Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maternal Age and Risk For Adverse Outcomes
Maternal Age and Risk For Adverse Outcomes
org
OBSTETRICS
Maternal age and risk for adverse outcomes
Jean-Ju Sheen, MD; Jason D. Wright, MD; Dena Goffman, MD; Adina R. Kern-Goldberger, MD; Whitney Booker, MD;
Zainab Siddiq, MS; Mary E. D’Alton, MD; Alexander M. Friedman, MD, MPH
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the risk for 12.1% to women aged 35e39 years (n ¼ 4,479,236), 2.6% to women
severe maternal morbidity and other pregnancy complications by maternal aged 40e44 years (n ¼ 974,289), and 0.2% to women aged 45e54
age during delivery hospitalizations. years (n ¼ 58,739). In unadjusted analyses, severe morbidity was more
STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort analysis used the than 3 times higher (risk ratio [RR], 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI],
Perspective database to characterize the risk for adverse maternal out- 3.03e3.66) for women 45-54 years compared with women 25e29
comes from 2006 to 2015 based on maternal age. Women were divided years. Women aged 40e44, 35e39, and 15e17 years were also at
into 7 categories based on maternal age: 15e17, 18e24, 25e29, increased risk (RR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.77e1.89; RR, 1.36, 95% CI,
30e34, 35e39, 40e44, and 45e54 years of age. The primary outcome 1.33e1.39; RR, 1.39, 95% CI, 1.34e1.45, respectively). In the adjusted
of this study was severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for model, the 45e54 year old group was associated with the highest relative
Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcomes included (1) overall risk (aRR, 3.46, 95% CI, 3.15e3.80) followed by the 40e44 year old
comorbid risk; (2) risk for pregnancy complications such as postpartum group (aRR 1.90, 95% CI, 1.84e1.97), the 35e39 year old group (aRR,
hemorrhage, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery; 1.43, 95% CI, 1.40e1.47), and the 15e17 year old group (aRR, 1.20,
and (3) risk for individual severe morbidity diagnoses such as stroke, 95% CI, 1.15e1.24). Cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, postpartum
embolism, eclampsia, and hysterectomy. Adjusted models were fitted to hemorrhage, and gestational diabetes were most common among women
assess factors associated with severe morbidity with adjusted risk ratios aged 45e54 years, as were thrombosis and hysterectomy.
(aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of effect. Population CONCLUSION: While differential risk was noted across maternal age
weights were applied to create national estimates. categories, women aged 45 years old and older were at highest risk for a
RESULTS: Of 36,944,292 deliveries included, 2.5% occurred among broad range of adverse outcomes during delivery hospitalizations.
women aged 15e17 years (n ¼ 921,236), 29.1% to women aged 18e24
years (n ¼ 10,732,715), 28.6% to women aged 25e29 years (n ¼ Key words: very advanced maternal age, severe morbidity, maternal
10,564,850), 24.9% to women aged 30e34 years (n ¼ 9,213,227), risk
within the CDC composite: (1) the last 3 years of the study period most common among women 40e54
eclampsia, (2) embolism, (3) hysterec- (2012e2014), the risk for severe (Figure 3A). For women 15e17 years,
tomy, and (4) stroke.16 morbidity excluding transfusion in 18.9% of births occurred by cesarean
Dichotomous outcomes were evalu- women of advanced maternal age was delivery from 2012 to 2014 compared
ated using the c2 test. Adjusted risk ra- 3.0% for women aged 45e54 years, 1.5% with 26.6% for women 18e24 years,
tios (aRRs) for severe morbidity with for women aged 40e44 years, and 1.0% 31.7% for women 25e29 years, 36.2%
95% confidence intervals (CI) as mea- for women aged 35e39 years (P < .01) for women 30e34 years, 42.5% for
sures of effect accounting for maternal (Figure 2A). Including transfusion, the women 35e39 years, 49.2% for women
age categories, other demographic fac- risk for severe morbidity was 5.3% for 40e44 years, and 62.8% for women 45e
tors, and hospital characteristics were women aged 45e54 years, 2.7% for 54 years (P < .01).
derived from fitting a log-linear regres- women aged 40e44 years, and 2.0% for Preeclampsia was also most common
sion model. As a sensitivity analysis, this women aged 35e39 years (P < .01) among women aged 45e54 years. From
model was subsequently repeated after (Figure 2B). 2012 to 2014, 10.4% of women aged
including the comorbidity index to In the unadjusted model, the risk for 45e54 years were diagnosed with pre-
determine the degree to which risk was severe morbidity was more than 3 times eclampsia compared with 6.1% of
attenuated by accounting for comorbid higher (risk ratio (RR) of 3.33, 95% CI, women 40e44 years and 4.5% of women
conditions. Population weights within 3.03e3.66) for women 45e54 years 35e39 years (P < .01) (Figure 3B).
the Perspective database can be applied compared with women 25e29 years Among women younger than 35 years,
to create estimates for the entire US (Table 3). Women aged 40e44, 35e39, women aged 15e17 years had the high-
population. These weights were used for and 15e17 years were also at increased est risk of preeclampsia (5.4%).
this analysis. All analyses were per- risk compared with women 25e29 years Postpartum hemorrhage similarly
formed with SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, (RR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.77e1.89; RR, 1.36, demonstrated a bimodal distribution,
Cary, NC). 95% CI, 1.33e1.39; RR, 1.39, 95% CI, with women aged 45e54 years most
1.34e1.45, respectively). likely to experience hemorrhage (4.8%
Results Other factors associated with from 2012 to 2014) followed by women
A total of 36,944,292 weighted delivery increased risk for severe morbidity in the aged 15e17 years (3.3% from 2012 to
hospitalizations were included in the unadjusted model included year of de- 2014) (Figure 3C).
analysis. Of these, 2.5% of births livery (higher risk in 2015 compared Finally, gestational diabetes was also
occurred among women aged 15e17 with 2006 [RR, 1.36, 95% CI, most common among women aged
years (n ¼ 921,236), 29.1% to women 1.32e1.45]), insurance type (higher risk 45e54 years (Figure 3D); the rate was
aged 18e24 years (n ¼ 10,732,715), with Medicare compared with com- lowest among women aged 15e17 years
28.6% to women 25e29 years (n ¼ mercial insurance [RR, 2.00, 95% CI, (1.5% from 2012 to 2014), increasing for
10,564,850), 24.9% to women 30e34 1.89e2.11]), and race (higher risks with each subsequent maternal age category to
years (n ¼ 9,213,227), 12.1% to women black compared with white race [RR, reach 16.4% of women aged 45e54 years.
35e39 years (n ¼ 4,479,236), 2.6% to 1.75, 95% CI, 1.72e1.78]). In the In evaluating risk for specific severe
women 40e44 years (n ¼ 974,289), and adjusted model, maternal age retained morbidity diagnoses, maternal age
0.2% to women 45e54 years (n ¼ significance. Age group 45e54 years was 45e54 years was associated with the
58,739) (Supplemental Figure 1). associated with the highest relative risk, highest risk for hysterectomy and
Women aged 24 years or younger were with women aged 25e29 years as the thrombosis (Figure 4). Hysterectomy
more likely to be single and receive reference group (aRR, 3.46, 95% CI, occurred in 103 per 10,000 deliveries for
Medicaid insurance, while women aged 3.15e3.80) followed by age 40e44 years women 45e54 years (95% CI, 85e126
25 years or older were more likely to be (aRR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.84e1.97), age per 10,000) vs 36 per 10,000 deliveries
married and have private insurance 35e39 years (aRR, 1.43, 95% CI, (95% CI, 33e39 per 10,000) in the next
(Table 2). From 2006e2007 to 1.40e1.47), and age 15e17 years (aRR, highest-risk group, women 40e44 years.
2014e2015, the proportion of births to 1.20, 95% CI, 1.15e1.24) (Table 3). Risk was highest for maternal stroke
women aged 15e17 years decreased by When the obstetric comorbidity index among women aged 45e54 and 40e44
47% and to women 18e24 years of age, was included in the model, risk was years and lowest among women 15e17,
15%. The proportion of births increased attenuated for women aged 45e54 years 18e24, and 25e29 years. The risk for
4% for women 25e29 years, 18% for (aRR, 2.83, 95% CI, 2.58e3.11), 40e44 eclampsia was highest among women
women 30e34 years, 5% for women years (aRR, 1.65, 95% CI, 1.59e1.71), aged 15e17 years (26 per 10,000, 95%
35e39 years, 8% for women 40e44 and 35e39 years (aRR, 1.30, 95% CI, CI, 24e29 per 10,000) followed by
years, and 26% for women 45e54 years 1.27-1.33) but not women 15e17 years women aged 18e24 years (10 per 10,000,
(Figure 1). (aRR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.33e1.44) 95% CI, 10e11 per 10,000).
Risk for severe morbidity both with (Supplemental Table 1). In evaluating comorbidity by
and without transfusion was highest Cesarean deliveries increased with maternal age, the proportion of women
among women aged 45e54 years. For higher maternal age category, and were with the lowest comorbidity score of
TABLE 2
Patient demographics
Age Age Age Age Age Age Age
Variables 15e17 y, n 18e24 y, n 25e29 y, n 30e34 y, n 35e39 y, n 40e44 y, n 45e54 y, n
All patients 921,236 10,732,715 10,564,850 9,213,227 4,479,236 974,289 58,739
Year
2006 128,250 1,308,914 1,177,199 981,420 516,744 107,119 5470
2007 131,657 1,336,000 1,228,694 1,004,333 519,876 107,320 6215
2008 128,171 1,291,345 1,204,729 984,761 500,378 106,251 6284
2009 113,856 1,213,233 1,154,921 973,902 476,659 106,242 6826
2010 101,767 1,129,219 1,120,239 975,159 466,194 103,714 6288
2011 90,846 1,107,812 1,121,125 992,677 468,286 107,391 6735
2012 82,668 1,102,427 1,120,293 1,015,316 466,836 106,255 6137
2013 70,775 1,058,863 1,119,311 1,040,668 486,210 107,526 7004
2014 60,478 970,241 1,078,977 1,022,580 473,313 100,367 6315
2015 12,768 214,662 239,364 222,411 104,741 22,104 1463
Hospital bed size
Small 574,451 6,896,587 6,771,499 5,816,990 2,786,069 599,194 34,885
Medium 231,489 2,486,083 2,420,042 2,147,477 1,058,210 231,547 14,242
Large 115,295 1,350,044 1,363,309 1,248,759 634,957 143,547 9612
Insurance status
Commercial 202,676 2,938,406 5,755,066 6,398,370 3,240,026 686,909 43,950
Medicare 2,421 63,755 81,783 70,351 38,595 10,769 523
Medicaid 668,860 7,061,942 4,098,955 2,275,735 980,153 226,151 11,143
Uninsured 26,910 268,366 250,481 205,559 109,998 27,336 1681
Other 20,369 400,245 378,565 263,212 110,465 23,124 1441
Hospital location
Rural 40,418 497,833 399,459 283,424 121,858 25,527 1495
Urban 880,818 10,234,882 10,165,391 8,929,803 4,357,379 948,762 57,244
Marital status
Married 38,555 2,679,524 5,729,365 6,070,577 3,016,066 631,119 38,118
Single 754,623 6,603263 3,455,024 1,940,115 862,747 207,380 11,770
Unknown 128,058 1,449,928 1,380,461 1,202,536 600,423 135,790 8851
Race
White 340,810 5,158,001 5,880,169 5,321,558 2,529,087 539,545 33,034
Black 209,484 1,955,111 1,196,611 787,313 379,944 90,245 5604
Other 370,430 3,613579 3,482,001 3,099,566 1,567,998 344,178 20,081
Unknown 511 6024 6070 4791 2208 321 20
Comorbidity index
0 79,3159 8,458,694 7,833,194 6,428,585 2,866,827 585,296 33,044
1 80,849 1,635,390 2,081,994 2,184,832 1,256,804 291,177 17,747
2 41,175 520,896 505,158 455,819 263,646 71,749 5715
>2 6053 117,735 144,507 143,993 91,960 26,067 2233
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018. (continued)
TABLE 2
Patient demographics (continued)
Age Age Age Age Age Age Age
Variables 15e17 y, n 18e24 y, n 25e29 y, n 30e34 y, n 35e39 y, n 40e44 y, n 45e54 y, n
Hospital region
Northeast 92,168 1,312,104 1,545,202 1,695,809 1,695,809 215,718 14,658
Midwest 201,978 2,352,970 2,416,084 1,988,915 1,988,915 164,423 9246
South 409,534 4,596008 4,162,822 3,337,739 3,337,739 321,389 17,164
West 217,556 2,471,633 2,440,742 2,190,765 2,190,765 272,759 17,671
Teaching
Nonteaching 729,306 8,628,574 8,457,462 7,243,851 3,488,870 753,796 43,686
Teaching 191,930 2,104,141 2,107,388 1,969,377 990,366 220,493 15,053
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
0 was highest among women age 15e17 In contrast, women 45e54 years had a years. Postpartum hemorrhage, pre-
years (86%) and decreased for each much higher likelihood for severe eclampsia, and specific morbidity di-
subsequent maternal age group morbidity, with risk >100% greater in agnoses such as thrombosis and
(Supplemental Figure 2), with the lowest unadjusted and adjusted models, hysterectomy were similarly much more
proportion among women aged 45e54 compared with women aged 35e39 likely among women aged 45e54 years.
years (56%) (P <.01). The proportion of
women in each of the higher comor-
bidity score categories (1, 2, >2) FIGURE 1
increased with each maternal age group. Change in proportion of births by maternal age categories
When risk for severe morbidity was
30%
stratified by maternal age group, bimodal
curves were again noted, with risk among
Change in proportion of births by maternal age
20%
those aged 15e17 years being higher than
for women 18e24, 25e29, and 30e34
years (Supplemental Figure 3). For each 10%
comorbidity category, the risk among
women aged 45e54 years was the highest 0%
(P <.01). For example, for women with a
comorbidity score of 0, the risk for severe -10%
morbidity was 3.7% for women 45e54
years compared with 1.4% for women -20%
35e39 years, and for comorbidity scores
of >2, the risk for severe morbidity was -30%
14.4% compared with 8.5% for women
35e39 years (P < .01 for both). -40%
Comment -50%
This analysis demonstrated that for 2006-7 2008-9 2010-1 2012-3 2014-5
women aged 40e44 years, the likelihoods
for most adverse outcomes such as overall
Maternal age in years:
severe morbidity as well as pregnancy
complications including postpartum 15-17 18-24 25-29 30-24 35-39 40-44 45-54
hemorrhage, preeclampsia, gestational
The figure demonstrates the changes in the proportion of births by maternal age by year with
diabetes, and cesarean delivery were
2006e2007 as a reference. Over the study period, births to women aged 45e54 years underwent
modestly increased compared with the largest proportionate change while births to women aged 15e17 years underwent the largest
women aged 35e39 years, with risks decrease.
generally 20e30% higher than this latter Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
group.
TABLE 3
Unadjusted and adjusted models for severe morbidity including transfusion
Unadjusted model Adjusted model
Variables RR 95% CI aRR 95% CI
Age, y
15e17 1.39 (1.34e1.45) 1.20 (1.15e1.24)
18e24 1.12 (1.10e1.14) 1.00 (0.99e1.02)
25e29 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
30e34 1.07 (1.05e1.09) 1.12 (1.10e1.14)
35e39 1.36 (1.33e1.39) 1.43 (1.40e1.47)
40e44 1.83 (1.77e1.89) 1.90 (1.84e1.97)
45e54 3.33 (3.03e3.66) 3.46 (3.15e3.80)
Year
2006 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
2007 1.04 (1.01e1.08) 1.04 (1.01e1.08)
2008 1.16 (1.13e1.20) 1.16 (1.12e1.20)
2009 1.32 (1.28-1.36) 1.31 (1.27e1.35)
2010 1.31 (1.27e1.35) 1.30 (1.26e1.34)
2011 1.35 (1.31e1.39) 1.33 (1.29e1.38)
2012 1.36 (1.32e1.40) 1.34 (1.30e1.38)
2013 1.36 (1.32e1.40) 1.34 (1.30e1.38)
2014 1.39 (1.35e1.43) 1.36 (1.32e1.40)
2015 1.39 (1.32e1.45) 1.34 (1.28e1.41)
Hospital bed size
Small 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Medium 1.14 (1.12e1.16) 1.04 (1.02e1.06)
Large 1.24 (1.22e1.26) 1.06 (1.04e1.08)
Insurance status
Commercial 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Medicare 2.00 (1.89e2.11) 1.72 (1.63e1.83)
Medicaid 1.21 (1.19e1.23) 1.15 (1.13e1.16)
Uninsured 1.24 (1.19e1.29) 1.18 (1.13e1.23)
Other 1.13 (1.09e1.17) 1.16 (1.12e1.21)
Urban location 1.11 (1.09e1.14) 1.00 (0.98e1.02)
Marital status
Married 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Single 1.27 (1.25e1.28) 1.15 (1.13e1.16)
Unknown 1.22 (1.20e1.25) 1.13 (1.11e1.16)
Race
White 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Black 1.75 (1.72e1.78) 1.58 (1.55e1.61)
Hispanic 1.15 (1.13e1.16) 1.13 (1.12e1.15)
Other 1.21 (0.91e1.60) 1.09 (0.82e1.45)
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018. (continued)
TABLE 3
Unadjusted and adjusted models for severe morbidity including transfusion (continued)
Unadjusted model Adjusted model
Variables RR 95% CI aRR 95% CI
Hospital region
Northeast 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Midwest 0.90 (0.88e0.92) 1.00 (0.98e1.03)
South 0.96 (0.95e0.98) 1.05 (1.03e1.07)
West 0.71 (0.79e0.73) 0.85 (0.83e0.87)
Teaching 1.28 (1.27e1.30) 1.19 (1.17e1.21)
Urban hospital location is in reference to rural location; teaching hospitals are in reference to nonteaching.
aRR, adjusted risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
Consequently, women in the 45e54 year Similarly, we do not have granular care. For these reasons, we are limited
age group with no medical comorbidity data available regarding social and in our determination of why younger
may be at lower relative risk than our physiological characteristics; our patients are at higher risk for adverse
models suggest. model includes no data on outpatient outcomes and to what degree social
FIGURE 3
Pregnancy outcomes and complications by maternal age category and year
70% 6%
A C
60%
5%
50%
4%
Proportion of all births
Proportion of all births
40%
2006-08
3% 2006-08
30% 2009-11
2009-11
20% 2012-14 2%
2012-14
10% 1%
0% 0%
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
Maternal age
Maternal age
B 12% D
18%
16%
10%
14%
ProporƟon of all births
8% 12%
10%
6% 2006-08 2006-08
8%
2009-11 2009-11
4% 6%
2012-14
2012-14
4%
2%
2%
0% 0%
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
Maternal age Maternal age
A, Cesarean delivery by maternal age category by year. B, Preeclampsia by maternal age category by year. C, Postpartum hemorrhage by maternal age
category by year. D, Gestational diabetes by maternal age category by year. Figure 3, AeD, demonstrates temporal trends in risk for cesarean delivery,
preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, and gestational diabetes by maternal age group by 3 year periods: 2006e2008, 2009e2011, and
2012e2014. Risk for all outcomes was highest for women 45e54 years, with risks significantly higher for this group than women aged 40e44 years
(P < .01).
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
FIGURE 4
Risks for severe morbidity diagnoses per 10,000 deliveries
A 6 C 30
5
25
4
20
3
15
2
10
1
5
0
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 0
Maternal age 15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
Maternal age
B 7 D
120
Thrombosis per 10,000 deliveries
2 40
1 20
0 0
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54 15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
Maternal age Maternal age
A, Risk for stroke by maternal age per 10,000 deliveries. B, Risk for thrombosis by maternal age per 10,000 deliveries. C, Risk for eclampsia by maternal
age per 10,000 deliveries. D, Risk for hysterectomy by maternal age per 10,000 deliveries. Figure 4, AeD, demonstrates rates of severe morbidity
diagnoses based on Centers for Disease and Prevention criteria for puerperal cerebrovascular disorders, air and thrombotic embolism, eclampsia, and
hysterectomy. Results are reported per 10,000 deliveries per maternal age category. Significant risk occurred across maternal age categories for each
outcome (P < .01).
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
factors vs medical or obstetrical com- A third limitation is that, because an important consideration for women
plications are responsible for the maternal mortality is relatively rare the of advanced maternal age considering
increased risk for morbidity. For denominators for some groups were pregnancy with assisted reproductive
example, while we did find that risk relatively small, we were not able to technology, particularly in the setting of
among women 15e17 years persisted perform meaningful comparisons across other preexisting comorbidities. n
in models adjusted for comorbidity groups for mortality.
including the presence of preeclampsia, Strengths of this study include a large References
we cannot determine how social fac- sample that allows meaningful statistical 1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK.
Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data
tors or outpatient care may have led to comparisons between groups for rela- Brief 2017:1–8.
optimal vs delayed timing of this tively rare outcomes, the ability to create 2. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK,
diagnosis, a potentially critical factor in population-level estimates, and the et al. Births: provisional data for 2016. Vital
morbidity risk. assessment of a broad range of adverse statistics rapid release, no 2. Hyattsville (MD):
National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
A second limitation of this analysis is maternal outcomes to produce a robust
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
that this administrative data set does not evaluation of maternal risk. vsrr/report002.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2018.
provide information on hospital re- In summary, the findings from this 3. Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M,
sources, infrastructure, and staffing, all analysis demonstrated that while differ- Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women
of which contribute to maternal out- ential risk was noted across maternal age who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think
comes and risk. We are not able to categories, women 45 years of age and about the process as a means to preserve
fertility? Fertil Steril 2013;100:1343–9.
determine whether women at especially older were at highest risk for a broad 4. Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced
high risk benefit from being in particular range of adverse outcomes during de- maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril
care settings. livery hospitalizations. This risk may be 2015;103:1136–43.
5. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Reversing utilization in patients with obstructive sleep ap- 20. Carolan M. Maternal age >/¼45 years and
the natural decline in human fertility. An nea undergoing joint arthroplasty. Anesth Analg maternal and perinatal outcomes: a review of the
extended clinical trial of oocyte donation to 2017;125:66–77. evidence. Midwifery 2013;29:479–89.
women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA 13. Poeran J, Opperer M, Rasul R, et al. Change 21. Fitzpatrick KE, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ,
1992;268:1275–9. in off-label use of bone morphogenetic protein in Knight M. Pregnancy at very advanced maternal
6. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Pregnancy spine surgery and associations with adverse age: a UK population-based cohort study.
after age 50: application of oocyte donation to outcome. Global Spine J 2016;6:650–9. BJOG 2017;124:1097–106.
women after natural menopause. Lancet 14. Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, 22. Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-
1993;341:321–3. Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in the Gavish K, Ben-Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A. Preg-
7. Usta IM, Nassar AH. Advanced maternal age. use of regional anesthesia: neuraxial and pe- nancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal
Part I: obstetric complications. Am J Perinatol ripheral nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:558.e1–7.
2008;25:521–34. 2016;41:43–9. 23. Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A,
8. Jackson S, Hong C, Wang ET, Alexander C, 15. Kuklina E, Whiteman M, Hillis S, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Effect of very
Gregory KD, Pisarska MD. Pregnancy outcomes Jameieson D, Meikle S, Posner S. An enhanced advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome
in very advanced maternal age pregnancies: the method for identifying obstetric deliveries: im- and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol
impact of assisted reproductive technology. plications for estimating maternal morbidity. 1998;92:935–9.
Fertil Steril 2015;103:76–80. Matern Child Health J 2008;12:469–77.
9. Ben-David A, Glasser S, Schiff E, Zahav AS, 16. Centers for Disease Control and Preven-
Boyko V, Lerner-Geva L. Pregnancy and birth tion. Severe maternal morbidity in the Author and article information
outcomes among primiparae at very advanced United States. Available at: https://www.cdc. From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
maternal age: at what price? Matern Child Health gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/ College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University,
J 2016;20:833–42. severematernalmorbidity.html. Accessed Jan. New York, NY.
10. Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, 20, 2018. Received April 19, 2018; revised July 30, 2018;
Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse 17. Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK Jr. accepted Aug. 20, 2018.
pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree Dr Friedman is supported by a career development
Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:634–43. perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum de- award (K08HD082287) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver
11. Stulberg J, Delaney C, Neuhauser D, Aron D, liveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:100–4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Develop-
Fu P, Koroukian S. Adherence to surgical care 18. Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S, ment, National Institutes of Health.
improvement project measures and the assso- et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use Dr Wright has served as a consultant for Tesaro and
ciation with postoperative infections. JAMA in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122: Clovis Oncology. The other authors report no conflict of
2010;303:2479–85. 957–65. interest. Each author has indicated that he or she has met
12. Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Olson A, 19. Metcalfe A, Lix LM, Johnson JA, et al. Vali- the journal’s requirements for authorship.
Mazumdar M, Morwald EE, Memtsoudis SG. dation of an obstetric comorbidity index in an Corresponding author: Alexander Friedman, MD,
Trends in perioperative practice and resource external population. BJOG 2015;122:1748–55. MPH. amf2104@cumc.columbia.edu
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 1
Proportion of births by maternal age group by year
100%
Proportion of all births
10%
1%
0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Maternal age:
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 2
Proportion of patients with individual comorbidity scores by age group
100%
90%
Proportion of patients with each comorbidity score
80%
70%
Comorbidity
60% index score:
>2 2
50% 1 0
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
15-17 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-54
Maternal age
This figure demonstrates the proportion of patients by age group with comorbidity scores of 0, 1, 2,
and >2. Scores of 0 are representative of the lowest comorbidity. The comorbidity index was
modified to exclude maternal age.
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE 3
Risk for severe morbidity by comorbidity score and maternal age
16%
Percent of patients wiht severe morbidity
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
0 1 2 >2
Obstetric comorbidity score
SUPPLEMENTAL TABLE 1
Adjusted models for severe morbidity including transfusion including
comorbidity index
Adjusted model
Variables aRR 95% CI
Age, y
15e17 1.38 (1.33e1.44)
18e24 1.08 (1.06e1.10)
25e29 1.00 (Reference)
30e34 1.07 (1.05e1.10)
35e39 1.30 (1.27e1.33)
40e44 1.65 (1.59e1.71)
45e54 2.83 (2.58e3.11)
Year
2006 1.00 (Reference)
2007 1.04 (1.01e1.07)
2008 1.15 (1.11e1.19)
2009 1.29 (1.25e1.33)
2010 1.28 (1.25e1.33)
2011 1.32 (1.28e1.36)
2012 1.32 (1.28e1.36)
2013 1.30 (1.27e1.34)
2014 1.31 (1.27e1.35)
2015 1.28 (1.22e1.35)
Hospital bed size
Small 1.00 (Reference)
Medium 1.03 (1.02e1.05)
Large 1.05 (1.03e1.07)
Insurance status
Commercial 1.00 (Reference)
Medicare 1.43 (1.35e1.52)
Medicaid 1.08 (1.06e1.09)
Uninsured 1.16 (1.11e1.21)
Other 1.14 (1.10e1.18)
Urban location 1.01 (0.99e1.04)
Marital status
Married 1.00 (Reference)
Single 1.10 (1.08e1.12)
Unknown 1.10 (1.08e1.13)
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018. (continued)
SUPPLEMENTAL TABLE 1
Adjusted models for severe morbidity including transfusion including
comorbidity index (continued)
Adjusted model
Variables aRR 95% CI
Race
White 1.00 (Reference)
Black 1.48 (1.45e1.51)
Other 1.09 (0.82e1.45)
Comorbidity index
0 1.00 (Reference)
1 1.65 (1.62e1.67)
2 2.66 (2.61e2.72)
>2 5.62 (5.48e5.77)
Hospital region
Northeast 1.00 (Reference)
Midwest 1.00 (0.98e1.02)
South 1.03 (1.01e1.05)
West 0.85 (0.83e0.87)
Teaching 1.13 (1.11e1.15)
Urban hospital location is in reference to rural location; teaching hospitals are in reference to nonteaching.
aRR, adjusted risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.
Sheen et al. Maternal age, adverse outcomes, and maternal risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018.