Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moment Influence Line (Part 2)
Moment Influence Line (Part 2)
Moment Influence Line (Part 2)
1.0 OBJECTIVE
1.1 To plot moment influence line.
1.2 To apply the use of a moment influence on a simply supported beam.
3.0 INTRODUCTION
Moving loads on beam are common features of design. Many road bridges are
constructed from beam, and such have to be designed to carry a knife edge load,
or a string of wheel loads, or a uniformity distributed load, or perhaps the worst
combination of all three. To find the critical moment at a section, influence line is
used.
4.0 THEORY
Definition: Influence line is defined as a line representing the changes in either
moment, shear force, reaction or displacement at a section of a beam when a unit
load moves on the beam.
An influence line for a given function, such as a reaction, axial force, shear force, or
bending moment, is a graph that shows the variation of that function at any given
point on a structure due to the application of a unit load at any point on the structure.
An influence line for a function differs from a shear, axial, or bending moment
diagram. Influence lines can be generated by independently applying a unit load at
several points on a structure and determining the value of the function due to this
load, for example shear, axial, and moment at the desired location. The calculated
values for each function are then plotted where the load was applied and then
connected together to generate the influence line for the function.
For example, the influence line for the support reaction at A of the structure shown in
Figure 1, is found by applying a unit load at several points (See Figure 2) on the
structure and determining what the resulting reaction will be at A. This can be done
by solving the support reaction YA as a function of the position of a downward acting
unit load. One such equation can be found by summing moments at Support B.
Once an understanding is gained on how these equations and the influence lines they
produce are developed, some general properties of influence lines for statically
determinate structures can be stated.
Part 1: This experiment examines how moment varies at a cut section as a unit
load moves from one end another (see diagram 1). From the diagram, moment
influence equation can be written.
‘cut’
x
1 (unit load) Mx
Mx
a b
L
RA = (1-x/L) RB = x/L
Figure 1
Part 2: If the beam is loaded as shown below, the moment at the ‘cut’ can be
calculated using the influence line. (See Figure 2).
a+b=L
F1 F2 F3
x3
x2
x1
Moment influence
line for cut
section
y1 y2 y3
Figure 2
5.0 APPARATUS
5.1 Bending moment Machine
6.0 PROCEDURES
6.1 Part 1
6.1.1 The Digital Force Display meter is checked that it reads zero with
no loading that the structure is subjected to.
6.1.2 A hanger with a 200g mass is placed on the left of the cut.
6.1.3 The Digital Force Display reading is recorded in Table 1.
6.1.4 Repeat steps to the next grooved hanger until to the last grooved
hanger at the right hand support.
6.1.5 Calculation in Table 1 is completed.
6.2 Part 2
6.2.1 The Digital Force Display meter is checked that it reads zero with
no loading that the structure is subjected to.
6.2.2 Three loads were placed with 100g, 200g and 300g and place them
at positions between the supports. The positions and the Digital
Force Display were recorded and the force reading is converted
into bending moment (Nm) using:
Bending moment at a cut (Nm) = Displayed Force x 0.125
6.2.3 The theoretical bending moment at the cut and also the support
reaction, RA and RB are calculated and entered into Table 2.
7.0 RESULT
PART 1
a. MX = (0.32)(0.14) – (0.32-0.30)
0.44
= 0.082 Nm
b. MX = (0.34)(0.14) – (0.34-0.30)
0.44
= 0.068 Nm
c. MX = (0.36)(0.14) – (0.36-0.30)
0.44
= 0.055 Nm
d. MX = (0.40)(0.14) – (0.40-0.30)
0.44
= 0.027 Nm
Part 2
Digital
Experimen Theoretical
Position of hanger from Force
t Moment
Location left hand support (m) Reading
Moment (Nm)
(N)
100g 200g 300g
1 0.06 0.28 0.36 1.6 0.2000 0.2150
2 0.40 0.28 0.10 2.5 0.3130 0.3131
3 0.28 0.80 0.36 1.9 0.2380 0.2319
4 0.12 0.24 0.38 2.2 0.2750 0.2615
Load = 100g
= 0.981N
Load = 200g
= 1.962N
Load = 300g
= 2.943N
Theoretical Moment
Location 1
x3
x2 ‘Cut’
x1
0.3m 0.14m
0.0955
y3
y2
y1
Mc = 0.0955m
x1 = 0.08m
x2 = 0.16m
x3 = 0.38m
Influence lines x
0.0955 = _y1_
0.3 0.08
y1 = 0.0255m
0.0955 = _y2_
0.3 0.16
y2 = 0.0509m
0.0955 = y3 __
0.14 (0.44-0.38)
y3 = 0.0409m
Location 2
x2 ‘Cut’
x1
0.3m 0.14m
0.0955
y3
y2
y1
Mc = 0.0955m
x1 = 0.04m
x2 = 0.16m
x3 = 0.34m
Influence lines x
0.0955 = _y1_
0.3 0.04
y1 = 0.0127m
0.0955 = _y2_
0.3 0.16
y2 = 0.0509m
0.0955 = y3 __
0.14 (0.44-0.34)
y3 = 0.0682m
Location 3
x1
0.3m 0.14m
0.0955
y3
y2
y1
Mc = 0.0955m
x1 = 0.08m
x2 = 0.16m
x3 = 0.36m
Influence line x
0.0955 = _y1_
0.3 0.08
y1 = 0.0255m
0.0955 = _y2_
0.3 0.16
y2 = 0.0509m
0.0955 = y3 __
0.14 (0.44-0.36)
y3 = 0.0546m
Location 4
x1
0.3m 0.14m
0.0955
y3
y2
y1
Mc = 0.0955m
x1 = 0.06m
x2 = 0.20m
x3 = 0.32m
Influence line x
0.0955 = _y1_
0.3 0.06
y1 = 0.0191m
0.0955 = _y2_
0.3 0.20
y2 = 0.0637m
0.0955 = y3 __
0.14 (0.44-0.32)
y3 = 0.0819m
8.0 DISCUSSIONS
Part 2
1. Calculate the percentage difference between experimental and theoretical
results in Table 2. Comment on why results differ.
Percentage difference :
Location 1
0.2150-0.200 x 100%
0.2000
= 7.50%
Location 2
0.3131-0.3130 x 100%
0.3130
= 0.03%
Location 3
0.2380-0.2319 x 100%
0.2380
= 2.56%
Location 4
0.2750-0.2615 x 100%
0.2750
= 4.90%
Comment :
Like every other experiment, there is no doubt that the experiment can
always improved in all aspects according to the passing of time. In this
experiment, it can be seen from the results that there is differences between the
experimental and theoretical results. It should be noticed that in the experiment, a
procedure states that the Force Display has to be checked to be zero, and if not, it
is calibrated until it is zero. In this procedure, this promotes the possibility that
there exist loadings even before the experimental loadings are subjected to the
beam. This loading may not be from any weights but could be external factors
such as environment.
It is possible that this had effect during the calibration to zero of the Meter
and this has caused error during the readings of values from the Force Display.
Not only that, the weights may have variation in their weights and therefore a
number of them might have more or less than the required weight and this either
reduces or increases the loading than she value that was assumed it to be.