Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indra Dai 2 Storey Report
Indra Dai 2 Storey Report
[
Of Residential Building
Submitted to
BHIMDUTTA MUNICIPALITY, KANCHANPUR
Chapter 2 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Objectives and Scope of Work..............................................................................................................6
2.3 Structural Components.......................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Codes, Standards and References.......................................................................................................7
2.5 Structural Design Methodology..............................................................................................................7
Chapter 6 Loads........................................................................................................................................ 13
6.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Gravity Load........................................................................................................................................ 13
6.3 Seismic Load....................................................................................................................................... 16
6.3.1 Code-based Design...................................................................................................................... 16
6.4 Analysis Procedures............................................................................................................................17
6.4.1 Code Based Design...................................................................................................................... 17
6.5 Component and Member Design.........................................................................................................18
Chapter 9 Summary.................................................................................................................................. 29
9.1 Summary............................................................................................................................................. 29
9.1.1 Beam design summary.................................................................................................................30
9.1.2 Column Design Summary.............................................................................................................31
2.1 Introduction
This report presents the structure analysis and design of Residetntial building. The building is Special Reinforced
Concrete Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type of building. It is designed to meet both strength and serviceability
requirements when subjected to gravity and earthquake loads.
The analysis and design has been based on IS codes & Nepal building code that are in practice in Nepal. This report
consists of the design assumptions, design methodology, design inputs and outputs, and sample design of structural
members.
The main objectives of the work were to perform the structural design of the building in terms of
suitability of the structural system, cost effectiveness, efficient use of materials and other resources,
conformance to the acceptable building codes, standards and established engineering practices, with
special emphasis on the effects due to earthquakes and other applicable demands.
The scope of work is divided into two phases.
Phase I: Structural System Development
Structural system is developed to achieve the good performance and cost effectiveness in collaboration
with the project architects.
1) Review architectural drawings provided by the client and other related documents as necessary.
2) Develop structural concepts and the structural system with an objective to achieve good performance
and cost effectiveness.
Phase II: Detailed Structural Design
Structural design is carried out using state-of-the-art methodologies, techniques, technologies, and tools.
References were made to the relevant design codes, standards, and documents.
1) Develop design criteria to be used for the structural design of the building.
2) Create finite element models of the structure with varying complexities and refinements as suitable to
understand the response.
3) Carry out an analysis and design of the structure, progressively using linear-static techniques.
4) Carry out detailed design and prepare structural design drawings.
The structural design is based primarily on the current Standards of Indian & Nepal codes, which is
prevailingly adopted for the structural design of the buildings in Nepal.
The basic building codes to be referred are listed below which were followed for structural design, also
indicating their area of application.
Table 2:Codes and Standards
SAP2000 version 22 was used for the linear static analysis and design of three-dimensional structures, in
which the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure was adequate for the calculation of
the significant features of structures.
The structural elements of reinforced concrete were designed to Limit State Theory, while the structural
steel elements were designed to the Permissible Stress Theory. The major structural elements were
automatically designed in the programmer to IS 456 for reinforced concrete structures elements, while the
certain design calculations for those not properly figured due to the limitation of program were manually
carried out in accordance with the relevant latest standards.
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design philosophy and approach used in structural design of buildings.
The set of equivalent static forces specified above were assumed to act simultaneously at each level in the
direction being considered and were applied through points eccentric to the centre of rigidity.
Importance factor(I):
Importance factor for the calculation of seismic is taken as on the following type
Table 3: Importance factor
Zone factore(z):
zone factors for different municipalities and other regions are given in below table and region
1 Ductile moment-resisting frame Must comply with the detailing for ductility 1.0
requirements.
2 Frame as in 1 with reinforced concrete shear walls Reinforced concrete shear walls must comply with 1.0
appropriate3 detailing for ductility requirement
3 Frame as in 1(a) with masonry infills Must comply with the detailing for ductility 21.2
requirements.
4 Frame as in 1 with either steel bracing members Steel bracing members must comply with the 1.51.2
detailed for ductility or reinforced concrete infill detailing for ductility requirements NBC 111-94.
panels
Structural
Modification (if
members
needed)
Preliminary Design
Analysis (linear
static or
Loap
dyanmic)& Checks(
Application(DL ,
torsional
LL , E-quake, wind
irregularity, drift,
etc.)
soft storey, mass
irregularity
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the strength of materials used in the design of structural components.
4.2 Concrete
The minimum compressive, used in different types of structural components are shown in the following
table.
Table 5: Compressive Strength of concrete
Minimum yield strength of reinforcing steel to be used in the design is shown in the following table.
Table 6 :Yield Strength of Reinforcing steel
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the finite element modeling of the building, including modeling assumptions of
materials, sections, and components properties.
5.2.3 Columns
Frame elements were used in modeling of columns, which includes the effects of biaxial bending, torsion,
axial deformation, and biaxial shear deformations. Insertion points and end offsets were applied to account
for the finite size of beam and column intersections, if required. The end offsets may be made partially or
fully rigid based on engineering judgment to model the stiffening effect that can occur when the ends of an
element were embedded in beam and column intersections.
Chapter 6 Loads
6.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design loads considered in the structural design, including gravity loads and
seismic loads.
Self-weight of the structure was considered as dead load and finishes and partitions were considered as
imposed dead load. Live load was determined in accordance with occupancy or use. The following loads
are in addition to the self-weight of the structure. The minimum loading requirements were taken from NS
101-1994.
Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load intensity
2
3 KN/m )
n
Total Weight of the frame, W= Wi Where, n = total number of storey
I=1
2 1.2(DL+LL±EL)
3 1.5(DL±EL)
4 0.9DL ± 1.5 EL
Where, Cd = CZIK
The structural components were designed to satisfy the strength and ductility requirements. Strength
capacities for different types of actions considered in the design are summarized in the table below.
Table 11: Component and Member Design
7.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the analysis and design results of the building. The structural components were
designed to resist the elastic demand forces considering R factor using seismic coefficient analysis method.
Drift check(Y-direction)
Store height( Absolute Relative permissible chec
y LoadCase m) Drift(mm) Drift(mm) drift k
Groun EqX 3.048 0 0 12.192 OK
Drift check(X-direction)
Store height( Absolute Relative permissible chec
LoadCase
y m) Drift(mm) Drift(mm) drift k
Groun
EqY 3.048 0 12.192 OK
d 0
1st EqY 3.048 2.16 2.16 12.192 OK
2nd EqY 3.048 3.82 1.66 12.192 OK
7.2.3 Deformation
Maximum deformation of the building for static earthquake load condition for X and Y direction was checked
from SAP2000 model. Deformed value of the structure is tabulated in capture 7. Deflected shape of building
in x-dir and y-dir due to Eqx & Eqy respectively are shown below
The concrete column was designed using various sections with reference IS 456. The minimum size of
column was designed considering the ductile detailing with reference to IS 13920. Section input to be
provided is as shown in below diagrams
Foundation Design
Foundation was designed as an isolated footing. The dimension of the foundation was calculated based on
150 kN/m 2 soil bearing capacity. The thickness of 350 mm footing was used for the foundation. The
thickness was checked under punching shear and size of footing was determined considering nominal load
transfer mechanism from the column to foundation below.
8.1.1 Introduction:
This chapter presents the finite element modeling of the building as mansion in chapter 2, including
modeling assumptions of materials, sections, components properties and design and result of the building
TABLE: Joint
Reactions
Join
t OutputCase CaseType F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3
Text Text Text KN KN KN KN-m KN-m KN-m
Combinatio
20 UDCON2 n 3.881 4.87 149.242 -5.1943 3.5735 0.0202
Combinatio
21 UDCON2 n -2.148 4.384 183.83 -4.7747 -2.4638 0.0202
Combinatio
22 UDCON2 n 0.622 4.274 171.53 -4.7352 0.31 0.0202
Combinatio
23 UDCON2 n -3.448 5.199 141.487 -5.7207 -3.7653 0.0202
Combinatio
24 UDCON2 n 4.121 1.382 344.495 -1.7018 3.736 0.0202
Combinatio
25 UDCON2 n -1.595 3.808 431.015 -4.1983 -1.987 0.0202
Combinatio
26 UDCON2 n -0.471 3.81 407.057 -4.2703 -0.8622 0.0202
Combinatio
27 UDCON2 n -5.032 1.702 266.754 -2.2194 -5.4297 0.0202
Combinatio
28 UDCON2 n 3.634 -5.75 154.155 5.4401 3.1622 0.0202
Combinatio
29 UDCON2 n -0.583 -9.435 276.852 9.063 -1.06 0.0202
Combinatio
30 UDCON2 n -1.26 -9.082 261.5 8.6392 -1.7381 0.0202
Combinatio
31 UDCON2 n -3.563 -5.933 147.632 5.4265 -4.0444 0.0202
Combinatio
32 UDCON2 n 3.278 0.034 75.983 -0.3172 2.8696 0.0202
Combinatio
33 UDCON2 n 2.564 0.737 73.32 -1.0212 2.2 0.0202
305
305
B= 1.53 meters
450 mm
200 mm
Lx = 3.74 m
Top cove r mm 20 (Norma l we ight concre te ) P la n
Btm cove r mm 20
Edge 2
Edge 4
LOADING characte ris tic EDGE CONDITIONS
Se lf we ight kN/m² 3.00 Edge 1 D C = Continuous
Extra de a d kN/m² 1.50 Edge 2 C D = Dis continuous Ly = 4.577 m
Tota l De a d, gk kN/m² 4.50 gf= 1.40 Edge 3 C
Impos e d, qk kN/m² 3.00 gf= 1.60 Edge 4 C 2
De s ign loa d, n kN/m² 11.10 S ee Figure 3.8 and claus es 3.5.3.5-6 Edge 3
MATERIALS
fcu 20 N/mm² gm 1.5 concrete Min ba r Ø = 8
fy 500 N/mm² gm 1.05 stee l Ma x ba r Ø = 12
h a gg 20 mm De ns ity 23.6 kN/m³
Cove r 25 mm (Norm al we ight concre te ) Nomina l top s te e l ? Y
LOADING
Impos e d 4.00 kN/m² 22.55 kN/m ult 24.96 kN/m ult
Flight finis he s 1.60 kN/m² (8.98 + 6.24) (10.71 + 6.24)
La nding finis he s 1.30 kN/m²
DES IGN
LANDING A, gk = 2.95 + 1.30 = 4.25 kN/m² n = 1.4 x 4.25 + 1.6 x 4.0 = 12.35 kN/m²
FLIGHT, gk = 5.47 + 1.60 = 7.07 kN/m² n = 1.4 x 7.07 + 1.6 x 4.0 = 16.30 kN/m²
LANDING C, no loa d .
MATERIALS
fcu 20 N/mm² gm 1.5 c onc rete Min ba r Ø = 8
fy 500 N/mm² gm 1.05 steel Ma x ba r Ø = 12
h a gg 20 mm De ns ity 23.6 kN/m³
Cove r 25 mm (Norm al we ight concre te ) Nomina l top s te e l ? Y
DIMENS IONS
a= 914 mm de pth, h = 125 mm
b= 914 mm width, w = 914 mm
c= 50 mm
d= 0 mm L = 1878 mm
LOADING
LANDING Impos e d 4.00 kN/m² 32.0 kN ult 33.1 kN ult
Finis he s 1.50 kN/m² 35.0 kN/m ult 36.2 kN/m ult
Sla b 2.95 kN/m² n = 1.4 x 4.45 + 1.6 x 4.0 = 12.63 kN/m²
gk qk
Flight a re a ction 8.98 6.24 kN/m n1 = (1.4 x 8.98 + 1.6 x 6.24)/0.91 = 24.67 kN/m²
Flight b re a ction 10.71 6.24 kN/m n2 = (1.4 x 10.71 + 1.6 x 6.24)/0.91 = 27.31 kN/m²
DES IGN
Ze ro s he a r is a t 36.24 /(12.63 + 27.31) = 0.907 m from right
M = 36.24 x 0.907 - 12.63 x 0.907²/2 - 27.31 x 0.907²/2 = 16.44 kNm/m
d = 125 - 25 - 5 = 95 mm K = 0.0911 As = 410 mm²/m
PROVIDET10 @ 190 B = 413 mm²/m
. T8 @ 300 T in s pa n
L/d = 1,878 /95 = 19.768 < 20.0 x 0.998 = 21.065 a llowe d OK
Chapter 9 Summary
9.1 Summary
Structural design was carried out for buildings. Structural system was Special moment resisting reinforced
concrete frame system with in-filled wall. Special moment resisting frame was analyzed with seismic load
from NBC 105:1994 and reinforced concrete members were designed with IS456. The outputs from both
codes were compared. The reinforced concrete section was taken from bigger value among the values
obtained from the codes. The foundations were designed as isolated footing considering the bearing
capacity of soil 150KN/m2 respectively. The proposed design satisfies the key requirement of the building
codes.
longitudinal Reinforcment
Shear
Beam Positio Reinforcment
Storey Grid At end At mid
size n
F1- Except F1
F2- grid-B, grid-4
C/B ratio
Ratio of flexural capacity of Beam/column is computed to preclude the formation of plastic hinges in columns for
obvious reasons.
Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam framing into the joint in
particular direction.
When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam, or play with
reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments; If both end of column will yield,
during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will most probably collapse. In a frame, that is resisting
lateral loads, you cannot take away the ability of beam to develop negative moment; if you do not provide top
reinforcement, it will not be called a moment resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC
Adopted
S.No Description Quantity Unit Remarks
Code
A General Information:
A.1 Client’s Name:
Address: Dhangadhi Sub metro-politian city
Plot no:
Basements 0
Typical 3.048 m
C Geological Investigation:
Geological Investigation
i) Yes No
Conducted
If No
Reinforcement Grade Used for
Fe415
shear:
i. Brick 18 kN/m3
kN/m
ii. Steel Section 75..8
3
iii. RCC 25 kN/m
D.8.9 Base Shear from Dynamic Analysis (Response spectrum analysis or time history)
Rx=
Ry=
D.8.1
Damping:
0
D.9 Seismic Analysis Method:
Seimic
D.9.1 Seismic Anlysis method Coeffecient
Method
D.9.2 No. of modes Considered:
D.9.3 Type of Modal Combination:
D.9.4 Modal Mass Participation Factor:
In X-direction
In Y-direction
D.9.5 Scale Factor
i. Along X-direction:
ii. Along Y-Direction:
D.9.6 Total Deflection of Building:
i. Along X-direction: 3.82 mm 24 mm permissible