Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MFTasoilsandsreclamation LunaWolter Jun 2014
MFTasoilsandsreclamation LunaWolter Jun 2014
MFTasoilsandsreclamation LunaWolter Jun 2014
net/publication/264490478
Dry Mature Fine Tailings as Oil Sands Reclamation Substrates for Three Native
Grasses
CITATIONS READS
5 108
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Ecosystem assembly and succession in reclaimed western boreal ecosystems View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gabriela Lucia Luna Wolter on 17 May 2019.
Abstract
Mature fine tailings (MFT) are a by-product of oil sands mining
that must be reclaimed through capping or use as a reclamation
substrate. Some chemical and physical properties of MFT make
I ndustry produces large amounts of waste materials
and is regulated to dispose of these materials to reduce envi-
ronmental impact. The use of waste materials, such as waste
rock (Drozdowski et al., 2012), tailings (Reid and Naeth, 2005a,
2005b), sewage (Drozdowski et al., 2012; Reid and Naeth
it inhospitable for plant growth, such as high concentrations
of sodium, sulfate, chloride, and hydrocarbons. A greenhouse
2005a, 2005b), biosolids (Gardner et al., 2012), manure, and
study assessed whether substrates of various mixes of dry MFT, wood shavings (Cohen-Fernández and Naeth, 2013), in land
overburden sand, and peat mineral soil mix (PMM) and caps of reclamation is a growing worldwide practice. These materials
forest floor organic material (LFH) and PMM would support the have been used as primary substrates, in substrate mixes, and as
emergence and growth of three native grass species commonly amendments to enhance degraded soils or to modify soil chemi-
used in land reclamation. Select vegetation properties were
monitored for 16 wk in the greenhouse; select chemical and
cal and physical properties.
physical substrate properties were determined in the laboratory. The oil sands industry generates approximately 5000 m3 of
Elymus trachycaulus was more tolerant of dry MFT than Agrostis waste material per 1000 m3 of synthetic crude oil daily; 2500 m3 of
scabra and Festuca saximontana. Mean aboveground and this waste material is associated with fluid fine tailings and mature
belowground biomass were more than twice as high on substrates fine tailings (MFT) (Majid and Sparks, 1999). Approximately
with <60% MFT than on 100% MFT. Aboveground biomass was
two to four times greater with capping than without and 30%
750 million m3 of MFT has accumulated in tailings ponds in
greater on LFH than PMM caps. Cover and density followed the Alberta oil sands region (Smith, 2011). These tailings are
similar trends. Belowground biomass on capped substrates was composed of water, clay, sand, and hydrocarbon residuals. Over
at least double that on uncapped substrates. Aboveground time, heavy materials settle to the bottom, and water rises to the
biomass was almost doubled with the use of fertilizer. High top. The middle layer is MFT, consisting of 20 to 40% solids
concentrations of hydrocarbons and exchangeable ions were
associated with reduced plant growth and health. Results from
suspended in water. Recent regulatory changes require reduced
this study show that capping, amendments, and fertilizer may production of fluid fine tailings and faster reclamation than was
improve the reclamation potential of dry MFT. acceptable in the past.
Suncor Energy Inc. has developed the tailings reduction
operations (TRO) technology to produce dry MFT (Mamer,
2011). Mature fine tailings is dredged from tailings ponds,
mixed with a polymer flocculent to bind clay particles, and
poured in thin layers onto sand beaches, where water drains and
is collected for reuse; within weeks the MFT dries. Relative to
traditional tailings, dry MFT has reduced volume and storage
space requirements, increased trafficability in a shorter period of
time, and increased potential for reclamation to a dry landscape.
Dry MFT is currently expected to be capped (a layer of material
over the MFT) during reclamation.
The use of TRO is expected to shorten tailings reclamation
from 30 to 10 yr. However, there is a large gap between
developing a trafficable surface with low environmental risk to
the establishment of a sustainable vegetation cover similar to
Copyright © American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, that of locally common forest. Although innovation in tailings
and Soil Science Society of America. 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA.
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, G.L. Luna Wolter, Biota, Gestión y Consultorías Ambientales Ltda.7 Av. Miguel
recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in Claro 1224, Santiago de Chile; M.A. Naeth, 855C General Services Building, Dep.
writing from the publisher. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H1.
Assigned to Associate Editor Keith Goyne.
J. Environ. Qual.
doi:10.2134/jeq2013.10.0415 Abbreviations: CCME, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment; LFH,
Received 10 Oct. 2014. forest floor organic material; MFT, mature fine tailings; OS, overburden sand; PMM,
*Corresponding author (anne.naeth@ualberta.ca). peat mineral soil mix; TRO, tailings reduction operations.
processing technology has resulted in geotechnical solutions, Germination rates were 74, 88, and 78% for the E. trachycaulus,
it is unknown whether these solutions provide appropriate A. scabra, and F. saximontana seed lots, respectively.
reclamation options. The main environmental concerns of Substrates were hand mixed in 20-L pails and randomly
MFT are phytotoxic organic compounds and inorganic ions, assigned to 15-cm-diameter, 15-cm-deep pots with drainage holes.
including hydrocarbons (naphthenic acids, benzene, toluene, Pots were filled within 2 cm of the top with substrate and capping
ethylbenzene, xylene), and high concentrations of sodium, treatments. Caps were placed on top of the mixes to a depth of 5
sulfate, and chloride (FTFC, 1995). Excessive salt can adversely cm. Filled pots were thoroughly watered, left for 24 h, and then
affect plant physiological activity and can cause tissue injury seeded with 30 seeds per pot (10 seeds from each grass species).
(Kozlowski et al., 1991). Petroleum hydrocarbons, specifically Greenhouse conditions were 21°C by day (14 h) and 15°C at night
those with high-molecular-weight recalcitrant fractions, can be (10 h) to approximate Fort McMurray growing season conditions.
hydrophobic and may affect plant growth (Gurska et al., 2009). Pots were watered every day for the first 4 wk and then as required
Research to date has focused on dry MFT physical properties, to keep the substrate from drying. The experiment ran for 16 wk.
dewatering potential, and aquatic toxicity (Fuhr et al., 1993).
Information on plant establishment on dry MFT is limited, Vegetation Assessment
although some research on conventional MFT shows that plant Each species was assessed in each pot to determine emergence,
(mainly woody species) survival and growth was compromised growth, and survival. Each week, emerging and dead plants were
by high salt concentrations, with peat amendment significantly counted. Plant health was determined monthly by assigning each
improving substrate electrical conductivity, cation exchange pot a health index value representative of all plants in the pot. A
capacity, organic carbon and nitrogen, microbial abundance and value of 1 was dead (<10% live green), 2 was mostly dying (<25%
diversity, and therefore plant growth (Li and Fung, 1998, 2001). live green), 3 was half dying and half healthy (>50% live green), 4
Research under controlled greenhouse conditions is required was mostly healthy (>75% live green), and 5 was healthy with no
before large-scale field reclamation with dry MFT. Because an necrosis or chlorosis (>90% live green).
important part of reclamation is revegetation, plant response to At the end of the experiment, plants were clipped at ground
dry MFT must be determined with and without improvement level (aboveground biomass) and sorted into species. Roots
of physical and chemical properties through use of amendments. (belowground biomass) were removed from the soil and washed
This initial research was conducted to determine if dry MFT could under gently running water. Biomass was oven dried at 105°C
be amended to support growth of selected native plant species to constant weight and weighed. Aboveground biomass was
with potential for use in oil sands reclamation. Overburden sand determined in all 300 pots; belowground biomass was determined
(OS) and peat mineral soil mix (PMM) amendments, as well as in three replicates of each capping and fertilizer treatment in the
forest floor organic materials (LFH) and PMM capping layers, five MFT mixes with highest aboveground biomass (84 pots).
were hypothesized to improve physical and chemical conditions
of the MFT substrate to make it more receptive for revegetation. Soil Analyses
Fertilizer was hypothesized to improve plant production. Before potting, three samples of each substrate were taken
and composited for chemical laboratory analyses. These analyses
Materials and Methods would provide information on initial growing conditions, the most
Substrate Treatments and Plant Species difficult time for plant establishment in this type of reclamation.
Methods were according to Carter and Gregorich (2008) unless
Substrate, amendments, and capping materials, readily available
otherwise noted. Sodium adsorption ratio, pH, and electrical
on site for oil sands reclamation, were from the Suncor Energy Inc.
conductivity were determined in 1:2 soil:water saturated paste.
mine site near Fort McMurray, Alberta. Dry MFT was produced
Total carbon was determined by combustion, and total organic
from the TRO process. Overburden sand had been removed before
and inorganic carbon were determined by acid digestion and
oil sands mining. The PMM was approximately 60% organic peat
combustion. Cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations
with 40% mineral soil. Forest floor (LFH) was an organic mix of
litter (L), fragmented and fermented litter (F), and humus (H). Ten Table 1. Amended dry mature fine tailings substrates used in the
substrates were evaluated, including eight MFT mixes with varying experiment.
proportions of OS and PMM, a 100% dry MFT control, and Volume
a potting soil reference (Table 1). Caps were LFH and PMM. A Substrates†
Dry MFT OS PMM
polyolefin-coated fertilizer with 7% ammonia nitrogen, 7% nitrate ——————— % ———————
nitrogen, 14% available phosphorus (P2O5), and 14% soluble MFT (100) 100 0 0
potash (K2O) was applied to the surface of half the pots at a rate of MFT:OS (80:20) 80 20 0
0.15 g pot-1 after seeding. Each treatment was replicated five times MFT:OS (60:40) 60 40 0
for a total of 300 pots (5 replicates × 10 MFT mixes × 3 caps × 2 MFT:OS (40:60) 40 60 0
fertilizer treatments) in a complete randomized block design. MFT:OS (20:80) 20 80 0
Three native grasses common in reclamation were used: MFT:OS:PMM (80:15:5) 80 15 5
slender wheat grass [Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex MFT:OS:PMM (80:10:10) 80 10 10
Shinners or Agropyron trachycaulum (Link) Malte], tickle grass MFT:OS:PMM (60:25:15) 60 25 15
(Agrostis scabra Willd.), and rocky mountain fescue (Festuca MFT:OS:PMM (40:30:30) 40 30 30
saximontana Rydb.). Germination tests were performed on
† MFT, mature fine tailings; OS, overburden sand; PMM, peat mineral soil
seeds before the experiment to ascertain if seeds were viable. mix.
Table 5. Mean properties of dry mature fine tailings treatments at the end of the experiment.
Bulk Hydraulic Field Wilting Water holding Gravimetric Volumetric
Treatments† Porosity
density conductivity capacity point capacity water content water content
Mg m-3 cm3 cm-3 1 × 10-05; m s-1 ———————— % ———————— ——— cm3 cm-3 ———
MFT (100) 1.18 (0.02)‡ 55.6 (0.71) 2.35 (0.26) 14.0 (0.9) 5.4 (1.00) 8.6 (1.2) 11.78bc (0.62) 10.14b (0.74)
MFT:OS (80:20) 1.24 (0.02) 53.3 (0.34) 0.66 (0.64) 11.8 (0.2) 4.4 (1.30) 7.4 (1.4) 9.85c (0.58) 9.30b (1.29)
MFT:OS (60:40) 1.29 (0.04) 54.5 (0.29) 0.50 (0.15) 12.1 (1.3) 4.7 (0.77) 7.3 (1.4) 10.92bc (0.50) 10.77b (0.56)
MFT:OS (40:60) 1.35 (0.02) 55.1 (1.59) 1.83 (0.28) 12.8 (2.8) 3.4 (0.98) 9.3 (1.8) 8.66c (0.85) 8.53b (0.96)
MFT:OS (20:80) 1.35 (0.05) 51.3 (0.15) 5.62 (0.97) 6.5 (0.6) 1.6 (0.17) 4.9 (0.5) 5.39d (0.55) 5.05c (0.83)
MFT:OS:PMM (80:15:5) 1.21 (0.01) 51.7 (0.31) 3.97 (0.10) 15.1 (0.8) 6.7 (1.25) 8.3 (1.4) 13.68b (0.54) 12.81ab 90.66)
MFT:OS:PMM (80:10:10) 1.19 (0.03) 49.2 (0.11) 9.14 (0.31) 13.7 (1.8) 5.4 (1.15) 8.2 (2.5) 11.10bc (0.85) 9.45b (1.13)
MFT:OS:PMM (60:25:15) 1.28 (0.01) 53.7 (0.13) 2.54 (0.79) 11.8 (1.0) 4.9 (0.95) 6.8 (1.9) 9.13c (0.70) 7.23b (0.86)
MFT:OS:PMM (40:30:30) 1.23 (0.05) 48.9 (0.33) 3.56 (0.72) 17.9 (2.6) 6.4 (1.32) 11.5 (3.8) 10.97bc (0.79) 8.51b (0.62)
PMM (100) 102.6 (4.0) 38.6 (1.41) 64.0 (2.8) 38.12a (0.32) 17.33a (0.93)
OS (100) 1.45e (0.08) 1.36d (0.10)
† MFT, mature fine tailings; OS, overburden sand; PMM, peat mineral soil mix.
‡ Values are mean (±SE) (n = 165). Different letters within columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Values within the first six columns with no
letters, excluding PMM, were not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.