Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English 2-Sarjana-Week 12 Material
English 2-Sarjana-Week 12 Material
DISCUSSION
WEEK 12
Overview
Review : Methodology
Writing: Results and Discussion
Practice
The results section is where you report the findings/results of your study based upon
the methodology you applied to gather information.
The results section should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical
sequence without bias or interpretation.
In general, the content of your results section should include the following:
Introductory context for understanding the results by restating the research problem
underpinning your study.
This is useful in re-orientating the reader's focus back to the research problem after reading the literature
review and your explanation of the methods of data gathering and analysis.
Inclusion of non-textual elements, such as, figures, charts, photos, maps, tables,
etc. to further illustrate key findings, if appropriate.
A systematic description of your results, highlighting for the reader observations
that are most relevant to the topic under investigation.
A short paragraph that concludes the results section by synthesizing the key
findings of the study.
Use the past tense when referring to your results. Reference to findings should
always be described as having already happened because the method of gathering
data has been completed.
interprets the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the
research problem being investigated and to explain any new understanding or insights
that emerged as a result of your study of the problem.
highlights the importance of your study and how it can contribute to understanding the
research problem within the field of study
The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes:
Explanation of results: comment on whether or not the results were expected for
each set of findings; go into greater depth to explain findings that were unexpected or
especially profound.
References to previous research: either compare your results with the findings from
other studies or use the studies to support a claim. This can include re-visiting key
sources already cited in your literature review section.
Deduction: A claim for how the results can be applied more generally. For example,
describing lessons learned, proposing recommendations that can help improve a
situation, or highlighting best practices.
Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion
section of your paper:
Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to
theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used
when describing the research problem in your introduction.
Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings of your study are
important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the
research problem.
Vitasari, P., Wahab, M.N., Othman, A.,Herawan, T., Sinnadurai, S.K. (2010).The
Relationship between Study Anxiety and Academic Perfomance among Engineerring
Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/results