Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS Assignment
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS Assignment
When you think of all the largest companies in the world, these are not proprietorships or
partnerships. These companies are all joint stock companies. When dealing with business on
a fairly large scale, a joint stock company is the most suitable form of business organisation.
Joint Stock Company
The simplest way to describe a joint stock company is that it is a business organisation that
is owned jointly by all its shareholders. All the shareholders own a certain amount of stock
in the company, which is represented by their shares.
Professor Haney defines it as “a voluntary association of persons for profit, having the
capital divided into some transferable shares, and the ownership of such shares is the
condition of membership of the company.” Studying the features of a joint stock company
will clarify its structure.
However, not all laws/rights/duties apply to a company. It exists only in the law and not in
any physical form. So we call it an artificial legal person.
3] Incorporation
For a company to be recognized as a separate legal entity and for it to come into existence,
it has to be incorporated. Not registering a joint stock company is not an option. Without
incorporation, a company simply does not exist.
4] Perpetual Succession
The joint stock company is born out of the law, so the only way for the company to end is by
the functioning of law. So the life of a company is in no way related to the life of its
members. Members or shareholders of a company keep changing, but this does not affect
the company’s life.
5] Limited Liability
This is one of the major points of difference between a company and a sole proprietorship
and partnership. The liability of the shareholders of a company is limited. The personal
assets of a member cannot be liquidated to repay the debts of a company.
A shareholders liability is limited to the amount of unpaid share capital. If his shares are fully
paid then he has no liability. The amount of debt has no bearing on this. Only the companies
assets can be sold off to repay its own debt. The members cannot be made to pay up.
6] Common Seal
A company is an artificial person. So its day-to-day functions are conducted by the board of
directors. So when a company enters any contract or signs an agreement, the approval is
indicated via a common seal. A common seal is engraved seal with the company’s name on
it.
So no document is legally binding on the company until and unless it has a common seal
along with the signatures of the directors.
7] Transferability of Shares
In a joint stock company, the ownership is divided into transferable units known as shares.
In case of a public company the shares can be transferred freely, there are almost no
restrictions. And in a public company, there are some restrictions, but the transfer cannot
be prohibited.
Advantages of a Joint Stock Company
One of the biggest drawing factors of a joint stock company is the limited liability of its
members. their liability is only limited up to the unpaid amount on their shares. Since their
personal wealth is safe, they are encouraged to invest in joint stock companies
The shares of a company are transferable. Also, in the case of a listed public company they
can also be sold in the market and be converted to cash. This ease of ownership is an added
benefit.
Perpetual succession is another advantage of a joint stock company. The
death/retirement/insanity/etc does affect the life of a company. The only liquidation under
the Companies Act will shut down a company.
A company hires a board of directors to run all the activities. Very proficient, talented
people are elected to the board and this results in effective and efficient management. Also,
a company usually has large resources and this allows them to hire the best talent and
professionals.
Joint-Stock Company
The joint-stock company was the forerunner of the modern corporation. In a JOINT-STOCK
VENTURE, stock was sold to high net-worth investors who provided CAPITAL and had limited
RISK. These companies had proven profitable in the past with trading ventures. The risk was
small, and the returns were fairly quick.
The risk was larger as the colony might fail. The STARTUP COSTS were enormous and the
returns might take years. Investors in such endeavors needed more than a small sense of
adventure.
Merchants who dissented from the Church of England were also willing investors in New
World colonies. There were plenty of Puritans who had the necessary capital, and with the
Catholic-leaning Stuart monarchs assuming the throne the Puritans' motive to move became
stronger.
With an excess landless population to serve as workers, and motivated, adventurous, or
devout investors, the joint-stock company became the vehicle by which England finally
settled the Western Hemisphere.
This starkly contrasted with Spanish and French settlements. New Spain and New France
were developed by their kings. The English colonies were developed by their people. Many
historians argue that the primary reason the relatively small and late English colonization
effort ultimately outlasted its predecessors was because individuals had a true stake in its
success.
SWOT ANALYSIS
SWOT analysis is a vital strategic planning tool that can be used by Public Joint-Stock
Company Mobile TeleSystems managers to do a situational analysis of the firm . It is a handy
technique to map out the present Strengths (S), Weakness (W), Opportunities (O) & Threats
(T) Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is facing in its current business
environment.
The Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is one of the leading organizatations in
its industry. Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems maintains its prominent
position in market by carefully analyzing and reviewing the SWOT analysis. SWOT analysis
an immensenly interactive process and requires effective coordination among various
departments within the company such as – marketing, finance, operations, management
information systems and strategic planning.
The SWOT Analysis framework enables an organization to identify the internal strategic
factors such as -strengths and weaknesses, & external strategic factors such as -
opportunities and threats. It leads to a 2X2 matrix – also known as SWOT Matrix.
SO (strengths-opportunities) Strategies
WO (weaknesses-opportunities) Strategies
ST (strengths-threats) Strategies
WT (weaknesses-threats) Strategies
Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems swot analysis / matrix
As one of the leading firms in its industry, Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems
has numerous strengths that enable it to thrive in the market place. These strengths not
only help it to protect the market share in existing markets but also help in penetrating new
markets. Based on Fern Fort University extensive research – some of the strengths of Public
Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems are –
Superb Performance in New Markets – Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems has
built expertise at entering new markets and making success of them. The expansion has
helped the organization to build new revenue stream and diversify the economic cycle risk
in the markets it operates in.
Reliable suppliers – It has a strong base of reliable supplier of raw material thus enabling the
company to overcome any supply chain bottlenecks.
Good Returns on Capital Expenditure – Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is
relatively successful at execution of new projects and generated good returns on capital
expenditure by building new revenue streams.
Highly skilled workforce through successful training and learning programs. Public Joint-
Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is investing huge resources in training and development
of its employees resulting in a workforce that is not only highly skilled but also motivated to
achieve more.
Weakness are the areas where Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems can improve
upon. Strategy is about making choices and weakness are the areas where a company can
improve using SWOT analysis and build on its competitive advantage and strategic
positioning.
Not highly successful at integrating firms with different work culture. As mentioned earlier
even though Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is successful at integrating
small companies it has its share of failure to merge firms that have different work culture.
Organization structure is only compatible with present business model thus limiting
expansion in adjacent product segments.
The marketing of the products left a lot to be desired. Even though the product is a success
in terms of sale but its positioning and unique selling proposition is not clearly defined which
can lead to the attacks in this segment from the competitors.
Investment in Research and Development is below the fastest growing players in the
industry. Even though Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile TeleSystems is spending above
the industry average on Research and Development, it has not been able to compete with
the leading players in the industry in terms of innovation. It has come across as a mature
firm looking forward to bring out products based on tested features in the market.
There are gaps in the product range sold by the company. This lack of choice can give a new
competitor a foothold in the market.
The company has not being able to tackle the challenges present by the new entrants in the
segment and has lost small market share in the niche categories. Public Joint-Stock
Company Mobile TeleSystems has to build internal feedback mechanism directly from sales
team on ground to counter these challenges.
Days inventory is high compare to the competitors – making the company raise more capital
to invest in the channel. This can impact the long term growth of Public Joint-Stock
Company Mobile TeleSystems
This method is called Weighted SWOT analysis. It is better than doing simplistic SWOT
analysis because with Weighted SWOT Analysis Public Joint-Stock Company Mobile
TeleSystems managers can focus on the most critical factors and discount the non-
important one. It also solves the long list problem where organizations ends up making a
long list but none of the factors deemed too critical.