7s92 06011 1300 CSR 001 r0 Fire Gas Detector Mapping Report

GS.10.
50696
CONFIDENTIAL - ECCN EAR 99
Fire & Gas Detection Mapping for PTTLNG

Jetty Development and LNG Receiving
Terminal Project
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Fire & Gas Detection Mapping for PTTLNG Jetty
Development and LNG Receiving Terminal Project
by
Prosad Roy
Anand Iyer
CONFIDENTIAL - ECCN EAR 99
This document is made available subject to the condition that the recipient will neither use nor disclose the contents except as agreed in
writing with the copyright owner. Copyright is vested in Shell Global Solutions International B.V., The Hague.
© Shell Global Solutions International B.V., 2010. All rights reserved.
Neither the whole nor any part of this document may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical,
reprographic, recording or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the copyright owner.
Shell Global Solutions is a trading style used by a network of technology companies of the Shell Group.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

GS.10.50696 1 CONFIDENTIAL - ECCN EAR 99
Document History
Date Issue Reason for Change Author Approved by
29/04/2010 Rev 0 Draft for Comment Prosad Roy Robert Nicol
11/05/2010 Rev 1 Revised after Client Prosad Roy Robert Nicol

comments
02/06/2010 Rev 2 Final Prosad Roy Robert Nicol
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Summary
Fire & Gas Detector Mapping (FGDM) has been carried out for PTTLNG Jetty Development
and LNG Receiving Terminal Project. The review was carried out by Shell Global Solutions.
The recommended detector layouts include 3-D detector location coordinates and detection
coverage maps for each of the modelled areas.
Table 1 below summarises the detector numbers, both as-built and improved for each zone.
Flammable Gas Detector Count Optical Flame Detector Count

Area
As-built Optimised As-built Optimised
Berth #1 2 (2 LOS) 4 (2 LOS) 4 8
Berth #1
Impoundment 3 3 3 2
Pit
Truck
12 15 8 8
Loading Area
Tanks 12 12 12 12
LNG Drain
5 2 1 2
Pump
HP LNG
2 2 12 5
Pumps
LNG
Impoundment 9 (3 LOS) 3 (3 LOS) 3 2
Pit
Metering
9 6 (3 LOS) 4 3
Station
Fuel Gas
6 3 3 2
Heater
Diesel Fuel
- - 3 2
Tank
BOG
6 8 (3 LOS) 4 4
Compressor
ORV 4 (4 LOS) 4 (4 LOS) 15 15
BOG
3 2 3 4
Recondenser
Emergency
Power - - 3 4
Generation
Yard
- - 6 6
Transformer
Table 1 – Fire & Gas Detector Summary
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Table of Contents
Document History 1
Summary 3
Glossary of Terms 7
1. Introduction & Background 8
2. Summary & Recommendations 9
2.1 Summary 9
2.2 Recommendations 9
3. Purpose, Role, Objective & Scope 10
3.1 Overall Purpose 10
3.1 Role 10
3.2 Objective 10
3.2.1 Limitations of this Study 11
4. Target Detection Performance (TDP) for FGDM 12
4.1.1 Target Detection Coverage 12
4.1.2 Target Detection Objectives 12
4.1.2.1 Flammable Gas Detection Objective (FGDO) 12
4.1.2.2 FDO – Fire Detection Objective 12
5. Fixed Detection Voting & Technologies 13
5.1 Detector Voting Logic 13
5.2 Detector Types 13
6. F&G Hazards Identification 14
6.1 Flame Detection Mapping 14
6.2 Flammable Gas Detection Mapping 15
7. F&G Mapping Results 18
7.1 Flame Detection Mapping 18
7.1.1 Berth #1 18
7.1.1.1 Existing 18
7.1.1.2 Optimised 19
7.1.2 Berth#1 Impoundment Pit 20
7.1.2.1 Existing 20
7.1.3 Truck Loading Area 23
7.1.3.1 Existing 23
7.1.4 Tanks 24
7.1.4.1 T1A Existing 24
7.1.4.2 T1B Existing 25
7.1.4.3 T1A Optimised 27
7.1.4.4 T1B Optimised 28
7.1.4.7 T2A Optimised 31
7.1.4.8 T2B Optimised 31
7.1.5 LNG Drain Pump 32
7.1.5.1 Existing 32
7.1.6 HP LNG Pumps 34
7.1.6.1 Existing 34
7.1.7 LNG Impoundment Pit 36
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.7.1 Existing 36
7.1.8 Metering Station 38
7.1.8.1 Existing 38
7.1.9 Fuel Gas Heater 41
7.1.9.1 Existing 41
7.1.10 Diesel Fuel Tank 42
7.1.10.1 Existing 42
7.1.11 BOG Compressor 44
7.1.12 Open Rack Vaporizer 46
7.1.13 BOG Recondenser 47
7.1.14 Emergency Power Generation Unit 50
7.1.15 Yard Transformer Area 52
7.2 Flammable Gas Detection Mapping 53
7.2.1 Berth #1 Impoundment Pit 53
7.2.1.1 Existing 53
7.2.2 Berth #1 54
7.2.2.1 Existing 54
7.2.2.2 Optimized 55
7.2.3 Truck Loading Area 56
7.2.3.1 Existing 56
7.2.4 Tanks 59
7.2.5 LNG Drain Pumps 59
7.2.5.1 Existing 59
7.2.6 HP LNG Pumps 61
7.2.6.1 Existing 61
7.2.6.2 Optimized 62
7.2.7 Open Rack Vaporizer 62
7.2.7.1 Existing 62
7.2.8 LNG Impoundment Pit 62
7.2.8.1 Existing 62
7.2.9 Metering Station 65
7.2.9.1 Existing 65
7.2.10 Fuel Gas Heater 67
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.2.11 BOG Compressor 70

7.2.12 BOG Recondenser 72
8. Practical Considerations 74
Appendix A. Interpretation of Coverage Map Results 75
A.1 Coverage Map 75
A.2 Detector Contributions Table 75
A.3 Detector Locations Table 76
Appendix B. Main Substation Transformer 77
B.1 Transformer Bay #3 77
B.1.1 Existing 77
B.1.2 Optimised 78
B.2 Transformer Bay #4 79
B.2.1 Existing 79
B.2.2 Optimised 80
Bibliographic Information 82
Report distribution 83
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Glossary of Terms
The following terms and abbreviations are used throughout this report, and for the purposes
of this report, are defined as follows:
BOG Boil Off Gas
Detection The quantifiable criteria or set of goals against which success can be
objectives measured for detection. In terms of fire and gas detection this includes the
size of fire and the shape and size of gas clouds to be detected.
DEP Design Engineering Practice – Shell design document
FGD Fire and Gas Detection
FGDM Fire & Gas Detection Mapping - Analysis technique for determining the
volume coverage using 3D models, geometric-based ray-tracing and
dispersion modelling techniques.
Flame The detection of flaming fires using optical methods – e.g. Infrared (IR),
Detection Ultraviolet (UV) or UV/IR (detectors that employ a combination of IR and UV
technologies).
GDM Gas Detector Mapping
LOS Line of Sight (open-path) optical beam gas detectors
LEL (or LFL) Lower Explosive Limit (or Lower Flammable Limit) - the lowest
concentration of a substance that will produce a fire or flash when an
ignition source (flame, spark, etc.) is present. It is expressed in percent of
vapour or gas in the air by volume.
ORV Open Rack Vaporizer
Triple IR or A type of flame detector that employs simultaneous detection at three

IR3 separate infrared bands, with advanced signal processing to achieve high
levels of immunity to spurious signals, and enhanced detection reliability.
Voting Logic applied to recognising an alarm event and triggering executive action
Strategy using the combined signals from an array of detectors
1ooN Voting strategy where one out of an array of N detectors is used to signal
an event.
2ooN Voting strategy where two out of an array of N detectors are used to signal
an event.
LOTAM List of Technically Approved Materials
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1. Introduction & Background
PTTLNG Jetty Development and LNG Receiving Terminal as part of the on-going
development have requested Shell Global Solutions, Process Automation Control &
Optimization (PACO) to review the performance of the existing fire and gas detection
systems installed.
This report covers the fire and gas detection mapping study for these facilities.
The aim of the study was to assess the adequacy of the existing fire and gas detection
against agreed detection performance requirements, and provide recommendations for
improvement where shortfalls are found.
The activities to achieve these aims included:

• Perform fire and gas detection mapping optimisation for agreed fire and gas
zones on all installations
• If detection targets for a given zone are not met, layout modifications or
additional detection have been suggested. These “optimised” layouts have
been mapped and the coverage presented together with modified detector
locations and individual contributions.
• Generation of draft reports for each installation detailing coverage and
detector locations for each of the agreed zones
• Generation of final reports for each installation based on the feedback from
Company
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

2. Summary & Recommendations

2.1 Summary
• FGDM has been carried out for the identified detection areas with resulting detector
layouts that are matched appropriately to the facility hazards.
• Detection layouts are recommended that achieve the agreed target detection
performance for FGDM.
• Suitable detector types are recommended, based on evaluation, and testing.
2.2 Recommendations
The following recommendations are made:

• The optimised detector layouts are implemented.
• Any significant changes to the recommended locations should be re-checked against
the agreed target detection performance.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

3. Purpose, Role, Objective & Scope

This section clarifies the purpose and role of the Fire and Gas System (FGS) and underpins
the objectives of these systems for the PTTLNG Jetty Development and LNG Receiving
Terminal Project.
3.1 Overall Purpose
The key purpose or objective of the FGS is to help mitigate hazardous events such as fire or
loss of containment by performing three basic functions:
• Detection of the Hazard

• Alerting People
• Initiating Action
In addition to the three basic functions, further design objectives of the detection system
include:
• Provision of a robust detection system, to maximise detection uptime while

reducing risk from spurious events
• A capability for recording historical events to enable incident investigation.
3.1 Role
The role of FGD, as a subset of the FGS, is to provide prompt, reliable detection of
hazardous gas release and fire events. A key function is to provide reliable detection before
significant escalation takes place.
3.2 Objective
The main objective (or outcome) of the FGDM review is to verify, and where necessary,
optimise the design of an effective and efficient detector layout for the detection of hazardous
gas releases and fires, this includes:
• Matching to the specific hazards
• High equipment and system reliability
• Accessibility of detectors
• Maximum availability
• High immunity to spurious alarms
• Low maintenance
• Low cost of ownership.
These objectives are met by
• Analysing process and inventory data to help delineate detection zones

• Selection of suitable robust, proven, detection technology
• Selection of easily accessible detector locations for maintenance purposes
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

3.2.1 Limitations of this Study

The following limitations apply to this study:
1. The approach for assessing the level of detection coverage afforded is based on the
presence of a “significant” hazard. For the purposes of this study:
(a) A “Significant Flammable Hazard” is defined as the presence of a quantity of

flammable gas at specified concentration (by volume), represented as an
equivalent sphere, which if ignited may result in structural damage to the plant.
(b) A “Significant Flame Hazard” is defined in terms of dimensions of flame that

must be detected sufficiently early to take mitigating action and avoid escalation.
2. Long-range dispersion and detection of hazardous gas is not considered in this study.
3. It is not the intention of this study to design or assess the gas detector layout for the
detection of small, fugitive level gaseous emissions, or for the purposes of long-term
occupational exposure monitoring.
4. The quantification of detection coverage assessed in this study relies on the accuracy
of the 3D CAD model used, and applies only to the layouts in their positions as
reported, against the stated target detection objectives. Significant changes in the
model and actual detector locations from those modelled may invalidate the reported
quantification of coverage.
5. Modelling smoke and heat detection inside buildings, utilities, control and switch
rooms are outside of the scope of this study and report. It is assumed that the
appropriate detector types, numbers and locations follow applicable local, national &
international regulations, and that appropriate actions are documented according to
the appropriate fire protection specification.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

4. Target Detection Performance (TDP) for FGDM

Target Detection Performance defines the performance goals set for FGDM. It describes the
performance that shall be achieved in terms of:
• Target Detection Coverage (TDC) - the level of coverage that shall be achieved for
the hazard area(s) and/or volume(s) of concern against the Target Detection
Objectives.
• Target Detection Objectives (TDOs) - the type and dimensions of the hazards to be
measured. These hazards include the flammable gas, toxic gas and flame hazards.
4.1.1 Target Detection Coverage

The agreed TDC for all areas was set at a minimum of 85% coverage for 2ooN operation for
both Fire and Gas detection, which is in keeping with Shell Design and Engineering
Practices.
4.1.2 Target Detection Objectives
4.1.2.1 Flammable Gas Detection Objective (FGDO)

The agreed FGDO for flammable gas accumulations was 180 m3 of flammable gas at LFL for
congested areas, represented as a sphere of LFL concentration of flammable gas having a
diameter of 7m. This is as per Shell Design and Engineering Practices. The alarm level has
been mapped at 60% LFL which is 3 LFL-m for LOS gas detectors.
4.1.2.2 FDO – Fire Detection Objective

The agreed FDO for fire detection was set for a 100kW heptane pool fire, characterised as
having an apparent flame height of 3 m and a base of 1m. Detection is typically set at 10% of
this for 3D CAD models as the detector Field Of View (FOV) specification for a 10KW fire.
This is as per Shell Design and Engineering Practices
The Flame Detection Mapping study has been carried out using Detronics X3301, which has
the smallest Field of Vision.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

5. Fixed Detection Voting & Technologies

5.1 Detector Voting Logic
Where executive action on alarm is implemented, then the 2ooN layout, with 2ooN voting
logic recommended. 2 detectors in alarm simultaneously are regarded as confirmed fire or
gas, and provide a layer of protection from action on spurious event from an individual
detector.
It is recommended that for 2ooN voted systems the logic is configured such that a detector in
fault or disabled reverts the system voting performance to a 1oo (N-1) logic.
When N=2, a detector not in operation (due to fault, maintenance, etc.) must result in that
detector being seen as a detecting vote. However, this will happen only in the case of a
revealed failure. Hence, it is recommended that in such zones, the customer adds a third
detector.
5.2 Detector Types
The following types of detectors will be installed,

1. UV IR Flame Detector
2. Point (Spot) Flammable Gas Detector
3. Open Path (Line of Sight) Flammable Gas Detector
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

6. F&G Hazards Identification

6.1 Flame Detection Mapping
The following process areas have been identified for Flame Detection Mapping
• Berth #1
• Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
• Truck Loading Area
• Tanks (T1A, T1B, T2A & T2B)
• LNG Drain Pump
• Open Rack Vaporizer
• LNG Impoundment Pit
• Metering Station
• Fuel Gas Heater
• Diesel Fuel Tank
• BOG Compressor
• HP LNG Pumps
• BOG Recondenser
• Emergency Power Generation Unit
• Main Transformer Area
Figure 1, Figure 2 & Figure 3 show the various zones identified for Flame Detection
Mapping
Figure 1 – Flame Detection Mapping zones in Process Area
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 2 – Flame Detection Mapping Zones in Tank Area
Figure 3 – Flame Mapping Zone in Berth #1
6.2 Flammable Gas Detection Mapping
The following process areas have been identified for Flammable Gas Detection Mapping
• Berth #1 Impoundment Pit

• Truck Loading Area
• Tanks (T1A, T1B, T2A & T2B)
• LNG Drain Pump
• Open Rack Vaporizer
• LNG Impoundment Pit
• Metering Station
• Fuel Gas Heater
• BOG Compressor
• BOG Recondenser
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 4, Figure 5 & Figure 6 shows the various zones identified for Flammable Gas
Detection Mapping
Figure 4 – Flammable Gas Mapping zones in Process Area
Figure 5 – Flammable Gas Mapping zones in Tank Area
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 6 – Flammable Gas Mapping zone in Berth #1
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7. F&G Mapping Results

F&G Detection Mapping has been carried out using a 3D Model supplied by the customer.
7.1 Flame Detection Mapping
7.1.1 Berth #1
7.1.1.1 Existing
Figure 7 shows the existing flame detection coverage map. Table 2 & Table 3 show detector
contributions (obtained after excluding the projection area within obstructions) and detector
locations respectively.
1ooN 82.9% 2ooN 50.6% >2ooN 10.5%

Figure 7 – Berth #1 Flame Detection Map
Detector Contributions in Modelled Fire Zone (Percentage)

Detector ID Individual 1ooN 2ooN >2ooN
All Detectors N/A 82.9% 50.6% 10.5%
FD-Berth1-01 28.7 5.1 16.7 6.8
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

FD-Berth1-02 23.6 7.4 11.8 4.4

FD-Berth1-03 46.3 9.7 26.1 10.5
FD-Berth1-04 45.5 10.0 25.7 9.9
Table 2 – Flame Detector Contributions for Berth #1
Detector Positions in Modelled Fire Zone

Detector ID East North Elevation Yaw Pitch
FD-Berth1- 9520.5 10325 110.6 10 15
01
FD-Berth1- 9511.5 10336 110.6 95 30
02
FD-Berth1- 9528.5 10353 110.6 180 15
03
FD-Berth1- 9537.5 10343 110.6 255 15
04
Table 3 – Flame Detector Locations for Berth #1
7.1.1.2 Optimised
Figure 8 shows the optimised flame detection coverage map. Table 4 & Table 5 show
detector contributions (obtained after excluding the projection area within obstructions) and
detector locations respectively.
1ooN 100% 2ooN 85.8% >2ooN 46.1%

Figure 8 – Berth #1 Flame Detection Map
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100% 85.8% 46.1%
FD-Berth1-01 15.2 1.5 3.4 2.8
FD-Berth1-02 21.1 0.5 9.2 6.3
FD-Berth1-03 48.1 3.0 15.5 17.5
FD-Berth1-04 65.6 13.6 15.0 19.9
FD-Berth1-05 56.4 1.9 20.9 18.0
FD-Berth1-06 23.9 0.8 3.3 7.5
FD-Berth1-07 13.1 1.1 5.1 4.6
FD-Berth1-08 20.2 1.6 7.0 6.9
Table 4 – Flame Detector Contributions for Berth #1

FD-Berth1- 9528.5 10329.5 110.6 325 30
01
FD-Berth1- 9512 10335.45 110.6 95 30
02
FD-Berth1- 9529.5 10353 110.6 180 15
03
FD-Berth1- 9537.5 10343 110.6 250 15
04
FD-Berth1- 9541 10341 110.6 275 15
05
FD-Berth1- 9533 10332.5 110.6 290 15
06
FD-Berth1- 9517 10333 110.6 75 30
07
FD-Berth1- 9513 10333 110.6 90 15
08
Table 5 – Flame Detector Locations for Berth #1
7.1.2 Berth#1 Impoundment Pit
7.1.2.1 Existing
Figure 9 shows the existing flame detection coverage map. Table 6 & Table 7 show detector
contributions (obtained after excluding the projection area within obstructions) and detector
locations respectively.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.8% 2ooN 94.7% >2ooN 89.1%

Figure 9 – Berth #1 Impoundment Pit Flame Detection Map

FD-Berth1Pit- 95.9 3.4 3.4 89.1
01
FD-Berth1Pit- 93.1 0.0 4.0 89.1
02
FD-Berth1Pit- 94.7 1.8 3.8 89.1
03
Table 6 – Flame Detector Contributions for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit

FD- 9533.5 10330 107 0 45
Berth1Pit-01
FD- 9538 10334.5 107 255 45
Berth1Pit-02
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

FD- 9535 10337.5 107 180 45

Berth1Pit-03
Table 7– Flame Detector Locations for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
7.1.2.2 Optimised
detector contributions (obtained after excluding the projection area within obstructions) and
detector locations respectively.
1ooN 100.0% 2ooN 90.8% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 10 – Berth #1 Impoundment Pit Flame Detection Map

FD-Berth1Pit- 95.9 5.0 90.8 0.0
01
FD-Berth1Pit- 93.1 2.2 90.8 0.0
02
Table 8 – Flame Detector Contributions for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


FD- 9533.5 10330 107 0 45
Berth1Pit-01
FD- 9538 10334.5 107 255 45
Berth1Pit-02
Table 9 – Flame Detector Locations for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
7.1.3 Truck Loading Area
7.1.3.1 Existing
Figure 11 shows the existing flame detection coverage map. Table 10 & Table 11 show
detector contributions and detector locations respectively.
1ooN 99.60% 2ooN 93.85% >2ooN 65.41%

Figure 11 – Truck Loading Area Flame Detection Map
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 99.60% 93.85% 65.41%
FD-TLA-01 26.06 1.59 5.12 11.4
FD-TLA-02 19.57 0.61 3.96 8.51
FD-TLA-03 32.81 1.58 5.84 12.67
FD-TLA-04 23.13 0.94 5.81 6.35
FD-TLA-05 55.81 0.58 4.03 10.48
FD-TLA-06 36.96 0.03 0.35 3
FD-TLA-07 58 0.39 16.69 7.49
FD-TLA-08 55.87 0.05 15.09 7.43
Table 10– Flame Detector Contributions for Truck Loading Area

FD-TLA-01 10122.5 10150.5 102.5 250 15
FD-TLA-02 10082.5 10149.5 102.5 105 15
FD-TLA-03 10122.5 10164.5 102.5 235 15
FD-TLA-04 10083.5 10164.5 102.5 120 15
FD-TLA-05 10122.5 10185.5 102.5 240 15
FD-TLA-06 10083.5 10185.5 102.5 120 15
FD-TLA-07 10122.5 10200.5 102.5 240 15
FD-TLA-08 10083.5 10200.5 102.5 130 15
Table 11– Flame Detector Locations for Truck Loading Area
7.1.3.2 Optimised
The existing set-up offers sufficient coverage (99.60% for 1ooN & 93.85% for 2ooN). Hence,
no further optimisation is required.
7.1.4 Tanks
7.1.4.1 T1A Existing

detector contributions and detector locations respectively
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 82.34% 2ooN 57.47% >2ooN 28.57%

Figure 12 – T1A Flame Detection Map

All Detectors N/A 82.34% 57.47% 28.57%
FD-T1A-01 49.91 2.85 18.48 28.57
FD-T1A-02 70.02 16.98 24.47 28.57
FD-T1A-03 48.46 5.03 14.86 28.57
Table 12 – Flame Detector Contributions for T1A
Detector Positions in Modelled Fire Zone (Percentage)

FD-T1A-01 10084 10419 153.5 225 30
FD-T1A-02 10066 10420 153.5 135 30
FD-T1A-03 10066 10409.5 153.5 60 30
Table 13 – Flame Detector Locations for T1A
7.1.4.2 T1B Existing

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 96.91% 2ooN 90.76% >2ooN 52.98%

Figure 13 – T1B Flame Detection Map

All Detectors N/A 96.91% 90.76% 52.98%
FD-T1B-01 90.12 0 37.14 52.98
FD-T1B-02 96.91 6.15 37.78 52.98
FD-T1B-03 53.62 0 0.64 52.98
Table 14 – Flame Detector Contributions for T1B

FD-T1B-01 10139 10410 151 40 30
FD-T1B-02 10139 10427 151 150 30
FD-T1B-03 10143 10410 151 340 45
Table 15 – Flame Detector Locations for T1B
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.4.3 T1A Optimised

1ooN 97.11% 2ooN 85.29% >2ooN 48.00%


All Detectors N/A 97.11% 85.29% 48.00%
FD-T1A-01 61.97 5.52 22.97 22.78
FD-T1A-02 47.14 3.22 9.41 23.82
FD-T1A-03 68.17 0.92 22.17 34.38
FD-T1A-04 63.81 2.16 20.03 30.93

FD-T1A-01 10076 10420 153.5 165 15
FD-T1A-02 10066 10407.5 153.5 60 30
FD-T1A-03 10065.5 10420 153.5 120 30
FD-T1A-04 10085 10419 153.5 230 15
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.4.4 T1B Optimised

detector contributions and detector locations respectively. The coverage achieved is 97.38%
for 1ooN and 95.41% for 2ooN.
1ooN 97.38% 2ooN 95.41% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 15 – T1B Flame Detection Map

All Detectors N/A 97.38% 95.41% 0.00%
FD-T1B-02 97.22 1.82 95.41 0
FD-T1B-03 95.57 0.16 95.41 0
Table 18 - Flame Detector Contributions for T1B

FD-T1B-02 10139 10429 151 150 15
FD-T1B-03 10143 10409 151 340 15
Table 19 - Flame Detector Contributions for T1B
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


1ooN 94.06% 2ooN 78.15% >2ooN 40.56%


All Detectors N/A 94.06% 78.15% 40.56%
FD-T2A-01 76.28 8.82 26.9 40.56
FD-T2A-02 77.83 6.71 30.55 40.56
FD-T2A-03 58.67 0.38 17.72 40.56

FD-T2A-01 10066.5 10294.5 153.5 50 15
FD-T2A-02 10082.5 10294 153.5 315 30
FD-T2A-03 10065.5 10304 153.5 110 15

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.94% 2ooN 96.30% >2ooN 88.98%

Figure 17 – T2B Flame Detector Map

All Detectors N/A 99.94% 96.30% 88.98%
FD-T2B-01 95.83 3.23 3.61 88.98
FD-T2B-02 93.53 0 4.55 88.98
FD-T2B2-03 95.86 0.41 6.47 88.98

FD-T2B-01 10139 10285 150.5 15 30
FD-T2B-02 10143.5 10304 150.5 215 30
FD-T2B2-03 10139 10304 150.5 150 30
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.4.7 T2A Optimised

1ooN 97.45% 2ooN 85.59% >2ooN 60.80%

Figure 18 – T2A Flame Detector Map

All Detectors N/A 97.45% 85.59% 60.80%
FD-T2A-01 76.28 4.62 18.76 20.08
FD-T2A-02 77.83 3.5 19.02 22.5
FD-T2A-03 58.67 0.35 4.36 21.15
FD-T2A-04 63.88 3.39 7.45 20.24

FD-T2A-01 10066.5 10294.5 153.5 50 15
FD-T2A-02 10082.5 10294 153.5 315 30
FD-T2A-03 10065.5 10304 153.5 110 15
FD-T2A-04 10075 10293.5 153.5 0 15
7.1.4.8 T2B Optimised

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.53% 2ooN 89.83% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 19 – T2B Flame Detector Map

All Detectors N/A 99.53% 89.83% 0.00%
FD-T2B-01 95.83 6 89.83 0
FD-T2B-02 93.53 3.7 89.83 0

FD-T2B-01 10139 10284.77 150.5 15 30
FD-T2B-02 10143.5 10304 150.5 215 30
7.1.5 LNG Drain Pump
7.1.5.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 97.04% 2ooN 0.00% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 20 – Flame Detection Map for LNG Drain Pump

All Detectors N/A 97.04% 0.00% 0.00%
FD-DRP-01 97.04 97.04 0 0
Table 28 – Flame Detector Contributions for LNG Drain Pump

FD-DRP-01 10045.5 10346.5 102.5 135 45
Table 29 - Flame Detector Locations for LNG Drain Pump
7.1.5.2 Optimised
for 1ooN and 97.04% for 2ooN with the addition of one detector.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 98.69% 2ooN 97.04% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 21 - Flame Detection Map for LNG Drain Pump

All Detectors N/A 98.69% 97.04% 0.00%
FD-DRP-01 97.04 0 97.04 0
FD-DRP-02 98.69 1.66 97.04 0
Table 30 - Flame Detector Contributions for LNG Drain Pump

FD-DRP-01 10045.5 10346.5 102.5 135 45
FD-DRP-02 10048.5 10346.5 102.5 225 30
Table 31 - Flame Detector Locations for LNG Drain Pump
7.1.6 HP LNG Pumps
7.1.6.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 98.73% 2ooN 94.83% >2ooN 87.53%

Figure 22 – Flame Detection Map for HP LNG Pumps

All Detectors N/A 98.73% 94.83% 87.53%
FD-ORVP-01 37.32 0 0 0.06
FD-ORVP-02 50.96 0 0.14 0.82
FD-ORVP-03 17.93 0.12 0.49 1.23
FD-ORVP-04 51.04 0 0 0.19
FD-ORVP-05 33.17 0.04 0.65 1.29
FD-ORVP-06 41.69 0 0.36 1.66
FD-ORVP-07 47.78 0 0.17 1.11
FD-ORVP-08 38.82 0.06 5.7 3.44
FD-ORVP-09 50.34 0 0.02 0.14
FD-ORVP-10 27.02 3.45 6.08 5.15
FD-ORVP-11 50.31 0 0.28 4.57
FD-ORVP-12 62.91 0.22 0.71 2.7
Table 32 - Flame Detector Contributions for HP LNG Pumps

FD-ORVP-01 10098 10538.5 102.5 45 30
FD-ORVP-02 10098 10548.5 102.5 125 30
FD-ORVP-03 10110 10538.5 102.5 305 30
FD-ORVP-04 10110 10548.5 102.5 125 30
FD-ORVP-05 10121 10538.5 102.5 305 30
FD-ORVP-06 10122 10549.5 102.5 135 30
FD-ORVP-07 10132 10538.5 102.5 305 30
FD-ORVP-08 10132 10549.5 102.5 135 30
FD-ORVP-09 10144 10538.5 102.5 305 30
FD-ORVP-10 10144 10549.5 102.5 135 30
FD-ORVP-11 10156 10538.5 102.5 305 30
FD-ORVP-12 10156 10549.5 102.5 270 0
Table 33 - Flame Detector Locations for HP LNG Pumps
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.6.2 Optimised
1ooN 97.06% 2ooN 85.26% >2ooN 33.73%

Figure 23 - Flame Detection Map for HP LNG Pumps

All Detectors N/A 97.06% 85.26% 33.73%
FD-ORVP-01 37.32 1.91 12.1 22.33
FD-ORVP-02 50.96 2.66 21.78 25.54
FD-ORVP-08 38.82 0.79 26.56 10.5
FD-ORVP-10 27.02 4.02 15.85 7.15
FD-ORVP-12 62.91 2.42 26.75 32.76
Table 34 - Flame Detector Contributions for HP LNG Pumps

FD-ORVP- 10098 10538.5 102.5 45 30
01
FD-ORVP- 10098 10548.5 102.5 125 30
02
FD-ORVP- 10132 10549.5 102.5 135 30
08
FD-ORVP- 10144 10549.5 102.5 135 30
10
FD-ORVP- 10156 10549.5 102.5 270 0
12
Table 35 - Flame Detector Locations for HP LNG Pumps
7.1.7 LNG Impoundment Pit
7.1.7.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 96.89% >2ooN 65.76%

Figure 24 – Flame Detection Map for LNG Impoundment Pit

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 96.89% 65.76%
FD-LNGP-01 86.94 0 21.19 65.76
FD-LNGP-02 88.29 0 22.53 65.76
FD-LNGP-03 87.41 3.11 18.55 65.76
Table 36 - Flame Detector Contributions for LNG Impoundment Pit

FD-LNGP- 10232 10514.5 102.5 30 15
01
FD-LNGP- 10250 10514.5 102.5 330 15
02
FD-LNGP- 10232 10530.5 102.5 150 15
03
Table 37 - Flame Detector Locations for LNG Impoundment Pit
7.1.7.2 Optimised
The existing set-up offers sufficient coverage (100% for 1ooN and 96.89% for 2ooN).
However, by removing one detector, we show that the remaining two detectors have
sufficient coverage (99.78% for 1ooN and 85.99% for 2ooN).
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.78% 2ooN 85.99% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 25 – Flame Detector Map for LNG Impoundment Pit

All Detectors N/A 99.78% 85.99% 0.00%
FD-LNGP-01 86.94 0.95 85.99 0
FD-LNGP-02 98.83 12.84 85.99 0
Table 38 - Flame Detector Contributions for LNG Impoundment Pit

FD-LNGP- 10232 10514.5 102.5 30 15
01
FD-LNGP- 10250 10514.5 102.5 320 15
02
Table 39 - Flame Detector Locations for LNG Impoundment Pit
7.1.8 Metering Station
7.1.8.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.71% 2ooN 97.60% >2ooN 82.13%

Figure 26 – Flame Detection Map for Metering Station

All Detectors N/A 99.71% 97.60% 82.13%
FD-MS-01 87.87 0.67 10.61 50.88
FD-MS-02 52.51 0.01 3.57 23.23
FD-MS-03 75.14 0.57 5.48 43.39
FD-MS-04 89.62 0.86 11.25 51.8
Table 40 - Flame Detector Contributions for Metering Station

FD-MS-01 10160.5 10759.5 102.5 45 15
FD-MS-02 10178.5 10759.5 102.5 320 15
FD-MS-03 10178.5 10793.5 102.5 220 15
FD-MS-04 10160.5 10793.5 102.5 135 15
Table 41 - Flame Detector Locations for Metering Station
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.8.2 Optimised
The existing set-up offers sufficient coverage (99.71% for 1ooN and 97.60% for 2ooN).
However, by removing one detector, we show that the remaining three detectors have
sufficient coverage (99.14% for 1ooN and 92.11% for 2ooN).
1ooN 99.14% 2ooN 92.11% >2ooN 38.75%

Figure 27 - Flame Detection Map for Metering Station

All Detectors N/A 99.14% 92.11% 38.75%
FD-MS-01 87.87 2.31 46.81 38.75
FD-MS-02 52.51 1.65 12.11 38.75
FD-MS-04 89.62 3.06 47.81 38.75
Table 42 - Flame Detector Contributions for Metering Station

FD-MS-01 10160.5 10759.5 102.5 45 15
FD-MS-02 10178.5 10759.5 102.5 320 15
FD-MS-04 10160.5 10793.5 102.5 135 15
Table 43 - Flame Detector Locations for Metering Station
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.9 Fuel Gas Heater
7.1.9.1 Existing
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 89.58% >2ooN 84.83%

Figure 28 – Flame Detection Map for Fuel Gas Heater

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 89.58% 84.83%
FD-FGH-01 87.33 0 2.5 84.83
FD-FGH-02 87.08 0 2.25 84.83
FD-FGH-03 100 10.42 4.75 84.83
Table 44 – Flame Detector Contributions for Fuel Gas Heater

FD-FGH-01 10158.5 10683 102.5 30 15
FD-FGH-02 10164 10683 102.5 330 15
FD-FGH-03 10165.5 10694 102.5 225 15
Table 45 - Flame Detector Locations for Fuel Gas Heater
7.1.9.2 Optimised
sufficient coverage (100% for 1ooN and 87.33% for 2ooN).
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 87.33% 3ooN 0.00%

Figure 29 - Flame Detection Map for Fuel Gas Heater

Detector ID Individual 1ooN 2ooN 3ooN
All Detectors N/A 100.00% 87.33% 0.00%
FD-FGH-01 87.33 0 87.33 0
FD-FGH-02 100 12.67 87.33 0
Table 46 - Flame Detector Contributions for Fuel Gas Heater

FD-FGH-01 10158.5 10683 102.5 30 15
FD-FGH-02 10165.5 10694 102.5 225 15
Table 47 - Flame Detector Locations for Fuel Gas Heater
7.1.10 Diesel Fuel Tank
7.1.10.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 99.97% >2ooN 96.60%

Figure 30 - Flame Detection Map for Diesel Fuel Tank

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 99.97% 96.60%
FD-DFT-01 99.27 0 2.67 96.6
FD-DFT-02 98.77 0.03 2.13 96.6
FD-DFT-03 98.53 0 1.93 96.6
Table 48 - Flame Detector Contributions for Diesel Fuel Tank

FD-DFT-01 10101.5 10749 102.5 45 15
FD-DFT-02 10101.5 10755 102.5 135 15
FD-DFT-03 10107 10755 102.5 225 15
Table 49 - Flame Detector Locations for Diesel Fuel Tank
7.1.10.2 Optimised
sufficient coverage (100% for 1ooN and 98.03% for 2ooN).
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 98.03% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 31 - Flame Detection Map for Diesel Fuel Tank

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 98.03% 0.00%
FD-DFT-01 99.27 1.23 98.03 0
FD-DFT-02 98.77 0.73 98.03 0
Table 50 - Flame Detector Contributions for Diesel Fuel Tank

FD-DFT-01 10101.5 10749 102.5 45 15
FD-DFT-02 10101.5 10755 102.5 135 15
Table 51 - Flame Detector Locations for Diesel Fuel Tank
7.1.11 BOG Compressor
7.1.11.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 96.77% 2ooN 85.15% >2ooN 32.87%

Figure 32 – Flame Detection Map for BOG Compressor

All Detectors N/A 96.77% 85.15% 32.87%
FD-BOGC-01 50.68 2.42 24.8 19.16
FD-BOGC-02 53.49 0.54 26.45 22.2
FD-BOGC-03 54.93 5.14 25.96 19.54
FD-BOGC-04 59.99 3.51 27.34 24.84
Table 52 - Flame Detector Contributions for BOG Compressor

FD-BOGC-01 10038.5 10514 102.5 30 15
FD-BOGC-02 10064.5 10514 102.5 315 15
FD-BOGC-03 10037.5 10540 102.5 140 15
FD-BOGC-04 10065.5 10542 102.5 225 15
Table 53 - Flame Detector Locations for BOG Compressor
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.11.2 Optimised
Hence, no further optimisation is required.
7.1.12 Open Rack Vaporizer
7.1.12.1 Existing
1ooN 79.21% 2ooN 62.33% >2ooN 36.03%

Figure 33 - Flame Detection Map for ORV

All Detectors N/A 79.21% 62.33% 36.03%
FD-ORV-01 5.54 2.48 0.77 2.28
FD-ORV-02 6.69 0.02 1.81 4.86
FD-ORV-03 9.66 0.3 3.04 6.13
FD-ORV-04 14.89 2.73 2.35 6.8
FD-ORV-05 12.28 0 2.28 8.68
FD-ORV-06 16.76 0.46 4.71 10.39
FD-ORV-07 18.47 3.24 4.2 8.32
FD-ORV-08 17.82 0.35 3.39 11.65
FD-ORV-09 12.79 0.01 0.97 7.14
FD-ORV-10 14.3 2.97 4.83 6.51
FD-ORV-11 17.83 0.11 5.37 10.63
FD-ORV-12 12.6 0.31 5.72 4.88
FD-ORV-13 9.2 0.14 6.27 2.79
FD-ORV-14 10.22 2.2 5.84 2.18
FD-ORV-15 3.23 1.57 1.05 0.61
Table 54 - Flame Detector Contributions for ORV
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


FD-ORV-01 10074 10603 102.5 90 15
FD-ORV-02 10093 10597 102.5 315 15
FD-ORV-03 10093 10612 102.5 210 15
FD-ORV-04 10095 10597 102.5 45 15
FD-ORV-05 10114 10597 102.5 315 15
FD-ORV-06 10114 10612 102.5 225 15
FD-ORV-07 10116 10612 102.5 135 15
FD-ORV-08 10134 10612 102.5 225 15
FD-ORV-09 10134 10597 102.5 315 15
FD-ORV-10 10136 10597 102.5 45 15
FD-ORV-11 10154 10612 102.5 225 15
FD-ORV-12 10154 10597 102.5 315 15
FD-ORV-13 10156 10597 102.5 45 15
FD-ORV-14 10156 10612 102.5 135 15
FD-ORV-15 10176 10604 102.5 270 15
Table 55 - Flame Detector Locations for ORV
7.1.12.2 Optimised
It is not possible to obtain more coverage for 1ooN by installing more detectors due the fact
that there is no coverage inside the Vaporizers. It is suggested to install a Linear wire heat
detector or fusible plug in addition to these detectors.
7.1.13 BOG Recondenser
7.1.13.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 91.53% 2ooN 69.61% >2ooN 34.74%

Figure 34 - Flame Detection Map for BOG Recondenser
Detector Contributions in Modelled Fire Zone

All Detectors N/A 91.53% 69.61% 34.74%
FD-BOGR-01 55.59 3.76 17.09 34.74
FD-BOGR-02 63.26 3.4 25.11 34.74
FD-BOGR-03 77.03 14.75 27.54 34.74
Table 56 - Flame Detector Contributions for BOG Recondenser

FD-BOGR-01 10068 10541 112.23 45 15
FD-BOGR-02 10070.5 10549.5 112.23 150 15
FD-BOGR-03 10076 10542 115.13 330 60
Table 57 - Flame Detector Locations for BOG Recondenser
7.1.13.2 Optimised
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 98.12% 2ooN 86.61% >2ooN 46.83%

Figure 35 - Flame Detection Map for BOG Recondenser

All Detectors N/A 98.12% 86.61% 46.83%
FD-BOGR-01 55.59 3 15.7 36.86
FD-BOGR-02 63.26 0.54 16.85 45.83
FD-BOGR-03 77.03 1.38 30.01 45.6
FD-BOGR-04 35.71 6.59 17 12.09
Table 58 - Flame Detector Contributions for BOG Recondenser

FD-BOGR-01 10068 10541 112.23 45 15
FD-BOGR-02 10070.5 10549.5 112.23 150 15
FD-BOGR-03 10076 10542 115.13 330 60
FD-BOGR-04 10077.5 10550.5 112.23 -175 30
Table 59 - Flame Detector Locations for BOG Recondenser
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.1.14 Emergency Power Generation Unit
7.1.14.1 Existing
1ooN 93.75% 2ooN 72.92% >2ooN 13.83%

Figure 36 - Flame Detection Map for Emergency Power Generation Unit

All Detectors N/A 93.75% 72.92% 13.83%
FD-EPG-01 64.5 12.5 38.17 13.83
FD-EPG-02 60.83 0.75 46.25 13.83
FD-EPG-03 55.17 7.58 33.75 13.83
Table 60 - Flame Detector Contributions for Emergency Power Generation Unit

FD-EPG-01 10127 10672 102.5 45 30
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

FD-EPG-02 10127 10676 102.5 135 30

FD-EPG-03 10130 10676 102.5 210 45
Table 61 - Flame Detector Locations for Emergency Power Generation Unit
7.1.14.2 Optimised
1ooN 94.17% 2ooN 92.67% >2ooN 54.00%

Figure 37 - Flame Detection Map for Emergency Power Generation Unit
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 94.17% 92.67% 54.00%
FD-EPG-01 64.5 0.33 21 43.17
FD-EPG-02 60.83 0.75 18.83 41.25
FD-EPG-03 55.17 0 17.75 37.42
FD-EPG-04 60.33 0.42 19.75 40.17
Table 62 - Flame Detector Contributions for Emergency Power Generation Unit

FD-EPG-01 10127 10672 102.5 45 30
FD-EPG-02 10127 10676 102.5 135 30
FD-EPG-03 10130 10676 102.5 210 45
FD-EPG-04 10130 10672 102.5 330 30
Table 63 - Flame Detector Locations for Emergency Power Generation Unit
7.1.15 Yard Transformer Area
7.1.15.1 Existing
1ooN 94.04% 2ooN 85.28% >2ooN 68.62%

Figure 38 - Flame Detection Map for Yard Transformer
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 94.04% 85.28% 68.62%
FD-TRN-01 43.53 0.21 8.85 33.17
FD-TRN-02 43.33 2.47 7.75 32.83
FD-TRN-03 37.41 1.32 2.33 32.61
FD-TRN-04 45.44 3.91 6.52 34.3
FD-TRN-05 42.77 0.3 6.29 34.86
FD-TRN-06 37.41 0.55 1.58 34.13
Table 64 - Flame Detector Contributions for Yard Transformer

FD-TRN-01 10038.5 10672.5 102.5 315 30
FD-TRN-02 10038.5 10680.5 102.5 230 30
FD-TRN-03 10029.5 10676.5 102.5 90 30
FD-TRN-04 10038.5 10682 102.5 315 30
FD-TRN-05 10038.5 10691 102.5 215 30
FD-TRN-06 10029.5 10686.5 102.5 90 30
Table 65 - Flame Detector Locations for Yard Transformer
7.1.15.2 Optimised
Hence, no further optimisation is required.
7.2 Flammable Gas Detection Mapping
7.2.1 Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
7.2.1.1 Existing
Figure 39 shows the existing flammable gas detection coverage map. Table 66 & Table 67
show detector contributions and detector locations respectively.
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 95.11% >2ooN 51.56%

Figure 39 – Flammable Gas Detection Map for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Detector Contributions in Modelled Gas Zone (Percentage)

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 95.11% 51.56%
GD-Berth1-01 97.33 4.89 40.89 51.56
GD-Berth1-02 74.67 0 23.11 51.56
GD-Berth1-03 74.67 0 23.11 51.56
Table 66 – Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
Detector Positions in Modelled Gas Zone

Detector ID Type East North Elevation
GD-Berth1-01 Point 9535 10332.5 102.2
GD-Berth1-02 Point 9535 10336.5 102.2
GD-Berth1-03 Point 9531 10332.5 102.2
Table 67 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Berth #1 Impoundment Pit
7.2.1.2 Optimised
The existing set-up offers sufficient coverage (100% for 1ooN and 95.11% for 2ooN). Hence,
no further optimisation is required.
7.2.2 Berth #1
7.2.2.1 Existing
1ooN 91.43% 2ooN 37.89% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 40 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Berth #1
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 91.43% 37.89% 0.00%
Berth#1-LOS- 72.5 34.61 37.89 0
01
Berth#1-LOS- 56.82 18.93 37.89 0
02
Table 68 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Berth #1
Detector Positions in Modelled Gas Zone (Percentage)

Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9518 10327.5 111.7
01 (T)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9536 10345.5 111.7
01 (R)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9531 10350.5 110.6
02 (T)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9513 10332.5 110.6
02 (R)
Table 69 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Berth #1
7.2.2.2 Optimized
Figure 41 shows the optimized flammable gas detection coverage map. Table 70 & Table 71
1ooN 99.95% 2ooN 87.72% >2ooN 21.40%

Figure 41 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Berth #1
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 99.95% 87.72% 21.40%
Berth#1-LOS- 93.11 5.77 65.94 20.38
01
Berth#1-LOS- 63.59 6.43 48.81 7.33
02
GD-Berth#1- 28.01 0 9.11 17.88
New-01
GD-Berth#1- 25.39 0.03 8.78 15.55
New-02
Table 70 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Berth #1

GD-Berth#1- Point 9526 10331.5 109.3
New-01
GD-Berth#1- Point 9530 10334.5 109.3
New-02
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9518 10327.5 111.7
01 (T)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9536 10345.5 111.7
01 (R)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9531 10350.5 110.6
02 (T)
Berth#1-LOS- LOS 9513 10332.5 110.6
02 (R)
Table 71 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Berth #1
7.2.3 Truck Loading Area
7.2.3.1 Existing
1ooN 99.97% 2ooN 70.84% >2ooN 25.98%

Figure 42 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Truck Loading Area
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 99.97% 70.84% 25.98%
TRL-GD-01 14.29 6.11 5.27 2.9
TRL-GD-02 15.82 5.75 3.82 5.94
TRL-GD-03 15.82 5.75 3.82 5.94
TRL-GD-04 15.82 2.54 6.33 6.92
TRL-GD-05 17.47 4.16 9.65 3.66
TRL-GD-06 18.19 0.03 10.16 7.7
TRL-GD-07 18.19 0.03 9.74 8.12
TRL-GD-08 18.19 0.03 9.43 8.12
TRL-GD-09 18.19 0.03 9.74 8.12
TRL-GD-10 18.19 0.03 10.16 7.67
TRL-GD-11 17.89 4.16 6.08 7.62
TRL-GD-12 9.38 0.53 5.52 3.29
Table 72 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Truck Loading Area

TRL-GD-01 Point 10101 10150 101.2
TRL-GD-02 Point 10101 10164 101.2
TRL-GD-03 Point 10101 10178 101.2
TRL-GD-04 Point 10101 10192 101.2
TRL-GD-05 Point 10092 10151 101.2
TRL-GD-06 Point 10092 10158 101.2
TRL-GD-07 Point 10092 10165 101.2
TRL-GD-08 Point 10092 10172 101.2
TRL-GD-09 Point 10092 10179 101.2
TRL-GD-10 Point 10092 10186 101.2
TRL-GD-11 Point 10092 10193 101.2
TRL-GD-12 Point 10101 10199 101.2
Table 73 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Truck Loading Area
7.2.3.2 Optimised
Figure 43 shows the optimised flammable gas detection coverage map. Table 74 & Table 75
show detector contributions and detector locations respectively. The coverage achieved is
99.97% for 1ooN and 88.09% for 2ooN.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.97% 2ooN 88.09% >2ooN 40.74%

Figure 43 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Truck Loading Area

All Detectors N/A 99.97% 88.09% 40.74%
TRL-GD-01 14.29 2.9 6.39 2.59
TRL-GD-02 15.82 0 5.08 5.27
TRL-GD-03 15.82 0 5.08 5.27
TRL-GD-04 15.82 0 6.45 6.61
TRL-GD-05 17.47 4.16 7.53 3.35
TRL-GD-06 18.19 0.03 7.98 5.02
TRL-GD-07 18.19 0.03 7.25 5.44
TRL-GD-08 18.19 0.03 7.25 5.44
TRL-GD-09 18.19 0.03 7.25 5.44
TRL-GD-10 18.19 0.03 7.98 5.02
TRL-GD-11 17.89 4.16 5.69 5.3
TRL-GD-12 9.38 0.53 4.85 3.66
TRL-GD-New-1 15.82 0 5.08 5.27
TRL-GD-New-2 15.82 0 5.08 5.27
TRL-GD-New-3 15.82 0 5.75 4.94
Table 74 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Truck Loading Area

TRL-GD-01 Point 10101 10150 101.2
TRL-GD-02 Point 10101 10164 101.2
TRL-GD-03 Point 10101 10178 101.2
TRL-GD-04 Point 10101 10192 101.2
TRL-GD-05 Point 10092 10151 101.2
TRL-GD-06 Point 10092 10158 101.2
TRL-GD-07 Point 10092 10165 101.2
TRL-GD-08 Point 10092 10172 101.2
TRL-GD-09 Point 10092 10179 101.2
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

TRL-GD-10 Point 10092 10186 101.2

TRL-GD-11 Point 10092 10193 101.2
TRL-GD-12 Point 10101 10199 101.2
TRL-GD-New-1 Point 10101 10185 101.2
TRL-GD-New-2 Point 10101 10171 101.2
TRL-GD-New-3 Point 10101 10157 101.2
Table 75 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Truck Loading Area
7.2.4 Tanks

The placement of Point Flammable Gas Detector in the zone is for strategic reasons. Hence,
no optimisation will be performed.



7.2.5 LNG Drain Pumps
7.2.5.1 Existing
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 100.00% >2ooN 100.00%

Figure 44 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for LNG Drain Pump
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
GD-DrainPump 99.11 0 0 1.19
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
Table 76 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for LNG Drain Pump

GD-DrainPump Point 10045.5 10346 101.2
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
Table 77 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for LNG Drain Pump
7.2.5.2 Optimised
Figure 45 shows the optimized flammable gas detection coverage map. Table 78 & Table 79
show detector contributions and detector locations respectively. The coverage achieved by
removing three detectors is 100% for 1ooN and 100% for 2ooN.
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 100.00% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 45 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for LNG Drain Pump
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%
GD-DrainPump 100 0 100 0
-1
GD-DrainPump 100 0 100 0
-2
Table 78 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for LNG Drain Pump

-1
-2
Table 79 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for LNG Drain Pump
7.2.6 HP LNG Pumps
7.2.6.1 Existing
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 90.31% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 46 – Flammable Gas Detection map for HP LNG Pumps

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 90.31% 0.00%
HPLNGP-LOS- 91.42 1.11 90.31 0
01
HPLNGP-LOS- 98.89 8.58 90.31 0
02
Table 80 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for HP LNG Pumps

HPLNGP-LOS- LOS 10100 10540.5 102.5
01 (T)
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

HPLNGP-LOS- LOS 10160 10540.5 102.5

01 (R)
HPLNGP-LOS- LOS 10100 10545.5 102.5
02 (T)
HPLNGP-LOS- LOS 10160 10545.5 102.5
02 (R)
Table 81 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for HP LNG Pumps
7.2.6.2 Optimized
The existing set-up offers sufficient coverage (100% for 1ooN and 90.31% for 2ooN). Hence,
no further optimization is required.
7.2.7 Open Rack Vaporizer
7.2.7.1 Existing
The placement of LOS Detectors in the zone is for strategic reasons (perimeter detection).
Hence, no optimisation will be performed.
7.2.8 LNG Impoundment Pit
7.2.8.1 Existing
show detector contributions and detector locations respectively
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 97.20% >2ooN 70.72%

Figure 47 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for LNG Impoundment Pit
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100.00% 97.20% 70.72%
LNGIP-LOS-01 87.1 0 21.56 30.01
LNGIP-LOS-02 64.91 2.72 14.89 25.61
LNGIP-LOS-03 61.07 0.03 11.17 23
LNGIP-GD-01 19.15 0 3.77 7.85
LNGIP-GD-02 19.41 0.05 0.5 3.32
LNGIP-GD-03 19.15 0 0.08 4.68
LNGIP-GD-04 19.41 0 0.08 2.77
LNGIP-GD-05 12.98 0 0.92 4.92
LNGIP-GD-06 11.67 0 0 1.52
Table 82- Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for LNG Impoundment Pit

LNGIP-GD-01 Point 10234.5 10522.5 95.9
LNGIP-GD-02 Point 10241 10526.5 95.9
LNGIP-GD-03 Point 10246 10522.5 95.9
LNGIP-GD-04 Point 10241 10517.5 95.9
LNGIP-GD-05 Point 10235 10517.5 95.9
LNGIP-GD-06 Point 10246 10526.5 95.9
LNGIP-LOS-01 LOS 10241.5 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-01 LOS 10241.5 10527.5 102
(R)
LNGIP-LOS-02 LOS 10236 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-02 LOS 10236 10527.5 102
(R)
LNGIP-LOS-03 LOS 10245 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-03 LOS 10245 10527.5 102
(R)
Table 83 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for LNG Impoundment Pit
7.2.8.2 Optimised
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 99.95% 2ooN 86.45% >2ooN 26.69%

Figure 48 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for LNG Impoundment Pit

All Detectors N/A 99.95% 86.45% 26.69%
LNGIP-LOS-01 87.1 0.65 59.76 26.69
LNGIP-LOS-02 64.91 11.96 26.27 26.69
LNGIP-LOS-03 61.07 0.89 33.49 26.69
Table 84 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for LNG Impoundment Pit

LNGIP-LOS-01 LOS 10241.5 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-01 LOS 10241.5 10527.5 102
(R)
LNGIP-LOS-02 LOS 10236 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-02 LOS 10236 10527.5 102
(R)
LNGIP-LOS-03 LOS 10245 10515.5 102
(T)
LNGIP-LOS-03 LOS 10245 10527.5 102
(R)
Table 85 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for LNG Impoundment Pit
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.2.9 Metering Station
7.2.9.1 Existing
1ooN 75.78% 2ooN 44.16% >2ooN 17.34%

Figure 49- Flammable Gas Detection Map for Metering Station

All Detectors N/A 75.78% 44.16% 17.34%
MS-GD-01 18.06 1.35 9.82 5.8
MS-GD-02 18.06 2.1 8.09 5.67
MS-GD-03 13.68 1.75 4.09 4.3
MS-GD-04 12.66 3.73 3.3 4.1
MS-GD-05 12.66 3.88 5.21 2.6
MS-GD-06 12.66 6.5 4.8 1.25
MS-GD-07 17.65 11.07 4.97 1.6
MS-GD-08 18.06 0.62 6.19 8.32
MS-GD-09 18.06 0.62 7.18 6.67
Table 86 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Metering Station
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


MS-GD-01 Point 10169.5 10784.5 101.2
MS-GD-02 Point 10169.5 10772.5 101.2
MS-GD-03 Point 10164 10776.5 101.2
MS-GD-04 Point 10163.5 10783.5 101.2
MS-GD-05 Point 10163.5 10769.5 101.2
MS-GD-06 Point 10169.5 10790.5 101.2
MS-GD-07 Point 10169.5 10765.5 101.2
MS-GD-08 Point 10169.5 10780.5 101.2
MS-GD-09 Point 10169.5 10776.5 101.2
Table 87 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Metering Station
7.2.9.2 Optimised
The coverage achieved by using three LOS detectors and three point detectors is 100% for
1ooN and 85.52% for 2ooN.
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 85.52% >2ooN 3.82%

Figure 50 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Metering Station
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100.00% 85.52% 3.82%
MS-LOS-New- 34.33 8.58 22.52 3.13
01
MS-LOS-New- 31.2 0 31.15 0.05
02
MS-GD-01 18.5 0 16.62 1.79
MS-GD-02 18.2 0.05 16.72 1.39
MS-GD-03 18.5 0 17.06 1.39
MS-LOS-New- 68.7 5.85 59.33 3.42
03
Table 88 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Metering Station

MS-GD-01 Point 10167.5 10777.5 101.2
MS-GD-02 Point 10167.5 10787.5 100
MS-GD-03 Point 10167.5 10767.5 101.2
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10161.5 10758.5 104
01 (T)
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10161.5 10794.5 104
01 (R)
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10178.5 10758.5 104
02 (T)
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10178.5 10794.5 104
02 (R)
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10172.5 10758.5 104
03 (T)
MS-LOS-New- LOS 10172.5 10794.5 104
03 (R)
Table 89 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Metering Station
7.2.10 Fuel Gas Heater
7.2.10.1 Existing
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 93.41% >2ooN 74.48%

Figure 51 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Fuel Gas Heater

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 93.41% 74.48%
FGH-GD-01 60.55 3.44 11.13 11.07
FGH-GD-02 83.62 0.17 11.42 16.67
FGH-GD-03 59.09 0 0.23 3.5
FGH-GD-04 42.07 0.35 5.48 7.28
FGH-GD-05 45.51 0 2.04 7.4
FGH-GD-06 62.3 2.62 7.58 11.42
Table 90 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Fuel Gas Heater
Detector Positions in Modelled Gas Zone

FGH-GD-01 Point 10160.5 10691.5 101.2
FGH-GD-02 Point 10161.5 10688 101.2
FGH-GD-03 Point 10164.5 10688 101.2
FGH-GD-04 Point 10164.5 10692 101.2
FGH-GD-05 Point 10164.5 10685 101.2
FGH-GD-06 Point 10161.5 10685 101.2
Table 91 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Fuel Gas Heater
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.2.10.2 Optimised
The coverage achieved by adding two point detectors is 100% for 1ooN and 89.86% for
2ooN.
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 89.86% >2ooN 29.37%

Figure 52 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for Fuel Gas Heater

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 89.86% 29.37%
FGH-GD-01 63.99 7.34 27.27 29.37
FGH-GD-02 89.86 0 60.49 29.37
FGH-GD-03 65.38 2.8 33.22 29.37
Table 92 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for Fuel Gas Heater
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


FGH-GD-01 Point 10160.5 10691.5 101.5
FGH-GD-02 Point 10161.5 10688 101.5
FGH-GD-03 Point 10161.5 10685 101.5
Table 93 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for Fuel Gas Heater
7.2.11 BOG Compressor
7.2.11.1 Existing
1ooN 73.06% 2ooN 11.25% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 53 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for BOG Compressor

All Detectors N/A 73.06% 11.25% 0.00%
GD-BOGC-01 15.9 11.85 4.05 0
GD-BOGC-02 14.32 8.78 5.54 0
GD-BOGC-03 12.79 10.32 2.47 0
GD-BOGC-04 15.9 12.66 3.24 0
GD-BOGC-05 11.08 9.93 1.15 0
GD-BOGC-06 14.32 8.27 6.05 0
Table 94 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for BOG Compressor
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


GD-BOGC-01 Point 10046.5 10528 101.2
GD-BOGC-02 Point 10045.5 10538 101.2
GD-BOGC-03 Point 10046.5 10519 101.2
GD-BOGC-04 Point 10054.5 10529 101.2
GD-BOGC-05 Point 10055.5 10518 101.2
GD-BOGC-06 Point 10051.5 10538 101.2
Table 95 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for BOG Compressor
7.2.11.2 Optimised
show detector contributions and detector locations respectively. The coverage achieved is
92.77% for 1ooN and 86.65% for 2ooN.
1ooN 92.77% 2ooN 85.65% >2ooN 33.91%

Figure 54 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for BOG Compressor

All Detectors N/A 92.77% 85.65% 33.91%
GD-BOGC-01 9.02 0.05 5.43 2.83
GD-BOGC-02 20.27 0 7.83 9.46
GD-BOGC-03 18.26 0.16 9.67 6.79
GD-BOGC-04 16.85 0.22 8.75 6.36
GD-BOGC-05 17.34 0 10 7.07
LOS-BOGC-01 55.87 1.3 23.32 27.5
LOS-BOGC-02 36.09 1.47 18.8 13.91
LOS-BOGC-03 42.39 3.91 19.67 16.58
Table 96 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for BOG Compressor
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


GD-BOGC-01 Point 10060 10538 101.2
GD-BOGC-02 Point 10054.5 10529.5 101.2
GD-BOGC-03 Point 10048 10523 101.2
GD-BOGC-04 Point 10055 10539 101.2
GD-BOGC-05 Point 10046 10539 101.2
LOS-BOGC-01 LOS 10039.5 10530.5 102.5
(T)
LOS-BOGC-01 LOS 10059.5 10530.5 102.5
(R)
LOS-BOGC-02 LOS 10040.5 10538 102.5
(T)
LOS-BOGC-02 LOS 10054.5 10538 102.5
(R)
LOS-BOGC-03 LOS 10040.5 10526 102.5
(T)
LOS-BOGC-03 LOS 10054.5 10526 102.5
(R)
Table 97 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for BOG Compressor
7.2.12 BOG Recondenser
7.2.12.1 Existing
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 99.71% >2ooN 83.04%

Figure 55 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for BOG Recondenser

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 99.71% 83.04%
GD-BOGR-01 100 0.29 16.67 83.04
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

GD-BOGR-02 84.5 0 1.46 83.04

GD-BOGR-03 98.25 0 15.2 83.04
Table 98 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for BOG Recondenser

GD-BOGR-01 Point 10072 10543.5 111.23
GD-BOGR-02 Point 10068 10540.5 111.23
GD-BOGR-03 Point 10072 10540.5 111.23
Table 99 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for BOG Recondenser
7.2.12.2 Optimised
Figure 56 shows the optimised flammable gas detection coverage map. Table 100 & Table
101 show detector contributions and detector locations respectively. The coverage achieved
by adding one point detectors is 100% for 1ooN and 92.69% for 2ooN.
1ooN 100.00% 2ooN 92.69% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure 56 - Flammable Gas Detection Map for BOG Recondenser

All Detectors N/A 100.00% 92.69% 0.00%
GD-BOGR-01 100 7.31 92.69 0
GD-BOGR-02 92.69 0 92.69 0
Table 100 - Flammable Gas Detector Contributions for BOG Recondenser

GD-BOGR-01 Point 10072 10543.5 111.23
GD-BOGR-02 Point 10069 10540.5 111.23
Table 101 - Flammable Gas Detector Locations for BOG Recondenser
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

8. Practical Considerations
The following practical considerations should be noted:
• Generally, the modelling takes into account positional tolerance and practical x-y
positioning within +/- 0.5m is acceptable without compromising the coverage stated.
Deviations greater than this or any deviations in the elevation should be checked for
its effect on overall coverage.
• Flame detector angle tolerance of +/- 5 degrees
• Optical flame detectors and Line Of Sight gas detectors should be mounted on
primary structural steel or on substantial purpose-built structures, braced against
vibration. The detector locations should be checked against the detector location
tables included for each area. Note that all 3-D coordinates for detector positions are
expressed in metres relative to the datum point contained in the supplied 3-D CAD
model.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Appendix A. Interpretation of Coverage Map Results

FGDM consists of detection coverage maps, detector contributions tables and detector
locations tables for each of the modelled areas.
These are interpreted as follows:
A.1 Coverage Map

Figure A1 shows an example of a detection coverage map. Areas shown in white are not
seen by any detector, i.e. they have no detection coverage.
Figure A1: Example Detection Coverage Map
Areas shown in red are seen by one detector only (1ooN). Areas shown in blue are seen by
two detectors in the array (2ooN), and areas shown in green are seen by more than two
detectors in the array (>2ooN).
A.2 Detector Contributions Table

Table A1 shows an example detector contributions table.
Detector Contributions in Modelled Area (Percentage)
All Detectors N/A 87.3 % 78.1 % 53.5 %
Detector 1 73.0 % 0.7 % 18.7 % 53.5 %
Detector 2 63.2 % 2.0 % 7.6 % 53.5 %
Detector 3 82.8 % 6.4 % 22.8 % 53.5 %
Table A1: Example detector Contributions Table
The overall % coverage for the entire array (all detectors) is displayed in row 3 (the greyed
cells), columns 3, 4 and 5. These are shown for 1ooN (Red), 2ooN (Blue) and >2ooN (Green)
respectively.
The values in the cells in rows 4, 5 and 6, column 2 show the individual contributions to the
overall coverage in % for each of the detectors. The values in the cells in rows 4, 5 and 6,
columns 3, 4 and 5 show the individual contributions in % for the applicable voting
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

configuration (i.e. 1ooN, 2ooN and >2ooN). The cell values under the applicable voting
configurations for each detector give effective % values that would be subtracted from the
overall coverage, should the specific detector be removed from the array. For example,
Detector 2 is shown as having contributory values of 2%, 7.6% and 53.5% for 1ooN, 2ooN
and >2ooN respectively. If this detector failed or was removed from the array, the overall
coverage (All detectors) value for the array would be reduced by 2%, 7.6% and 53.5% for
1ooN, 2ooN and >2ooN respectively.
A.3 Detector Locations Table

Table A2 shows an example detector locations table for fire detectors.
Detector Positions in Modelled Fire Area (m)
Detector 1 -15.0 15.0 9.0 135 40
Detector 2 -15.0 -15.0 7.0 45 40
32
Detector 3 15.2 15.0 12.5 229
Table A2: Example Detector Contributions Table
3-D coordinates are marked as East (x), North (y) and Elevation (z). Figures are in m from a
datum point, which may be the CAD model datum (point 0, 0, 0), or refer to a declared datum
(e.g. the bottom L.H. corner of the model at zero elevation). In this case, table 2 includes
Yaw (angular direction in azimuth) and Pitch (angular direction in zenith). In the case of gas
detector locations, yaw and pitch are omitted.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Appendix B. Main Substation Transformer
In addition to the main report, Flame Detection Mapping and coverage calculation has been
carried out for Transformers adjacent to Main Substation on request of Daewoo Engineering.
Table B1 below summarises the detector numbers, both as-built and improved for each zone.
Flammable Gas Detector Count Optical Flame Detector Count

Area
As-built Optimised As-built Optimised
Transformer
- - 3 4
Bay #3
Transformer
- - 3 4
Bay #4
Table B1 – Detector numbers for Main Substation Transformer
B.1 Transformer Bay #3
B.1.1 Existing
Figure B1 shows the existing flame detection coverage map for the transformer in Bay #3.
Table B2 & Table B3 show detector contributions (obtained after excluding the projection
area within obstructions) and detector locations respectively.
1ooN 100% 2ooN 38% >2ooN 0.00%

Figure B1 – Flame Detection Coverage map for Transformer in Bay #3
DRAFT FOR COMMENT


FD-MT1-01 58.8 37.5 21.3 0.0
FD-MT1-02 30.7 10.0 20.7 0.0
FD-MT1-03 50.6 16.9 33.7 0.0
Table B2 – Flame Detector Contributions for Transformer in Bay #3

FD-MT1-01 10105 10661 103 315 20
FD-MT1-02 10098.5 10661 103 45 20
FD-MT1-03 10098.5 10666 103 135 20
Table B3 – Flame Detector Locations for Transformer in Bay #3
B.1.2 Optimised
Figure B2 shows the optimised flame detection coverage map for the transformer in Bay #3.
area within obstructions) and detector locations respectively. The coverage obtained after
one additional detector is 100% for 1ooN and 87.6% for 2ooN.
1ooN 100% 2ooN 87.6% >2ooN 18.5%

DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 100% 87.6% 18.5%
FD-MT1-01 58.8 7.4 36.7 14.7
FD-MT1-02 30.7 3.2 20.2 7.3
FD-MT1-03 50.6 4.0 31.5 15.2
FD-MT1-04 72.3 4.0 49.8 18.5

FD-MT1-01 10105 10661 103 315 20
FD-MT1-02 10098.5 10661 103 45 20
FD-MT1-03 10098.5 10666 103 135 20
FD-MT1-04 10104.93 10666.08 103 225 20
B.2 Transformer Bay #4
B.2.1 Existing
Figure B3 shows the existing flame detection coverage map for the transformer in Bay #4.
area within obstructions) and detector locations respectively.
1ooN 96.1% 2ooN 44.6% >2ooN 1.4%

DRAFT FOR COMMENT


FD-MT2-01 43.8 26.1 16.3 1.4
FD-MT2-02 41.4 8.9 31.0 1.4
FD-MT2-03 56.9 16.6 38.9 1.4

FD-MT2-01 10097.5 10661 103 315 20
FD-MT2-02 10091 10661 103 45 20
FD-MT2-03 10091 10666 103 135 20
B.2.2 Optimised
Figure B4 shows the optimised flame detection coverage map for the transformer in Bay #4.
Figure B8 & Figure B9 show detector contributions (obtained after excluding the projection
area within obstructions) and detector locations respectively. The coverage obtained after
one additional detector is 98.4% for 1ooN and 85% for 2ooN.
1ooN 98.4% 2ooN 85% >2ooN 18.5%

DRAFT FOR COMMENT


All Detectors N/A 98.4% 85% 18.5%
FD-MT2-01 43.8 4.7 27.4 11.7
FD-MT2-02 41.4 3.8 27.2 10.4
FD-MT2-03 56.9 3.0 37.6 16.1
FD-MT2-04 59.3 2.2 40.0 17.1

FD-MT2-01 10097.5 10661 103 315 20
FD-MT2-02 10091 10661 103 45 20
FD-MT2-03 10091 10666 103 135 20
FD-MT2-04 10097.5 10666 103 225 20
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Bibliographic Information
This report has been classified as Confidential and is subject to US Export Control
regulations and has been classified as ECCN EAR 99.
Report Number : GS.10.50696

Title : Fire & Gas Detection Mapping for PTTLNG Jetty Development and
LNG Receiving Terminal Project
Author(s) : Prosad Roy GSIN-PTE/PPAC
Anand Iyer GSIN-PTE/PPAC
Verified by : Robert Nicol GSUK-
PTE/EPAC
Approved by : Robert Nicol GSUK-
PTE/EPAC
Content Owner : Prosad Roy GSIN-PTE/PPAC
Issue Date : June 2010
Activity Code : ZZPT/004848/01.01
Issuing Company : Shell Technology India Pvt Ltd.,
RMZ Centennial Campus B, # 8B,
Kundanahalli Main R,
Bangalore 560048,
India.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Report distribution
Outside Shell Global Solutions
Company name and address E or P No. of

paper
copies
Mr. Bae, Chang-Mun E 0
Project Manager
Daewoo Engineering Company Limited
Within Shell Global Solutions
Name Ref. Ind. Location E or P No. of

paper
copies
Shell Research and Technology GSNL-GSXI (Reports Library) E and P 1
Centre Amsterdam
This report can be freely shared with all Shell Global Solutions employees.
DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7s92 06011 1300 CSR 001 r0 Fire Gas Detector Mapping Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

7s92 06011 1300 CSR 001 r0 Fire Gas Detector Mapping Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GS.10.

Fire & Gas Detection Mapping for PTTLNG

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

CONFIDENTIAL - ECCN EAR 99

© Shell Global Solutions International B.V., 2010. All rights reserved.

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

11/05/2010 Rev 1 Revised after Client Prosad Roy Robert Nicol

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Flammable Gas Detector Count Optical Flame Detector Count

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

7.2.11 BOG Compressor 70

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

BOG Boil Off Gas

DEP Design Engineering Practice – Shell design document

FGD Fire and Gas Detection

GDM Gas Detector Mapping

LOS Line of Sight (open-path) optical beam gas detectors

ORV Open Rack Vaporizer

Triple IR or A type of flame detector that employs simultaneous detection at three

LOTAM List of Technically Approved Materials

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

1. Introduction & Background

The activities to achieve these aims included:

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

2. Summary & Recommendations

The following recommendations are made:

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

3. Purpose, Role, Objective & Scope

3.1 Overall Purpose

• Detection of the Hazard

• Provision of a robust detection system, to maximise detection uptime while

These objectives are met by

• Analysing process and inventory data to help delineate detection zones

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

3.2.1 Limitations of this Study

(a) A “Significant Flammable Hazard” is defined as the presence of a quantity of

(b) A “Significant Flame Hazard” is defined in terms of dimensions of flame that

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

4. Target Detection Performance (TDP) for FGDM

4.1.1 Target Detection Coverage

4.1.2 Target Detection Objectives

4.1.2.1 Flammable Gas Detection Objective (FGDO)

4.1.2.2 FDO – Fire Detection Objective

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

5. Fixed Detection Voting & Technologies

5.2 Detector Types

The following types of detectors will be installed,

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

6. F&G Hazards Identification

Figure 1 – Flame Detection Mapping zones in Process Area

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 2 – Flame Detection Mapping Zones in Tank Area

Figure 3 – Flame Mapping Zone in Berth #1

6.2 Flammable Gas Detection Mapping

• Berth #1 Impoundment Pit

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 4 – Flammable Gas Mapping zones in Process Area

Figure 5 – Flammable Gas Mapping zones in Tank Area

DRAFT FOR COMMENT

Figure 6 – Flammable Gas Mapping zone in Berth #1