The document defines severity, probability, and detectability criteria for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Severity is ranked from 1-10 based on the potential effects of failure, ranging from no effect to hazardous without warning. Probability is ranked from 1-10 based on the expected frequency of failures, from very unlikely to expected regularly. Detectability is ranked from 1-10 based on the likelihood of detecting failures, from almost certain detection to normally not detected.
The document defines severity, probability, and detectability criteria for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Severity is ranked from 1-10 based on the potential effects of failure, ranging from no effect to hazardous without warning. Probability is ranked from 1-10 based on the expected frequency of failures, from very unlikely to expected regularly. Detectability is ranked from 1-10 based on the likelihood of detecting failures, from almost certain detection to normally not detected.
The document defines severity, probability, and detectability criteria for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Severity is ranked from 1-10 based on the potential effects of failure, ranging from no effect to hazardous without warning. Probability is ranked from 1-10 based on the expected frequency of failures, from very unlikely to expected regularly. Detectability is ranked from 1-10 based on the likelihood of detecting failures, from almost certain detection to normally not detected.
Failure could lead to death or permanent injury to 10 HAZARDOUS WITHOUT WARNING the customer. Failure could lead to injury to the customer. Failure 9 HAZARDOUS WITH WARNING would create non-compliance with registered specifications. Failure could lead to adverse reaction for customer. Failure would create noncompliance with GMP 8 VERY HIGH regulations or product registrations. Failure possible to lead to recall. Failure leads to customer perception of safety issue. Failure renders individual unit(s) unusable. Failure 7 HIGH causes a high degree of customer dissatisfaction. Recall for business reasons possible but Authority required recall unlikely. 100% of product may have to be reworked. Failure causes a 6 MODERATE high degree of customer dissatisfaction and numerous complaints. Failure unlikely to lead to recall. Minor disruption to production line. A portion of 5 LOW the product may have to be scrapped (no sorting). Customer dissatisfied. Minor disruption to production line. Failure relates 4 VERY LOW to non-dosage form issues (like minor packaging problems) and can be easily overcome by customer. Minor disruption to production line. A portion of 3 MINOR the product may have to be reworked. Defect noticed by average customers. Minor disruption to production line. A portion of the 2 VERY MINOR product may have to be reworked. Failure not readily apparent to the customer. 1 NONE No Effect
FMEA PROBABILITY CRITERIA
VALUE DESCRIPTION CRITERIA 10 VERY HIGH: REGULAR FAILURES EXPECTED TO HAPPEN REGULARY 8 HIGH: REPEATED FAILURES EXPECTED TO HAPPEN IN A LOW FREQUENCY 6 MODERATE: OCCASIONAL FAILURES EXPECTED TO HAPPEN INFREQUENTLY 4 LOW: UNLIKELY FAILURES UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN 2 REMOTE: FAILURE IS UNLIKELY NOT TO HAPPEN FMEA DETECTABILITY CRITERIA VALUE DESCRIPTION CRITERIA FAILURE VERY LIKELY TO BE OVERLOOKED, HENCE 10 NORMALLY NOT DETECTED NOT DETECTED 8 LIKELY NOT DETECTED FAILURE MAY BE OVERSEEN 6 REGULARY DETECTED FAILURE WILL NORMALLY NOT BE DETECTED 4 ALWAYS DETECTED FAILURE CAN AND WILL BE DETECTED IN ALL CASES 2 ALMOST CERTIAN NO FAILURE AND 100% AUTOMATIC INSPECTION