Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Did Literary Histories Say To You? - Pradeepan Pampirikunnu
What Did Literary Histories Say To You? - Pradeepan Pampirikunnu
What Did Literary Histories Say To You? - Pradeepan Pampirikunnu
-- Pradeepan Pampirikunnu
Main Argument: Traditional literary histories should be revisited and rewritten. History should be
democratized.
The author wrote the essay at a time when all over the world the oppressed social groups, considered inferior
‘others’, are at present engaged in serious exploration of history and interrogations of culture.
This is part of an attempt to retrieve lost pride and honour with the intention of redefining their sense of self.
One of the lessons from history is that only people who initiate a politics of self-representation and maintain
records of their discursive practices will find a place in history and culture.
Dalit studies is therefore a political mode of enquiry and explanation generating discourses on the past,
present and future of Dalit’s in order to help them find a place in history and culture and shape their future.
******
Knowledge production and distribution goes through various procedures of rigorous social control.
This process is called the politics of knowledge: to choose from a large body of information available, leave
the rest out, subject the select knowledge to editing and interpreting, confer on it scientificity and
objectivity, reduce its availability and limit its accessibility.
What is left out in the ideological apparatus of the state is the history and knowledge of the oppressed. It is
the voice of the broken, which is always silenced. It is the truth of the oppressed, which is always excluded.
The task of dalit studies is to release the counter-hegemonic forces of critique in order to facilitate the
eruption of dalit voice and truth, breaking the silence and darkness in the midst of prevailing politics of
knowledge.
*******
Caste and Casteism
Every society offers an explanation for its structure. The explanation given by Indian society is that of the
caste system.
The famous historian Kosambi said the most important distinguishing feature of Indian society is jati or
caste.
Caste becomes casteism when these social divisions are arranged in hierarchical order and one’s position in
the hierarchy is used as justification for preferential treatment in inter-group relations.
Those higher in the hierarchy grab the monopoly of purity, ownership and control over the means of
production and political power.
For example even now, most of those doing manual labour in the agricultural sector are drawn from certain
castes customarily forced to the fields for centuries.
Casteism has played an important role in devising the grammar of our language and designing the inflections
of our behavior.
Examples
Chandu Menon’s Indulekha (1889), the celebrated first Malayalam novel, stages a conflict between a
feudal, Nair project of modernity and western modernity. We find no dalit interaction in the novel. By
contrast Kunjambu’s novel treats conversion as a means to overcome caste, is far less discussed. It is the
first non-Brahmin, non-Nair novels in Malayalam. This obscurity of secularism is one reason why Dalit
creative writing emerged so late in Kerala. Caste is a hidden identity for Dalit’s in Kerala. Few people will
openly declare their caste.
Everything holds a note of caste for the Keralite. An internal fear exists that if one is dark-skinned, even if a
savarna, one may be mistaken for an SC.
Consummables identified with different castes and their tastes such as marar pickles, Brahmins wheat flour,
marar papadam, namboothiri tooth powder are widely marketed all over kerala.
The absence of such market possibility for other communities is also a consequence of the savarna
constructions of ‘lower-caste’ identities.
There is also the use of ‘universal’ categories such as servants, sweepers, agricultural slaves and folk singers
---
“If the lowly acquire wealth, they will carry umbrellas even at midnight.’ [Alpan artham kittiyal
ardha rathriyilum kuda pidikum.’]
Can the accouterment of caste be simply peeled off?
Can a crow turn into crane by taking a bath?
You might catch a leech and put it on the mattress, but will it stay there?
Examples of how the bodies and social status of avarna people are depicted in savarna discourse.
Such figures are shaped by contempt as well as pity.
While savarna bodies and lives are conceived of as respectable and national, the local or indigenous takes
forms of leech, lowly idiot and crow.
The so –called secular language we use today is the language of the upper caste
You in Malayalam literature a rejection of regional identities and pan-Indian savarna subjectivity.
Most important of this is treatment of savarna life and transactions and symbols as secular.
His novels are about the anger of those dismissed from nair tharavad- in his work society is pushed to the
rear and the tharavad assumes primary importance – the language of nairs was accepted as secular-
valluvanadan dialect
Consider the word veedu (home). William Logan in his Malabar says veedu or bhavanam is a place where
nairs usually live. Within the nair caste, the powerful live in idam. It was not illam or mana (namboothiri
houses) or pura (thiya house) or chala/ madam or cheri (dalit dwellings) that became a secular word in
Kerala- it was the nair word ‘veedu’
This transformed the kerala tharavadu from a being a system of inheritance to the cultural foundation of
Kerala.
This is why despite the decline of matrilineal system, there exists a an anxiety regarding the decline of
tharavadu