Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bacon As A Moralist Not An Ideal Moralist His Morality Is A Good Advice For
Bacon As A Moralist Not An Ideal Moralist His Morality Is A Good Advice For
MAN OF RENAISSANCE:
In spite of all given examples, one cannot deny the fact that Bacon was a “Man
of Renaissance”.
“The revival of arts and learning from 14th through middle of 17th century
is called renaissance.”
He had a deep insight in human nature. He knew that man is naturally more
prone to evil than good. He was a clear-eyed realist who saw the weakness in human
nature and drawbacks of human conduct and also knew that man is not capable of acting
according to noble set of ‘ideals’. Though Bacon’s morality was greater than that of
average man’s, yet it was not of the highest order. The matter of good and right was
important for him but not if it proved too costly in worldly terms. On one hand, he
preached high moral principles and on the other hand, he also expressed a mean
capacity by compromising upon those morals for the sake of worldly success.
For this reason, William Blake, a spiritual poet says about his essays:
OF ENVY:
OF JUDICATURE:
OF GREAT PLACES:
In his essay “Of Great Places” Bacon certainly shows a high morality when he condemns
or at least dislikes the practice of ‘wrongs’ on part of high officials.
“In place there is license to do good and evil; where of the latter
is a curse.”
But besides these moral approaches, he also supports the idea of adopting certain
disloyal means to reach a high position.
“It is good to side a man’s self whilst he is in the rising and to balance himself
when he is placed”.
HIS UTILITARIANISM:
As elaborated by Jeremy Bentham and James Mill; the aim was said to be the grat
happiness for the greatest numbers is called utilitarianism.
“Someone who believes that value of a thing depends upon its utility is called
utilitarian.”
Like a moralist, Bacon preaches the noble dimensions of great place, but with this
statement his purely utilitarian approach also comes forth with all its power.
OF TRUTH:
In the essay “Of Truth” he appears to be a ‘genuine’ admirer of truth and seems to
install the love of truth in his readers.
“It is heaven upon earth, to have man’s mind move in charity, rest in
providence and turn upon the poles of truth.”
“Falsehood is like an ‘alloy’ in gold and silver, which makes the metal work
better even though it reduces, the value of the metal”.
He says:
By putting this he has diluted all the effect of his own words said in the praise of the
truth.
OF REVENGE:
One can find the same strange mixture of high ethics and utilitarianism in the
essay “Of Revenge”. In this essay Bacon condemns revenge by saying:
And
“But then let a man take heed the revenge be such as there is no law to punish;
else a man’s enemy is still forehand”.
OF SUITORS:
In his essay “Of Suitors” Bacon says that a man should refuse to undertake a suit
if it is by giving a false hope to the petitioner and that one should not demand undue
reward for his services. Those who employ crooked methods to win suits are the worst
offenders of society. But he also says that if a patron wants to favour the undeserving
party, he should bring both the parties to a compromise for this would be less dangerous
for him. So, to Bacon, morality and ethical codes seem inferior to worldly considerations.
“The best position and temperament is; to have openness in fame and opinion;
secrecy in habits; dissimulation in seasonal use; and power to feign, if there be
no remedy.”
Bacon’s morality has also been described as a cynical kind of wisdom. This
impression is confirmed by even those essays which deal with strong private relations
between men. “Of Friendship”, “Of Parents and Children”, “Of Marriage and Single life”
and “Of Love”, all depict a certain kind of utilitarianism and worldly benefit. Here Bacon
expresses a definite failure of emotions, for he takes the pure matters of heart in terms
of their uses and abuses.
CONCLUSION:
In short, though Bacon’s essays portray morality and high ethical standards, yet he
does not appear as an ideal moralist and these are but the “flashes of morality”. He is
not a true moralist. His essays are good advice for a Satan’s kingdom.