Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Andrea Yao Kr-Copy of Socratic Seminar Self-Score 2020
Andrea Yao Kr-Copy of Socratic Seminar Self-Score 2020
Directions: Score yourself between 0-3 in the boxes that apply. To receive full credit (20 points), you should
have shown evidence that you participated fully and thoughtfully. Remember that your score will reflect both
your own score and the teacher evaluation of performance.
Speaking
Attribute Score Evidence
0-3
Shared my position on a question with 3 Jackie asked a question about Kite Runner as a whole.
a relevant idea. May Mon, Mia, and Carina mentioned the sensitive topics
of the novel. They also talked about the Western
audience and how people might react to Afghanistan
culture and mindset. I agreed with everyone and tied
Jackie’s statement with the original question about
redemption.
Spoke clearly with volume control. 3 I tried my best to speak loud so everyone could hear me
even though it was difficult to do it with the ma on.
Expanded on someone else’s idea, or 3 I expanded on Carina’s ideas twice because I could hear
respectfully disagreed with an idea. her more clear than everyone else. I agreed with her idea
of redemption. I also agreed with Mia’s statements about
gender roles.
Showed deep analysis by making a 3 I connected the sensitive topics from Jackie’s original
connection, reflecting on author’s question and the theme of redemption. I also mentioned
choices, or debating a topic. the Afghanistan’s cultural connections to answer Kaylee’s
IB English A: Literature Hanthorn
Name: Andrea Yao Period: 2
Listening
Attribute Score Evidence
0-3
Encouraged someone else to speak. 2 I didn’t talk over anybody in my group and let everyone
share their thoughts respectfully.
Used body language to indicate 2 It was hard to determine my peer’s body language
participation. because we wore masks. I tried to keep track of everyone
who spoke.
Stayed on-task and maintained focus, 3 I listened to everyone’s ideas/thoughts even though it was
overcame distractions. hard to understand them at one point (outside
distractions by the gym).
Took notes. 3 - Now that we’ve read the novel, is redemption an idea
that can happen? Can someone truly justify a sin?
- Ending: Amir reminds Sohrab the same thing Hassan
told him in a dream. “For you a thousand times over”.
What does this mean?
- The last sentence of the novel is “I Ran”
- Hosseini mentions why he wrote about historical events
in Afghanistan which parallels the same ideas that
happened to the characters.
- The author incorporates the theme of redemption
everywhere.
- Amir would do anything/everything for Sohrab. He did a
lot for Hassan but he will re-do his actions once again for
his son.
- Flashback: Hassan and Amir’s childhood
- The states of Sohrab towards the ending changes.
Hosseini decoupled the characterization fully.
- Not a completely satisfying happy ending but rather a
valuable one (ambiguity/realistic).
- Ending parallels Amir and Hassan’s childhood days.
- The ending opened a new passageway for
interpretation.
- Rahim Khan plays a large role in the book. He sends
Amir to a new journey to find Sohrab. Rahim Khan wants
to be alone but leaves Amir one last letter.
- Rahim Khan’s character is similar to a fatherly figure to
IB English A: Literature Hanthorn
Name: Andrea Yao Period: 2
Reading
Attribute Score Evidence
0-3
Reviewed chapter before seminar and 2 I didn’t share my discussion questions but I reviewed
created discussion questions. everyone’s page numbers (examples from the book).
Found relevant lines and page 3 Pages 288-292: The scene where Amir accepted Assef’s
numbers during discussion. fight. I connected this idea to the theme of redemption
because I thought Amir redeemed himself. Amir knew he
needed to stand up for himself because he never did as a
child.
Page 343:
Hyperbole: “...until I thought my throat would rip and my
chest would explode.” Sohrab’s suicide attempt in the
bathtub.
Conduct
Attribute Score Evidence
0-3
Kept discussion relevant, literary, We were respectful of each other’s ideas/thoughts. All of
inclusive, and respectful. 3 us agreed with each other’s statements which made it
easier for me to connect different ideas.
Refrained from either Although I found it difficult to speak loud with a mask, I
over-dominating the conversation or 3 answered the main questions and related to the themes of
not contributing at all. the novel.
Took risks or showed 2 I could’ve asked a question but it was interesting to build
open-mindedness. Showed an IB different ideas. I noticed nobody mentioned the fight
Learner profile attribute. scene so it was the perfect opportunity to share my idea
with the class.
Identify a personal goal for our next Socratic Seminar:
- Ask a question about the theme of the novel or a key takeaway
- Possibly share a new idea