Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

TECHNiCAL BROCHURE

541
WG
Asset Management Decision Making C1.25
using different Risk Assessment
Methodologies

Members
Eric Rijks, Convener (NL), Gérald Sanchis, Secretary (FR),
Gary Ford (CA), Earl Hill (US), Yury Tsimberg (CA), Athanasios Krontiris (DE),
Philipp Schütt (CH), Gerd Balzer (DE), Kjell Sand (NO), Roberto Zacheo (IT),
Robert Kuik (NL), Jeroen Schuddebeurs (NL), Doug Pankhurst (AU),
Herman de Beer (AU), Miro Zunec (SI), Simona Voronca (RO)

Introduction CIGRE Publications on Asset


Management
WG C1.25 regards Asset Management as a total
business concept that comprises the management Over the past several years electric utilities have been
of risks for the business values arising from the asset in a transition from vertically integrated structures into
base itself and risks that may arise from an in-adequate market oriented organizations. During this transition,
response to changes in the environment. Asset many companies have adopted the asset management
Management includes sustainment as well as system organizational structure and have implemented risk based
planning aspects. The activities and practices of an Asset asset management decision-making processes. Through
Manager attempt to optimally manage assets, and their this transition period, CIGRÉ has produced many Technical
associated performance, risks and expenditures over Brochures and other publications on topics related to
their life cycle, for the purpose of achieving the required asset management. Therefore, the Technical Committee
quality of service in the most cost-effective manner. requested that WG C1.25 prepare a survey of recent CIGRÉ
The objective of WG C1.25 is to provide insight into publications on asset management topics. This survey was
the current and future application of asset management, summarized and published in an Electra article in June
risk management and the information needed for these 2012 [1] and a detailed report on the survey is presented in
processes in electricity transmission companies in order the TB. The study focuses on six asset management topics:
to prepare for future challenges. The TB contains the Condition Assessment and Monitoring, End of Life Issues,
following deliverables as set out by the TC of CIGRÉ Asset Management Decision Making and Risk Management,
for WG C1.25. Grid Development, Maintenance Processes and Decision
Making, Collection of Asset Data and Information and
1 - A comprehensive overview on CIGRÉ’s work on references all relevant TB’s published by CIGRÉ SC’s in
Asset Management. recent years. As several groups within CIGRÉ continue to
2 - A description of how Electricity Transmission investigate topics related to asset management, coordination
Companies include environmental impact in and communication of concepts can be facilitated through
their Asset Management decision making. regular updates such as provided in the TB.
3 - An overview of how utilities quantify the
monetary consequences for events impacting Including Environmental
business values that are not directly measured in
financial terms. Impact in Asset Management
4 - A description of the application of Risk Indicators Decisions
for transmission assets and the transmission
system by Electricity Transmission Companies. One of the drivers, for this is that many industries, •••

No. 268 - June 2013 ELECTRA 67


TECHNiCAL BROCHURE
541
WG
including the electricity transmission business,
have become increasingly aware of the impact of
multiple conflicting criteria into the management
planning process. Essential to MCDA is the
C1.25
industrial activities on the environment. assumption that the decision maker has a set of
values and preferences, and that these values can be
Based on the Kyoto Protocol and supported by modeled. The use of MCDA in Asset Management is
standards (ISO 14064), a carbon balance assessment justified when not all aspects that matter (and must
is used to identify the actions for the reduction be considered) can be given a monetary value.
of carbon emission connected to the activities of
Transmission System Operators. A familiar method The TB provides an example of fully monetized
applied for asset management decision making is risk-based business case analysis. A fully monetized
the use of a risk assessment matrix. With this risk power transformer risk model combines condition
assessment matrix the severity of events that can information with technical life data and failure
impact the business values can be assessed using a consequence information to quantify the risks of
combination of the likelihood and magnitude of operating the existing fleet of transformers over time.
impact of the event. The CO2 footprint is considered This model does not predict end-of-technical life; it
a part of the impact score on the business value quantifies the risk of retaining each transformer in
“environment”. This risk matrix can be considered service and facilitates comparison of the risk cost of
as a first filtering in the investment decision making alternate refurbishment and replacement strategies.
process. In the optimization of the investment Using scenarios, the model enables the optimisation
options the CO2 footprint is calculated and taken of the volume and timing of replacements and
into account in the decision making process. refurbishments.

Other cases of environmental impacts of electricity Risk Indicators


transmission assets are discussed in the TB such as
a number of cases on SF6 handling, including the The goal of the asset manager is to optimize the
agreement on SF6 handling between SF6 producers, balance of cost, risk and performance of the electricity
manufactures and users of electrical equipment in transmission grid. To do this, organizations apply
Germany. A case on oil spillage from transformers risk based decision making for grid development
and oil pressure cables illustrating a risk based and asset sustainment programs. One key way to
replacement policy is also included. use risk is through the application of risk indicators.
Risk indicators will ideally provide measures of the
Quantitative Evaluation of level of risk of a particular activity. Risk indicators
provide information about risk performance or
Risk Treatment Plans for risk exposure, and can be leading (predicting future
Grid Development and performance – to the extent practical) or lagging
Sustainment (past performance). Risk indicators can be specific
to an equipment item or class of items, or can be
With the increasing interest in, and use of risk-based system wide. The TB provides examples of risk
investment decision-making there is a need to indicators currently applied and under development,
investigate how utilities factor into their business in the electricity transmission business.
case analyses, in quantitative terms, the impacts of
events on business values that are not immediately System risk indicators provide a measure of the
quantifiable in monetary terms. Methods range from likelihood that the grid will be able to serve its main
the well-known health index-criticality weighting purpose, to supply customers reliably. An example
methods, to multi-criteria decision support analysis, of the development of an “Integrated Risk Indicator”
to fully monetized risk-based business case analysis. which will combine measures of past performance,
regulatory violations and equipment condition, is
Development of capital sustainment plans using discussed in the TB. Other cases provide examples of
Health Index – Criticality is one of the early and tools that measure the expectation or probability of
common methods. Based on a combination of health loss of load to customers based on generation and/or
index-based probability of failure and the weighted transmission capability. Equipment risk indicators
estimates of criticality, assets can be flagged for measure the likelihood an individual equipment
replacement in a long-term replacement plan. item (or group of similar equipment) will fail with
adverse consequences. The brochure presents a
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) studies number of case studies relating equipment condition
methods and procedures to formally incorporate and risk associated with the equipment item. •••

No. 268 - June 2013 ELECTRA 69


541
TECHNiCAL BROCHURE

Conclusions
WG
condition and operational factors (e.g. loading and
maintenance history). From all the considerable
C1.25
In the present context, sustainability approaches, amount of data, the goal is to find those parameters,
and especially carbon consumption, develop a new which indicate potential risks for the assets of the
conscience on the impact of industrial activity company. Therefore the concept of risk indicators
for the environment. While collecting cases was introduced and illustrated.
and examples from the participating electricity
transmission companies it was recognized that the The survey on Asset management publications
level of implementation of environmental impact in by CIGRÉ demonstrates that the area of Asset
Asset Management decision making differ. Management is very wide and covers many topics.
The Study Committees of CIGRÉ are doing
The examples of business case analysis provided important work in this field. As several groups within
in the TB illustrate that a range of methods from the CIGRÉ continue to investigate topics related to Asset
fully monetized approach to other approaches that Management, coordination and communication of
consider impacts on business values in a quantitative, concepts can be facilitated through regular updates
but not fully financial, manner have been applied. such as provided in the TB. 

To enable the asset manager to obtain a valid


risk assessment and determine the risk treatment References
options, the asset manager needs to have relevant
WC C1.25, “Overview of CIGRÉ publications on Asset
data available, such as: asset data, data on Management Topics”, CIGRÉ Electra, June 2012
internal and external developments such as asset

You might also like