Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ac500336f Si 001
Ac500336f Si 001
Xiao-Long Zhang, Cheng Zheng, Shan-Shan Guo, Juan Li*, Huang-Hao Yang* and
Guonan Chen
The Key Lab of Analysis and Detection Technology for Food Safety of the MOE,
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Analysis and Detection Technology for Food
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: hhyang@fio.org.cn.; Fax: +86 591 22866227; Tel: +86 591 22866135
S-1
Figure S1. Fluorescence spectra of g-C3N4 nanosheets (blue) and g-C3N4-MnO2
nanocomposite (brown).
Figure S1 showed that the fluorescence optical properties of g-C3N4 nanosheets and
blue emission at 438 nm. Conversely, the fluorescence was obviously quenched when
Figure S2. (A) UV-vis absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of KMnO4 (black)
and MnO2 nanoparticles (red); (B) UV-vis absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of
g-C3N4 nanosheets (black) and g-C3N4-MnO2 nanocomposite (red).
As seen from Figure S2A, MnO2 nanoparticles solution exhibited a broad peak from
S-2
may be an indication of the formation of the MnO2 through the redox reaction of
nanocomposite indicate the formation of the MnO2 deposited onto the g-C3N4
protein thiols can produce fluorescence. As shown in Figure S3, The g-C3N4-MnO2
S-3
Figure S4. Fluorescence response of g-C3N4-MnO2 nanocomposite towards Trx (250
µM) and GSH. The F refers to the fluorescence intensity response of the target (GSH)
or non-target samples; the F0 refer to the fluorescence intensity response of water.
It is clear from Figure S4 that Trx only caused a slight fluorescence recovery of
cells.
S-4