Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GAMSAT Essay Guide 2
GAMSAT Essay Guide 2
GAMSAT
ESSAY
GUIDE
www.frasersgamsat.com.au
Health is not valued till
sickness comes.
The rest of this contention has an Bob Marley was a Rastafarian and people in this community do
acceptable structure. The third
sentence offers further detail to not care about medicinal treatment as much as most people do. The example
set up the contention and the comes out of
final sentence states the When his career was becoming a force in the world that was nowhere. Placing
contention. However, it is not
structure that is the problem changing the way many people thought about things, he died. the argument at
the beginning of
here, it is content. The contention
of this essay is simply that
Thus, we can see that someone who could have made society a the paragraph is
poor structure as it
medicine is important and we much better place had his life cut short because he did not worry does not allow the
should care about it. This is underlying
mediocrity. The language and about the toe infection he had and did not seek medical treatment. argument to be
expression is also quite simple made clearly.
and lacks impetus and It is sad that something as small as a toe infection which could
eloquence
have easily been cured caused the death of a great influencer of
the twentieth century.
Feedback
The structure of this essay is not too bad; however, it tackles the issue at a very
surface level. The arguments are weak, lack any compelling evidence and are
quite childish in the way they are expressed.
Essay 2: Mid 50s
Confucius once said, ‘it is not how slowly you go, as long as you do not stop.’
This phrase highlights the projection of this purpose. Medicine slowly births
from the vertices, leaving its tracks along the way, and when it reaches the
center it cuts its metaphorical umbilical cord to perceive the light of a new
world where it guides the collective to a heightened immortal consciousness.
Feedback
This essay is extremely confusing. At a surface level it looks like the Author might
be saying something very interesting, however when we read deeper, we see
that there is no clear contention and the logical progression is pretty poor. The
expression is extremely verbose as well. Thus for entirely different reasons, this
essay scores quite a similar to the first essay.
Essay 3: Low 60s
This introduction has Violence is inherent too many systems. A structure that permeates
interesting ideas that
could build a really high violence in the modern day is medicine as it results in most people not
scoring essay. However,
the introduction is a bit having the chance to be properly healed. For us to clearly understand
fumbled and vague.
Structural violence and
this we shall look at disenfranchised people and how medicine relates to
health care need be them. Medicine being a core element of the modern day, having
broken down more. The
relationship between the institutions placed throughout society. Thus, the structural violence that
two should be made
clearer to set up the body medicine carries out is an extremely polarizing one as it is not
paragraphs. There are
grammatical mistakes as something that most people recognize and try to change.
well.
Healthcare should be a right to all people. Those people who do not have
Again, the first two
sentences are strong. this healthcare are disadvantaged in life. How can anyone become
However, from there the
links to the theme are
better and move forward if there are barriers stopping them from
non-apparent. The becoming who they need to be. Their destiny and desires in life are
example is completely
irrelevant and healthcare unattainable as there are huge impediments that stop them along the
seems to just be
shoehorned in because it way. These and legitimized and normalized in society and thus are
is the theme.
difficult to fight against for most people. A clear example of this are
people who are victims of the racism of the drug war in America and
were sent to jail where there are no opportunities and the healthcare is
not great.
Feedback
This essay has heaps of potential; however, it falls very short as it seems the
author spent no time planning. There are two major flaws in this essay: 1. The
logical progression is terrible. 2. The paragraphs do not stay on theme enough.
There are too many tangents. If the author took some time to plan and clearly
show how healthcare functions as a form of structural violence, the essay could
have gone up 10-15 marks.
Essay 4: Low/Mid 70s
This is a strong paragraph, However, in current times medical research is clearly shifting
its major weakness is that
it is too short. Both the towards evidence-based procedures. Evidence based medicine
argument and the
contention need to further
influences more than just the space of research, it goes further out
be developed and
analysed.”
into the way medicine is practiced as a whole. This is because
evidence based not only uses critically appraised and peer reviewed
medical processes, it also studies patient values and preferences in
order to make the best decisions. This extra layering of context is
important as it has allowed for medicine to become something more
accessible for historically disenfranchised communities. A clear
example of this is the development of medical diagnostic procedures
that are specific to indigenous people. This procedure has an extra
layer of understanding as they have to take into account the
historical context pertaining to the relationship indigenous people
have had to hospitals and Western medicine.
Essay 4: Low/Mid 70s
... continued
Thus, we can see through the exploration of one of the major ways
medical practice has evolved, that the trajectory that modern day
medicine is taking is a positive one, and if this progress carries on
many of the problems that have historically plagued medical practice
will eventually disappear.
Feedback
All things considered, this is a pretty strong essay. There is a clear contention. The
logical progression and structure are neat. It shows the author is well read and
empathetic. However, it falls short in a few things that prevent it from being an
amazing essay; 1. The expression is very basic. and 2. When it starts to talk about
politics the explanations are very shallow
Essay 5: 80+
In the current politico-economic landscape of most nation states, health and healthcare are
contentious issues. It is this very discourse that lead me to both research the realities and
explore my own values and beliefs in relation to the notion of health. This surveying of my
mental landscape led me to one unwavering belief: “healthcare is not a privilege, it is a
right.” When this statement became core to the way I understand the human condition, I
started to question why is it that the societies I live in have come to embody the opposite of
this belief in practice. This line of questioning led me to understand one of the most
fundamental mechanisms in the way modern societies function. This mechanism is the
domineering politico-economic ideology: Neoliberalism. Through observation we can see it
functions to commodify most aspects of the human experience and does so very drastically
in the case of healthcare.
The current dominant perception on the notion of healthcare is to simply see it as medicine.
This reductive narrative on the nature of healthcare disregards the complexity and multi-
factorial reality of healthcare. Thus, for us to truly understand the change in how healthcare
has functioned we must first understand some of its core components. Currently, healthcare
exists as a set of systems and structures that function to convey generally curative
procedures to members of the population that are deemed viable. These systems and
structures function in the tangible through institutions and bureaucracy, and procedures
and methods that are often perceived as apolitical are backbone of this reality. However, we
can ask ourselves in the words of Michel Fouccault, “ Are there truly any apolitical facts?”
and come to the answer that any realm of inquiry and thought exists in relation to the
knowledge production in and around it, which is clearly a political reality.
Coming to the realization that healthcare has always been a deeply politicized notion, we
must understand the historical evolution of its political positionality to understand where it
is situated in the current context. Roughly speaking medicine and healthcare used to be
more fragmented in most pre-industrialized societies, where individuals in communities
would use the tools they had to best help people with diseases. However, with the scientific
and industrial revolution, medicine and healthcare as a practice became more systematized.
It is not this systemization that is the cause of healthcare no longer being viewed as a right.
Rather it is the fact that this process of systemization happened both simultaneously and
together with the development of capitalism, and in recent times Neoliberalism. Thus, we
see that this systemization builds procedures and institutions that function with money
central to its purpose.
This commodification acts to remove access to healthcare as a right and rather establish it as
privilege only afforded to those who can afford it. A very clear example of this is the
defunding of hospitals in rural areas, especially areas inhabited by indigenous people. Since
these hospitals are generally unprofitable, they are deemed unnecessary. It is clear to see
from this that healthcare has become deeply commoditized, to the point where in some
countries such as America it is almost completely privatized. Taking something that has
historically been seen as a right and stripping it from those who need it most.
Essay 5: 80+
... continued
To conclude, I would like to re-emphasize my central belief that healthcare should be seen
as a right and not a privilege and implore you to resist the politico-economic ideologies that
have resulted in society believing that it is a privilege.
Feedback
For the time allocated, this essay is pretty much perfect. It is deep, clear, logical,
empathetic and compelling.
Notes:
www.frasersgamsat.com.au