THE GEOMETRIC

GROUP OF
COMPONY

STATISTICAL
REPORT

3rd quarter Grade in

ESP of Grade 10
Courage Students in
Rosario Integrated
School

RESEARCHERS:

FIONA GEM G. SAMSON

JOAN L. FABROS

STEPHANIE BALLATONG

MAYNARD BERNAS

HARVEY LAYOG

CRISHAN JAMES GAYO

CHARLES JOSHUA SAPITULA

TEACHER: SIR DEO GUAPO GALERA

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

We’re the researchers Joan, Fiona, Stephanie, Maynard, Charles, Harvey and Crishan

James are conducted a research of Percentile Rank.

The percentile rank of a score is the percentage of scores in its frequency distribution

that are equal to or lower than it. For example, a test score that is greater than 75% of

the scores of people taking the test is said to be at the 75th percentile, where 75 is the

percentile rank. In educational measurement, a range of percentile ranks, often

appearing on a score report, shows the range within which the test taker's "true"

percentile rank probably occurs. The "true" value refers to the rank the test taker would

obtain if there were no random errors involved in the testing process.

In statistics, percentile are used to understand and interpret data. The nth percentile of

a set of data is below it. In everyday life, percentiles are used to understand values such

as test scores, health indicators, and other measurements.

In our grades we will soon know if we really understand the lessons of our teacher that

teached to us. And of course we know if it’s passing or not if it’s still necessary to adjust

to rise.
TABLE 1

THE CLASS DATA (ESP GRADE)

84 90 83 85 87 88 94

85 87 93 86 90 88 88

85 85 84 90 85 87 85

75 90 85 84 86 93 86

87 84 87 87 84 88 87

85 85 88 86 88 85 86

86 n = 43
TABLE 2

CLASS INTERVAL TALLY TOTAL

96-100 0

91-95 IIIII-II 7

86-90 IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-IIII 19

81-85 IIIII-IIIII-IIIII-I 16

76-80 0

71-75 I 1
 CLASS INTERVAL FREQUENCY LOWER CFB
BOUNDARIES

96-100 0 95.5 43

91-95 7 90.5 43

86-90 19 85.5 36

81-85 16 80.5 17

76-80 0 75.5 1

71-75 1 70.5 1

TABLE 3
COMPUTATION

PPR ¿ 83 (HARVEY LAYOG)

PPR¿ ( 100N )( ( P−LB

i
)f
+ cfb )

100 ( 83−80.5 ) 16
PPR¿ ( )(
43 5
+1 )

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 2.55) 16 +1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 405 ) +1)

PR83¿ ( 8+1 )

PR83 ¿ 20.97

INTERPRETATION:

Therefore, 20.97% of the 43 students got a grade of less than or equal to 83.
PPR ¿ 84 ( STEPHANIE BALLATONG, CRISHAN JAMES GAYO )

PPR¿ ( 100N )( ( P−LB

i
)f
+ cfb )

100 ( 84−80.5 ) 16
PPR¿ ( )(
43 5
+1 )

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 3.55) 16 +1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( 565 +1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( 11.2+1 )

PPR84¿ 28.43

INTERPRETATION:

Therefore, 28.43% of the 43 students got a grade of less than or equal to 84.
PPR ¿ 85 ( MAYNARD BERNAS, JOAN FABROS )

PPR¿ ( 100N )( ( P−LB

i
)f
+ cfb )

( 85−80.5 ) 16
PPR¿ ( 100
43 ) ( 5
+1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 4.55) 16 +1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( 725 +1)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( 14.4+1 )

PPR85¿ 35.88

INTERPRETATION:

Therefore, 35.88% of the 43 students got a grade of less than or equal to 85.
PPR ¿ 87 ( FIONA GEM G. SAMSON, CHARLES JOSHUA SAPITULA )

PPR¿ ( 100N )( ( P−LB

i
)f
+ cfb )

( 87−85.5 ) 21
PPR¿ ( 100
43 ) ( 5
+ 17 )

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 1.55) 21 +17)

PPR¿ ( 2.33 ) ( ( 31.55 ) + 17)

PPR¿ ( 6.3+17 )

PPR87¿ 54.29

INTERPRETATION:

Therefore, 54.29% of the 43 students got a grade of less than or equal to 87.