Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harley Charlebois Primary Critique Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
Harley Charlebois Primary Critique Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
Harley Charlebois Primary Critique Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
Primary Critique
Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
Ariana Meewes’ A day in the Life is subtle and poignant. The alternating of short and
long lines guides the reader through the monotony of a normal day with a hidden tapestry of gray
determination to get through the day simply because you have to. Living life by a check list of
necessary activates is a common method of living with many mental illnesses and even just hard
times in general. Nearly every reader will be able to read this piece and conjure to mind a
memory of a time when going through the motions was the only thing keeping them going
through the day. This piece recognizes and addresses mental health/illness without attempting to
say that it is wrong or a failing. I am finding it difficult to offer much in the way of useful
critique, but I will do my absolute best to offer something that will help the poet to enrich the
piece.
The diction works well throughout and the capitalization works to emphasize certain
points. In the third stanza the consistent punctuation and capitalization seems to represent a
check list or routine unhealthy and unenjoyed but necessary. What illness the character is
struggling with is left undefined which allows for a personal reading by nearly all readers.
Though some might suggest making it clear what illness the poet was specifically thinking of or
representing, I think being explicit would detract from rather than enrich the piece.
I think the piece could benefit from more of an emphasize on sound; assonance,
consonance, alliteration and the like. I think it would also add to the piece to put some more
focus on the interaction between the world and the character’s senses. Are things in sharper focus
or seem further away? Or a mixture of both? How does the numbness that the character
approaches the day with effect the senses that are often times second nature anyway? We see a
few examples of the character seeming to chase warmth; I think that can be expanded on.
Harley Charlebois
Primary Critique
Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
Two minor things that I noticed that read odd to me were lines 2 and 52. Line two is the
only one in the entire peace to be written in passed tense and I would suggest switching it to
present to fit the rest of the piece. Line 52 begins with an uncapitalized “away” but follows one
of the few periods punctuation marks in the piece. Line 45 does the same thing, but it was less
something I know the poet put much thought into and so might have had a reason for this that I
Line 34 “thanks mom” which is situated by itself feels as though it should have a clear
and important meaning, but I think that the reader isn’t sure what it is. I think the piece would
benefit from a few more lines added on to further explore the feelings behind the characters
seemingly silent thanks. Is it sarcastic? Heartfelt? Pained or guilty? I also think that (whether the
poet adds more to the previous line or not) line 35 should be on the second page with the rest of
There seems to be a significance to the fact that the first two lines avoid enjambment, but
the rest of the poem does not seem to hesitate with this poetic device. The average length of the
long lines actually seem to get shorter as the poem progresses. If this is purposeful it’s great, if it
was not, I would urge the poet to continue the theme when adding more content if possible.
Overall, I think that the piece is wonderfully done, and I have not much to suggest or
urge that would enrich the piece, but I will offer a shortened list of some suggestions I feel the
most strongly about what I have said above. I think the piece would benefit from the inclusion of
more poetic devices. I also suggest expanding the piece through the inclusion of interactions
between the world/the day and the character’s senses. I suggest more explanation and feeling to
Harley Charlebois
Primary Critique
Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
go along with line 34: “thanks mom”. In conclusion I loved the piece and as with all of Ari’s
All the pieces written and offered to workshop by Ari Meewes were insightful and well
done. This makes my job as primary critic more difficult, but I enjoy the challenge. The final
piece, Ari’s dramatic monologue was no exception. The cyclical process of living, struggling,
and being guided by anxiety as well as the poet’s ability to turn this disorder (much as she hates
As a poem and a work of art Ari Meewes’ Relationship with Anxiety employs diction and
literary functions to showcase an all too relatable experience. However, despite the
personification of Anxiety as a character, it is easy to read this piece as being a genre other then
dramatic monologue. As it is, Anxiety’s responses, though reading and feeling like dialogue
coming from a real character, are actually personification and a manifestation of the speakers’
own thoughts, making the argument for this piece to be considered dramatic monologue slightly
rocky. I do not think that a shift to dramatic monologue is necessary or paramount to improving
or enriching the piece itself but, for the purposes of the assignment I would suggest a different
character be added as that of audience member. The first suggestion that comes to my mind
would be a counselor. I myself have had a counselor suggest that I write a letter to my anxiety
and depression and I have read said letter to a counselor before. Adding such a character would
allow the piece to be more deeply rooted in the dramatic monologue genre, without
fundamentally shifting or altering the personification of the Anxiety which adds so much depth
I enjoyed the use of the image however I think there are ways to bring it forward more
and connect the image to the piece and the reader more fully. One such way would be to enlarge
the image and center the text inside of it. Given the extra space this would allow, while
Harley Charlebois
Primary Critique
Cycle III-Dramatic Monologue
maintaining a clear boarder, I think the poem would also benefit from being mostly centered with
a slightly larger distance set between the start of the speaker’s words and that of the Anxiety.
In the piece there are moments where the poet’s use of the concrete and physical
reactions more closely ties the speaker and the anxiety together. One such example is the use of
“shaking” and “quivering” in the third stanza. I think employing this more throughout would
There was some confusion during workshop in relation to the title. I know that titles can
be a difficult thing and so can offer very little advice except to say that if the reader doesn’t
understand the implications of the title in the beginning, they certainly should by the end.
However, if it is a concern to the poet my suggestion would be to add some kind of possessive
pronoun such as saying “My relationship with Anxiety”, “Relationship with My anxiety”, or
“My Anxiety and I: A Relationship”; alternatively the poet can also substitute the word
“conversation” for relationship and make necessary grammatical adjustments from there.
There were many things in this piece that worked well from a reader and/or listener’s
point of view. The sound, diction, and cyclical nature of the piece were all clearly representative
of the repetitive cycle that is a relationship with anxiety. The reader is also struck by the fact that
though the speaker begins the discourse they do not seem in control of the conversation. The
interaction is led by the anxiety. This subtle attention further enforces what it is actually like to
live with anxiety. All of the aforementioned functions lend themselves to a greater raw and
honest representation that feels genuine and therefore relates closer to the reader. I greatly
enjoyed and appreciated this piece and thank the poet for sharing and for allowing me to present
it to the class.