Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fault Diagnosis of High Speed REB Sing RSM
Fault Diagnosis of High Speed REB Sing RSM
Keywords: fault diagnosis, rolling element bearings, radial internal clearance, nonlinear
stiffness, design of experiments, response surface method
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-1
Copyright © 2011 by ASME
兵
Q = 3.587 ⫻ 107 共 兺 兲 −1/2
其
共␦ⴱ兲−3/2 ␦3/2 共N兲 共7兲
The elastic modulus for the contact of a ball with the inner race
is
Ki = 3.587 ⫻ 107 共兺 兲i
−1/2
共␦iⴱ兲−3/2 冉 冊
N
mm3/2
共8兲
r j = 共x cos i + y sin i兲 − 共␥兲 共2兲 The effective elastic modulus 共K兲 for bearing system using geo-
metrical and physical parameters is written as
冉 冊
Substituting it into Eq. 共1兲, we get
K = 7.481 ⫻ 105冑␦
N
F j = k关共x cos i + y sin i兲 − 共␥兲兴+3/2 共3兲 共11兲
mm3/2
If the expression inside the bracket is greater than zero, then the
ball at the angular location i is loaded, giving rise to a restoring 2.3 Surface Defects. Spalls, pits, and dents are the major
force Fi. Thus, the total restoring force components in the x and forms of bearing damage. Fatigue cracking of the surface occurs
y directions are when the repeatedly cycled stress on a surface in rolling contact
with another exceeds the endurance strength of the material. This
Nb
defect propagates and results in a large pit or spall on the surface
Fx = 兺 k关共x cos + y sin 兲 − 共␥兲兴
i=1
i i
3/2
+ cos i 共4a兲 of bearing components. Corrosion and oxidation pits, true/false
brinnelling, and hard particle contamination dents act as locations
Nb
for incipient fatigue. This can cause bearing endurance to be
shorter than that designed and may also lead to rapid failure of the
Fy = 兺 k关共x cos + y sin 兲 − 共␥兲兴
i=1
i i
3/2
+ sin i 共4b兲 bearing 关19兴.
2.3.1 Outer Race Defect. In this paper, a defect has been con-
2.1 Equations of Motion. The system governing equations sidered on the outer race, which is located at an angle ␣ from the
accounting for inertia, restoring and damping forces, and constant x-axis. Whenever, a ball passes over the defect location, it has an
vertical force acting on the inner race are additional deflection ⌬s. The outer race is assumed to be station-
Nb ary. The contact deformation of the ith ball when it coincides with
defect angle ␣ becomes
mẍ + cẋ + 兺 k关共x cos + y sin 兲 − 共y兲兴
i i
3/2
+ cos i
i=1 ri = x cos i + y sin i − 共␥ + ⌬s兲 共12兲
= W + Fu cos共t兲 共5a兲 Substituting ri into Eq. 共1兲, we obtain
Nb
F j = k关共x cos i + y sin i兲 − 共␥ + ⌬s兲兴+3/2 共13兲
mÿ + cẋ + 兺 k关共x cos + y sin 兲 − 共y兲兴
i=1
i i
3/2
+ sin i = Fu sin共t兲
Thus, the total restoring force components in the x and y direc-
tions given by Eq. 共4兲 and the system’s governing Eq. 共5兲 can be
共5b兲 modified accordingly.
The equation of motion, Eq. 共5兲, consists of two nonlinear or-
dinary second order differential equations with a parametric exci- 2.3.2 Inner Race Defect. The inner race is rotating at the shaft
tation effect, the 1.5 nonlinearity and the summation term. The + speed and the ball center is rotating at the speed of cage, so the
sign as subscript in these equations signifies that if the expression contact angle i is
inside the bracket is greater than zero, then the rolling element at 2
angular location i is loaded, giving rise to a restoring force and if i = 共i − 1兲 + cage ⫻ t 共14兲
Nb
the expression inside the bracket is negative or zero, then the
rolling element is not in the load zone, and the restoring force is Defect is on the surface of the inner race, so it rotates at speed
set to zero. in. Additional deflection ⌬s in contact deformation is obtained
when defect angle ␣ coincides with the contact angle i of ith
2.2 Contact Stiffness. The application of the classical theory rolling element.
of elasticity to the problem forms the basis of stress calculation
for machine elements as ball and roller bearings. Hertz considered 2.3.3 Rolling Element Defect. Ball with spall rotates about an
the stress and deformation in such perfectly smooth, ellipsoidal, axis normal to the plane containing the centers of the inner race
contacting elastic solids. As per the sign convention followed, and outer race contacts. It is assumed that ball spins about its axis,
negative radius denotes a concave surface. For the contacting bod- so it comes in contact with inner race and outer race at regular
ies made of steel, the relative approach between two contacting intervals. Additional deflection ⌬s in contact deformation can be
and deforming surfaces is given by obtained when sin共ballt兲 = 0 关20兴.
3 Experimental Setup and Data Acquisition Fig. 4 Inner race with spall
Parameter Value
Parameter
designation Minimum Maximum
symbols Parameters level 共−兲 level 共+兲
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-3
cage =
冉
in 1 −
db
D
cos共␣兲 冊 6.65 33.22
Similarly, with Nb rolling element, the frequency of rotation of The method of least-squares is used to estimate the polynomial
the rolling elements with respect to outer races considering outer coefficients in the approximating polynomials such that it mini-
race stationary is given by mizes the sum of squares of the model errors. Then, matrix B of
冉 冊
polynomial coefficients can be obtained from the formula
db
Nbin 1 + cos共␣兲
D B = 共XTX兲−1XTY 共21兲
bp = cage − out = 共17兲
2 The response surface analysis is done in terms of the fitted
where bp is known as the outer race defect frequency or ball surface. Once a response surface model is obtained, statistical
passage frequency. analysis techniques, such as analysis of variance 共ANOVA兲, can
Assuming no slip, the frequency of rotation of rolling elements be used to check the fitness of the model. The process of the
about their own axes of rotation is given by whole RSM is shown in Fig. 6.
bsf =
i D
2 db
1−冉 冉
db
D
cos共␣兲 冊冊 2
共18兲
4.1 Response Surface Model Establishment. This procedure
begins with the identification of various bearing component de-
fects that affect the stability of the rotor bearing system. Each
For the bearing geometry and at rotor speeds 1000 rpm and parameter affects the nature of the response in mutual interactions
5000 rpm, the significant frequency components are shown in with other parameters as well as with separate factors.
Table 3. Here, in is the rotational frequency of inner race, db is The following bearing component faults are considered as fac-
the ball diameter, D is the pitch diameter, Nb is the number of tors that are influencing responses that are taken as peaks of vi-
rolling elements, and ␣ is the contact angle. bration response in horizontal and vertical directions.
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-5
Fig. 8 Response plot for rotor speed 1000 rpm supported on bearings with outer race defect „trial 2…
Fig. 10 Response plot for rotor speed 1000 rpm supported on bearings with ball defect „trial 4…
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-7
Fig. 12 Response plot for rotor speed 5000 rpm supported on bearings with outer race defect „trial 6…
Fig. 14 Response plot for rotor speed 5000 rpm supported on bearings with ball defect „trial 8…
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-9
and 8. It can be visualized from Table 5 that the theoretical and R2 = − 0.03082 + 4.671 ⫻ 10−3 ⫻ A + 0.040808 ⫻ B + 0.016945
experimental results are having same exciting frequencies and
their amplitudes are also in close approximation. ⫻ C + 3.81665 ⫻ 10−5 ⫻ D − 3.78425 ⫻ 10−5 ⫻ B ⫻ D
Table 4 shows that for the trials 1–8, peak amplitude of vibra- − 1.24213 ⫻ 10−5 ⫻ C ⫻ D 共23兲
tion appears in the spectrum for horizontal acceleration response
and for vertical acceleration response. Through the experiments, The performance prediction of vibration amplitude in horizon-
the polynomials f共x兲 is approximated by the design parameters tal and vertical acceleration responses has been shown in Fig. 15.
共A , B , C , D兲. The final functions of the response surface model are The actual and predicted values of response in both directions are
listed as the following. The second-degree polynomial for hori- very close and verify the fitness of polynomial for the response.
zontal acceleration response is In order to verify whether the obtained polynomials are valu-
able or not, we perform variance analysis and F-ratio test on them.
R1 = − 7.85712 ⫻ 10−3 − 5.03125 ⫻ 10−4 ⫻ A + 0.022920 ⫻ B Table 6 shows the analysis of variance table for horizontal dis-
+ 2.20681 ⫻ 10−5 ⫻ D + 1.10591 ⫻ 10−5 ⫻ A ⫻ D − 2.15991 placement. The model F-value of 4713.87 implies that the model
is significant. Values of prob⬎ F less than 0.0500 indicate that
⫻ 10−5 ⫻ B ⫻ D 共22兲 model terms are significant. In this case, A, B, D, AD, and BD are
The second-degree polynomial for vertical acceleration re- significant model terms. Values greater than 0.1000 indicate that
sponse is the model terms are not significant. Analysis of variance for ver-
Fig. 15 The performance prediction: „a… horizontal and „b… vertical acceleration response
Table 7 Analysis of variance table for vertical acceleration „partial sum of squares: type III…
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-11
Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control MAY 2011, Vol. 133 / 031007-13