Chapter 5-Capital Structure

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

19/08/2020

CORPORATE FINANCE
Quyen Do Nguyen PhD
Corporate Finance Dept.
Faculty of Banking and Finance
Foreign Trade University

CHAPTER 5

COST OF CAPITAL &


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

1
19/08/2020

OBJECTIVES

 Cost of capital

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


 Capital structure

 MM theory on Capital Structure

 Tax Impact on Capital Structure

The investment decision

Assets Liabilities & equity


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Current assets Current liabilities

Fixed assets Long-term debt


Preferred stock
Common equity

2
19/08/2020

The financing decision

Assets Liabilities & equity

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Current assets Current liabilities

Fixed assets Long-term debt


Preferred stock
Common equity

Capital structure

Assets Liabilities & equity


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Current assets Current liabilities

Capital structure
Fixed assets Long-term debt
Preferred stock
Common equity

3
19/08/2020

Cost of capital
 For investors the rate of return on a security is a benefit
of investing
 For financial managers that same rate of return is a cost

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


of raising funds
 The context determines which of these similar terms to
use: :
 Cost of capital
???
 Required rate of return
 Discount rate
 Interest rate
7
 Yield

Cost of capital
 The minimum rate that a company must earn on
investment projects in order to satisfy the required
rates of return of its investors
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 The rate of return on investments that leaves the price


of the firm’s ordinary shares unchanged
 Interchangeable terms
 Required rate of return
 Hurdle rate for new investments
 Discount rate for evaluating new investments
 Opportunity cost of funds 8

4
19/08/2020

Connecting the investment and financing decisions

Financing decisions

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Cost of capital

Investment decisions

How can the firm raise capital?


 By borrowing from the bank
 By selling:
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 Bonds
 Preference shares
 Ordinary shares
 Each offers a rate of return to investors
 These returns are costs to the firm

 “Cost of capital” actually refers to the weighted cost of


10
capital

10

5
19/08/2020

Factors determining the


weighted cost of capital
 General economic conditions: Inflation, Capital
supply and demand  Interest rate fluctuation.

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


 Marketability conditions
 Firm’s operating and financing decisions
 Business risk
 Financial risk
 Amount of financing
11

11

The weighted cost of capital Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

WCC = wd Costd
+ wp Costp
+ we Coste

12

12

6
19/08/2020

Example …

Salinas company’s capital structure

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


% of capital
Type Amount structure

Debt 600,000 30
Preference shares 200,000 10
Ordinary shares 1,200,000 60
Total liabilities & equity $2,000,000 100
13

13

… Example

Salinas company weighted cost of capital


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Weight Cost of Weighted


Type % sources cost

Debt 30 10% 3.0%


Preference shares 10 12% 1.2%
Ordinary shares 60 16% 9.6%
100 13.8%
14

14

7
19/08/2020

Calculating the WCC


Compute the cost of capital for each source of
financing used by the firm

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


 Cost of debt
 Cost of preference
shares
 Cost of ordinary shares

15

15

Cost of debt

The rate of return


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

required by
investors to buy the
bonds offered for
sale by the firm

16

16

8
19/08/2020

Adjusting for taxes

If an after tax cost of debt is required

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Kd,AT = Kd,BT ( 1 – T )

where
Kd,AT = After tax percentage cost of debt
Kd,BT = Before tax percentage cost of debt
T = Relevant tax rate
17

17

The weighted cost of capital


(Adjusting for taxes)
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

WCC = wd Costd ( 1 – T )
+ wp Costp
+ we Coste

18

18

9
19/08/2020

Cost of preference shares

 For an irredeemable preference share:

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Kp = D / P0 = Dividend / Price

 Whether to consider flotation costs

Kp,AT = D / NP0 = Dividend / Net price


where NP0 = Price – Flotation costs
19

19

EXAMPLE:

If a company issues preference shares with an expected


dividend of $8 per year and an issue price of $75 per
share, what is the cost to the company of the preference
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

shares if flotation costs amount to $1 per share?

Kp,AT = D / NP0
= $8 / ( $75 - $1 )
= 10.81%

20

20

10
19/08/2020

Cost of ordinary shares

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


There are two sources of ordinary equity:
1. Internal ordinary equity – retained earnings
2. External ordinary equity – new ordinary shares
issued

21

21

Measuring the required rate of return

2 approaches:
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

1. The dividend-
growth model
2. The capital asset
pricing model

22

22

11
19/08/2020

Cost of equity

1. Dividend growth model

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Ke,AT = Re,AT = D1 / P0 + g

2. Capital asset pricing model

Ke,AT = Re,AT = Rf +  ( Rm – Rf )

23

23

g – growth rate
 g = ROE x r
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 ROE of the company is 15%; retention rate is 35%


and will be stable in the coming years..

 g = (0.35) (15%) = 5.25%

24

24

12
19/08/2020

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

25

Financial structure

Balance sheet
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Current Current
Financial structure

assets liabilities

Debt and
preference
Fixed shares
assets
Shareholders’
equity 26

26

13
19/08/2020

Capital structure

Balance sheet

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Current Current
assets liabilities

Capital structure
Debt and
preference
Fixed shares
assets
Shareholders’
equity 27

27

Why is capital structure important?


 Leverage
Higher financial leverage means potentially higher
returns to shareholders, but higher risk due to higher
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

interest payments.
 Cost of capital
Each source of finance has a different cost. Capital
structure affects the cost of capital.
 Optimal capital structure
The structure that minimises the firm’s cost of
capital and maximises firm value 28

28

14
19/08/2020

Measuring the financial leverage

Using “debt-equity” ratio = Total debt/Total equity

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Using “debt-to-value” ratio = Total debt/(Total
equity + total debt)

Both “debt-equity” and the “debt-to-value” ratios


can measure the book value and market value

29

29

Using the financial leverage

Each industry uses different financial leverage


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Companies operating in IT usually use less leverage

Companies operating in furniture, equipments,


airplanes use more leverage

30

30

15
19/08/2020

Modigliani/Miller THEORY (MM)

The theory on the optimal capital structure is

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


based on the Modigliani/Miller (MM)
propositions (American Economic Review, 1958)

The most important conclusion from their


original (1958) paper was that capital structure
choice does not matter
31

31

Assumptions of the MM model


Homogeneous expectations
Perpetual cash flows
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Perfect capital markets


Perfect competition
Firms and investors can borrow/lend at the same
rate
Equal access to all relevant information
No transaction costs
No taxes 32

32

16
19/08/2020

Capital Structure and the pie


 The value of a firm is defined to be
the sum of the value of the firm’s

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


debt and the firm’s equity
V=B+S
 If the goal of the firm’s management
is to make the firm as valuable as
possible , then the firm should pick
the debt-equity ratio that makes the
pie as big as possible. 33

33

Modigliani and Miller: Proposition I


Consider the all-equity firm FTU Inc. that is contemplating
going into debt. (Proceeds are to be used to buy back shares)
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

34

34

17
19/08/2020

EPS and ROE under current structure

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


35

35

EPS and ROE under proposed structure Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

36

36

18
19/08/2020

Financial leverage and EPS

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


37

37

What is the optimal capital structure? Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

38

38

19
19/08/2020

MM Proposition I (no taxes)


 In the condition of no taxes, Levered firm value is equal to
Un-levered firm value

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


VL  VU
 Capital Structure (B/S) does not affect firm value
  There is no optimal capital structure  firms cannot
increase their value by changing capital structure

39

39

MM Proposition II (no taxes)


 Required cost of capital has the positive correlation with the
level of financial leverage
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

B
RS  R0  ( )( R0  RB )
S

40

40

20
19/08/2020

MM Proposition II (no taxes)

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


41

41

Example: FTU Inc.


Question: How much are the R0 and the RWACC
for the un-levered firm?
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Answer:

42

42

21
19/08/2020

Example: FTU Inc. (2)


Suppose that the firm implements its proposed
new capital structure

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


Q. What is the RWACC of the firm under the new
capital structure?

A.

43

43

Example: FTU Inc. (3)


 Q. How does the RS change in the new capital structure?

 A. B
RS  R0  ( R0  RB )
S
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 Q. What if the firm would attract $ 10,000 in debt financing


in order to buy back equity?
B
 A. RS  R0  ( R0  RB )
S

44

44

22
19/08/2020

MM Proposition II (no taxes)

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


45

45

Corporate taxes (1)


 MM (1963)
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 Corporate taxes lead to a preference for debt

 Interest is tax deductible

 Dividends are not tax deductible

46

46

23
19/08/2020

Corporate taxes (2)

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


VL  VU  TC B

47

47

MM Proposition I (with taxes)


Annual reduction in corporate taxes
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

TC RB B
Tax shield with perpetual cash flows

TC RB B
 TC B
RB
48

48

24
19/08/2020

MM Proposition I (with taxes) (2)


Value of the un-levered firm is:

EBIT (1  TC )

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


VU 
R0
Value of the levered firm is:

EBIT (1  TC ) TC RB B
VL    VU  TC B
R0 RB
49

49

MM Proposition II (with taxes) (1)


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

50

50

25
19/08/2020

MM Proposition II (with taxes) (2)

Some of the increase in equity risk and return is

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


offset by the interest tax shield

B
RS  R0  ( )(1  TC )( R0  RB )
S

51

51

Applying to FTU Inc.


Assume a corporate tax is 35%
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

Q. How much is Rs for the un-levered firm?

A.

52

52

26
19/08/2020

FTU Inc. (2)


 Q. How much is RS if the firm accepts the proposed capital
structure?

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


53

53

FTU Inc. (3)


 Q. What if the firm attracts $ 10,000 of debt to buy
back $ 10,000 of equity?
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 A.

54

54

27
19/08/2020

THE EFFECT OF FINANCIAL LEVERAGE

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


55

55

Total cash flow to investors Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

56

56

28
19/08/2020

Total cash flow to investors

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


 The levered firm pays less in taxes than does the all-equity
firm
 Thus, the sum of the debt plus the equity of the levered firm
is greater than the equity of the un-levered firm
 This is how cutting the pie differently can make the pie
“larger.”- the government takes a smaller slice of the pie!! 57

57

Exercise:
Lauria manufacturing Inc. (unlevered)

Issuance of 2 mln. perpetual bonds in order to buy back stock


Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

 6% coupon rate

 S = 10 mln.

 500,000 shares

EBIT = 1.5 mln.

Tc = 40%
58

58

29
19/08/2020

Exercise:
a. Calculate Rs?
b. What is the Market-value balance sheet before

Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU


announcement of the debt issue?
c. What is the Market-value balance sheet after announcement
of the debt issue?
d. How many stocks to be bought back?
e. What is the Market value balance sheet after restructuring?
f. Calculate Rs after issue?

59

59

Conclusion from MM (1963)


MM (1963): Optimal capital structure is 99.99% debt
Miller (Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988)
Quyen Nguyen, PhD - FBF - FTU

“By 1963, however (..), we seemed to face an unhappy


dilemma: either corporate managers did not know (or
perhaps care) that they were paying too much in taxes;
or something major was being left out of the model.
Either they were wrong or we were”
Solution: look at other market imperfections
60

60

30
19/08/2020

_End of chapter 5_

61

61

31

You might also like