Penalty Scores

MGMG 645 Seminars in Management

Red Committee

1. Ms. Thatchanan Kositbanterng 5249194

2. Mr. Kaipich Pojanatananchai 5249197

3. Ms. Jutarat Trairatwong 5249198

4. Ms. Nattakitta Ampon 5249203

5. Mr. Dhanahd Settachan 5249207

Penalty table for each group since the beginning
Group Score Compliance issue Reasonableness Performance
As the group invest some portion in MAI
 The cash holding exceed for every week and proportion of market, it is hard to compare with benchmark We accept that the value of
largest stock is over the limit (but in the lower portion). on ETF (SimPort 1) this portfolio is high when it
1 -5  There is improvement on stock liquidity trading. According to Abhisit's overview, we think that compare with SD. However,
 The errors and misunderstandings on some performance investing in MAI is not a good idea it is because the high
calculations led to the wrong decision making for investors. Some reasons for investing is quite against the portion of cash holding.
market overview.
 During the first 2 weeks, a lot of breaking regulation
occurred.  The unclear calculation method during the first
 IP3 presentation for compliance issue has been improved. 2 weeks.  Due to the volatility in SET
2 -3  The wrong data in the fact sheet have a problem for  Many analysis base on the market and analyst and oil price makes the
investor's decision, even though it is correct in the coverage whereas less personal analysis from performance fluctuation.
appendix (investors see fact sheet, not raw data, thus they the advisor.
do not know the real performance).
 The misunderstanding on the first trading week made the
breaking regulation and did not meet the customer’s
requirement.
 There were mistakes on compliance during IP3 period,
 The reason support decision making in SimPort  Due to the volatility in SET
especially the liquidity issue which the group complied in
4 -3 last week but broke the rule in this week.
#2 is not clear. The data provide comes from and oil price makes the
coverage with the date after making decision. performance fluctuation.
 The wrong data in the fact sheet have a problem for
investor's decision, even though it is correct in the
appendix (investors see fact sheet not raw data, thus they
do not know the real performance).
 The error in calculation occurred in the first week, yet


advisor already corrected it.
 The presentation time is over limit.
 Due to the volatility in SET
***Remark*** not compliance issue, but the small alphabet
5 -1 in report makes committee uncomfortable sometime. We
and oil price makes the
performance fluctuation.
think that the reason for pages limit is set for capture the
important part and they should select information rather than
reduce font size.
Remark: We, Red Committee, express only their errors of both calculation and rationale in concerning with only the punishment.