Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Singapore Kokurikulum
Singapore Kokurikulum
SINGAPORE
Meng Teck Chee, Tan Ying Chin, Mei Yoke Loh, Hui Leng Ng, Chew Leng Poon,
Kim Ho Sin, Suet Yen Tang, Wee Beng Tay, Yeen Peng Yen
Ministry of Education
Introduction
Overview of Education System
A small nation with few natural resources other than its people, Singapore has always placed a high
value on education. The mission of Singapore’s Ministry of Education (MOE) is to mold the future of
the nation by nurturing its people. Nearly all Singaporean students attend publicly funded schools.
Public education in Singapore is balanced and well-rounded, and aims to help children develop
passion and capabilities for learning throughout life so that they may realize their potential, live a full
and satisfying life, and use their strengths gainfully for the good of the self, family, society, and
country.1
The Singaporean education system in the 1960s–1980s was largely efficiency-driven and more
centrally controlled, with the goal of rapidly raising the basic literacy and numeracy rates within its
population. Launched in 1997, “Thinking Schools, Learning Nation” (TSLN) represented an
important inflection point in the transformation of the Singaporean education system into its current
form, which is characterized by flexibility, diversity, and greater school autonomy.2 This fundamental
shift was actualized through changes in education governance and the education landscape over the
past two decades. Due to its small sizea and by design, the Singaporean education system has a very
flat structure of governance, with no intermediary levels of government between the MOE
Headquarters (MOE HQ) and schools. The key design objective, both in the post-TSLN years and
currently, is to create a close nexus between policy and practice through achieving a purposeful
balance between the centralization and decentralization of different elements of the education and
school system.
The MOE HQ is responsible for selected functions within the education system to ensure that
important educational resources are equitably distributed across schools. More specifically, the MOE
HQ is responsible for setting national policies that affect access to education and schools for all
children (e.g., curriculum, school admission criteria, funding rates, and fees payable). For example,
the adoption of a national curriculum ensures that children in all schools have access to the same
core set of important knowledge and skills. Similarly, the MOE HQ is responsible for recruiting
public school teachers, paying for their initial teacher training at the National Institute of Education
(NIE), and deploying them to schools. This ensures that the same high standards are applied
a
There were 366 schools across all grade levels in the Singapore education system in 2015.
consistently in the recruitment of teachers, and that there is equitable deployment of teachers to all
schools.
The MOE HQ devolves significant autonomy and responsibility to individual schools in school
administration and professional matters (e.g., pedagogical approaches for students with different
learning needs). Schools are given the autonomy within broad parameters and, in fact, are highly
encouraged to customize the implementation of national curriculum policies and programs, set and
developed by the MOE HQ, to suit the learning needs of their students. Similarly, schools decide the
local job assignments of teachers centrally posted to them by the MOE HQ (e.g., deployment to grade
level and co-curricular activities).
Central oversight of individual schools is carried out mainly using a holistic school evaluation
and improvement framework. The School Excellence Model, centrally developed by the MOE HQ in
consultation with schools and other key stakeholders, is a self-evaluation framework that all schools
use to guide continual school improvement, in areas such as teaching and learning, student and staff
welfare, and school leadership. School self-evaluation is supported by a process of external validation,
carried out approximately once every six years, whereby schools invite a team of experienced
principals and quality assessors, appointed by the MOE HQ, to provide an assessment of school
strengths and areas for improvement. The validation-based approach of these external evaluations
marks a departure from the previous practice of externally imposed inspections by a team of school
inspectors, reflecting the post-TSLN belief that continual and sustainable school improvement is
most effective when it is initiated and owned by schools themselves. This decentralized but
systematic approach to school improvement allows the MOE HQ to retain a light touch in
monitoring schools and to provide assistance to schools where necessary.
At the same time, the MOE HQ works very closely with schools, both directly through school
visits and consultations with MOE HQ subject specialists, for example, and indirectly through a
school cluster system. The cluster system comprises clusters of 12 to 14 schools located in close
geographical proximity, and serves as a key platform for professional development, communication,
networking, and sharing among schools. The close working relationship between schools and the
MOE HQ is further enhanced through a deliberate centralized personnel posting policy that
systematically rotates education officers, especially those with strong leadership potential, between
practitioner roles in schools (e.g., teachers, heads of departments, and principals) and policymaking
roles in the MOE HQ. This helps to create a coherent system with a tight link between policy and
practice. Shifting between job roles allows educators to gain insight into the policymaking and policy
implementation aspects of the system such that each is continually informed by the other. Socially,
the overlapping networks that follow individual officers as they move from one role to another
organically facilitate a close working relationship between school personnel and HQ personnel.
Overall, this practice contributes to a strong sense of common mission among school and MOE HQ
personnel, and strong alignment between policy and implementation.
New education pathways and curricular options have been introduced progressively and refined
over the past two decades to allow children to discover their interests and develop their strengths in
different domains. Exhibit 1 illustrates the diversity of pathways available to students today,
including avenues for lateral transfers between courses of study. These pathways are designed to
allow students to discover their individual talents and interests, develop and hone these so that they
may acquire skills in particular domains, and inculcate a passion for learning that will drive the
continual pursuit of new knowledge and skills throughout their lives.
While preschool education is not compulsory in Singapore, early childhood educational
development programs for children under age 3 and preprimary education programs for children age
3 or older (including kindergartens) are widely accessible. Most parents enroll their children in these
programs, with some starting from as early as 18 months of age. Over the past five years, the
government has played a more active role in raising the quality of preschool education through
measures, which include the introduction of national curriculum frameworks for early childhood
educators,3,4 the implementation of a new quality assurance consultancy scheme for kindergartens,5
and the establishment of MOE kindergartens to provide quality, affordable preschool education
directly, while catalyzing improvements in the rest of the preschool sector.6 With the establishment
of the Early Childhood Development Agency in 2013, there have been further concerted efforts by
the government to facilitate the enrollment of 5-year-old children who are not already enrolled in a
preschool program, by reaching out to their families. These efforts have reduced the proportion of
children not enrolled in a preschool program to 1 percent.
Primary school education is compulsory, and formal schooling starts in Grade 1 (Primary 1) in
the year in which children turn age 7. All primary school students learn a common national
curriculum. To build a strong foundation in literacy and numeracy, English (the language of
instruction), mother tongue (Malay, Chinese, or Tamil, depending on the student’s ethnicity), and
mathematics are emphasized in the primary school years. Science is introduced in Grade 3
(Primary 3). The curriculum also includes art, music, character and citizenship education, social
studies, and physical education, as well as a wide range of co-curricular activities that allow students
to explore their interests while imparting values, inculcating life skills, and building character.
At the end of Grade 6 (Primary 6), all students take the Primary School Leaving Examination
(PSLE), which assesses students in four subjects: English language, mother tongue, mathematics, and
science. For the majority of students, results from the PSLE are used as a measure of academic merit
in the centralized secondary school admission system, which is both merit- and choice-based. Some
students utilize their achievement in other areas (e.g., sports, music, and leadership) to gain direct
admission to specific secondary schools, especially those offering special programs in these areas.
Secondary school is not compulsory, but is completed by nearly all students in Singapore. In
2014, less than 1 percent of the Grade 1 (Primary 1) cohortb did not complete secondary education.8
At the secondary levels, students enroll in Express, Normal (Academic), or Normal (Technical)
courses of study. These four- to five-year academic programs lead to the Singapore-Cambridge
b
Henceforth, use of the word “cohort” refers to the Grade 1 cohort.
Languages of Instruction
Singapore has a multiracial and multiethnic population with a diverse language environment. There
are four official languages in Singapore: Malay, Chinese (Mandarin), Tamil, and English. Malay is the
national language, while English is the language of administration and education. The proportion of
the resident population ages 15 and older who are literate in one or more languages has increased
steadily over the years to 97 percent in 2014.15 Between 2000 and 2010, the proportion of the resident
population speaking English predominantly at home increased from 23 percent to 32 percent.16,17
In school, English is the medium of instruction for all academic subjects at all grade levels
(including mathematics and science), except for the mother tongue language subjects. A fundamental
feature of Singapore’s post-independence education system is its bilingual policy. Students are
encouraged to be proficient in both English and their own mother tongue language (Malay, Chinese,
or Tamil), and to study both languages to the highest level they are able to. In 2010, 71 percent of the
literate resident population in Singapore was literate in two or more languages, an increase from 56
percent in 2000.18
The Singapore mathematics curriculum comprises a set of syllabi spanning 12 years, from
primary to preuniversity education. As mathematics is a hierarchical subject, higher concepts and
skills are built upon foundational ones and must be learned in sequence. The curriculum is designed
in a spiral manner where concepts and skills in each content strand (e.g., Numbers and Algebra,
Geometry and Measurement) are revisited and built upon at each level to achieve greater depth and
understanding. Exhibit 3 presents a summary of the concepts and skills to be learned by the end of
Grade 8 (Secondary 2). Teachers help their students learn these concepts and skills by adopting age-
and grade-appropriate pedagogical approaches. Central to these pedagogical approaches at the
primary and lower secondary levels is the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (C-P-A) approach, whereby
teachers lead students through activities that help build an understanding of abstract mathematical
concepts from everyday experiences and meaningful contexts, using concrete and pictorial
representations.
The primary and lower secondary science syllabi are designed around themes that students can
relate to in their everyday experiences and on commonly observed phenomena in nature. The five
themes at the primary level are diversity, cycles, energy, interactions, and systems. The lower
secondary science curriculum builds on the themes at the primary level, with an additional theme on
models, and continues the way science is taught at the primary level as a way of exploring and
understanding the physical and natural world. Lower secondary students are introduced to scientific
endeavor to develop their understanding of how science is practiced and applied, and are provided
with further hands-on learning opportunities situated in everyday contexts. This allows students to
make connections in science with their own lives and the environment. Exhibit 5 presents a summary
of the topics to be learned under each theme by the end of Grade 8 (Secondary 2).
laboratories and in the business and community sectors through the Teacher Work Attachment
program.c Through local or overseas attachments, teachers gain new experiences and bring back
fresh perspectives to their classrooms that also benefit their students.
The MOE encourages the growth of a teacher-led culture of professional excellence and
innovation. The establishment of the Academy of Singapore Teachers in 2010 was a significant step
toward achieving this aim. This teacher-led academy fosters pedagogical leadership focused on
teacher collaboration within schools and professional networks. It also aims to strengthen the culture
of teaching excellence and raise the standards of practice in the classroom and across Singapore’s
education system.
Use of Technology
The Singapore Masterplan for Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in Education
provides guidelines on utilizing ICT in teaching and learning. The fourth (and latest) Masterplan for
ICT in Education (mp4), introduced in 2015, builds on the foundation of the first three master plans.
Incorporating insights from extensive reviews and stakeholder consultations, it seeks to optimize the
use of ICT in learning and in supporting the total curriculum. The master plan reflects the changing
educational landscape and developments in educational technology, and the MOE’s directive to help
students develop 21st century competencies and build a broad and deep foundation and lifelong love
for learning.
Since 2008, electronic calculators have been introduced in Grade 5 (Primary 5). At the primary
level, calculators are used in mathematics to enhance the teaching and learning process, and to allow
students to focus on problem solving instead of routine computations. At the secondary level,
students use a variety of mathematical tools, including calculators, graphing software, dynamic
geometry software, and spreadsheets. The use of calculators and other computational tools does not
diminish the emphasis on mental and manual calculations. The development of these skills remains a
priority; students are expected to develop and apply number sense and estimation skills to verify the
reasonableness of answers obtained using calculators.
In science at both the primary and secondary levels, the use of ICT supports the inquiry process
and facilitates student collaboration and self-directed learning. ICT devices, such as data loggers, for
example, are used to facilitate data collection and analysis. Online collaborative tools allow students
to share and discuss their ideas or findings, and extend their learning through consultation with
experts in the field. Students also explore and visualize abstract concepts using animation and
simulation tools to manipulate variables and define relationships between them.
conduct at least two summative assessments per year—one at the end of each semester. For formative
assessments, teachers adopt a variety of subject-appropriate assessment methods, such as oral
presentations, written tests, and portfolios. Formative assessments allow teachers to monitor student
progress, identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide meaningful and immediate feedback. They
also allow teachers to adapt teaching methods and materials to student needs and abilities.
Schools closely monitor student progress and work closely with parents to support student
learning. Parents are updated regularly through progress reports, personal phone calls, and school-
organized parent-teacher meetings.
National examinations aligned with the national curriculum are administered in the final years of
primary, secondary, and preuniversity education. The Singapore Examinations and Assessment
Board, in collaboration with the MOE, conducts the following national examinations: the PSLE, GCE
N-Level, GCE O-Level, and GCE A-Level.26
learning difficulties) in various domains of learning for different groups of students. Insights from
TIMSS are shared with mathematics and science department heads. Teachers work together to devise
teaching and learning approaches that address the student learning difficulties identified by the
study.
Where appropriate, TIMSS data provide the MOE with an additional source of information to
inform policy and program reviews. For example, historical TIMSS data were used to investigate
shifts in pedagogical practice in science before and after a system-wide implementation of an
inquiry-based approach. Similarly, as TIMSS 2015 coincided with the implementation of the revised
secondary mathematics curriculum for eighth grade students, data from national items in the Student
and Teacher Questionnaires will be used to identify any early impact of the syllabus changes on
teaching and learning in the classrooms.
References
1
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). About us. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/about/
2
Goh, C. T. (1997). Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th international conference on
thinking. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/1997/020697.htm
3
Early Childhood Development Agency, Singapore. (2013). Early years development framework for child care centres.
Retrieved from https://www.ecda.gov.sg/growatbeanstalk/Documents/EYDF%20eng_secured.pdf
4
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2012). Nurturing early learners: A curriculum framework for kindergartens in
Singapore. Retrieved on from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-
source/document/education/preschool/files/kindergarten-curriculum-framework.pdf
5
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (March 20, 2012). Press release on “Raising the quality of kindergartens: Greater
MOE support.” Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/raising-the-quality-of-
kindergartens--greater-moe-support
6
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2014). MOE Kindergarten: Our vision and mission. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/microsites/moekindergarten/about-us/our-vision-and-mission.html
7
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2016).
Education system. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system
8
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (April 14, 2014). Parliamentary reply on “Student drop-out rate for primary,
secondary and ITE levels.” Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/parliamentary-replies/student-drop-out-
rate-for-primary--secondary-and-ite-levels
9
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). Education statistics digest 2015. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/publications/education-statistics-digest/esd-2015.pdf
10
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). Education statistics digest 2015. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/publications/education-statistics-digest/esd-2015.pdf
11
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). Education statistics digest 2015. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/publications/education-statistics-digest/esd-2015.pdf
12
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). Education statistics digest 2015. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/publications/education-statistics-digest/esd-2015.pdf
13
Higher Education Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2012). Report of the Committee on University
Education Pathways Beyond 2015 (CUEP): Greater diversity, more opportunities (final report). Retrieved from
http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/files/2012/08/cuep-report-greater-diversity-more-opportunities.pdf
14
Shanmugaratnam, T. (2015). Budget speech 2015: Building our future, strengthening social security. Retrieved from
http://www.singaporebudget.gov.sg/budget_2015/budgetspeech.aspx
15
Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. (2014). M850001: Indicators on education and
literacy, annual, 1995−2014. Retrieved from
http://www.tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/publicfacing/createDataTable.action?refId=967
16
Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. (2001). Census of population 2000 statistical
release 2: Education, language and religion. Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-
and-papers/cop2000/cop2000r2
17
Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. (2011). Census of population 2010 statistical
release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Retrieved from
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-
library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf
18
Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. (2011). Census of population 2010 statistical
release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Retrieved from
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-
library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf
19
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2006). Mathematics syllabus primary. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/2007-mathematics-
%28primary%29-syllabus.pdf
20
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2012). Mathematics syllabus primary one to four: Implementation starting with
2013 primary one cohort. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-
source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/mathematics-syllabus-(primary-1-to-4).pdf
21
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2008). Science syllabus primary 2008. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-
2008.pdf
22
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2013). Science syllabus primary 2014. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-
2014.pdf
23
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (September 23, 2014). Press release on “Growing our teachers, building our
nation.” Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/growing-our-teachers--building-our-
nation
24
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2016). Approved textbook list. Retrieved from
https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/approved-textbook-list
25
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). Resources to support mainstream students with special needs. Retrieved
from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/programmes/support-for-children-special-needs
26
Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. (2015). National examinations. Retrieved from
https://www.seab.gov.sg/pages/nationalExaminations/PSLE/general_information.asp