Professional Documents
Culture Documents
29.4. 16.45 France Breussin
29.4. 16.45 France Breussin
29.4. 16.45 France Breussin
Micromachine Summit
29 April 2010
© 2010
Content
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 2
Content
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 3
Yole Développement
• Yole Développement is a market research and strategy consulting
company, founded in 1998 with headquarters in Lyon, France.
• Our fields of competence include:
• MEMS
• Microfluidics
• Compound Semiconductor (SiC, GaN, AlN, ZnO)
LED & HB LED, RF devices
• Power electronics
• Photovoltaic
• Advanced Packaging (3D IC, TSV, SoC, WLP)
• Nanomaterials
© 2010 • 5
Content
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 6
Markets Considered
Life sciences
Pharmaceutical & In vitro diagnostic
Medical devices
Biotech industry (IVD)
© 2010 • 7
Geographic Market Distribution
Geographic distribution of the medical and diagnostic market in 2009 – source Eucomed
Canada Europe
2% 33% Japan
11%
China
2%
US India
45% 1%
Bresil
1% Australia
1%
© 2010 • 8
Market Distribution
• The market of in-vitro diagnostics, medical devices and pharmaceuticals is
dominated by the US and European industry.
MicrofluidicDevices market in M$
3500,00
3000,00
CAGR 16%
MicrofluidicDevicesmarket in M$
500,00
0,00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
clinical & Pharmaceutical
Point of Care Industrial and Total microfluidic
veterinary and life science Analytical devices Drug delivery
diagnostics environmental market
diagnostics research
CAGR2006-2008 13% 35% 26% 17% 27% 38% 22%
CAGR2009-2014 19% 39% 33% 14% 27% 22% 26%
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 12
Philips Magnotec
• Philips Handheld Immunoassays
focuses on developing innovative
solutions for point-of-care testing.
© 2010 • 13
STMicroelectronics
In-Check platform
© 2010 • 14
targets.
DALSA Semiconducteur BioMEMS
• A highly miniaturized DNA identification equipment for inexpensive point-of-care
diagnostics.
Integration of sample preparation, DNA amplification, separation and optical detection at the
micro scale using mass production semiconductor MEMS, HV, CMOS and IMAGING
technologies is the key to drive the costs down by several orders of magnitude, and provide
accessible healthcare applications.
. To demonstrate its capabilities, DALSA has developed an integrated Point-of-care
device that fits on a USB stick.
© 2010 • 15
Siemens Medical Solutions Quicklab
© 2010 • 16
Semicon Industry Needs Partnership
•Many Players from the Semicon industry try to enter the diagnostic and
Point-of-Care market
•However, access to the market has to be done through diagnostic
companies.
•It is therefore crucial for technology providers to set-up partnership with the
key players in the development phase.
© 2010 • 17
Content
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 18
Microfluidic Prototyping and
Production
© 2010 • 19
Materials by Application
Microfluidicdevices market, in M$
Material breakdown
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
Market share
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Clinical and Industrial &
Pharmaceutical Analytical devices Total microfluidic
veterinary Point of care devices environment Drug Delivery
research (MS, GC, HPLC) device market
diagnostics applications
autres 3,9 0,2 2,4 0,0 0,5 1,5 8,7
Si 59,2 8,3 8,9 26,3 9,4 107,5 219,6
Glass 41,2 19,6 44,8 98,4 4,6 0,1 208,7
Polymer 156,0 78,3 97,1 20,3 8,6 3,8 364,0
• The choice of material depends on the application. In general, polymer is preferred for disposable
devices due to its low cost.
• The drug delivery market is dominated by the Inhaler from Boehringer Ingelheim and the insuline
micropumps, which are manufactured in Silicon
© 2010 • 20
Case Study
Cost analysis Caliper Labchip
• The production costs have been estimated using our reverse Cost Breakdown for 500 000 units/ year
costing model. This model simulates the different process
steps and the associated costs. Depreciation Cost Manufacturing
3% Cost
10%
$1 000,00
$100,00
Glass
$10,00 Polymer
$1,00
$0,10
10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000
© 2010 • 21
Cost Breakdown
Patient test
Market value
• Material costs are a very small fraction of the final cost of an IVD test.
• The added value of design and manufacturing of a microfluidic based device
brings the price of a device to the order of $0.10 to $10
• Diagnostic company add value related to biology (application knowledge,
reagents) and take care of marketing and distribution. The price per test becomes
in the order of $30 to $100
• At the end, the cost paid by the patient can reach up to $300 for molecular biology
tests, principally due to manpower of highly qualified laboratory staff.
© 2010 • 22
Content
– Conclusions
© 2010 • 23
Conclusions
• Many things happened over the last 3 years: A large number of companies have
been created and/or raised funds, and a large number of microfluidic based
technologies have been developed.
• Although some technologies have been already acquired by major players, it will still
require some time for microfluidic technologies to become common diagnostic
products.
• Research applications show high growth rates. However, this domain is very
segmented in terms of requirements and technologies. One particular aspect is the
need for technologies allowing multiplexing and simplifying High Throughput
Screening (HTS).
• The Point of care market did not really take-off yet. However, it is expected to grow
considerably in the coming years
© 2010 • 24
Conclusions
• Point of care diagnostics suppliers need both microfluidics technology and
medical expertise, so close and effective partnerships between very
different companies are required.
• Preferably these partnerships will have to be formed before development
proceeds too far, so development work focuses on users’ practical needs
early on.
• In fact, the complex reality of marketing to medical infrastructure probably
means any diagnostics technology supplier will have to partner with one of
the top ten medical diagnostics players.
• Unfortunately, however, those key medical companies do not want to take
any risks on new technology. Now they prefer acquire technology
supplying companies, figuring it’s well worth paying a higher price for
100% assurance of success.
• It provides an efficient exit strategy for biotechnology startups, but it’s a
problematic model for big semiconductor companies developing these
technologies.
© 2010 • 25
Conclusions
• They may have a hard time interesting these risk-adverse giant medical
companies in partnerships, and will have then to propose extremely
innovative solutions precisely fitting with the market needs.
• Be aware of the big market risk – the diagnostic field is represented by many
different segments with their own requirements and expectations from an
economic and technological point of view.
• The high technology level is important, but the understanding the biology
remains the main success factor
© 2010 • 26
For More Information …
45 rue Sainte Geneviève, F-69006 Lyon, France 45 rue Sainte Geneviève, F-69006 Lyon, France
Tel: +33 472 83 01 80 - Fax: +33 472 83 01 83 Tel : +33 472 83 01 80 - Fax : +33 472 83 01 83
Web: http://www.yole.fr Web: http://www.yole.fr
© 2010 • 27