Dissertation g00363780

MODULE TITLE: DISSERTATION
TITLE OF PROJECT
The Development of an Interdisciplinary Galway Hooker

Model-making Module for Transition Year Students,
Designed to Enhance Motor Skills and Enrich Heritage
Knowledge
Student’s Number
G00363780
Submitted for the Award of

Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Education
(Design Graphics and Construction)
to
Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, Letterfrack
i
Supervisor: Dr. Pauline Logue Collins
Submission Date
23/04/2021
Plagiarism Disclaimer
Student Number: G00363780

Programme: BSc. (Hons) in Education (Design Graphics and
Construction)
Year: 4
Module: Dissertation
Lecturer: Dr. Susan Rogers
Assignment Title: Dissertation
Due Date: 23/04/2021
Date Submitted: 23/04/2021
Additional Information:
I understand that plagiarism is a serious academic offence, and that GMIT deals with it
according to the GMIT Policy on Plagiarism.
I have read and understand the GMIT Policy on Plagiarism and I agree to the
requirement set out therein in relation to plagiarism and referencing. I can confirm that I
have referenced and acknowledged properly all sources used in preperation of this
assignment. I understand that if I plagiarise, or if I assist others in doing so, that I will
be subject to investigation as outlined in the GMIT Policy on Plagiarism.
I understand and agree that plagiarism detection software may be used on my
assignment. I declare that except where appropriately referenced, this assignment is
entirely my own work based on my personal study and/or research. I further declare that
I have not engaged the services of another to assist in, or complete this assignment.
Signed:_________________________________________
Date:___________________________________________
Please note: Students MUST retain a hard/soft copy of all assignments.
i
The Development of an Interdisciplinary ‘Galway
Hooker Model-making’ Module for Transition Year
Students, Designed to Enhance Motor Skills and Enrich
Heritage Knowledge
ii
Abstract
South Connemara has a renowned maritime history, where heritage and the love for
Gaeilge - the native tongue - is a part of its heritage and identity as a region. Once a
thriving boat building region, the trade has come to a decline with the traditional
craftsmanship phasing out. The aim of this research is to develop an interdisciplinary
Galway Hooker model-making module for transition year students, designed to enhance
their motor skills and to enrich heritage knowledge. Methodologically, a literature
analysis study is conducted. The literature investigation encompasses three main areas:
the Connemara boatbuilding tradition (with particular reference to the Galway Hooker),
Transition Year (TY) unit development, informed by the National Council of
Curriculum and Assessment guidelines, and selected, relevant teaching and learning
philosophical theories, including constructionism, as developed by Seymour Papert, and
Kinesthetic Intelligence (KI), as developed by Howard Gardner. The main findings of
the study are, traditional skills of boatbuilding are disappearing due to the increasing
demand for Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) that require little to no maintenance
comparing to that of a wooden constructed hull, resulting in a cost factor. A TY unit is
assessed in a diagnostic and formative approach to give the students an opportunity to
participate in the procedure of exchange/discussion of ideas, self-rating, self-awareness,
and potential to take responsibility for performance and personal learning. Development
of this TY unit is informed by the learning theory of KI as learners process information
best through physical activity and emotions, therefore prefer an active learning approach
involving tactile activity (touching) and movement. The author found that published TY
Units in the field of technical education are generally unavailable among the NCCA
model samples. It is recommended that the developed module be implemented in a
Gaelscoil in the context of a pilot action research study.
Keywords: Galway Hooker; Heritage; Model-making; Transition Year Unit; Cross

Curricular Teaching and Learning; Kinesthetic Intelligence; Constructionism
iii
1 Introduction
The Galway Hooker, “often referred to as the ‘workhorse of the west’, played
an important role in the economy of the coastal communities in and around
Galway Bay”[CITATION Gal21 \t \l 6153 ].
Positioning myself as a researcher, I am final year award student at Galway-
Mayo Institute of Technology (GMIT) Letterfrack. I am from Cill Chiaráin
(Kilkieran), a small fishing village located in south Connemara Co. Galway.
South Connemara has a renowned maritime history, resilience, and vibrancy of
coastal and island life[CITATION Séa00 \t \l 6153 ]. In this region and
surrounding regions of Connemara, Gaeilge (Irish) is the first spoken language. In
Connemara, heritage and the love of our native tongue are not only a part of local
heritage, they are fundamental to our identity as a region. In recent years I have
witnessed a demand for boatbuilders here in the west of Ireland with boating
enthusiasts looking to learn the trade. It is from these bases, and my devotion for
these vessels, language, heritage, and culture thrive from and the motivation to
drive this project forward.
The boat building trade is a distinct trade here in Ireland, and with many
traditional craft skills dying, it is currently under threat[CITATION Wat16 \t \l
6153 ]. Shantanu Bose (2012), argues that shortage of a skilled traditional wooden
boat-building work force is a real problem as there is no educational support at
either graduate and diploma level to retain a skilled individuals who is attracted to
a more lucrative trade [CITATION Sha12 \p 357 \t \l 6153 ]. Providing the
younger generation with opportunities to explore boatbuilding is a requirement, if
the trade is to survive. It is on these bases that I have decided to develop an
1
interdisciplinary Transition Year (TY) unit to enhance motor skills and enrich
heritage knowledge.
The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) states that, TY
is a one-year programme that helps students with the transition from junior cycle
to senior cycle[ CITATION Cle12 \l 6153 ]. The Department of Education and
Skills explains that a TY programme welcomes a cross interdisciplinary approach
by giving the students an opportunity to mature with the emphasis on their
development including social awareness and social competence. It gives the
students an opportunity to enhance their technical and academic skills with a
direct focus on interdisciplinary and self-directed learning while also giving the
students the experience of adult and working life as a foundation for personal
development and maturity [CITATION Dep206 \p 3 \t \l 6153 ]. Joseph A.
Moynihan (2015) explains that the TY programme was first introduced in 1974 in
three schools as a pilot programme [CITATION Jos15 \p 200 \t \l 6153 ].
Moynihan further states that:
Students find themselves immersed in alternative learning environment where the

focus is no longer on rote learning but on more socio-cultural and experimental
learning styles. Young people in TY have the opportunity to participate in various
mutual arrangements where they have much to learn from experienced others, but
they too, have much to share with their older counterparts. They are coming from an
intensive education setting. In most cases, today’s students are quite comfortable
with technology and innovation. This new way of learning for them does not just
apply to work experience, but also to the many other tasks and challenges that they
will encounter during the TY experience [CITATION Jos15 \p 201 \t \l 6153 ].
The aim of this dissertation is to develop an interdisciplinary Galway Hooker
model-making unit for TY students to enrich their motor skills and enhance
heritage knowledge. The objectives are to:
 Conduct a literature study of the craft of boatbuilding, including the

Galway Hooker, in terms of origins and heritage.
 Investigate best practice for TY module development with reference to
the National Council of Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA)
guidelines and related literature.
2
 Develop an interdisciplinary module, informed by learning theory, that
incorporates the construction of the Galway Hooker and the local
heritage of boat building.
The research methodology used for the development of this TY unit is primarily
secondary research. I critically evaluate academic publications, this includes educational
journal articles, electronic resources, websites, dictionaries, academic reports,
complementary publications which will include folklore and history of the Galway
Hooker, boat building in Connemara and the development of a TY unit.
This is an original contribution to teacher education. My intention was to
develop, implement and evaluate a cross-disciplinary TY unit (as indicated
above), however due to unanticipated Covid-19 restrictions, it was only possible
to develop it for use at a later stage.
The article begins with an exploration of the origins and heritage of the Galway
Hooker, situated within the context of the history and tradition of boatbuilding in
south Connemara. This is followed by an investigation of best practice TY
development, with reference to NCCA guidelines. Learning theories, that
contribute to the curriculum design for the TY Unit are multiple intelligence and
constructionism. To conclude, I will state my research findings and
recommendations.
Rouling Chen (2014) explains, cognitive development and emotional
development has been viewed as separate elements in the development of a child,
but in fact these two elements are intricately related [CITATION Rou14 \p viii \l
6153 ]. We will learn the difference between Jean Piaget’s (1896-1980)
constructivism and Symour Papert’s (1928-2016) constructionism and how these
theories may be beneficial to both the educator and student. In an effort to capture
3
the most relevant theoretical perspectives for this research study, I will solely
explore Symour Papert’s Constructionism theory and Howard Gardner’s theory of
Kinesthetic Intelligence.
2. The Galway Hooker: Origins and Heritage
Bád mór, 10.5m to 13.5m (35ft to

44ft) in length with a forward deck.
This class is rigged with a gaff rig
Leathbhád/half boat is approximately

10m (32ft). This class is known as the
Leathbhád/half boat due to the load
which it can transport is reduced by half
of the bigger boat (Bád mór). This vessel
also uses the gaff rig.
Gleoiteog mhór, 7m to 9m (24ft to

28ft). Similar to that of the two
previous boat classes. This vessel is
a typically an open boat but can be
fitted with a forward deck. This
class can bare two different rigs, the
gaff rig and a dipping lug sail rig
more commonly known as a púcán
rig.
Gleoiteog bheag, 6m to 7m (20ft to

23ft). This class would be
considered the smallest class of the
Hookers and again can be either set
up as gaff rig or a dipping lug sail.
The name Gleoiteog is said to have
come from the Irish word “gleoite”
which translates to the word pretty.
4
Púcán, 7m to 9m (24 to 28ft). A
Púcán is very similar to that of the
gleoiteog but is always an open
boat with no deck with a dipping
lug sail rig only. [CITATION Eli16
\p 17 \n \l 6153 ].
The Galway Hooker (Húicéir in Irish) is a sailing vessel unique to Galway Bay and
Connemara. Traditionally built from native white oak frames and larch planking, these
Table 1. Classes of the Galway Hooker Boat (Original Photographs)
vessels are famously known for their racked transom, curved lines, and unique tumble
home, build as workboats and not for speed or aesthetics [CITATION Sab19 \p 13 \t \l
6153 ]. However, the hooker vessel is characterised into five different classes based on
their length and type of rigging (see Table 1).
As stated by Pádraig Ó’Sabhain and Brian McGrath (2019), the word hooker is
connected to a fishing technique called “hook and line” fishing and is associated
with the Dutch hoeker [CITATION Pád19 \t \l 6153 ]. The authors further state
that “(t)he hooker remains the iconic traditional boat associated with Galway and
occupies a position in the maritime heritage and identity of the region”
[CITATION Pád19 \p 2 \t \l 6153 ].Various theories have developed over the
origins of the hooker, in a report conducted by W.H. Church (1849) in the
washington parlimentary report stated that the word hooker be a distortion of the
Spanish word “Urca” (pronounced “Ookra”) a name given to a small fore and aft
rigged vessel in Spain [ CITATION WHC49 \l 6153 ]. Paddy Barry and Richard
Scott (2008), further explain theories of Dutch origins, and propose that the vessel
may be based on the standard nineteenth-century British-type inshore cutters and
evolved[CITATION Pad08 \p 168 \t \l 6153 ]. Therefore, it is uncertain where the
5
Hooker originated from but only the fact that its unique design is harmonised for
its needs of the rough and shallow coastal conditions of the west coast of Ireland
facing the Atlantic Ocean.
Heritage is often mistaken from past events rather than our relationship the
present and the future [CITATION Rod13 \p 4 \t \l 6153 ], Suzanne Aalberse, Ad
Backus and Pieter Muysken (2019) states that “heritage refers to knowledge and
goods from the past that can be used now and in the future” as well as inherited
language and common definitions of heritage speakers[CITATION Suz19 \p 1
\t \l 6153 ]. The wider boatbuilding heritage will be discussed next, and further
elaborated upon in section 4.3.
2.2 Boat Builders in South Connemara
Galway is renowned for its boat building heritage, not alone of the building of
Galway Hookers, but the construction of Currach’s, Nobbies, Zulu’s and half
decker fishing boats [ CITATION hIa08 \l 6153 ]. Donal Greene writes that
“(u)nfortunately, there is no tangible recorded written history relating to
Connemara boat builders or the boats they constructed, instead stories and songs
are the mode of transmission.” [CITATION Gre13 \p 105 \t \l 6153 ]. Referring
to his own experience, Greene (2017) states how he trained as master boatwright
under the traditional methods. Training consisted of a seven-year apprenticeship
where learning was informal with no textbooks to study. Knowledge and training
were passed orally, with training consisting of experimental learning and guided
instruction [CITATION Don17 \t \l 6153 ].
The main location of boat building in Connemara was Muighinis, a small
island with road access via a bridge (see appendix 1). Muighinis - a small island -
6
had four different families constructing boats: the Casey, Mulkerrin, and two
Clougherty families. The Casey family were renowned for their vessels’ safety,
load capacity and speed; all important factors in the carrying of cargo. Richard
Scott (2004) states that sometime in the 1840’s a well-known boatbuilder known
as Seán Ó Laidhe from Lettermullan, Co. Galway, moved to Muighinis, and in
due course started building Hookers. Laidhe acquired Seán Casey (O’Cathasig) as
his apprentice. It was Seán O’Cathasig that, in time, would become the founder of
the long line of Casey’s boatbuilding family in Muighinis, in which he passed his
trade to his sons Padraig, Martin and Johnny [CITATION Ric04 \p 48 \l 6153 ].
In more recent times with demand increasing for glass reinforced plastic (GRP)
hulls or more commonly known as fibreglass boats, resulting in the demand for
wooden boats decreasing due to maintenance cost. Pádraig Seosamh Ó Sabhain
(2019), explains how the dynasties of hooker-building in Connemara is no more
as there is no great market today for a newly-build hooker [CITATION Sab19 \p
195 \t \l 6153 ].This has however had an instrumental effect on boatbuilding all
over Ireland. Darina Tully states in her report titled Audit of Maritime Collections
for the heritage council (2006), that the resource of traditional boat builders is
diminishing with regions only consisting of one boat builder. Tully further states
that the survival of particular class of boats depend on community employment
schemes and evening classes [CITATION Dar06 \p 11 \l 6153 ]. With this in
mind, this module development could be implemented as part of evening classes
for adults. Adult education is best explained by Malcom Tight (2004), when he
states that adult education and training is now widely re-labelled under the banner
of lifelong learning, producing a platform for activity and study. Tight explains
7
how we are all, as children and adults, engaged in learning in everyday life
[CITATION Tig04 \p 1 \t \l 6153 ].
As we have now investigated the origins and heritage of the Galway Hooker,
within the context of boatbuilders in south Connemara, we will next investigate
how to develop a TY unit that incorporates boatbuilding and heritage, that is
informed by educational learning theories.
3 An Investigation of Best Practice Transition Year Unit Development
The mission or overall aim of a TY programme is best stated by the
Professional Development Service for Teachers (PDST): “(t)o promote the
personal, social, educational and vocational development of the students, and to
prepare them for their role as autonomous, participative and responsible members
of society.” [CITATION Pro202 \p 3 \t \l 6153 ].
In order to develop a TY programme, it is necessary to understand what a TY
programme is and how to develop a unit that will enhance students learning and
progression. TY was first introduced in 1974 by the then Minister for Education
Richard Burke in a teachers’ Union of Ireland annual conference in Dún
Laoghaire, county Dublin. Gerry Jeffers (2011) explains that, in the Republic of
Ireland, where schooling system is highly centralised and dominated by the high-
stakes public examinations, TY differentiates from other school programmes
[CITATION Ger11 \t \l 6153 ]. The NCCA (2020) explains, TY is a one-year
programme that is designed to bridge Junior Certificate and Leaving Certificate
subjects while giving the students an opportunity to mature, develop and reflect
without the pressure of an examination [CITATION Nat204 \l 6153 ]. Joseph A.
Moynihan (2015) explains that the assessment of the programme is projected to be
diagnostic and formative to give the students an opportunity to participate in the
8
procedure of exchange/discussion of ideas, self-rating, self-awareness and
potential to take responsibility for performance and personal learning. Moynihan
further states that a whole school approach is highly recommended with clear co-
ordination and teamwork all responsible for a TY programme [CITATION
Moy15 \p 202 \t \l 6153 ]. Gerry Jeffers (2010), based a study of TY being
implemented in six different schools, co-ordinators and school principals play a
key role in successful implementation of TY [CITATION Ger10 \p 469 \t \l
6153 ]. When devising a TY programme, schools attempt to comply to a rationale.
Mullins, in an article entitled Teacher Education in the Republic of Ireland:
Retrospect and Prospect in a conference proceeding by the Standing Conference
on Teacher Education, North and South (SCoTENS) (2004), points out that this
rationale comprises of the following: Developing a learning structure that
promotes maturity, cognitive and emotional processes, Learning-led rather than
exam driven, Providing breadth and balance in the curriculum, co-operating with
all educational partners, especially parents, in providing a broad and enriching
educational experience, Challenge students in all areas of development and life
skills, Encourage variety in teaching and learning, learn through networking with
other schools and social agencies to facilitate interdisciplinary work, Develop
basic competence in key areas, including remediation and Enable students to
become independent self-directed learners [CITATION Pad04 \p 54 \t \l 6153 ].
Again, as explained by the NCCA website (2020) under the subject area of
Graphics and Construction general recommendations, teachers have scope to
exercise their own professional judgement based on the interests and abilities of
the class. However, it is vital that the essential principles of the Leaving
Certificate be sustained while ensuring a methodology is developed that is student
9
centred, activity based [CITATION Nat203 \p 7 \n \l 6153 ]. In a Chief
Examiner’s Report of 2009, it reported that heritage and new technologies
coursework comprised less than 10% of course work presented for assessment.
The report further states that Ireland has a rich architectural and craft heritage in
which remains unexplored and advised teachers to encourage students to
investigate both formal and vernacular construction, buildings of historical
construction and traditional crafts associated. The Chief Examiner suggests that
such investigations would provide a diverse and rich source of material for
students that would aid them raise awareness of the importance to conserve and
maintain a rich inheritance [CITATION Coi20 \p 41 \t \l 6153 ].
In order to create a TY unit, we will need to research and explore the
guidelines set by the Department of Education and Skills and the NCCA. During
my studies and a collaboration with National University of Galway (NUIG),
Ireland and GMIT set up as the Teachers Educators Together (TET) [CITATION
Tea21 \t \l 6153 ], we had the privilege of studying a TY short course that
consisted of a cross curricular knowledge based on the subjects of Material
Technology (Wood), Mathematics, Graphics and Science (see appendix 2).
For the purpose of this dissertation I will develop a TY unit that will further
explore the history and heritage of the boat builders that occupied this small island
on the west coast. As illustrated in the Leaving Certificate History Syllabus
(2003), it will give students an insight of human experience while developing
student’s understanding of human conditions and motivation of past experiences
of his/her community while establishing insights into the roots of their own
inherited traditions and identity [CITATION Dep03 \p 2 \t \l 6153 ]. It is on these
bases we will explore Social, Environmental and Scientific Education (SESE)
10
syllabus which consists of three subjects, they are Science, Geography and
History. In combination students get the opportunity to explore, investigate and
develop a deeper understanding of local environment’s [CITATION AnR20 \t \l
6153 ]. In conjunction to the SESE syllabus, we will also investigate the leaving
certificate Construction Studies Syllabus and junior level graphics which main
aims are to (see Table 2):
Table 2-Subjects Syllabus Quotes-Curriculumonline.ie-11-03-2021
Construc
Subjects History SESE Graphics
tion
“Respect “to “to “develop
for truth reinforce introduce students
and and pupils to cognitive
evidence stimulat the and
, a e knowled practical
commit curiosity ge and skills
ment to and skills associated
being imaginat involved with
open to ion in modelling
seeing about construct and
the past local ion graphical
from and technolo communic
different wider gy and ation”
Aims perspecti environ construct
ves and ments” ion
regard materials
for the and
integrity practices;
of the through
past” theoretic
al study
and
integrate
d
practical
projects”
An important aspect of TY programme that should be included is
interdisciplinary study [CITATION Dep206 \p 4 \t \l 6153 ]. Casey Jones
explains that this mode of study creates an advantage of school curriculum at all
levels by combining more than one discipline to develop a team of teachers and
students to enrich the overall educational experience [CITATION Jon09 \t \l 6153
11
]. Jones concludes that an interdisciplinary approach favoured teachers and
students in advanced critical thinking, communication, creativity, pedagogy and
essential academia techniques.
Curriculum content is a matter of selection by the given school and all areas
studied have a clear distinction from the leaving Certificate (LC) syllabus as it
clearly stated that a TY programme is not part of the LC programme and should
not be used to spend three years instead of two years studying LC content
[CITATION Dep206 \p 3 \t \l 6153 ]. Therefore, this has led to a new form of
curriculum which will be discussed in detail in section 3.1.
3.1 Transition Units
Sarah Hayes (2011) writes, “TY presents a unique opportunity to educators:
to be innovative, to teach without the constraints of the curriculum”[CITATION
Sar11 \p i \l 6153 ]. In addition to this, Transition Units (TUs) are units that are
created by a school and intended to be integrated into the school’s TY
programme. As stated by the NCCA (2021),
Transition Units (TUs) are new curriculum components that are timetabled
for approximately 45 hours. Alongside shorter modules and other learning
experiences, schools may include a variety of TUs as part of their transition
year programme. Transition units are not intended to be ‘exam’ courses but
are assessed as part of the teaching and learning in the unit [CITATION
Nat21 \t \l 6153 ].
In the NCCA draft handbook for schools (2008), it states that, TUs can be organised in
different ways such as:
 Independent/group research within the school or externally
 TUs made up of two or more separate complementary subjects that
may be taught by more than one teacher. For example, this TY
module could be thought be teachers of Construction Studies,
History and Irish to work on a multidisciplinary study of the
students’ local area [CITATION Nat08 \t \l 6153 ].
12
When developing a TU, the NCCA provides support and feedback to schools
and teachers. To illustrate this fact, I have included a TU development plan (see
Appendix 5), where I have taken advantage of the professional support and
advice. Feedback is pending and will be added at a later stage time permitting.
The NCCA assures that the TUs provide a high quality educational experience
and that the TUs meet the criteria set out by the NCCA [CITATION Nat08 \n
\t \l 6153 ]. Therefore, confirms the idea of PDST (2021), that both students and
teachers benefit from a well-planned TU as shown in the table (see Table 3.)
[CITATION PDS21 \t \l 6153 ].
Benefits for Teachers Benefits for Students

 Creates a more unified  More perspective on certain
perspective topics
 Promotes professional co-  Establishing connections
operation & discourse between subjects
 Clarification of teaching &  Initiates transferable
learning objectives thinking skills
 Goes beyond the constraints of  Promotes collaborative
subject focus learning
 A more collaborative  Fosters co-operation rather
environment than competition
 Develops mixed ability teaching  Allows for the exploration
strategies of wide range of issues
 Facilitates portfolio development/  Facilitates active teaching &
assessment learning
 Accommodates different
levels of ability
 Work as a team
13
Table 4-Teaching & Learning- Adapted from the NCCA Draft Handbook for schools 2008.
Table 3.-Benifits of TUs- adopted from PDST.ie 2021
In the NCCA draft handbook for schools (2008) titled ‘Developing Transition
Units’ which can be found on the NCCA website, it gives detail of five key skills
(see Figure 1) that have been identified as important assisting senior cycle
students to become more effective learners. The NCCA draft handbook (2008)
states,
As students encounter the five key skills through transition units and
across the senior cycle curriculum, they begin to develop the knowledge,
skills, attitudes and values that will enable them to become more effective
learners [CITATION Nat08 \p 14 \t \l 6153 ].
Type of Teaching & learning TY Unit

Develop positive beliefs about Speak their language, clear
learning. communication, trust, let the
students make decisions and build a
positive relationship with students
and parents
Learn in ways that suit their own Assessment, discussions, observing
strengths and needs and determining their current
knowledge, skills, and attitudes
Develop a range of learning Student-led classroom with the aid
strategies of visualization of information,
differentiation, inquiry-based
instruction, and the implementation
of technology in the classroom
Make connections across learning Socrative questioning/higher order
thinking. Getting students to reflect
and critically analyse their learning.
Influencing students to get their
intellectual, creative, and emotional
development in motion
Develop a commitment to Encourage and demonstrate
improving learning. commitment to students learning
and personal development,
classroom management to ensure a
secure and comfortable
environment for the students
Be willing to engage in new Embrace new technology,
learning situations experiment with different teaching
styles, and highlight your own
dedication, willingness, and
eagerness to new learning
Develop reflective practice Students review their process,
thoughts, actions, and decisions
while completing the model boat
Figure 1-TU Five
andKey Skills-of boatbuilding
research
Curriculumonline.ie
14
One should note here that the more effective students become as learners, the
more responsible and aware they become of their own learning. As students
become more responsible and aware of their learning, they become less depended
on the teacher which in turn develops the students into independent learners. The
five key skills should be characterised by the teacher to promote teaching and
learning that encourages the following as demonstrated in the table below (see
Table 4).
In my research in the development of different types of TUs, one noted that
there is significant area for improvement. In the NCCA draft handbook (2008), it
provides an infographic (see figure 2),
in this infographic, one can observe that there is no reference to technical subjects
in the segments provided. In light of this I propose that in the segment of area of
15
study ‘top-up and tasters’ where the description of study states “Bridging learning
gaps; stimulating interest in Leaving Certificate courses”[CITATION Nat08 \p
19 \t \l 6153 ], that the study of technical subjects be included in examples of
transition units, either be Construction Studies or Engineering. This may be
included under the title of model making, manufacturing technology, design and
manufacturing or other. This proposal is demonstrated below (see figure 3).
4 Philosophical Underpinnings of an Interdisciplinary Transition Year Unit

In order for any TY unit or better known as a module to be successful, it needs
to be underpinned by a robust philosophy of education and educational theory.
Joseph A. Moynihan (2015) writes,
Transition Year, with its focus on active learning and experiential learning,
combines the best of both these worlds in terms of how students learn. They
have the benefit of the teacher in the classroom while, at the same time,
having substantial access to the many more experienced or more
knowledgeable others within the school or the wider community [CITATION
Jos151 \p 205 \t \l 6153 ].
The selected theories underpinning this unit are: Multiple Intelligence (MI)
developed by Howard Gardner, with a focus on Kinesthethetic Motor Imagery
16
(KMI) one of eight intelligence theory’s developed by Gardner, and
Constructionism, a pedagogy developed by Seymour Papert. These will be
explored respectably next.
4.1 Multiple intelligence
Multiple intelligence is a theory that Howard Gardner developed in the late
1970’s and early 1980’s. In 1997, Gardner argued that humans have different
intellectual strengths and that not all humans learn the same way [CITATION
How97 \t \l 6153 ]. Gardner’s theory is based on evidence from a wide range of
sources, disciplines, and research tradition [CITATION MIO20 \t \l 6153 ].
Gardner (1997) stated that if we as humans had the same frame of mind and only
one frame of intelligence, then we as educators could teach and assess all students
in the same way and that would be fair to all. However, when we realise that all
humans have different frames of minds, different intellectual strengths, treating
everyone with the same frame of mind is actually being unfair to the students as it
only facilitates one frame of mind and intellectual learning style [ CITATION
How97 \l 6153 ].
An intelligence gives the ability to problem solve within a relevant setting or
community [CITATION MIO201 \p 9 \t \l 6153 ]. Armstrong explains how
Gardner looked to broaden the scope of human potential by mapping the wide
variety of abilities that we have as humans by grouping them into eight
comprehensive intelligences [CITATION Tho181 \t \l 6153 ]. They are (see
Figure 4):
17
Figure 4- Source: Simplypsychology.org-Michele Marenus-09-06-2020
Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya, Prof. Dr. Ugur Demiray and Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilknur Istifci
(2013) state that students can achieve more academically through education based
on MI theory where they can be more effective, use materials voluntary by
themselves, speak and discuss freely, learn by seeing and doing, and use their
undiscovered intelligence fields. In today’s society where individual differences
come into play, more attention should be given to the theory MI so that it can
support the students’ individuality, which in turn, will make the learning more
pleasant to students’ [CITATION Pro13 \p 33 \t \l 6153 ].
Eleme Bodily- Interpers

Musical Spatial
nts kinesthetic onal
Coordinating Listening Collabora Visualisi
your mind to to the ting with ng the
hand. Used rhythm of their lines and
when cutting the saw peers and shape of
TY to a line. and plane others their
while outside of individua
outco cutting the l boat
through classroo model
mes the m. when
material laying out
to ensure the
correct battens.
use.
18
For technical teachers of both junior and senior cycle students, MI theory can
be an important factor in the classroom, where teachers have to accommodate
different learning styles of students. A good example of this is the noise a power
tool (Sander, planner, drill etc) does when put under pressure, in comparison to a
power tool that is being used correctly. A power tool that is being used correctly
has a contentious pitch/rhythm while a power tool that is being forced or used
incorrectly has a pitch/rhythm that ramps up and done. This may sound as
common knowledge for an individual that is musically intelligent but may be a
struggle for a student that has no sense of rhythm. This can be also expressed in
the making of the Hooker model when students are using hand tools (see Table 5).
When you use for example a handsaw, you as the educator are listening for the
sound of the saw while in use. You are listening is the sound of the cut a smooth
Table 5. Elements of MI theory in TY module
and contentious or is the sound of the saw halting and jaggedly.
While above the various intelligences are explored, here I focus on Kinesthetic
Intelligence (KI), since it is the dominant intelligence type relating to
boatbuilding. KI is best described by Thomas Armstrong (2018) when he states
that KI is a one of eight intelligence (see figure 1, p.15) that uses the individual
whole body to express ideas and feelings and ability in using hands to produce or
transform artefacts such as a craftsperson, sculptor, mechanic or a surgeon would.
Armstrong further explains KI comprises of “specific physical skills such as
coordination, balance, dexterity, strength, flexibility, and speed, as well as
proprioceptive, tactile, and haptic capacities” [CITATION Tho182 \p 3 \t \l
6153 ]. This form of intelligence is widely used in the technical classroom as
students use their body to coordinate and balance their structure to use a tenon
saw while sawing a component. Flexibility and speed is practiced when
19
completing working drawings as students need to adjust their bodies at different
stages in drawing while ensuring accuracy at a swift pace. These are skills that
students will practice during the model-making module.
In the proceedings of the scientific conference of Academia, Fortelor et al
(2017), KI includes the ability of expression of the body in solving problems
through physical activity. Individuals that have developed KI have an excellent
eye to hand coordination, an important factor where the fineness of movements
are important [CITATION Flo17 \p 231 \t \l 6153 ]. Again, this is an important
factor in Wood Technology (WT) and in Construction Studies (CS) as there is a
major emphasis on precision of eye to hand coordination from the aspects of
marking out process to the making (cutting joints, chiselling mortices). This is
significant in the development of the Galway Hooker model as, the process of
laying out the outline of the ‘backbone’ requires eye to hand coordination.
Students use and develop the KI skills as they outline the shape of the model boat
and apply their design to the shear of the hull. Students will furthermore
coordinate their bodies, flexibility and strength abilities when dealing with small
fine components.
When conducting research for this article, I reflected on the gender differences
in the uptake of woodwork-related subjects, where males traditionally dominate. I
questioned whether gender has an effect on KI. In an article co-written by Gulap
Shahzada, Umar A. Khan and Safdar R. Ghazi (2015), the authors state that a
study was conducted on Mckenzie’s Intelligence scale based on Gardner’s MI. It
stated that male students measured higher on the scale of bodily KI and
naturalistic intelligences over their female counterparts while the same study
stated that female students achieved a higher grade in verbal/linguistic,
20
interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences. The authors further state that there
was no significant difference were found between students on logical, visual,
musical and existential intelligences, but however suggested that teachers should
provide an environment that all intelligences of both gender may develop
[CITATION Gul15 \p 1 \l 6153 ].
KI ought not to be seen in isolation. D. O. Ramadian, B. Y. Cahyono and N.
Suryati (2019) state that one method that teachers can improve students learning is
by adapting to a Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) learning model. The authors
explain that a VAK approach combines motivation, engagement and cognitive
processing habits in which aids the use of metacognitive skills such as self-
evaluation and situation analysis[CITATION Oki19 \p 143 \l 6153 ]. Adrian
Cooke (2018), suggests that “VAK model is the most appropriate approach to take
when developing such a practical teaching pack”[CITATION Adr18 \p 20 \l
6153 ].
To illustrate this point, students’ in the technical classroom use visual skills to
read working drawings and see components dimensions, Auditory skills are used
when students listen and contribute (vocally) in group work and planning of
projects assigned to them. Kinesthetic skills are used by touching and doing, all of
these skills are exercised in the technical classroom on a daily basis. In a journal
article by T. Rick Whiteley (2007), the author explains the learning outcomes of
KI within the VAK model. Kinesthetic learners process information best through
physical activity and emotions therefore prefer an active learning approach
involving tactile activity (touching) and movement [CITATION TRi07 \p 5 \l
6153 ]. The VAK learning model is a common learning strategy that can be seen
in all practical classroom across Ireland and further afield. As technical educators
21
we provide an active classroom where students engage in tactile activities on a
daily basis as students feel and observe different wood species, grain, sandpaper
grit, try square, saw etc. For example, this model of learning can be implemented
while technically drawing a lines plan (see Appendix 4) adapted from Pat Tanner,
with permission of the Galway Hooker model [CITATION Pat21 \t \l 6153 ].
Students will construct a lines plan of the model where they will explore different
pencil weight/pressure to produce construction lines (light weight-light line), to a
finished line (heavy weight/pressure-heavy line-clearly visible). Students will then
convert drawings into physical components to produce the shape of the model
boat, where they can touch and engage in active learning in the design and
construction of the model boat.
Having examined MI theory, we now investigate constructivist theory-
specifically constructionism.
4.2 Constructionism
Constructionism is a pedagogy developed by Seymour Papert (1928-2016):
South African born and leader of artificial intelligence and the constructionist
movement in education. As Jean M. Griffin (2019) explains, Papert’s
constructionism theory involves experiential learning where students engage in
exploration, create artefacts that are personal and meaningful and share them with
others. A pedagogy that focuses on analysing, skill building and problem solving [
CITATION Jea19 \l 6153 ]. This is an approach that will reflect the making of
the Galway Hooker model as students will be asked to actively engage with one
another to research and investigate the cultural heritage of boatbuilding in South
Connemara and the status that this indigenous vessel have/had in the region.
22
Constructionism can easily be confused with Constructivism, a theory mainly
developed by Lev S. Vygotsky, John Dewey, Jerome S. Bruner and Jean Piaget.
As stated by Antje Mays (2015), Constructionism is a branch off to
constructivism. Constructionism builds on the bases of learning by making where
learners actively engage and explore needed information which they make their
own through reflection and practical hands-on learning activities [ CITATION
May20 \l 6153 ]. It is important to add that the similarities of constructionism and
constructivism may be due to, as stated by Edith Ackermann “Papert worked with
Piaget in Geneva in the late 1950’ies and early 1960’ies”[CITATION Edi21 \p
4 \t \l 6153 ]. Certainly, it is evident that both theories show similarities, however,
as stated by Richard Dunphy (2019),
It is reasonable to argue that the most substantial difference between

constructionism and constructivism is the way in which individuals construct
their own knowledge. Piaget believed that knowledge is created by internal
mental functions such as thinking, attention and perception whereas Papert
believes that knowledge is best constructed when making physical objects,
(learn-by-making) such as computer program or sandcastle [CITATION
Ric191 \p 15 \t \l 6153 ]
23
Having introduced constructionism as an educational theory that can inform the
Table 6 - Week 1 - Module Planning Grid
TY unit development, let us next systematically work through the weekly
planning grid to see how the module unfolds. A planning grid is a detailed scheme
of work that includes and integrates curriculum, learning intensions/outcomes,
teaching methodologies and assessment processes and methodologies (see
Appendix 3). As displayed below (see Table 6), week 1 of commencement, is an
introduction to the module where students get the opportunity to get acquainted
with subject matter beginning with a documentary serious (Bádoirí) aired on TG4
in 2019 (See the full planning grid in Appendix 3, and relevant teaching resources
in Appendices 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8).
Students will be asked to conduct research of the traditional Galway Hooker and their
history in which they will create posters and presentations based on their learning.
24
Week 2 (see Table 7), students engage with a traditional
boatwright/boatbuilder in a question and answers interview where they will
discuss the training received by him/her compared to the training of past
boatbuilders. Students will work actively together as a group and discuss issues
they have in reading and working to a working drawing which focuses on

analysing and problem solving.
In week 3 (see Table 8), Students engage in building skills be commencing
marking components and demonstrating the importance accurate measurement
and precision in model making.
S, McCarthy, K. L. Dickson, J. Cranney, A. Trapp and V. Karandashev (2012)
state that “(t)eaching from a constructionist perspective requires us to be aware of
the relativistic, relational and contextualized construction of both knowledge and
reality”[ CITATION She12 \l 6153 ]. Theory and practice need to be seamlessly
integrated. Peter Skillen (2020) states, making has a strong connection to Papert’s
constructionism, Piagets’s constructivism, Vygotsky’s social constructivism and
John Dewey’s experientialism, constructionism does not purely the act of
constructing, constructionism relies on evident thinking and conversation
[ CITATION Pet20 \l 6153 ]. As this module progresses students will be
instructed accordingly of stages to follow (See Appendix 3 for planning grid). It is
reality that the traditional terminology in the Irish language associated to the
Galway Hooker are diminishing alongside the traditional methods of boatbuilding
25
in Ireland. In a survey conducted by Millward Brown Survey on behalf Conradh
na Gaeilge in 2019 where 2,000 individuals were surveyed both North (Northern
Ireland) and South (Republic of Ireland). The results were astonishing as only
34% in the republic understood Irish and 30% felt comfortable speaking Irish. The
survey continued to ask individuals in the republic should Irish remain as core
subject up to Leaving Certificate and the results were as follows: 64% in favour
and only 11% answered no with the 25% unsure [ CITATION Kan20 \l 6153 ].
This indicates that Irish is considered valuable in today’s society and is a part of
our heritage as a nation and considerable care and conservation should be given to
our language, culture and heritage. As part of the development of this TY model
making module, the author has added a list of Irish terminology that is translated
to English in order to assist the educator to conserve and protect our ancient
language and terminology that is vastly disappearing among young adolescence
(see Appendix 2).
The theory of constructivism by Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934) must be mentioned
but due to limitations of the brief, discussion will be kept to a minimum. As stated
by Noel Sheehy (2004), Vygotsky saw language not simply as a tool whereby
mental activity of an individual, the parent or teacher in this case, interacts with
the child/student. It is a tool that has shaped cultural change and it is fundamental
to the environment given to both adults and adolescence [CITATION Noe04 \p
240 \t \l 6153 ]. Charlotte Hua Liu and Robert Matthews (2005) writes that, the
mastery of language is not just producing grammatically correct text, but
producing appropriate speech required by situational and communicative
demands. Language is the foundation of our verbal and higher mental thinking,
language provides interaction between individuals [CITATION Cha05 \p 394 \t \l
26
6153 ]. In view of these facts, and my own point of view is that this module
development could be used as a pilot action research study in a Gaelscoil to
promote, protect and safeguard our language, culture and heritage.
5. Conclusion and Recommendations
The main aim of this dissertation was to develop an interdisciplinary Galway
Hooker model-making module for TY students to enrich their motor skills and
enhance heritage knowledge.
Having conducted a literature analysis study of the Galway Hooker in term of
its origins and heritage, there is no significant evidence as to where the Galway
Hooker originated from. Having delved deeper into research and interviews with
local historians, it has been established that there is very little to no existence of
recorded history of the Galway Hooker with only folklore to communicate its
heritage.
Investigations and guidelines were reviewed relating to the NCCA in a bid to
best develop a TY unit. A major role to be considered for the academic year of
2020/21 is Covid-19 and the implication’s and restrictions it has on fulfilling this
module. In a press release by the Minister for Education Norma Foley TD on the
7th January 2021, Foley confirmed that all schools would remain closed to
students from January 11th on foot from the public health advice [CITATION
Dep211 \t \l 6153 ]. As stated by the PDST (2020), planning for TY in the
academic year 2020/21 will impact students’ ‘opportunity to gain work experience
and restrict external and internal visits as well as external learning activities
[CITATION AnR202 \p 2 \t \l 6153 ]. My intention was to develop, implement
and evaluate a cross-disciplinary TY unit (as indicated above), however due to
27
unanticipated Covid-19 restrictions, it was only possible to develop it for use at a
later stage.
Due to social distancing and cross contamination, group work restrictions, I
believe that the Galway Hooker model would be best conducted in groups of four
to distribute tasks and responsibilities. As stated by Eva Hammar Chiriac (2011),
knowledge is developed through a social constructive perspective where learning
is formed in a social context of communication and interactions with their
peers[CITATION Eva11 \p 9 \l 6153 ].
In the development of this TY unit which is focused on the origins and heritage
of the Galway Hooker, the author has concluded that a strong knowledge of the
maritime terminology must be obtained before conducting this TY unit. Irish as a
first language would be preferable but not necessary as the module can be taught
as an interdisciplinary module and Irish class integrated to advance Oracy skills.
Boatbuilding skills are not essential as the module leader can work from working
drawings provided. However, a high level of competency of skills in making and
teaching strategies is required to achieve the Galway Hooker model.
In the development of this TY unit, the author conducted a thorough
investigation into Educational theories and studies, following from the
investigation of constructionism, the author explored the KI and its importance in
the technical classroom. where eye-to-hand coordination is a major factor as well
as ensuring a tactile and movement activity is catered for in each lesson.
Following further investigation in the research of this article, the author noted that
there is very little effort made by the NCCA in developing TUs to promote
technical subjects. The author has proposed that changes which can be found on
28
page 16, figure 3. The author further proposes that the developed unit be
implemented in a Gaelscoil in the context of a pilot action research study.
After examining two theoretical theories of multiple intelligence with the focus
on kinesthetic intelligence (one of eight), and constructionism. The arguments the
author has presented, suggest that constructionism is most fitting the development
of this TY module. This form of teaching is the most common practice and
observation in the technical classroom, where students learn in an experimental
manner by developing knowledge by making. A theory developed by Seymore
Papert. A constructionism approach will provide a student-centred environment
where they will work actively together as a group and discuss issues they have in
reading and working to a working drawing which focuses on analysing and
problem solving as constructionism relies on evident thinking and conversation.
6. List of References
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piagets's constructivism, Papert's constructionism: What's
the difference. Future of learning group publications, 438.
Ackermann, E. (2021, 03 10). www.syliastipich.com. Retrieved from
Googlescholar.com: http://www.sylviastipich.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/Coursera-Piaget-_-Papert.pdf
An Roinn Oideachais agus Eolaíochta. (2020, 10 25). An Roinn Oideachais agus
Eolaíchta-Leaving Certificate-Construction studies Syllabus. Retrieved
from Curriculumonline.ie: https://curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/01cd4efc-
abf5-4adb-b3da-
2b85b4be3611/SCSEC11_Construction_syllabus_Eng.pdf
29
An Roinn Oideachas agus Eolaíochta. (2020). Social, Environmental and
Scientific Education. Dublin: National Curriculum Council of Assessment.
Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, USA:
ASCD.
Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria,
Virginia, USA: ASCD.
Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria,
Virgina USA: ASCD.
Assessment, N. C. (2020, 10 20). Curriculumonline.ie. Retrieved from NCCA.ie:
https://curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/15acb6ec-9091-45de-b9a3-
68cac6936935/Graphics_Construction.pdf
Assessment, N. C. (2020, 10 20). Curriculumonline.ie. Retrieved from
Curriculumonline.ie/senior-cycle/Transition-Year:
https://curriculumonline.ie/Senior-cycle/Transition-Year/
Assessment, N. C. (2020, 09 16). Curriculumonline.ie. Retrieved from
www.curriculumonline.ie: https://www.curriculumonline.ie/Senior-
cycle/Transition-Year/
Baepler, P. M. (2016). A Guide to Teaching in the Active Learning Classroom :
History, Research, and Practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing,
LLC.
Barry, P. (2008). Traditional Boats of Ireland, History, Folklore and
Construction: Origins and History. Cork: The Collins Press.
Bose, S. (2012). Wooden Boat Building For Sustainable Development.
International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 345-360.
30
Carvalho, P. Y. (2019). Moving between material and conceptual structure:
Developing a card-based method to support design for learning. Elsevier,
64-89.
Chen, R. (2014). Cognitive Development: Theories, Stages and Processes and
Challenges. New York: Nove publishers.
Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Research on Group Work in Education. New York: Nova
Science Publisher, Inc.
Church, W. (1849). the washington parlimentary report of 1849. London: Science
museum London.
Clark, R. C. (2019). Evidence-based Training Methods : A Guide for Training
Professionals. Alexandria, USA: ATD Press.
Clerkin, A. (2012). Personal development in secondary education: The Irish
Transition Year. Education policy analysis archives, 1-18.
Cooke, A. (2018). A critical examination of the development of spatial intellgence
using applied roof geometry through a teaching resource pack.
Dissertation submitted to GMIT, 1-27.
Council, T. H. (2020, 10 06). www.heritagecouncil.ie. Retrieved from
heritagecouncil.ie/projects/heritage-in-schools-scheme:
https://www.heritagecouncil.ie/projects/heritage-in-schools-scheme
Críostóir Mac Cárthaigh, D. M. (2008). Traditional Boats of Ireland-Ár mBáid
Dúchais. Cork: Collins.
Department of Education & Science. (2003). Leaving Certificate History
Syllabus. Dublin 2.: The Stationery Office.
Department of Education & Skills. (2020, 10 24). Department of Education and
Skills-Transition Year Programmes-Guidelines for Schools. Retrieved
31
from Department of Education and Skills:
https://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Information/Curriculum-
and-Syllabus/Transition-Year-/ty_transition_year_school_guidelines.pdf
Department of Education and Skills. (2020, 10 25). Returning to School-
Transition Year 2020/21. Retrieved from
www.pdst.ie/sites/default/files/returning:
https://www.pdst.ie/sites/default/files/Returning%20to%20School
%20Transition%20Year%202020-2021.pdf
Dr Eugenia Wickens, A. P. (2003). Andragogy and the Socratic Method: The
Adult Learner Perspective. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport &
Tourism Education, 4-14.
Dr. BADA, S. O. (2020, 10 08). www.iosrjournals.org. Retrieved from
GoogleScholar:
https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/54094559/Constructivism.pdf?
1502257187=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename
%3DConstructivism_Learning_Theory_A_Paradig.pdf&Expires=1602167
716&Signature=J4H8y712XSgcCzbnQtbzk9bS1FGB61c36rOxXzqU8g~1
GzJ4a0fCM
Dunphy, R. (2019). A critical Exploration of the Application of Cognitivist
Perspectives to Materials Technology (Wood) with Particular Attention
Given to the Constructionist Perspective, as Advocated by Seymour
Papert. GMIT Letterfrack, 1-25.
Education, D. o. (2021, 02 22). www.education.ie. Retrieved from
www.education.ie/en/press-events: https://www.education.ie/en/Press-
Events/Press-Releases/2021-press-releases/PR21-01-07.html
32
Education, M. T. (2004). Ibrahim A. Halloun. Netherlands: Springer.
Elisabetta Petroni, G. D. (2016). Húicéirí, Galway Hookers. Renvyle, Galway:
Seanchaí Editions.
Fáilte Ireland. (2021, 02 22). www.Fáilteireland.ie. Retrieved from
www.Fáilteireland.ie/Failteireland:
https://www.failteireland.ie/FailteIreland/media/WebsiteStructure/Docume
nts/2_Develop_Your_Business/Key%20Projects/The-Connemara-Coast-
Aran-Islands-Visitor-Experience-Development-Plan.pdf
Frangenheim, E. (2018). Reflections on Classroom Thinking Strategies: how to
Create your Thinking Classroom with 42 Practical and Engaging thinking
Tools (With Mr Majola's Question). Australlia : Rodin Educational
Publishing.
Galway City Museum. (2021, 04 10). Galwaycitymuseum.ie/galway-hooker.
Retrieved from galwaycitymuseum.ie:
https://www.galwaycitymuseum.ie/galway-hooker/
Gardner, H. (1997, 01 01). Howard Gardner on Multiple Intelligences.
(Edutopia.org, Interviewer)
Gerald L. Glutek, P. A. (2016). Bringing Montessorri to America: S.S. McClure,
Maria Montessori, and the Campaign to Publicize Montessori Education.
Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
Ghazi, G. S. (2015). Gender Differences in Self-estimated Multiple Intelligences
Among Secondary School Students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological
Research, 1-14.
Greene, D. (2013). The Galway Hooker. In Vivs Head, Sailing Gaffers, pp. 104-
109.
33
Greene, D. (2017). The Development of a Boat Building Transition Year Module
Designed to Enhance Spatial and Kinaesthetic Intelligences and Skills.
Dissertation, 1-25.
Griffin, J. M. (2019). Constructionism and De-Constructionism: Opposite yet
Complementary Pedagogies. Temple University, USA, 234-243.
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage - Critical Approaches. New York: Routledge.
Hayes, S. (2011). A critical examination and evaluation of the place of science in
the Irish transition year. Department of Chemical and Environmental
Sciences, University of Limerick , 1-578.
hIarnáin, C. Ó. (2008). Traditional Boats of Ireland - West Coast Region. Cork:
The Collins Press.
Ilaria Viscione, F. D. (2017). Psychomotor Assessment in Teaching and
Educational Research. Athens Journal of Education, 169-178.
Iomaire, S. M. (2000). Cladaí Chonamara. Newtownlynch, Kinvara, Co. Galway:
Tír Eolas.
Istifci, P. D. (2013). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Methods on Students'
Academic Achievments in Social Psychology Lessons. International
Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 1-102.
James M. Applefield, R. H. (2000, 12 2). Constructivism in Theory and Practice:
Toward a Better Understanding. Wilmington, North Carolina, North
Carolina, United States.
Jeffers, G. (2010). The role of school leadership in the implentation of the
Transition Year Programme in Ireland, School Leadership &
Managemaent. Formerly School Organisation, 469-486.
34
Jeffers, G. (2011). The Transition Year programme in Ireland. Embracing and
resisting a curriculum innovation. Cuuriculum Journal, 61-76.
Jeffers, G. (2021, 03 11). www.irishtimes.com. Retrieved from
www.irishtimes.com/culture: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/the-
legacy-of-an-inspiration-1.1309959#:~:text=Thirty%20years%20ago
%20this%20month,to%20emerge%20from%20my%20ministry%22.
Jones, C. (2009). Interdisciplinary Approach- Advantages, Disadvantages, and the
Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies. ESSAI, 1-7.
K. Richard Ridderinkhof, M. B. (2015). How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works:
A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor
expertise. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 53-63.
Karandashev, S. M. (2012). Teaching Psychology around the World: Volume 3.
Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful Learning and Montessori Education. The NAMTA
Journal, 137-174.
Mathhews, C. H. (2005). Vygotsky's Philosophy: Constructivism and its
criticisms examined. International Educational Journal, 386-399.
Mays, A. (2020, 11 04). Toward the Application of Constructivism and
Constructionism to Work-Related Training in Service of the Enhancement
of Human Capital Development in Postsecondary Education Setting in the
United States. Retrieved from Google Scholar:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556116.pdf
McGrath, P. Ó. (2019). Traditional sailing boats, embodied knowledge(s) and
dwelling in coastal rural communities: The case of the ‘Galway Hooker’ in
South West Conamara, Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 228-239.
35
Moynihan, J. A. (2015). The Transition Year: A unique Programme in Irish
Education Bridging The Gap Between School and The Workplace.
International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 199-210.
Moynihan, J. A. (2015). The Transition Year: A Unique Programme in Irish
Education Bridging The Gap Between School and The Workplace. IEJEE:
Moynihan, J. A. (2015). The Transition Year: A Unique Programme in Irish
Education Bridging The Gap Between School and The Workplace.
Mullins, G. J. (2004). Teacher Education in the Republic of Ireland: Retrospect
and Prospect. Standing Conferrence on Teacher Education North and
South (SCoTENS) (pp. 1-64). Armagh, Northern Ireland: Dr. Andy Burke.
Murphy, M. (2015). Plato's Philosophy of Education and the Common Core
debate. University of St. Francis (p. 12). Chicago: Association for the
development of Philosophy teaching (ADOPT).
Muysken, S. A. (2019). Heritage Languages: A Language Contact Approach.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
NCCA. (2008). Developing Transition Units- Draft Handbook for Schools.
Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
NCCA. (2021, 03 09). NCCA.ie/en/senior-cycle. Retrieved from NCCA.ie:
https://ncca.ie/en/senior-cycle/programmes-and-key-skills/transition-year
OASIS, M. (2020, 10 27). www.multipleintelligenceoasis.com. Retrieved from
squarespace: https://www.multipleintelligencesoasis.org/a-beginners-
guide-to-mi
36
OASIS, M. (2020, 10 27). www.static1.squarespace.com. Retrieved from MI
OASIS:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c65be2cfb22a5044c764343/t/5c6c7
12fa4222f0b0b72c829/1550610735671/In+a+nutshell+MINH.pdf
PDST. (2020, 10 24). Professional Development Services for Teachers. Retrieved
from PDST.ie: https://pdst.ie/sites/default/files/Section%201%20-
%20Planning.pdf
PDST. (2021, 03 09). pdst.ie/node/2947. Retrieved from pdst.ie:
https://www.pdst.ie/node/2947
Perry, R. (2008, 10 1). On Creative Thinking in the Classroom. Forum thoughts
to share, p. 1.
Plekhanov, A. (1992). The pedagogical theory and practice of Maria Montessori.
Russian Social Science Review, 79-91.
Roberts, J. W. (2016). Experimental Education in the College Context: what it is,
how it works, and why it matters . New York: Routledge.
Sabhain, P. S. (2019). The Centrality of the Galway Hooker to Dwelling in the
Island and Coastal Communities of South West Connemara. Galway: NUI
Galway.
Scott, R. J. (2004). The Galway Hookers, Sailing work boats of Galway Bay.
Limerick: A.K. Ilen Company.
Sheehy, N. (2004). Fifty Key Thinkers In Psychology. London: Routledge.
Skillen, P. (2020, 11 16). www.questconference.ca. Retrieved from Google
Scholar: http://www.questconference.ca/wp-
content/uploads/2019/01/2015SkillenArticle.pdf
37
Skills, D. o. (2020, 09 16). education.ie. Retrieved from education.ie:
https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Inspection-Reports-Publications/
State Examinations Commission. (2020, 10 25). Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit-
State Examinations Commission/Examiners_report. Retrieved from
www.examinations.ie/archieve/examiners_report/LC_Const_Studies_2009
.PDF:
https://www.examinations.ie/archive/examiners_reports/LC_Const_Studie
s_2009.pdf
Survey, K. M. (2020, 11 05). Conradh na Gaeilge. Retrieved from cnag.ie:
https://cnag.ie/images/28DF2019_Ce%CC%81ard_e%CC%81_an_Sce
%CC%81al_RP.pdf
Suryati, O. D. (2019). The Implementation of Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic
(VAK) Learning Model in Improving Students' Achievement in Writing
Descriptive Texts. English Language Teaching Educational Journal
(ELTEJ), 142-149.
Tanner, P. (2021, 03 11). www.tradboats.ie/projects/west/typical-galway-
hooker/linesplan.pdf. Retrieved from www.tradboats.ie:
http://www.tradboats.ie/projects/west/typical-galway-hooker/linesplan.pdf
Tight, M. (2004). Key Concepts in Adult Education and Training 2nd Edition.
New York: Routledge.
Together, T. E. (2021, 03 09). teacherseducatorstogether.weebly.com/#. Retrieved
from teacherseducatorstogether.weebly.com:
https://teachereducatorstogether.weebly.com/#
Tully, D. (2006). Audit of Maritime Collections. Dublin: The Heritage Council.
38
Vancea, F. (2017). The Body Intelligence- Description and Measurement.
Preceedings of the Scientific Conference AFASES (pp. 231-234). Brasov,
Romania: Spiru Haret University.
W. Huitt, J. H. (2003). Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. Valdosta, 1-5.
Waterways Ireland. (2016). Traditional Heritage Boat Survey; Grand Canal,
Royal Canal, Barrow Navigation. Cork: Meitheal Mara.
Whiteley, T. R. (2007). Integrating The Technological Resources of The Online
Learning Enviornment with The VAK Learning-Styles Model To Foster
Student Learning. American Marketing Association/Winter 2007, 1-10.
Youyan Nie, S. L. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic
instruction to students' cognition, motivation, and achievement. Elsevier,
411-423.
7. Appendices
Appendix 1
Figure 1- Ireland map- Google images, 19th Oct 2020
39
Knee – Glún
Apron – Naprún
Lacing – Lásáil
Bailing bucket – Galún taosctha
Mainsail – Seól mór
Bailing hole – Poll a’ruma
Mast – Crann
Ballast – Ballasta
Mast step – Ceaptró
Beam – Seas
Oakum – Ócum
Beam Shelf (stringer) – Rongail/ stringer
Planking – Stracaí
Boatbuilder – Saor bád
Rake – Ráca
Boom – Bum
Rope – Téad
Bow/ stem – Ball
Rowboat – Bád iomartha
Caulking – Corcáil
Rudder – Stiúr
Cleat – Cléit
Ruddar post – Posta Stiurach
Sail – Seol
Sheer – Lag bhórd
Dead wood – Maide ceangail
Shrouds – Scriudaí
Fore deck – Deic tosaigh
False stem – Graidhp
Forestay – Stoith an tseóil tosaigh
Staysail – seól tosaigh
Frames – Framaí nó Easnacha
Stepping beam – Clord an bhallasta
Gaff – Gaif
Tacking (sailing) – Tornáil
Garboard- Straca iochtair nó Garboard
Tack – ar leath-bhórd
Gunwale – Slat bord
Tiller – Halmadóir
Heel – Sáil
Tumblesome – Boilsc
Keel – Cíle
Weatherboard – Clar aimsire
40
Appendix 2
Nautical terminology translated from English to Irish to aid the facilitator in the
heritage aspect of this TY unit
41
Appendix 3
1
2
3
4
Appendix 4
5
6
Appendix 5
7
Title of Transition Unit
Galway Hooker Heritage Model
Area of Study
The area of study comprises of two categories in the Transition Unit (TU) chart. They are:
1. Creativity.
2. Local and Global Citizenship
Overview
Creativity.
As described in the segment box of the category, students will express creativity and imagination. This is done by getting students
creating individual Galway Hooker (scaled) model while also imagining the construction methods used by their ancestors.
Local and Global Citizenship.
Students will learn how to become an active citizen and understand social, environmental, and economic issues at local, national, and
global level by investigating economic growth and change in society and industry.
8
Combining these two TU will develop student’s creativity and reflective skills as they will reflect on traditional craftsmanship compared
to modern techniques of construction. This is beneficial to students contemplating progressing from Wood Technology at junior cycle, to
Construction Studies at senior cycle. Students will also develop their design abilities as they will practice a design led project. This method
is beneficial to students progressing to senior cycle Design Communication Graphics (DCG). Finally, enhancing student’s imagination and
questioning skills, these skills can be beneficial to students progressing in history or Social, Environmental and Scientific Education
(SESE).
Related learning
1. Transition from wood technology to construction studies (junior cycle to senior cycle). Equip students kinesthetic skills (fine motor skills)
to prepare students for a practical career i.e. apprenticeship, engineering, education, furniture manufacturing etc.
2. Students will explore their culture and heritage. This will be explored as culture and heritage defines a nations identity and will be done
so to create an interdisciplinary module of the technical subjects and the subject of Social, Environmental and Scientific Education
(SESE), which consists of three subjects, they are Science, Geography and history.
Summary outline of unit
 Week 1 of commencement is an introduction to the module where students get the opportunity to get acquainted with subject matter
beginning with a documentary serious (Bádoirí) aired on TG4 in 2019. Students will be asked to conduct research of the traditional
9
Galway Hooker and their history in which they will create posters and presentations based on their learning.
 Week 2, students engage with a traditional boatwright/boatbuilder in a question and answers interview where they will discuss the
training received by him/her compared to the training of past boatbuilders. Students will work actively together as a group and discuss
issues they have in reading and working to a working drawing which focuses on analysing and problem solving.
 In week 3, Students engage in building skills be commencing marking components and demonstrating the importance accurate
measurement and precision in model making. As stated by S, McCarthy, K. L. Dickson, J. Cranney, A. Trapp and V. Karandashev
(2012), “(t)eaching from a constructionist perspective requires us to be aware of the relativistic, relational and contextualized construction
of both knowledge and reality”[ CITATION She12 \l 6153 ].
 Week 4 sees students setting up the frames/ribs (shape templates). This allows students the scope to be creative and readjust the frames in
order to create their own design to the boat as previously explored in the early learning of the TY unit of how previous boatbuilders
formed the shape of the hull using their visual-spatial intelligence, one of eight multiple intelligence.
 Week 5, students visits a working boat yard and investigate the process and time that is necessary to construct a Galway Hooker. Students
will record and document their findings which will be used as a group presentation at the end of the TY unit.
 Week 6, students will experiment with different materials in order to plank the Galway Hooker boat model. Students will also use
mathematical equations in order divide equal plank sizes to cover the hull.
 Week 7, students commence planking. This will involve students using their kinesthetic intelligence by creating accurate cut planks
where attention to detail is essential.
10
 Week 8, students research different fastening techniques and glues. This is essential if students pursue construction studies into senior
cycle.
 Week 9, students complete the Galway Hooker model.
 Week 10, students present their findings from research conducted of the heritage and culture of the Galway Hooker and history of
boatbuilders in the Connemara region.
Breakdown of unit
Transition unit is planned to be timetabled over a 10-week timeline with two double periods per week. Each period consists of 40 minutes.
However, due to housekeeping, this time is reduced to 30 minutes. This approximately adds to 27 hours class time, the remaining 21 hours of the
45 hours will be used for guest speakers, independent research, group activities inside and outside the classroom.
Aims
 conduct a literature study of the Galway Hooker in terms of origins and heritage.
 to help students discover, through participation, cultural heritage that defines them as a community.
 Develop motor skills while reinforcing numeracy, literacy, graphicacy and literacy.
Learning outcomes
On completion of the TU the student should be able to:
11
1) Identify the importance of the traditional craft before road infrastructure
2) Investigate relevant literature resources
3) Evaluate their learning and process
Key skills
During the process of this TU, students will encounter all five key skills across the senior cycle curriculum. They will develop knowledge and
skills to process and manufacture an artifact that are obtained from the transition from Wood Technology (WT) to Construction Studies (CS).
Students’ will obtain attitude’s and values that will obtain their interests to become more effective learners by developing positive beliefs to
engage in new learning and learning situations.
1) Communicating
Students’ will develop good communication skills by using a variety of media/platforms, interview and research techniques when
investigating the origins and heritage of boatbuilders in the South Connemara region.
2) Being personally effective

Students will develop this key skill by planning and setting targets/goals for themselves. This will be achieved by setting timelines and
assignment upload dates to further proceed in the TU project.
3) Working with others

Working with others is vital skill to learn at an early stage. It is vital as students will progress to work experience and working life in later
years, teamwork and collaboration is a fundamental aspect of all work environments. This will be achieved by group presentations,
12
collaboration in the construction of the Galway Hooker model boat. Social skills will be developed by investigation and research in the
context of interviews.
4) Critical and creative thinking

This skill will assist students become more skilled in higher order reasoning and problem solving. This will be achieved by students
creating and designing jointing and fastening methods to complete the model boat. Students will also be given the opportunity to design
and influence the shape of the Galway Hooker model boat.
5) Information process
Students will be become efficient learners in an information intensive environment by accessing and evaluating, selecting, and recording
information. This will be achieved by interviews, literature review and establishing the correct/valid resources.
Teaching approaches
During the course of this TU, a variety of teaching approaches will be conducted.
1. Project work and research

Students will be immersed in a project activity where they will conduct research in the construction of a Galway Hooker and the
boatbuilders that constructed them.
2. Visiting speakers and seminars
13
A boatwright talk of his/her experience as a boatwright. Students will also get the opportunity to question and investigate lectures of the
International Boatbuilding Training College (IBCT) Portsmouth.
3. Study visits and field trips

Students will experience the construction of a Galway Hooker boat by visiting a working boat yard.
4. Activity based learning

Students will encounter an active based learning experience of manufacturing an artifact by constructing the model boat while also
incorporating the use numeracy, literacy, graphicacy and oracy. This will be achieved by working from working drawing and
collaboration.
5. Group work, pair work

This is a vital role of this project as students will be asked to complete a group presentation on the history of boatbuilders in the South
Connemara region and the vessels differentiation.
Assessment approaches
Formative Assessment
Students will be provided with feedback and guidance during the course of the TU. This will be achieved by self-assessment and peer review.
This may be achieved using a rubrics sheet which encourages students to reflect on their learning and take on more responsibility.
Adding to the formative assessment process, students will engage in the following,
14
1. Entry and exit cards. This provides an excellent opportunity to investigate student’s knowledge at the start of class, by starting with a
quick question about the previous lesson while students are getting settled in class. Exit cards are no longer restricted to pen and paper.
Exit cards can be assessed with online platform tools like Padlet, Polly, Poll Everywhere, Microsoft Forms, Google Classroom’s Question
tool etc. This method is effective whether you are assessing at the bottom or top of Bloom’s taxonomy.
2. Quizzes and polls can be used to further investigate your student’s knowledge. Quizzes and polls such as Socrative and Quizlet or
classroom activities such as Kahoot, Quizalize, Plickers can assist the teacher get a better understanding of students’ knowledge. As these
methods are designed by the teacher, the level of complexity can be determined by the teacher.
3. Flipped classroom. This method is beneficial as the students become the expert and teach the topic at hand to their peers and the teacher.
Summative Assessment
Summative assessment will occur at the end of each stages of construction and research. This will be done administer students’ progress
and evaluate their learning. This form of assessment proves to be beneficial to the teacher as he/she may need to change their teaching
approach to accommodate the students learning styles. Assessment may be carried out in the form of the following.
1. End of unit or stage tests

2. Final presentation and portfolios
3. Project grading
In order for summative assessment to be successful, students will be rewarded a certificate of completion to award their hard work.
An example of the certificate is shown below.
15
16
17
Evaluation
This TU is in the process of development and will be evaluated after feedback is received from the NCCA and acting principals and head of
technical departments.
Resources
 (2017) Psychomotor Assessment in Teaching and Educational Research published by Athens Journal of Education- Volume 4, Issue 2- Pages 169-
178. This academic journal explores the relationship between the body and its surroundings in a school environment through structured observation. In
addition, it also explains the results of how features of everyday life and classroom activity may help guide teaching for the recovery, development
and psychomotor skills that is needed in a practical classroom. [ CITATION Ila17 \l 6153 ]
 Ruthann Perry (2008), On Creative Thinking in the Classroom published by Forum thoughts to share. In this periodical journal, Perry discusses the
importance of being creative in the classroom and how she as an Art teacher refuses to buy readymade kits from education companies as they took the
students creativity opportunity away. She further explains to how she gives real-life examples of sports stars and famous musicians on how they
persevered, kept practicing, and never gave up on their dreams. I believe this mindset a valuable part to include in my dissertation and transition year
module as it is important that students realise that it is okay to make mistakes [ CITATION Rut08 \l 6153 ].
 Eric Frangenheim (2018), Reflections on Classroom Thinking Strategies: How to Create your Thinking Classroom with 42 Practical and Engaging
Thinking Tools (with Mr Majola’s Question). This book gives examples on how to get your students to think and explore for themselves. The author
explains how we as educators have the responsibility to create a thinking and learning environment for our students, encouraging the students to think
for themselves and to take charge of their own learning. In addition, the author further explains how the students might be disengaged due to lack of
positive appraise from parents, mentors, and other idols in their life. This book also establishes how to incorporate Blooms taxonomy into the higher
order thinking classroom from applying three thinking skills which are Analyse, Evaluate and Design which are paramount to Wood Technology,
Graphics and Design, Communication Graphics (DCG). [ CITATION Eri18 \l 6153 ].
18
 Gerald L. Gutek, Patricia A. Gutek (2016), Brining Montesorri to America: S. S. McClure, Maria Montesorri, and the campaign to publicize
Montessori Education. This book gives a detailed insight into the life of Maria Montesorri and the origins of her teaching methods. In my dissertation,
I will closely examine Maria Montessorri and her methods as I find it most appealing to my teaching style (learn by doing/making) and preferred
learning ability. [ CITATION Ger161 \l 6153 ].
 Jay W. Roberts (2016), Experimental Education in the college Context: what it is, how it works, and why it works. This book discusses experimental
education and explains the theory and practice together. The first chapter is broadly catalogued of active learning, integrated learning, project-based
learning, and community-based learning. In chapter two of this book, the author explains the difference between several methodologies and
approaches from his twenty years of experience of teaching [ CITATION Jay16 \l 6153 ].
 A. Plekhanov (1992), The pedagogical theory and practice of Maria Montessori. This academic journal gives details of Maria Montessori’s methods
of teaching based on her methodology by handing out different materials to develop the students senses of touch, weight, size, sight, hearing, rhythm
and later asked to insert the different shapes and sizes of material into the most suitable spaces which in turn exercised the students psychosensory
skills [ CITATION APl92 \l 6153 ].
 Peter Cunningham, Ruth Heilbronn (2016), Dewey in our time: Learning from John Dewey for transcultural practice. In this book the authors
examines John Dewey’s work and gives an insight into Dewey’s work and pedagogical theory. It explains how we as educators should create
educative experiences not only for students, but also for the teachers as intellectuals and initiators of pedagogical theory. This book further explains
how teachers are conceived as artists, intellectuals, and experimenters in which we as educators have the duty to develop the growth and knowledge
development of our students. I believe this book and the research of John Dewey’s work is fundamental to my dissertation as I, as an educator will
experiment and attempt to develop student’s knowledge and inspire them to contemplate on taking the subjects of Wood Technology and Graphics as
subjects for the leaving certificate.
 Curriculumonline.ie (2020), National Council of Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). I will use the NCCA website as a guide and a reference to
develop my dissertation module using their templates and guidelines to fulfil the Department of Education’s specifications [CITATION Nat202
\n \l 6153 ].
 Inspection reports and publications (2020), Department of Education and Skills. I believe these publications will play sufficient role in my
dissertation as an educator and a module developer as we can learn key skills that have been recommended for approval in other schools nationwide
(schools name will remain anonymous for discretion). In order for my dissertation module to be successful and students to develop their education and
knowledge we will explore forms of teaching, learning and assessment that have been questioned and how we as educators may approve in these areas
of education [CITATION Dep205 \n \l 6153 ].
19
 Plato’s Philosophy of Education and the common Core debate (2015). In this conference paper, the author Madonna Murphy of University of St.
Francis gives us an insight of ancient Greek philosophy and the relevance in today’s society. It also portrays how Plato was the first to suggest equal
education for men and women. A very important aspect to my dissertation as I will try and persuade female students to take the subjects of
construction studies and DCG after this beginner module course [CITATION Mad15 \n \l 6153 ].
 A Guide to teaching in the active learning classroom: History, Research and practice (2016). I believe this book will help me deliver my dissertation
module as the book explains the importance of active learning in the classroom. It gives opinions how to layout your classroom from the typical
traditional approach of teaching with one focal point to the more active classroom with posters and projectors spread across the room to enhance more
engagement within students creating a more active learning environment [CITATION Pau16 \p 18 \l 6153 ].
 Playful Learning and Montessori Education (2013). In this academic journal, the author explains the difference between free play and guided play and
how playful learning is a constructivist child/student centred learning approach. This is a method I look forward to approaching in my future teaching
as it gives me, as the teacher an opportunity to ask open ended questions exploring “discovery learning” and didactic instruction [CITATION Ang13
\p 138 \l 6153 ].
 Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement (2010). In this journal it gives us
an insight into educational reforms and key points into the theory of learning through an active and constructive practice. As we will explore in my
dissertation and the principles of how an active approach to learning through making will enhance students learning, the author of this journal
(Youyan Nie, Shun Lau, 2010) best explains by stating “Learning is not passively receiving knowledge but an active process of constructing
meaningful representations of knowledge”[CITATION You10 \p 412 \n \l 6153 ].
 Andragogy and the Socratic Method: The Adult Learner Perspective (2003). In this journal it gives us examples of the Socratic method in adult
education and how they may relevant to young adult students. It further goes on to explain how students actively and co-operatively develop
knowledge and ability to understand a topic if they had received the information passively. The journal further goes onto explain how two Socratic
strategies (Elenchus, Aporia) could engage students and help the teacher liberate the students of their cognitive egocentrism [CITATION DrE03 \p
6 \l 6153 ].
 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development (2006). This is a journal that gives an insight into Jean Piaget (1896-1980) theory of Cognitive
development and the four stages of cognitive development which are:
1. Sensorimotor
2. Pre-operational
3. Concrete operational
20
4. Formal operational
In this journal, it explains how Piaget theory set the foundations for constructivist learning [CITATION WHu03 \p 2 \l 6153 ]. When
conducting this module, I believe this journal will assist and prepare me for my dissertation as to what expect from students at the four different
stages as stated above.
 www.heritagecouncil.ie/Projects/heritage-in-schools-scheme (2020). On this website, it gives you Aims & Objectives of the heritage in school
scheme. The website gives examples of why it is important to encourage greater awareness in schools of Ireland’s rich built and cultural heritage. It
gives you details of experts in your area across the island of Ireland and provides support in aims and objectives of the Social, Scientific and
Environmental Education (SESE) curriculum and additional educational tools and resources for teachers. I believe this will be beneficial to my
dissertation as I will implementing an appreciation for the uniqueness of our culture and developing knowledge of our local heritage [CITATION
The201 \n \l 6153 ].
 Traditional Boats of Ireland Project, Ár mBáid Dúchais (2008). This is a book that was published of a combined effort of Irish individuals who were
passionate about the rich diversity of our maritime traditions and many vessel/crafts throughout the island of Ireland. This book contains surveys
conducted on traditional skills and knowledge that is commonly used in the technical classroom i.e. Hand tools, materials, defects etc. Therefore, this
book will be invaluable to my module and students to conduct research as there is a free online version of the book which you can access the different
regions of Ireland. Along with the different regions of Ireland, it gives you a brief history on the type of craft you are investigating which will
contribute to students independent learning [CITATION Crí08 \n \l 6153 ].
 Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a better Understanding (2000). In this book, the author explains the constructivist view of human
learning of knowledge acquisition emphasizing knowledge construction instead of knowledge transmission and recording information explained by
others. The author further explains how Moshman (1982) identified three types of constructivism: exogeneous, endogenous and dialectical
constructivism. I believe that this book will help my dissertation and module as it will be based on constructivism theory by developing knowledge
through an active construction process rather than traditional instruction [CITATION Jam00 \n \l 6153 ].
 Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning (2015). In this journal article the author gives us an introduction to the
Constructivism approach/theory and explains to the reader how the theory may be applied. “The theory suggests that humans construct knowledge and
meaning from their experiences”[CITATION DrB20 \p 66 \n \l 6153 ].
21
 Ackermann, E., 2001. Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), p.438. In
this journal article, the author gives us a detailed explanation to the difference between Piaget’s constructivism and Papert’s constructionism.
Piaget’s constructivism offers students a window into what they are interested in and what they are able to achieve at different stages. The author
further explains how Piaget’s theory suggests students shouldn’t abandon an idea because they are told so by either an expert, teacher that they’re
wrong. Papert on the other hand focuses more on the art of learning or learning to learn and “making things” in learning. Papert’s theory of
constructionism is focused in how learners engage in a conversation and how these conversations engage students in self-directed learning and
ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge [CITATION EAc01 \n \l 6153 ].
 Modeling Theory in Science Education (2004). This book consists of twenty years of work developing modelling theory as a pedagogical theory for
teaching and learning science at all levels. Originally a theory of science identifying model making to be fundamental in the process of scientific
inquiry which in turn promotes experimental learning. Appropriate activities are designed for students to develop different rational and realistic
perspectives. I believe this method/theory will pay a major role in this module as students will learn through the making of the Galway Hooker
model [CITATION Mod04 \n \l 6153 ].
 Journal of physiology-Paris: How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery work: A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise
(2015). In this journal, the author explains Kinesthetic Motor Imagery (KMI) and its importance to acquire and refine motor skills. This article gives
an insight of how sport science and cognitive neurophysiology can be bridged. I believe this article will be of benefit to my dissertation as students
will be using their kinesthetic motor skills as they try and “eye” the shape of the curves and lines of the model Galway Hooker [CITATION
KRi15 \n \l 6153 ].
 Evidence-based Training methods: A guide for Training Professionals (2019). In this book, the author focuses on learning styles and basic modes of
communication from Graphics, text and audio. The author also recaps on teaching procedures and building critical thinking skills and ends with an
updated chapter on games and evidence-based guidelines as to apply instructional design and development. It also explains what it means to be a
kinesthetic learner. This book will help both the reader and I to get a better understanding of visual learning and concept of Kinesthetic learner.
[CITATION Rut19 \n \l 6153 ].
 Multiple Intelligences in the classroom (2018). In this book, the author explains the different categories of multiple intelligence and the background
of its origins. I believe this is an important book to develop my TY module and to learn as an educator how to accommodate different types of
learning and intelligences [CITATION Tho18 \n \l 6153 ].
22
Appendix 6
Online resources (YouTube clips) of Húicéiri (Hookers) Part 1, 2 and 3.
23
24
Appendix 7
25
Appendix 8
SolidWorks drawing to introduce and assist students in the use of SolidWorks and the visualisation of 2D to 3D.
26
Appendix 9
27

Dissertation g00363780

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Dissertation g00363780

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dissertation g00363780

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MODULE TITLE: DISSERTATION

The Development of an Interdisciplinary Galway Hooker

Submitted for the Award of

Student Number: G00363780

Keywords: Galway Hooker; Heritage; Model-making; Transition Year Unit; Cross

an important role in the economy of the coastal communities in and around

Galway Bay”[CITATION Gal21 \t \l 6153 ].

Positioning myself as a researcher, I am final year award student at Galway-

Mayo Institute of Technology (GMIT) Letterfrack. I am from Cill Chiaráin

(Kilkieran), a small fishing village located in south Connemara Co. Galway.

South Connemara has a renowned maritime history, resilience, and vibrancy of

coastal and island life[CITATION Séa00 \t \l 6153 ]. In this region and

surrounding regions of Connemara, Gaeilge (Irish) is the first spoken language. In

drive this project forward.

traditional craft skills dying, it is currently under threat[CITATION Wat16 \t \l

boat-building work force is a real problem as there is no educational support at

a more lucrative trade [CITATION Sha12 \p 357 \t \l 6153 ]. Providing the

younger generation with opportunities to explore boatbuilding is a requirement, if

the trade is to survive. It is on these bases that I have decided to develop an

to senior cycle[ CITATION Cle12 \l 6153 ]. The Department of Education and

Skills explains that a TY programme welcomes a cross interdisciplinary approach

by giving the students an opportunity to mature with the emphasis on their

development including social awareness and social competence. It gives the

students an opportunity to enhance their technical and academic skills with a

development and maturity [CITATION Dep206 \p 3 \t \l 6153 ]. Joseph A.

three schools as a pilot programme [CITATION Jos15 \p 200 \t \l 6153 ].

Moynihan further states that:

Students find themselves immersed in alternative learning environment where the

The aim of this dissertation is to develop an interdisciplinary Galway Hooker

heritage knowledge. The objectives are to:

 Conduct a literature study of the craft of boatbuilding, including the

secondary research. I critically evaluate academic publications, this includes educational

journal articles, electronic resources, websites, dictionaries, academic reports,

Hooker, boat building in Connemara and the development of a TY unit.

This is an original contribution to teacher education. My intention was to

develop, implement and evaluate a cross-disciplinary TY unit (as indicated

above), however due to unanticipated Covid-19 restrictions, it was only possible

to develop it for use at a later stage.

south Connemara. This is followed by an investigation of best practice TY

development, with reference to NCCA guidelines. Learning theories, that

constructionism. To conclude, I will state my research findings and

Rouling Chen (2014) explains, cognitive development and emotional

development has been viewed as separate elements in the development of a child,

6153 ]. We will learn the difference between Jean Piaget’s (1896-1980)

constructivism and Symour Papert’s (1928-2016) constructionism and how these

explore Symour Papert’s Constructionism theory and Howard Gardner’s theory of

2. The Galway Hooker: Origins and Heritage

Bád mór, 10.5m to 13.5m (35ft to

Leathbhád/half boat is approximately

Gleoiteog mhór, 7m to 9m (24ft to

Gleoiteog bheag, 6m to 7m (20ft to

Table 1. Classes of the Galway Hooker Boat (Original Photographs)

their length and type of rigging (see Table 1).

occupies a position in the maritime heritage and identity of the region”

[CITATION Pád19 \p 2 \t \l 6153 ].Various theories have developed over the

origins of the hooker, in a report conducted by W.H. Church (1849) in the

may be based on the standard nineteenth-century British-type inshore cutters and