completed a actually carries out these Thus, if the CE were a E The participants were
However, when the same visual task processes. This could be single unitary store we able to carry out the
participants were asked E This research provides because the central would assume that higher instrumental task along
to complete two similar some physical evidence executive isn’t very well mental processes are with the acoustic task
tasks (i.e. both in the for the existence of the understood completely normal or because there may be a
articulatory loop) then phonological loop and L Therefore, the central completely damaged. ‘musical memory’
recall on the first task was VSSP. Additionally, it executive has been But, the fact that some component that dealt
affected supports the role of the oversimplified and not processes of the CE can with the instrumental
E This demonstrates that phonological loops in very well explained. Thus, remain intact while some task. However, the WMM
the short term memory auditory and speech reducing the validity of areas show clear damage. didn’t account for all
consists of multiple based tasks as well as the the WMM This suggests there are types of memory i.e.
separate stores and that VSSP’s role in visual tasks several components to musical
each has a limited L Therefore, this suggests the CE and in EVR’s case L Therefore, the WMM is
capacity that the assumptions only one was damaged an incomplete model of
L Therefore, supporting the made by the WMM were L Therefore, the WMM’s memory, which reduces
WMM’s view that STM correct, increasing the unitary view of the CE the validity of the model
consists of multiple stores validity of the WMM appears incorrect, which
with limited capacities reduces the validity of the
WMM

NOTE: Only select the relevant AO1s (e.g. 2/3 points) and four evaluation points (AO2/AO3)

You might also like