Student Learning Outcome Spring 2016

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING 2016
©2016
School of Business
Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)
Assessment Committee, Accreditation Office
Plot 16, Block B, Aftabuddin Ahmed Road, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229

Tel: +88-02-8431645-53, 8432065-76, Extension 2113
Fax: +88-02-8431991
Email: ibs@iub.edu.bd
Web: www.sb.iub.edu.bd
Table of Contents
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program Page 3

Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting Page 13
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Finance Page 21
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business Page 29
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Management Information Systems Page 37
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing Page 47
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Management Page 55
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Human Resource Management Page 61
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: MBA Program Page 73
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: EMBA Program Page 83
Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BSc in Economics Page 93
2|SLAR/SB/SPRING 2016
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Learning Goal Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
Outcome observations
1. 1.1 Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Test Figures 1 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Exceeds and 2 should meet or, communication system for
effectively. Course Embedded Expectation: 3.24% exceed MGT490 was developed. The
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. system required students to
490, integrative 54.16% Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
capstone course Does Not Meet target for both the Classroom discussion is going
group Expectation:39.8% formative and to be prioritized at the end of
term projects). summative the each schedule class where
Course-Embedded Assessment. student can grasp the key
Formative: Assessment: points based on the chapter
Course-Embedded Rubric # Trend: contents and build their idea.
Assessment (MGT BBA 1.1.R.2 The percentage of
201 final term (summative), students not Improvements to be Made
projects and MGT R.1 meeting A standardized approach for
examinations). (formative) expectation is summative assessment in MGT
considerably high 490 will be developed in
in summative Summer 2016, to ensure
assessment. consistency in measurement
criteria across various sections.
FIGURE 1: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 2: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
Program Student Measurement Techniques Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or
Learning Learning Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
Goal Outcome observation
s
2. Critical 2.1 Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking Demonstrati Exit Assessment Test, and Test 3 and 4 80% A new home project outline for
on of Course Embedded Exceeds Expectation: students MGT490 was developed. The
analytical Assessment (MGT 3.24% should meet project required students to
and critical 490, integrative Meets Expectation: or, exceed work in teams outside of the
capstone course group 54.16% expectation. class to apply their chapter
thinking
term projects). Does Not Meet Students met knowledge by solving the
ability to the target for strategic capsule. Practicing
Expectation:39.8%
assess both the this project students not only
simulated Formative: formative going to develop their own
business Course-Embedded Course-Embedded and critical thinking but also they
scenarios. Assessment Assessment: summative understand the complexities
from the Disciplines: FIN Rubric # Assessment. that general managers face in
460 group term projects for FIN BBA 2.1.R.2 Trend: strategy development and
students; ACN 405 for ACN (summative), The implementation at various
students, HRM 390 group terms ACN 3.R.5 percentage phases in a company’s growth
projects for HRM students; INB (formative) of students cycle.
303 group term projects for INB FIN 3.R.4 not meeting
students; MIS 405 group term (formative) expectation Improvements to be Made
projects for MIS students; MGT HRM is A standardized approach for
405 for MGT students, and MKT (formative) considerably summative assessment in MGT
302 group term projects for INB 3.R.3 high in 490 will be developed in
MKT students. (formative) summative Summer 2016, to ensure
assessment consistency in measurement
MIS 1.R.2
but legible in criteria across various sections.
(formative)
formative
MGT 1.R.2 assessment.
(formative)
MKT 1.R.2
(formative)
FIGURE 3: BBA PLG 2, SLO 2.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 4: BBA PLG 2, SLO 2.1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
3. Knowledge 3.1 Application Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Application of underpinning Exit Assessment Test Figures 5 80% students A new project (e.g. case
knowledge for Test, and Exceeds and 6 should meet or, development/ business plan)
analysis and Course Embedded Expectation: exceed outline for MGT 490 was
Assessment (MGT 3.24% expectation. developed. This project
decision making.
490, integrative Meets Expectation: Students met the required students to work in
capstone course 54.16% target for both the teams to apply their course
group Does Not Meet formative and knowledge what they acquire,
term projects). Expectation:39.8% summative convert and share with each
Assessment. other throughout the semester.
Moreover, this project will
Formative: Course-Embedded Trend: provide knowledge to
Course-Embedded Assessment: The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
Assessment (MGT Rubric # students not various industries and
201 final term BBA 3.1.R.2 meeting competitive positions of firms
projects and (summative), expectation is within these industries using
examinations). MGT R.1 considerably high various strategic models in the
(formative) in summative context of Bangladesh.
assessment.
Improvements to be Made
A standardized approach for
summative assessment in
MGT490 will be developed in
Summer 2016, to ensure
consistency in measurement
FIGURE 5: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 6: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: SPRING 2016:FORMATIVE
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Perspective business Exit Assessment Test Figures 7 80% students A new project outline for
information to Test, and Exceeds and 8 should meet or, MGT490 was developed. This
improve Course Embedded Expectation: 3.24% exceed project outcome is jointly
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
490, integrative 54.16% Students met the This is a group project and
in an target for both the
capstone course Does Not Meet students should work in teams.
international group Expectation:39.8% formative and The strategy student develop,
setting. term projects). summative craft and made probable
Assessment. suggestion for execution under
Course-Embedded the project, it must incline with
Formative: Assessment: Trend: the global perspective (e.g.
Course-Embedded Rubric # The percentage of benchmark activities) while
Assessment BBA 4.1.R.2 students not prescribing Bangladeshi
(INB301 (summative), meeting companies.
final term projects INB R.1 expectation is Improvements to be Made
and examinations). (formative) considerably high A standardized approach for
in summative summative assessment in
assessment. MGT490 will be developed in
10 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
5. Ethics 5.1 Uphold Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
ethical Exit Assessment Test Figures 9 80% students A new project outline for
standards in Test, and Exceeds and 10 should meet or, MGT490 was developed. The
every Course Embedded Expectation: 3.24% exceed project required students to
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. work in teams. The outcome of
professional
490, integrative 54.16% Students met the this project will highlight the
practice. target for both the
capstone course Does Not Meet macroeconomic factors (e.g.
group Expectation:39.8% formative and stakeholders’ right,
term projects). summative government rules), give the
Assessment. students better understanding
Course-Embedded about the ethics and will also
Formative: Assessment: Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
Course-Embedded Rubric # The percentage of laws in doing business.
Assessment (MGT BBA 5.1.R.2 students meeting
201 final term (summative) expectation is Improvements to be Made
projects and MGT R.1 considerable in A standardized approach for
examinations). (formative) summative summative assessment in
assessment. MGT490 will be developed in
11 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
12 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN ACCOUNTING
Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
1. Knowledge Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
of Accounting Exit Assessment Test 11 and 12 80% students A new project outline for ACN301
concepts and Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, was developed. The project
application Course Embedded 1.85% exceed required students to work in
according to Assessment (ACN Meets Expectation: expectation. teams on practical application of
accounting process 301 examinations) 48.15% Students met the accounting concepts according to
Does Not Meet target for both the accounting process.
Expectation:48.15%
formative and
Formative: summative Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded Assessment. A standardized approach for
Course-Embedded
Assessment (ACN summative assessment in ACN
Assessment:
201 examinations Trend: 301 will be developed in Summer
Rubric #
and projects) The percentage of 2016, to ensure consistency in
ACN 1.R.2
students not measurement criteria across
(summative),
meeting various sections.
ACN 1.R.1
expectation is
(formative)
considerably high
in summative
assessment.
13 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 11: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 12: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
14 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Analyze Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
financial Exit Assessment Test 13 and14 80% students A new project outline for ACN305
statements Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, was developed. The project
according to Course Embedded 1.85% exceed required students to work in
accounting Assessment (ACN Meets Expectation: expectation. teams to analyze financial
principles through 305 group term 48.15% Students met the statements of Bangladeshi
Does Not Meet target for both the
usage of project) companies according to
Expectation:48.15%
appropriate formative and accounting principles through
technology. summative usage of appropriate technology.
Formative: Assessment.
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded Improvements to be Made
Assessment:
Assessment (ACN Trend: A standardized approach for
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of summative assessment in ACN
ACN 2.R.3
and projects) students not 305 will be developed in Summer
(summative),
meeting 2016, to ensure consistency in
ACN 2.R.1
expectation is zero measurement criteria across
(formative)
in both formative various sections.
and summative
assessments.
15 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
16 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Explain cost Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
concepts, Exit Assessment Test 15 and 16 80% students A standardized project outline for
understand cost Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, ACN202 was developed. The
accumulation and Course Embedded 1.85% exceed project required students to work
apply appropriate Assessment (ACN Meets Expectation: expectation. in teams on a case that
controlling 405 group term 48.15% Students met the demonstrated practical
methods and project) application of basic costing
Expectation:48.15%
demonstrate formative and techniques. Case study focusing
decision making summative on advanced cost concepts and
abilities. Formative: Assessment. application introduced in ACN
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded 405 for the summative
Assessment:
Assessment (ACN Trend: assessment.
Rubric #
202 examinations The percentage of
ACN 3.R.5
and projects) students not Improvements to be Made
(summative),
meeting A standardized approach for
ACN 3.R.4
expectation is very summative assessment in ACN
(formative)
negligible in both 405 will be developed in Summer
formative and 2015, to ensure consistency in
summative measurement criteria across
assessments. various sections.
17 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
18 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Ethical Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
issues in Exit Assessment Test Figures 17 80% students A new project outline for ACN202
Accounting Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 18 should meet or, was developed. The project
Course Embedded 1.85% exceed required students to work in
Assessment (ACN Meets Expectation: expectation. teams on a real Bangladeshi
403 group term 48.15% Students met the company to identify the ethical
project) and auditing issues in accounting
Expectation:48.15%
formative and in these companies and provide
summative suggestions to improve the
Formative: Assessment. current scenario of these
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded companies.
Assessment:
Assessment (ACN Trend:
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of Improvements to be Made
ACN 4.R.6
and projects) students not A standardized approach for
(summative),
meeting summative assessment in ACN
ACN 4.R.1
expectation is very 403 will be developed in Summer
(formative)
negligible in both 2016, to ensure consistency in
formative and measurement criteria across
summative various sections.
assessments.
19 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
20 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN FINANCE

1. Identify and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
classify financial Exit Assessment Test 19 and 20 80% students A standardized project outline for
information; Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, FIN 301 was developed. The
present and Course Embedded 3.08% exceed project required students to work
interpret financial Assessment (FIN Meets Expectation: expectation. in teams on financial statements
statements and 301 group term 56.92% Students met the that demonstrated practical
utilize technology project) application of income statement,
Expectation:38.46%
for application formative and balance sheet and cash flows.
purpose. summative Interpreting results focusing on
Formative: Assessment. advanced understanding and
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded application introduced in FIN 301
Assessment:
Assessment (FIN Trend: for the summative assessment.
Rubric #
FIN 1.R.2
and projects) students not Improvements to be Made
(summative),
meeting A standardized approach for
FIN 1.R.1
expectation is zero summative assessment in FIN
(formative)
in summative 301 will be developed in Summer
assessments and 2016, to ensure consistency in
negligible in measurement criteria across
formative various sections.
assessments.
21 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 19: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 20: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
22 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Managing Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
financing and Exit Assessment Test 21 and 22 80% students A standardized project outline for
investment Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, FIN302 was developed. The
decision of Course Embedded 3.08% exceed project required students to work
corporate in order Assessment (FIN Meets Expectation: expectation. in teams on a project that
to achieve good 302 group term 56.92% Students met the demonstrated practical
governance. project) application of investment and
Expectation:38.46%
formative and financing decision making.
summative
Formative: Assessment. Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded A standardized approach for
Assessment:
Assessment (FIN Trend: summative assessment in FIN
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of 302 will be developed in Summer
FIN 2.R.3
and projects) students not 2015, to ensure consistency in
(summative),
meeting measurement criteria across
FIN 2.R.1
expectation is zero various sections.
(formative)
in summative
assessments and
negligible in
formative
assessments.
23 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
24 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Able to apply Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
best investment Exit Assessment Test Figures 23 80% students A new project outline for FIN460
strategy by Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 24 should meet or, was developed. The project
analyzing various Course Embedded 3.08% exceed required students to invest in a
investment Assessment (FIN Meets Expectation: expectation. hypothetical scenario with
options. 460 group term 56.92% Students met the hypothetical funds and apply
project) various investing strategies
Expectation:38.46%
formative and through the analysis for various
summative investment options in
Formative: Assessment. Bangladeshi Stock market.
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Assessment (FIN Trend: Improvements to be Made
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of A standardized approach for
FIN 3.R.4
and projects) students not summative assessment in fin 460
(summative),
meeting will be developed in Summer
FIN 3.R.1
expectation is very 2016, to ensure consistency in
(formative)
negligible in both measurement criteria across
formative and various sections.
summative
assessments.
25 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
26 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Able to manage Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
risk and return in Exit Assessment Test 25 and 26 80% students A new project outline for FIN460
domestic and Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, was developed. The project
global market Course Embedded 3.08% exceed required students to invest in a
condition. Assessment (FIN Meets Expectation: expectation. hypothetical scenario with
460 group term 56.92% Students met the hypothetical funds and apply
project) various investing strategies
Expectation:38.46%
formative and through the analysis for various
summative investment options in
Formative: Assessment. Bangladeshi Stock market. This
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded required students to apply risk
Assessment:
Assessment (FIN Trend: management techniques to
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of ensure successful return in
FIN 4.R.4
and projects) students not domestic market. A basic
(summative),
meeting comparison to global markets
FIN 4.R.1
expectation is very was included in the assignment.
(formative)
negligible in both
formative and Improvements to be Made
summative A more in depth analysis and
assessments. comparative analysis to global
markets will be included in the
assignment from Summer 2016.
27 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
28 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

1. Demonstrate an Summative: Exit Assessment See Figure 27 Target: Actions Taken
understanding of Exit Assessment Test and 28 80% students A standardized project outline for
global cultural Test Exceeds should meet or, INB301 was developed. The
knowledge through Expectation: exceed updated syllabus contained
understanding the 0.00% expectation. elements that cover the SLO. The
core components of Formative: Meets Expectation: Students met the project required students to work
75% target for both the
international Course-Embedded in teams on a case that
Does Not Meet
business and the Assessment (INB formative and demonstrated practical
Expectation:25%
local and national 301 group projects) summative application of international
differences. Assessment. business issues.
Course-
Trend: Improvements to be Made
Embedded
The percentage of A standardized approach for
Assessment:
students not formative assessment in INB 301
Rubric #
meeting will be developed in Summer
INB 3.R.1
expectation is very 2015, to ensure consistency in
( formative ),
negligible in measurement criteria across
formative various sections.
assessments.
29 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 27: BBA IN INB: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 28: BBA IN INB: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
30 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
different factors Exit Assessment Test 29 and 30 80% students A standardized project outline for
that determine Test, and Exceeds should meet or, INB301 was developed. The
international trade Course Embedded Expectation: exceed project required students to work
patterns and Assessment (INB 0.00% expectation. in teams on a case that
capital flows and 302 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the demonstrated practical
their impact on project) application of international
Does Not Meet
global business formative and business principles. Term paper
Expectation:25%
operations. summative focusing on gains from trade,
Formative: Assessment. classical theories of international
Course-Embedded Course- trade, and theories of trade
Assessment (INB Trend: pattern and trade
Embedded
301 examinations The percentage of competitiveness was introduced
Assessment:
and projects) students not in INB302 for the summative
Rubric #
meeting assessment.
INB 3.R.2
expectation is zero
(summative),
in both formative
INB 3.R.1
and summative
(formative)
assessments.
31 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
32 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Identify the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
international Exit Assessment Test 31 and 32 80% students A standardized project outline for
competitiveness of Test, and Exceeds should meet or, INB 302 was developed. The
nations and their Course Embedded Expectation: exceed project required students to work
attractiveness for Assessment (INB 0.00% expectation. in teams on a case that
international 302 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the demonstrated practical
business. project) application of Ricardo’s Model of
Does Not Meet
formative and Comparative Advantage and The
Expectation:25%
summative HO Model, The Product Life Cycle
Formative: Assessment. Theory and Porter’s Diamond
Course-Embedded Course- Model.
Assessment (INB Trend:
Embedded
Assessment:
and projects) students not
Rubric #
meeting
INB 3.R.2
expectation is zero
(summative),
in both formative
INB 3.R.1
and summative
(formative)
assessments.
33 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
34 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Demonstrate Summative: Exit Assessment See Figure 33 Target: Actions Taken
knowledge on Exit Assessment Test 80% students A standardized project outline for
cross-border Test, and Exceeds should meet or, INB303 was developed. The
communications Course Embedded Expectation: exceed project required students to work
and managerial Assessment (INB 0.00% expectation. in teams on a case that
issues from an 303 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the demonstrated practical
International project) application of cross-border
Does Not Meet
business context. formative and cultural differences across a wide
Expectation:25%
summative array of countries and their
Assessment. implications in international
Course- business practices for the
Trend: summative assessment.
Embedded
The percentage of
Assessment:
students not
Rubric #
meeting
INB 3.R.3
expectation is very
(summative),
negligible in both
formative and
summative
assessments.
35 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 33: BBA IN INB: SLO 4: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE
36 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MIS
Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or Improvements

Outcome Techniques Criteria Results Results and to be Made
observations
1. Apply Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
managerial Exit Assessment Test 34 and 35 80% students A standardized project outline for
concepts and Test, and Exceeds should meet or, MIS 442 was developed. The
decision theories to Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed project required students to work
use enterprise Assessment (MIS Meets Expectation: expectation. in teams on a case that
information 405 group term 0.00% Students met the demonstrated practical
Does Not Meet
systems. project) target for both the application of Information
Expectation:0.00%
formative and Systems in Business.
summative
Course-Embedded
Course-
Assessment (MIS Trend:
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
meeting
MIS 1.R.2
expectation is very
(summative),
negligible in both
MIS 1.R.1
formative and
(formative)
summative
assessments.
37 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 34: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 35: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
38 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
observations
2. Demonstrate the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
understanding Exit Assessment Test 36 and 37 80% students Case study and projects are
about systems Test, and Exceeds should meet or, focusing on system analysis and
theory, systems Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed application introduced in MIS
analysis, systems Assessment (MIS Meets Expectation: expectation. 405 for the summative
design and project 405 group term 0.00% Students met the assessment.
Does Not Meet
management. project) target for both the
Expectation:0.00%
formative and
summative
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MIS 2.R.2
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MIS 2.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
39 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 36: BBA IN MIS: SLO 2: SPRING 2016:SUMMATIVE FIGURE 37: BBA IN MIS: SLO 2: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
40 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
observations
3. Exhibit the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
knowledge on web Exit Assessment Test 38 and 39 80% students A standardized approach for
based information Test, and Exceeds should meet or, summative assessment in MIS
systems in business Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed 405 will be developed in Summer
context. Assessment (MIS Meets Expectation: expectation. 2016, to ensure consistency in
405 group term 0.00% Students met the measurement criteria across
Does Not Meet
project) target for both the various sections.
Expectation:0.00%
formative and
summative
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MIS 3.R.2
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MIS 3.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
41 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
42 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
observations
4. Develop and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
implement Exit Assessment Test 40 and 41 80% students Project in Summer 2016 will
information Test, and Exceeds should meet or, include real life applications of
systems with the Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed information systems and provide
help of latest Assessment (MIS Meets Expectation: expectation. opportunity for students to
business tools. 405 group term 0.00% Students met the implement the system with the
Does Not Meet
project) target for both the help of business tools.
Expectation:0.00%
formative and
summative
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MIS 4.R.2
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MIS 4.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
43 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
44 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
observations
5. Illustrate the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
familiarity about Exit Assessment Test 42 and 43 80% students A standardized project outline for
computer networks Test, and Exceeds should meet or, MIS 442 was developed. The
and security Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed project required students to work
concepts. Assessment (MIS Meets Expectation: expectation. in teams on a case that
405 group term 0.00% Students met the demonstrated practical
Does Not Meet
project) target for both the application of Information
Expectation:0.00%
formative and Systems in Business. Case study
summative and projects are focusing on
Formative: Assessment. system analysis and application
Course-
Course-Embedded introduced in MIS 405 for the
Embedded
Assessment (MIS Trend: summative assessment.
Assessment:
Rubric #
MIS 5.R.2
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MIS 5.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
45 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
46 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MARKETING

1. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
in-depth marketing Exit Assessment Test 44 and 45 80% students A uniform project outline for
management Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, MKT 302 was developed. The
process and its Course Embedded 3.64% exceed project required students to work
implementation Assessment (MKT Meets Expectation: expectation. in groups on an assignment that
locally and globally 302 group term 58.18% Students met the demonstrated practical
for products and project) application of basic marketing
Expectation:34.55%
services. formative and management theories for the
summative summative assessment.
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Assessment (MKT Trend:
Rubric #
201examinations The percentage of
MKT 1.R.2
(summative),
meeting
MKT 1.R.1
expectation is very
(formative)
negligible in both
formative and
summative
assessments.
47 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 44: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 45: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
48 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
concepts of Exit Assessment Test 46 and 47 80% students A standardized approach for
Marketing Test, and Exceeds should meet or, summative assessment in MKT
Communications, Course Embedded Expectation: 3.64% exceed 302 will be developed in Summer
ethical Assessment (MKT Meets Expectation: expectation. 2016, to ensure consistency in
consideration and 302 group term 58.18% Students met the measurement criteria across
branding. project) various sections.
Expectation:34.55%
formative and
summative
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MKT 2.R.2
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MKT 2.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
49 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
50 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Analyzing Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
consumer behavior Exit Assessment Test 48 and 49 80% students A uniform project outline for
focusing on Test, and Exceeds should meet or, MKT 481 was developed. The
psychological Course Embedded Expectation: 3.64% exceed project required students to work
aspects. Assessment (MKT Meets Expectation: expectation. in groups on an assignment that
481 group term 58.18% Students met the demonstrated practical
project) application of basic consumer
Expectation:34.55%
formative and behavior theories for the
summative summative assessment.
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MKT 3.R.3
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MKT 3.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
51 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
52 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
consumer behavior Exit Assessment Test 50 and 51 80% students A standardized approach for
theories and its Test, and Exceeds should meet or, summative assessment in MKT
implications on Course Embedded Expectation: 3.64% exceed 481 will be developed in Summer
strategy Assessment (MKT Meets Expectation: expectation. 2016, to ensure consistency in
formulation. 481 group term 58.18% Students met the measurement criteria across
project) various sections.
Expectation:34.55%
formative and
summative
Course-
Course-Embedded
Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MKT 4.R.3
meeting
(summative),
expectation is very
MKT 4.R.1
negligible in both
(formative)
formative and
summative
assessments.
53 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
54 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MANAGEMENT

1. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
role of Exit Assessment Test 52 and 53 80% students A standardized project outline for
entrepreneurship Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, MGT 401 was developed. The
in business, its Course Embedded 0.00% exceed project required students to work
benefits and Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. on a project and case study
drawbacks. 405 group term 100% Students met the focusing on creation and startup
project) of a new small business.
Expectation:0.00%
formative and
summative Improvements to be Made
Formative: Assessment. A new assessment will be
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded developed for students in
Assessment:
Assessment (MGT Trend: Summer 2016 which will focus on
Rubric #
201 examinations The percentage of the development and creation of
MGT 1.R.2
and projects) students not a small business with in-depth
(summative),
meeting focus on knowledge about
MGT 1.R.1
expectation is zero marketing plan of a business and
(formative)
in summative overall idea about advertisement
assessments and and pricing, cash management
negligible in and financial plan for a small
formative business.
assessments.
55 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 52: BBA IN MGT: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE53: BBA IN MGT: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
56 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
the overall idea Exit Assessment Test 54 and 55 80% students A standardized project outline for
about the Test, and Exceeds should meet or, MGT301 was developed. The
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed project required students to work
organization and
Assessment (MGT 0.00% expectation. on a case focusing on leadership
work environment Meets Expectation:
and enlightening 301 group term Students met the and organizational work
project) environment.
with organizational Does Not Meet
formative and
theories related to Expectation:0.00%
motivation, Formative: Assessment. A new assessment will be
communication, Course-Embedded developed in Summer 2016
leadership and Course-
Assessment (MGT Trend: focusing on all key areas of
Embedded
teams. 201 examinations The percentage of management theories thus
Assessment:
and projects) students not making the assignment more
Rubric #
meeting comprehensive of all topics of
MGT 1.R.3
expectation is organizational behavior in
(summative),
noticeable in both relation a real Bangladeshi
MGT 1.R.1
summative company.
(formative)
assessments
formative
assessments.
57 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 54: BBA IN MGT: SLO 2: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 55: BBA IN MGT: SLO 2: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
58 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or
Outcome Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
observations
3. Demonstrate in- Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
depth knowledge Exit Assessment Test, Test Figures 80% students A new project on MGT 330 was
about fundamental and Exceeds 56 and should meet or, developed where students
theory, techniques Course Embedded Expectation: 0.00% 57 exceed required to work on Lean
and mathematical Assessment (MGT 330 Meets Expectation: expectation. Awareness in the readymade
calculations of group term project 100% Students met the garments industry of Bangladesh
operational and examinations)
Expectation:0.00%
management with formative and Improvements to be Made
particular focus on summative A new more standardized
layout planning, Formative: Assessment. assignment will be developed in
Course-
forecasting, Course-Embedded Summer 2016 on Productivity
Embedded
Inventory Assessment (MGT 201 Trend: Improvement after
Assessment:
Management, examinations and The percentage of implementation of Lean
Rubric #
Material projects) students not Manufacturing Techniques. A
MGT 1.R.4
Requirement meeting continuation from the current
(summative),
Planning, Capacity expectation is very semester’s project.
MGT 1.R.1
Management, Lean negligible in both
(formative)
Production, formative and
Scheduling, Staffing summative
and control in order assessments.
to optimize operating
systems in Industrial
and Management
setting.
59 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 56: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 57: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
60 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN HRM

1. Be able to Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
describe, discuss Exit Assessment Test 58 and 59 80% students A standardized course outline for
and debate on the Test and Exceeds should meet or, HRM 390 was developed to
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed ensure that the course
key terms, and 0.00%
Assessment (HRM expectation. encompasses all the relevant
theories/concepts 390 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the theories and contemporary
within the field of 57.14%
project) target for both the issues in Strategic HRM.
human resource Does Not Meet
formative and
Expectation:40%
management. summative Improvements to be Made
Formative: Assessment. A standardized approach for
Course-Embedded Course- summative assessment in HRM
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: 390 will be developed in Summer
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of 2016, to ensure consistency in
and projects) Rubric # students not measurement criteria across
HRM 1.R.2 meeting various sections.
(summative), expectation is
HRM 1.R.1 negligible in both
(formative) formative and
summative
assessments.
61 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 58: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 59: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
62 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Identify and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
analyze problems Exit Assessment Test 60 and 61 80% students To make students familiar how
in the field of HRM Test and Exceeds should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed approaches to specific policy
and be able to 0.00%
Assessment (HRM expectation. areas, HR practitioners were
devise apposite 390 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the brought in to share their
solutions. 57.14%
project) target for both the experience.
Does Not Meet
formative and
Expectation:40%
Formative: Assessment. Students were able to contribute
Course-Embedded Course- better during the case discussion
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: sessions than before.
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of
and projects) Rubric # students not
HRM 2.R.2 meeting
summative
assessments.
63 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
64 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. be able to outline Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
alternative Exit Assessment Test 62 and 63 80% students To make students familiar how
approaches to Test and Exceeds should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
specific policy areas, Course Embedded Expectation: exceed approaches to specific policy
Assessment (HRM 0.00% expectation. areas, HR practitioners were
such as involvement
390 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the brought in to share their
initiatives or 57.14%
approaches to project) target for both the experience.
Does Not Meet
resourcing.
formative and
Expectation:40%
summative
Formative: Assessment. Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded Course- Students were able to contribute
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: better during the case discussion
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of sessions than before.
HRM 3.R.2 meeting
summative
assessments.
65 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
66 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Demonstrate Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
that they can Exit Assessment Test 64 and 65 80% students Students were asked to analyse
critically evaluate Test and Exceeds should meet or, several business cases during the
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed semester, both as a part of class
the strengths and 0.00%
Assessment (HRM expectation. discussion and project to enhance
weaknesses of 390 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the their potency in appreciating any
particular human 57.14%
project) target for both the particular Human Resource
resource Does Not Meet
formative and approach in specific contexts.
Expectation:40%
approaches in summative
specific contexts. Formative: Assessment. Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded Course- Students have performed better
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: in project relative to their
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of midterm exams.
HRM 4.R.2 meeting
summative
assessments.
67 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
68 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
5. Exhibit an Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
awareness of the Exit Assessment Test 66 and 67 80% students In order to ensure that students
concerns and Test and Exceeds should meet or, are capable to understand how
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed wider social, economic and legal
experiences of a 0.00%
Assessment (HRM expectation. aspects of a country affect
range of 390 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the Strategic HRM polices, a set of
organizational 57.14%
project) target for both the relevant courses have been
stakeholders whilst Does Not Meet
formative and selected as prerequisites for
Expectation:40%
identifying the summative students to take this course from
implications of a Formative: Assessment. summer, 2016 semester.
variety of policy Course-Embedded Course-
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: Improvements to be Made
alternatives for all
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of Improvement would be
stakeholder and projects) students not measured from Summer, 2016
groups. Rubric #
HRM 5.R.2 meeting semester.
summative
assessments.
69 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
70 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
6. Be able to Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
identify and Exit Assessment Test 68 and 69 80% students A standardized project outline for
appreciate the Test and Exceeds should meet or, HRM 380 was developed. The
significance of Course Embedded Expectation: exceed project required students to work
ethical and Assessment (HRM 0.00% expectation. in teams on a case that
institutional issues 380 group term Meets Expectation: Students met the demonstrated practical
57.14%
in HR practices and project) target for both the application of Bangladesh Labor
Does Not Meet
the management of formative and Act 2006 and ILO Case study
Expectation:40%
people in the summative focusing on industrial
workplace. Formative: Assessment. relationships and application
Course-Embedded Course- introduced in HRM 380 for the
Assessment (HRM Embedded Trend: summative assessment.
301 examinations Assessment: The percentage of
and projects) Rubric # students not Improvements Made
HRM 6.R.3 meeting A standardized approach for
(summative), expectation is summative assessment in HRM
HRM 6.R.1 negligible in both 380 will be developed in Summer
(formative) formative and 2015, to ensure consistency in
summative measurement criteria across
assessments. various sections.
71 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
72 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Learning Goal Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
1. Managerial 1.1 Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Embedded 70 and 71 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Assessment: should meet or, communication system for
effectively Course Embedded Rubric # exceed MBA550 was developed. The
reflecting Assessment (MBA MBA 1.1.R.2 expectation. system required students to
550 final term (summative), Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
managerial
projects). MBA 1.1.R.1 target for both the Classroom discussion is going
proficiency formative and
(formative) to be prioritized at the end of
summative the each schedule class where
Formative: Assessment. student can grasp the key
Course-Embedded points based on the chapter
Assessment (MBA Trend: contents and build their idea.
512 final term The percentage of
projects and students not Improvements to be Made
examinations). meeting A standardized approach for
expectation is summative assessment in MBA
almost negligible 550 will be developed in
in both summative Summer 2016, to ensure
and formative consistency in measurement
assessment. criteria across various sections.
73 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 70: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 71: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016:FORMATIVE
74 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Critical 2.1 Effective Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking and decision making Exit Assessment Embedded 72 and 73 80% students A new home project outline for
Decision Making through critical Test, and Assessment: should meet or, MBA 550 was developed. The
thinking Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project required students to
Assessment (MBA MBA 2.1.R.2 expectation. work in teams outside of the
strategies and
550 final term (summative), Students met the class to apply their chapter
determine target for both the
projects). MBA 2.1.R.1 knowledge by solving the
effective (formative) formative and strategic capsule. Practicing
solution for summative this project students not only
management Formative: Assessment. going to develop their own
dilemmas with Course-Embedded critical thinking but also they
the use of Assessment (MBA Trend: understand the complexities
extensive 512 final term The percentage of that general managers face in
internal and projects and students not strategy development and
external examinations). meeting implementation at various
information expectation phases in a company’s growth
negligible in both cycle.
analysis.
summative and
formative Improvements to be Made
assessments. A standardized approach for
summative assessment in MBA
550 will be developed in
75 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
76 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Application of 3.1 Application Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Managerial of Managerial Exit Assessment Embedded 74 and 75 80% students A new project (e.g. case
Knowledge and Knowledge and Test, and Assessment: should meet or, development/ business plan)
Skills Skills to explain Course Embedded Rubric # exceed outline for MBA 550 was
Assessment (MBA MBA 3.1.R.2 expectation. developed. This project
composite
550 final term (summative), Students met the required students to work in
management target for both the
projects). MBA 3.1.R.1 teams to apply their course
issues and (formative) formative and knowledge what they acquire,
provide summative convert and share with each
informed Formative: Assessment. other throughout the semester.
business Course-Embedded Moreover, this project will
improvements. Assessment (MBA Trend: provide knowledge to
512 final term The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
projects and students not various industries and
examinations). meeting competitive positions of firms
expectation is within these industries using
negligible in both various strategic models in the
summative and context of Bangladesh.
formative
assessments. Improvements to be Made
77 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
78 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Perspectives business Exit Assessment Embedded 76 and 77 80% students A new project outline for MBA
information to Test, and Assessment: should meet or, 550 was developed. This
enhance Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project outcome is jointly
Assessment (MBA MBA 4.1.R.2 expectation. attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
550 final term (summative), Students met the This is a group project and
in a global target for both the
projects). MBA 4.1.R.3 students should work in teams.
perspective. (formative) formative and The strategy student develop,
summative craft and made probable
Formative: Assessment. suggestion for execution under
Assessment (MBA Trend: the global perspective (e.g.
514 final term The percentage of benchmark activities) while
projects and students not prescribing Bangladeshi
examinations). meeting companies.
expectation is Improvements to be Made
considerably high A standardized approach for
in summative summative assessment in MBA
assessment but 550 will be developed in
negligible in Summer 2016, to ensure
formative consistency in measurement
79 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
80 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Considerations and articulate Exit Assessment Embedded 78 and 79 80% students A new project outline for MBA
ethical Test, and Assessment: should meet or, 550 was developed. The project
considerations Course Embedded Rubric # exceed required students to work in
Assessment (MBA MBA 5.1.R.2 expectation. teams. The outcome of this
in managerial
550 final term (summative), Students met the project will highlight the
decision making target for both the
projects). MBA 5.1.R.4 macroeconomic factors (e.g.
and in (formative) formative and stakeholders’ right,
enterprise summative government rules), give the
management. Formative: Assessment. students better understanding
Assessment (MBA Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
515 final term The percentage of laws in doing business.
projects and students not
examinations). meeting Improvements to be Made
expectation is A standardized approach for
negligible in both summative assessment in MBA
summative and 550 will be developed in
formative Summer 2016, to ensure
assessments. consistency in measurement
81 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
82 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: EXECUTIVE MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION

1. Managerial 1.1 Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Embedded 80 and 81 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Assessment: should meet or, communication system for
effectively Course Embedded Rubric # exceed MBA550 was developed. The
reflecting Assessment (EMBA EMBA 1.1.R.2 expectation. system required students to
550 final term (summative), Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
managerial
projects). EMBA 1.1.R.1 target for both the Classroom discussion is going
proficiency formative and
(formative) to be prioritized at the end of
summative the each schedule class where
Formative: Assessment. student can grasp the key
Course-Embedded points based on the chapter
Assessment (EMBA Trend: contents and build their idea.
512 final term The percentage of
projects and students not Improvements to be Made
examinations). meeting A standardized approach for
expectation is summative assessment in MBA
almost negligible 550 will be developed in
in both summative Summer 2016, to ensure
and formative consistency in measurement
83 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 80: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 81: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SPRING 2016:FORMATIVE
84 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
2. Critical 2.1 Effective Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking and decision making Exit Assessment Embedded 82 and 83 80% students A new home project outline for
Decision Making through critical Test, and Assessment: should meet or, MBA 550 was developed. The
thinking Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project required students to
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 2.1.R.2 expectation. work in teams outside of the
strategies and
550 final term (summative), Students met the class to apply their chapter
determine target for both the
projects). EMBA 2.1.R.1 knowledge by solving the
effective (formative) formative and strategic capsule. Practicing
solution for summative this project students not only
management Formative: Assessment. going to develop their own
dilemmas with Course-Embedded critical thinking but also they
the use of Assessment (EMBA Trend: understand the complexities
extensive 512 final term The percentage of that general managers face in
internal and projects and students not strategy development and
external examinations). meeting implementation at various
information expectation phases in a company’s growth
negligible in both cycle.
analysis.
summative and
formative Improvements to be Made
assessments. A standardized approach for
85 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
86 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
3. Application of 3.1 Application Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Managerial of Managerial Exit Assessment Embedded 84 and 85 80% students A new project (e.g. case
Knowledge and Knowledge and Test, and Assessment: should meet or, development/ business plan)
Skills Skills to explain Course Embedded Rubric # exceed outline for MBA 550 was
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 3.1.R.2 expectation. developed. This project
composite
550 final term (summative), Students met the required students to work in
management target for both the
projects). EMBA 3.1.R.1 teams to apply their course
issues and (formative) formative and knowledge what they acquire,
provide summative convert and share with each
informed Formative: Assessment. other throughout the semester.
business Course-Embedded Moreover, this project will
improvements. Assessment (EMBA Trend: provide knowledge to
512 final term The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
projects and students not various industries and
examinations). meeting competitive positions of firms
expectation is within these industries using
negligible in both various strategic models in the
summative and context of Bangladesh.
formative
assessments. Improvements to be Made
87 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
88 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Perspectives business Exit Assessment Embedded 86 and 87 80% students A new project outline for MBA
information to Test, and Assessment: should meet or, 550 was developed. This
enhance Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project outcome is jointly
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 4.1.R.2 expectation. attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
550 final term (summative), Students met the This is a group project and
in a global target for both the
projects). EMBA 4.1.R.3 students should work in teams.
perspective. (formative) formative and The strategy student develop,
summative craft and made probable
Formative: Assessment. suggestion for execution under
Assessment (EMBA Trend: the global perspective (e.g.
514 final term The percentage of benchmark activities) while
projects and students not prescribing Bangladeshi
examinations). meeting companies.
expectation is Improvements to be Made
considerably high A standardized approach for
in summative summative assessment in MBA
assessment but 550 will be developed in
negligible in Summer 2016, to ensure
formative consistency in measurement
89 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 86:EMBA PLG 4, SLO 4.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 87: EMBA PLG 5, SLO 4.1: SPRING 2016:FORMATIVE
90 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Considerations and articulate Exit Assessment Embedded 88 and 89 80% students A new project outline for MBA
ethical Test, and Assessment: should meet or, 550 was developed. The project
considerations Course Embedded Rubric # exceed required students to work in
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 5.1.R.2 expectation. teams. The outcome of this
in managerial
550 final term (summative), Students met the project will highlight the
decision making target for both the
projects). EMBA 5.1.R.4 macroeconomic factors (e.g.
and in (formative) formative and stakeholders’ right,
enterprise summative government rules), give the
management. Formative: Assessment. students better understanding
Assessment (EMBA Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
515 final term The percentage of laws in doing business.
projects and students not
examinations). meeting Improvements to be Made
expectation is A standardized approach for
negligible in both summative assessment in MBA
summative and 550 will be developed in
formative Summer 2016, to ensure
assessments. consistency in measurement
91 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 88:EMBA PLG 5, SLO 5.1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 89:EMBA PLG 5, SLO 5.1: SPRING 2016:FORMATIVE
92 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
SPRING 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BSc IN ECONOMICS
Program Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

knowledge of basic Exit Assessment Test 90 and 91 80% students Exit exam designed and introduced
economic Test, and Meets Expectation : should meet or, for BSc Economics.
principles, theories Ecn 490 { Research 55% exceed
and usage of project/Thesis) Does Not Meet expectation. Standardized course outline for
theories, models to course embedded Expectation :33.33% 100% meets Macro, Micro economics courses
explain real world assessment Exceeds expectation for are designed
phenomenon and Expectation:11.11% summative
their policy measure and
implications. Formative: 100% meets
Course-Embedded Course-Embedded expectation in the
Assessment ECN Assessment: formative measure
330 Development Rubric # Meeting the overall
Economics ECN 1.R.1 target.
Coursework (summative), Improvements to be Made
ECN 1.R.2 A standardized approach for
(formative) summative assessment for ECN
490 to be developed to
comprehensively cover all criteria
set in the program objectives.
93 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 90: ECN PLO 1: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 91: ECN PLO 1: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
94 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
knowledge of Exit Exam and Ecn Test 92 and 93 80% students
quantitative and 490 {Research Meets Expectation : should meet or, Extra informal training sessions and
research skill for project/Thesis) 55% exceed tutorials organized to help students
theoretical and course embedded Does Not Meet expectation. enhance their research skills.
empirical analyses assessment Expectation :33.33%
using appropriate Exceeds More than 80%
methodology Expectation:11.11% meets expectation
Formative: Ecn in the summative
486 Coursework measure but target
(Literature review Course-Embedded for formative
and Economic Assessment: measure is not met
modeling section) Rubric # with 57% student
ECN 2.R.1 meeting
(summative), expectation. Improvements to be Made
ECN 2.R.2 A standardized approach for
(formative) summative assessment for ECN
490 to be developed to
comprehensively cover all criteria
set in the program objectives.
95 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 92: ECN PLO 2: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 93: ECN PLO 3: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
96 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
communication Ecn 490 { Research Test 94 and 95 80% students Course plan for Ecn 330 and 486 to
skill for project/Thesis) Meets Expectation : should meet or, be revised to enhance
dissemination of course embedded 55% exceed communication skill
research findings assessment Does Not Meet expectation.
Expectation :33.33%
Exceeds The summative
Formative: Expectation:11.11% measure shows
Course embedded target is met with
assessment Ecn 486 more than 80%
Research Course-Embedded meeting
Methodology Assessment: expectation and the
(Communication Rubric # formative measure Improvements to be Made
section) ECN 3.R.1 also shows target is Course plan for Ecn 330 and 486 to
(summative), met with more than be revised to enhance
ECN 3.R.2 80% meeting communication skill
(formative) expectation.
Trend:
97 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 94: PLO 3: SPRING 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 95: PLO 3: SPRING 2016: FORMATIVE
98 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6
FACULTY MEMBERS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS REPORT
Dr A.N.M. Shibly Noman Khan Mr Maqbool Kader Quraishi
Dr Samiul Parvez Ahmed Ms Sadia Haque
Dr Rushdi Razzaque Mr Shamil M Al-Islam
Mr Abul Bashar Mr Sumon Prosad Saha
Mr Sohel Islam Mr Iftekhar Mahfuz
Mr Hanif Mahtab Mr Fahad Noor
Mr Mohammad Ali Arafat Mr G M Wali Ullah
Mr A B Emran Salahuddin Mr Naheem Mahtab
Mr Latiful Khabir Ms Zakia Binte Jamal
Mr Saquib Shahriar Mr Shafiqul Alam
Mr Rajib Rahman Mr Aynul Hoque
Dr Ikramul Hasan Ms Anita Fairuz
Ms Sumita Das Ms Sariat Rafa Khan
Mr Abul Khair Jyote
99 | S L A R / S B / S P R I N G 2 0 1 6

Student Learning Outcome Spring 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Student Learning Outcome Spring 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING 2016

Plot 16, Block B, Aftabuddin Ahmed Road, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229

Spring 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program Page 3

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or Improvements

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Program Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

You might also like