Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creating A Conducive Learning Environment For Effective Integration of ICT: Classroom Management Issues
Creating A Conducive Learning Environment For Effective Integration of ICT: Classroom Management Issues
net/publication/49279390
CITATIONS READS
44 33,335
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Preservice and inservice training for ICT integration in education View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Myint Swe Khine on 19 May 2014.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Kounin (1970, p.63) defined effective classroom management as “producing
a high rate of work involvement and a low rate of deviancy in academic set-
tings.” It includes “the provisions and procedures necessary to establish and
maintain an environment in which instruction and learning can occur and the
preparation of the classroom as an effective learning environment” (Fraser,
1983, p.68). A well-managed classroom is then one in which pupils are con-
sistently engaged in the learning tasks with few pupil off-task behaviours.
The literature reviewed in this section discusses the classroom management
issues that create a conducive environment for the effective integration of
ICT in schools.
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 43
use, (b) procedures for teacher-led instruction, (c) Procedures for moving in
and out of the room, (d) Procedures for group work, and (e) general proce-
dures, such as distribution of materials and fire drills.
These rules and procedures are to be integrated into a workable system
by teachers and should be deliberately taught to the pupils. By making the
rules and procedures “concrete, explicit, and functional,” order in the learn-
ing environment and pupils’ work accomplishment are achieved (Doyle,
1986, p.410). Although many of these rules and procedures are established
in “regular” classrooms, they can still be applied in ICT-based learning envi-
ronments (Wong, 2000).
Mediating Tools
Division
Rules of Labor
Community Adapted from Cole and Engeström, 1993, p.8
ple strategies involve gathering accounts of different realities that have been
constructed by various groups and individuals in the school; and hence,
enhance reliability and validity of the study.
interaction between the participating pupils elicits more of the pupils’ point
of view by allowing a struggle of understanding of how others interpret key
terms/ideas and a debate of issues raised (Morgan, 1993). Moreover, pupils
may feel more at ease when they are in a group, and that may encourage
more spontaneity, especially if the pupils are classmates or close friends
(Bers, 1994).
Three groups of six pupils were chosen from each school for the focus
group discussions. The groupings were done according to the levels that the
pupils were from – Primary 3, 4, and 5. Each group had a 30-minute discus-
sion conducted in the classroom or the computer lab. A list of topics and ques-
tions was used to guide the group discussions: objectives of ICT-based
lessons, ICT and non-ICT tools, ICT-based lessons and learning, rules and
procedures, and division of labour among participants. These topics were gen-
erated from the activity theoretical framework and the literature review. Care
was taken to ensure a natural progression across topics in the list, with some
overlap between them; an artificial compartmentalisation of the discussion
might defeat the purpose of using focus group discussions (Morgan, 1993).
Data Analysis
From the various sources of data collected, units of information were iden-
tified. These units became the basis for defining categories. It was essential
that the activity theoretical framework informed these units with respect to
the availability of ICT tools, establishment of rules and procedures, support
of ICT-based activities by non-ICT and ICT tools, and division of labour
among participants (teachers, students, and TAs). These units were situated
in the ecological settings of the activity systems (ICT-based lessons in the
two schools).
By December 1999, the teacher-computer ratio was 2:1 for all schools
and pupil-computer ratio was 6.6:1 for primary schools. The schools were
also given funds to purchase educational software and other peripherals
annually. The schools have the autonomy to identify and purchase ICT
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 50
resources that best meet the needs of their students and teachers. The music
teacher in North Primary School, during the interview, recalled how she per-
suaded her school to purchase Midisaurus, a music software:
The school has always been supportive of the use of information tech-
nologies (IT). I came across Midisaurus in a music workshop and asked
for a demo copy to explore. After evaluation, I put up a proposal to pur-
chase 50 copies of the CD-ROMs. The school has funds for the purchase
of hardware and software, so it is up to the individual teacher to propose
the purchase of IT resources that are useful for their students.
All classrooms in the two primary schools were equipped with a data pro-
jector and a desktop computer. And the computer rooms were equipped with
more than 40 desktop computers per room, enough for a class of 40 pupils
to engage in individual work, and flexible enough to support pair and group
work. In all the ICT-based lessons observed, there was no problem that was
associated to a lack of computers, educational software or ICT peripherals.
All the teachers, who were interviewed, stated that they have more flexibil-
ity in planning and conducting ICT-based lessons, as they were not con-
strained by the availability of ICT tools. Therefore, the availability of ICT
tools in the computer rooms mediates between the teacher and his/her man-
agement of the ICT-based lessons that creates a conducive learning environ-
ment for the effective integration of ICT in these schools.
All the pupils in the focus group discussions agreed that the discipline-
specific rules and procedures were reasonable and they ensured the smooth
running of the lCT-based lessons. A few of them elaborated on the impor-
tance of rules and procedures during these discussions: “… if not (no rules),
we’re talking too much and we don’t follow the teacher’s instructions, we do
our own things” and “if there are no rules about the computers, other people
may mess up the computers. We already have something to work on for the
class, and if the computer is messy, then we’ve got another problem to think
of and it makes it very hard for us.”
Some discipline-specific procedures that were observed in both schools
included the following:
• Pupils entered and exited the computer room in an orderly fashion
according to their class index number. Each of them knew their
assigned seats and there was no rushing. The computers were indexed
with the index number of the pupil. Indexing facilitated the procedure
of seat assignment and the monitoring of the ICT tools. One teacher
from the school elaborated during the interview:
Every computer is labelled with an index, and the pupil of that index
number will use that particular computer…even the CD-ROMs are also
tagged with numbers, so that we can check any breakdown, or any mis-
chief done to the computer. And before they [the pupils] leave, they have
to turn the mouse over, so that the track ball…you can see that the track
ball is still inside.
• Some teachers grouped or paired pupils with ICT skills with those who
needed more support using ICT. Such an arrangement facilitated the
learning process of pupils who were weak in ICT skills as they were
able to better engage in the task. It also eliminated the need for these
pupils to frequently interrupt the teacher for help. For example, one
teacher in East Primary School paired pupils who were weak in typing
with those who could type well. She also made sure that no “playful”
pupils were put together.
• Pupils turned on the computers only when the teacher gave instructions
to. In both schools, some teachers would get the pupils to turn off their
monitor or move to the front of the computer room (away from the com-
puters) when they were explaining a concept or giving instructions.
These procedures ensured that the pupils paid attention to the instruc-
tions and explanations.
The discipline-specific rules and procedures observed in East and North
Primary School communicated the teachers’ expectation of the pupils’
behaviour. Of all the 30 lessons observed in both schools, there were only 2
lessons in East Primary School and 1 in North Primary School that lacked a
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 52
the ICT learning package. If these assumptions are not addressed, pupils
may lose task-orientation and display deviant behaviours that are disruptive
(Lim, 2001). Therefore, teachers need to employ ICT and non-ICT tools to
support the ICT-based activities such that the assumptions of the “expert”
learners are addressed. Such practices were observed in both schools at var-
ious stages of the ICT-based lessons: preinstructional activities, instruction-
al activities, and postinstructional activities.
Preinstructional Activities
Most of the teachers reviewed previous concepts and made links to the con-
cepts to be covered in the ICT-based lessons. Some teachers highlighted and
demonstrated the key features and the navigation buttons of the ICT learn-
ing package before allowing pupils to start using the computers. The teach-
ers, mediated by the whiteboard, visualiser, teacher’s computer, overhead
projector, and data projector, carried out these presentations and demonstra-
tions that created a conducive environment for learning.
These activities, supported by ICT and non-ICT tools, are especially
important when a new hardware and/or software are being introduced, as in
the case of North Primary School. When the QX3 microscope and its accom-
panying program were first introduced in a Science lesson with a group of
Primary three pupils, the teacher explained the features and functions of the
different parts of the microscope with the use of PowerPoint slides. She then
asked the pupils to imitate her actions as she used the microscope and soft-
ware to capture some images. This ensured that the pupils knew how to use
the microscope and its accompanying program. The pupils in the focus
group discussions found the introduction and demonstration of the micro-
scope helpful as they “did not encounter any problems when using the
microscope” and they were able to “concentrate on the science experiment.”
Most of the instructions for the ICT-based activities were usually given
to pupils as handouts or projected onto the screen by way of the teachers’
computer. When pupils were clear about the tasks that they were to com-
plete, they were more likely to be task-oriented and motivated. When
instructions were confusing, as observed in a lesson in North Primary
School, pupils were found to display more deviant behaviours. In the focus
group discussion, one of the pupils who was talking to his partner during the
lesson, commented that he did not know what the ICT-based task was about
and he was “lost in cyberspace” when carrying out the task.
Instructional Activities
Scaffolding activities were present in most lessons observed in both schools.
Worksheets and checklists were distributed to the pupils to guide them to
complete their tasks. During a Science lesson in East Primary School, the
teacher designed a worksheet to mediate knowledge construction (searching
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 54
Postinstructional Activities
All the teachers who were observed in both schools carried out postinstruc-
tional activities to round up the ICT-based lessons and linked the concepts
learnt to the next lesson. They also briefed the pupils on the tasks to be com-
pleted by the next lesson. Most of the tools used to mediate these activities
were similar to the ones used in the preinstructional activities. In East Pri-
mary School, one of the teachers used a concept-mapping software, Inspi-
ration, to engage her pupils in the reflection of the ICT-based lessons. The
teacher constructed the concept map on her computer, projected on the
screen, together with her pupils. Another teacher in the school constructed
the concept map with his class on the whiteboard.
The teachers in both schools employed both ICT and non-ICT tools to
support the ICT-based activities to ensure that their pupils were task-orient-
ed and engaged in their learning processes. These tools, employed by the
teachers to create a conducive learning environment, mediate between the
community and the object of managing ICT-based lessons.
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 55
Role of Teacher
There were only two lessons observed in East Primary School where more
than two-thirds of the lesson was spent on direct teaching. The other ICT-
based lessons were pupil-centred with very little direct teaching. Examples
of such lessons included pupils working with CD-ROMs, composing essays
with Microsoft Word, searching for information on the Internet and present-
ing their findings, and carrying out experiments with ICT tools such as the
QX3 microscope. Although pupil learning was mediated by ICT and non-
ICT tools (worksheets, checklists, and handouts), the teachers were
observed to be facilitators, helping and guiding the pupils in their work. As
the pupils worked at their own pace, the teachers were able to spend more
time working with the weaker pupils, and provided them with more scaf-
folding to complete the tasks. When pupils are able to successfully carry out
and complete the tasks, they are less likely to engage in deviant behaviours
that may be disruptive to the lesson.
By doing so, the TAs freed the teachers from attending to technical prob-
lems and ensured that the teachers focused their attention on the conduct and
management of the ICT-based lessons. That is, the division of labour
between the TA and the teacher in the ICT-based lesson mediates between
the subject (teacher) and the object of managing the lesson to create a con-
ducive learning environment.
The division of labour among the teachers, pupils, and TAs in both
schools have indeed facilitated the creation of a conducive environment that
is the necessary condition for the effective integration of ICT in the class-
room. By defining the roles of each participant in the ICT-based lesson, the
teacher is then able to achieve the object of managing the lesson; the role
definitions or division of labour mediates between the community of the
ICT-based lesson and the object of a well-managed lesson.
CONCLUSION
Managing ICT-based lessons is not very different from managing non-ICT
based ones. The basic classroom management principles apply for both. Tak-
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 57
ing the ICT-based lesson as an activity system, we can study how the tools,
rules, community, and division of labour mediate between the subject
(teacher) and the object of managing the ICT-based lesson. The findings in
the collective case study have highlighted the elements of a well-managed
ICT-based lesson as:
1. Availability of ICT tools: When ICT tools are available and ade-
quate in the learning environment, they mediate between the
teacher and his/her management of ICT-based lessons that creates a
conducive environment for effective ICT integration.
2. Establishment of rules and procedures: Teachers have to set clear
discipline-specific and educational rules and procedures to mediate
between the community of participants and the object of effective
management of ICT-based lessons.
3. Supporting ICT and non-ICT tools for ICT-based activities: Teach-
ers have to employ both ICT and non-ICT tools to support ICT-
based activities by mediating between the community of partici-
pants and rules of the learning environment, and/or mediating
between the community and the object of effective management of
ICT-based lessons.
4. Division of labour among teachers, TAs, and pupils: Every partici-
pant in the ICT-based lesson has a role to play in ensuring a con-
ducive learning environment. The well-defined roles of participants
mediate between the community and the object of a well-managed
ICT-based lesson.
These elements facilitate the creation of a conducive learning environ-
ment that provides the necessary condition for the effective integration of
ICT in the classroom. In such an environment, pupils are more likely to be
task-oriented and reflective, and hence, more likely to engage in higher
order thinking.
REFERENCES
Bers, T.H. (1994). Exploring institutional images through focus group interviews. In N., Bennett,
R., Glatter, & R., Levacic (Eds.), Improving educational management through research and con-
sultancy (pp. 290-299). London: The Open University.
Brophy, J. (1979). Teacher behaviour and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733-750.
Brophy, J., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M.C. Witttrock
(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Cheung, C. K. (1997). Factors affecting the successful implementation of Information Technolo-
gy (IT) in the secondary business education curriculum Hong Kong in the eyes of teachers. Com-
puter Education, 97, 7-13.
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 58
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition In G.,
Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.1-46).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crook, C. (1991). Computers in the zone of proximal development: Implications for evaluation.
Computers and Education, 17(1), 81-91.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C., Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of
research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom management techniques. In O.C., Moles (Ed.), Student discipline
strategies: Research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y.,
Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R-L (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.L. (Eds.) (1998). Perspectives on activity theory.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Emmer, E.T., & Evertson, C.M. (1981). Synthesis of research on classroom management. Edu-
cational Leadership, 51(8), 12-15.
Evertson, C.M., Emmer, E.T., Clements, B.S., & Worsham, M.E. (1997). Classroom management
for elementary teachers (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fisher, C., Dwyer, D.C., & Yocam, K. (1996). The APPLE classroom of tomorrow – an overview,
education and technology – reflections on computing in classrooms (pp.1-12). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Fraser, B.J. (1983). Managing positive classroom environments. In B.J. Fraser (Ed.), Classroom
management. Western Australian Institute of Technology: Faculty of Education.
Gettinger, M. (1988). Methods of proactive classroom management. School Psychology Review,
17, 227-242.
Good, T. (1982). Classroom research: What we know and what we need to know (R&D report no.
9018). Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
Holland, D., & Reeves, J.R. (1994). Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team per-
spectives on the intellectual work of programming. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 9-24.
Kounin, J.S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart
& Winston.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in Psychology. In J.V., Wertsch (Ed.), The concept
of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 41-68). New York: Sharpe.
Lim, C.P. (2001). Learner control and task-orientation in a hypermedia learning environment: A
case study of two economics departments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(3),
271-285.
Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia’s basic skills/com-
puter education program: An analysis of student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Fami-
ly Foundation.
Marcovitz, D.M., Hamza, M.K., & Farrow, V.R. (2000). Students and support for technology in the
elementary classroom. Computers in the Schools, 16(3/4), 213-225.
Ministry of Education (1997). Launch of Masterplan for IT in Education. Press Release 015/97.
[Online]. Available: http://www1.moe.edu.sg/press/1997/pr01597.htm
JILR 14/4 page layout 12/23/03 3:23 PM Page 59
Morgan, D.L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park,
CA: SAGE.
Munn, P., Johnstone, M., & Chalmers, V. (1990). How do teachers talk about maintaining effec-
tive discipline in their classrooms? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Edu-
cational Research Association, Boston.
Parks, A., & Pisapia, J. (1994). Developing exemplary technology-using teachers. Research Brief
#8. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411 360)
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide
educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.
Potter, J. (2000). First steps in organising ICT in the Primary classroom. In M. Leask & J. Meadows
(Eds.), Teaching and learning with ICT in the primary school (pp. 124-143). London: Routledge.
Sanford, J.P., Emmer, E.T., & Clements, B.S. (1983). Improving classroom management. Educa-
tional Leadership, 40(7), 56-60.
Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distrib-
uted cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). New York: Cam-
bridge University Press.
Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Sheingold, K., Hawkins, J., & Char, C. (1984). I’m the thinkist, you are the typist: The interaction
of technology and the social life of classrooms. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 49-61.
Silverman, D. (1994). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interac-
tion. London: SAGE.
Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997.
Washington, DC: Software Publisher’s Association.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: SAGE.
Verenikina, I. & Gould, E. (1997). Activity theory as a framework for interface design. ASCILITE
’97, Perth, 611-615.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and
student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Informa-
tion Center.
Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current
use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307-320.
Wong, P. (2000). Managing IT classrooms. In M. D. Williams (Ed.), Integrating technology into
teaching and learning (pp. 121-139). Singapore: Prentice Hall.