Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 40

Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses Definitions

Environmental Deterioration
…result of chemical interaction with its climate or environment…

Page 41
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses Definitions

Fatigue Damage
…cracks due to cyclic loading and subsequent propagation.

Page 42
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses Definitions

Wear Damage
Physical deterioration of the surface of an item due to relative motion
between two parts in contact.

Page 43
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


IN-SERVICE
EXPERIENCE
INFORMATION
DESIGN

FATIGUE
& DAMAGE
TOLERANCE
TEST RESULTS EVALUATIONS
Page 44
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses AIRCRAFT


STRUCTURE

Significant YES NO Other


SELECTION Significant?
Structure Structure

Document the Significant


DOCUMENTATION
Structure (SSD)

Identify Strutural
IDENTIFICATION
Significant Items (SSI)

Perform SSI
ANALYSIS
MSG-3 Analysis

Resulting
RESULTS
Requirements

Structure To be considered
by Zonal WG
MPP

Page 45
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


DAMAGE SOURCES
ACCIDENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL FATIGUE
DAMAGE DETERIORATION DAMAGE

SUSCEPTIBILITY
EVALUATION

DAMAGE
DETECTABILITY

EFFECT ON
CONTINUING
AIRWORTHINESS

Page 46
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


individual SSI Analysis
Each type of deterioration/damage is analysed separately:
METALLIC NON-METALLIC METALLIC & NON-METALLIC

ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE


ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

ED/CPCP ED (“Aging”) ED/CPCP ED (“Aging”)


ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

FATIGUE DAMAGE FATIGUE DAMAGE


ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

Page 47
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


Corrosion Prevention Control Programme (CPCP)

ATA MSG-3
Operator/Manufacturer
Scheduled
Maintenance
Development

Revision 2

April 1988
November 1993
Objective of CPCP: “control corrosion to Level 1 or better”
Level 1 Corrosion
Corrosion damage that does not require structural reinforcement or replacement,
Or
Corrosion occurring between successive inspections that exceeds allowable limits but is local
and can be attributed to an event not typical of operator's usage of other aircraft in the same
fleet (e.g. mercury spillage).
Page 48
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


Consolidated ED / CPCP Requirement
ED INSPECTION CPCP
REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT
• INSPECTION LEVEL • INSPECTION LEVEL
• THRESHOLD • CPCP THRESHOLD
• INTERVAL • INTERVAL
• Sampling (Y/N) • TPS Application (Y/N).

ED/CPCP CONSOLIDATED
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT

• INSPECTION LEVEL
SAMPLING
• THRESHOLD (Y/N)
• INTERVAL
• TPS Application (Y/N)
• CPCP THRESHOLD (100% Threshold)
Page 49
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT
SSI
STRUCTRURE STRUCTURE
ANALYSIS
SELECTION DOSSIER
FORMS
FORMS FORMS

Page 50
Maintenance Program Development

Structure MSG3 analyses


SSD SSI SSI SSI

AD AD AD
ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

ED/CPCP ANALYSIS ED/CPCP ANALYSIS ED/CPCP ANALYSIS

ED (“Aging”) ED (“Aging”) ED (“Aging”)


ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

FATIGUE DAMAGE FATIGUE DAMAGE FATIGUE DAMAGE


ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS

CONSOLIDATION TASKS
Page 51
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal MSG3 analyses

Page 52
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal MSG3 analyses

General Principles

The Zonal Inspection Requirements = General Visual Inspection


(GVI) requirements for each aircraft zone to check system and
power plant installations , wiring (EWIS- Electrical Wiring
Interconnection Systems) for security and general condition and
structure for general condition

Page 53
Maintenance Program Development
Zonal MSG3 analyses
The Aircraft is sub-divided into major zones:
e.g A380: 8 Major Zones (External)
100 Lower half of fuselage to rear pressure bulkhead
200 Upper half of fuselage to rear pressure bulkhead
200
300 Fuselage tail section and stabilizers 500
400 800

400 Power Plant, Nacelles and Pylons 800


100

500 Left Wing 400


300
600 Right Wing 800
600
800
700 Landing Gear & Landing Gear Doors 800
800
800 Doors
Major Sub-Zones (Internal)
Sub-divisions of the Major Zones, e.g. 100 is divided into 110, 120, 130,..
Zones
Sub-divisions of Major Sub-Zones, e.g.
120 is divided into 121, 122, 123,..
Page 54
Maintenance Program Development

Enhanced Zonal (EZAP)


wiring and wiring installations within
the Zone

Zonal Analysis Procedure

Page 55
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal Maintenance Requirements

GVI: General Visual Inspection


Visual examination to detect obvious unsatisfactory
conditions and discrepancies in the zone

DET: DETailed Inspection


Full examination of a specific component,
installation or assembly to find damage, failure or
defect.
RST: ReSToration tasks (e.g. cleaning, discard)
Bring the Wiring and Wiring Installation conditions
back to their original Standard

FNC: FuNCtional check


Quantitative test (continuity check-Impedance
loop) to determine if one or more functions of an
item performs within specified limits.
Page 56
Maintenance Program Development

Standard Zonal
To detect degradation of
the whole zone (Structure,
equipment, wiring, L/HIRF
protection, bonding leads,
grounding points, ...)

4 major parameters to be considered


•Accidental Damage exposure
GVI
•Environmental Deterioration Exposure
•Zone Density
•Importance of the components installed in the zone
Page 57
Maintenance Program Development

Enhanced Zonal
•Detect wiring
degradation Æ
G Route to electrical ignition
Engine
Generator source
•Avoid combustible
material accumulation
P Route with increased wiring
Crossover related risk of fire
Note: appropriate attention
M&S is given to safety related
Routes to deterioration of wiring and
Engine etc.
wirings installation (Electrical
Wiring Interconnection
4 major parameters to be considered Systems, EWIS)

•Accidental Damage exposure


•Environmental Deterioration Exposure
•Zone Density (EWIS Inspect ability) GVI DET RST
•Potential fire effect on adjacent Wiring and Systems
Page 58
Maintenance Program Development
L HIRF
(Lightning) (High Intensity Radiated Fields)
MRB
and
Aircraft certification
offices

manufacturer to identify an appropriate method capable to confirm that in-


service operation will not reduce the HIRF and Lightning protection to a level
that is inadequate to maintain Type Certification objectives

1.Identification of dedicated maintenance tasks if needed Æ MRBR


2.Identification of a ‘Lightning/HIRF protection Assurance Plan’ Æ specific
tests on a representative sample of the world fleet at specified intervals
Page 59
Maintenance Program Development

L/HIRF maintenance tasks


To detect L/HIRF protection degradation
Aircraft Structure continuity, metal to metal contact
, bonding leads and Metallic networks for Composite
Structures.
Electrical wiring protection Raceways and Braided
conduits -Individual shielding for engine cables in
exposed areas.
Equipment protection clamping and filtering devices
at inputs/outputs prevent damage from
voltage/current resulting from Lightning and HIRF in
addition to the inherent equipment protection.
Systems architecture increasing the non-
susceptibility of Systems to HIRF and Lightning
effects by Segregation of electrical wiring routes

2 major parameters to be considered


•Accidental Damage exposure
•Environmental Deterioration Exposure FNC
Page 60 GVI DET
Maintenance Program Development

L/HIRF assurance plan


Objectives

1. Scheduled maintenance program is adequate to keep the


electromagnetic protection at a satisfactory level.
2. Design of the electromagnetic protection is robust and not susceptible
to any systematic degradation.

The tests carried out in the frame of the Assurance Plan consist in measuring the loop
impedance made by the protection element (e.g. a braided conduit or a raceway)
and its bonding to the aircraft structure. This impedance is representative of the
protection element integrity and efficiency.
Loop Impedance
Clamp

Loop Resistance
Tester (LRT)

Page 61
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal MSG3 analyses Consolidation


• List of aircraft zones
• Analysis type (Standard, Enhanced, L/HIRF)
(Zone selection)

Zone number: XXX, YYY:


• Description / access
• Contains (structure items, systems components,
wiring, L/HIRF protection elements) (Zone description)

L/HIRF ZONAL ENHANCED STANDARD ZONAL STRUCTURE SYSTEM & POWERPLANT


ANALYSIS ZONAL ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

Stand-alone GVI’s, GVI’s GVI’s & VCK’s


DET’s & RST

Task consolidation Task consolidation


(Consolidation)

System & Powerplant Zonal Program


Program
Page 62
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal MSG3 analyses


Failure modes not identified
through the SSI/MSI
analysis but naturally
inspected by the zonal

• Failure modes identified


through the SSI/MSI
analysis but naturally
inspected by the zonal
(e.g. corrosion)
• MSI/SSI tasks transferred
into the zonal program

Page 63
Maintenance Program Development
The MRB Report

Systems & Zonal &


Structure
Powerplant L/HIRF

Page 64
Maintenance Program Development

MWG
activities
completed Manufacturer
develops the ISC validates
+ MRB Report MRBR
Proposal proposal
ISC validates
MWG results

Authorities
approve the
MRB Report

Page 65
Maintenance Program Development
The MRB Report

Page 66
Maintenance Program Development
The MRB Report
Administration pages:
 Approval Letters,
 Record of Revisions,
 Summary of changes from previous revision,
 List of Effective Pages
Section A: Introduction
 Purpose & Scope
 A350 Models covered
 Reference to the basis (MSG3 revision, PPH)
 Aircraft Utilization Assumptions
 Revision Policies
 Overall Document Description
Section B: General Rules that Apply to Sections C, D & E

Page 67
Maintenance Program Development

Systems &
Powerplant

Page 68
Maintenance Program Development

Structure

Page 69
Maintenance Program Development

Zonal &
L/HIRF

Page 70
Maintenance Program Development
The MRB Report

Section F: Requirements for U.S. Operators


 Contains additional requirements which must be embodied
by the US certificated Operators to complement the ones
listed in sections A, B, C, D and E of the MRB Report.

Page 71
Maintenance Program Development
A typical Maintenance Programme development planning

Operators’ needs

Flight test

Page 72
Maintenance Program Development

9 5 training sessions
9 4 MRB meetings
9 10 ISC meetings
9 53 MWG meetings

More then 800 MSG


analysis dossiers
reviewed

Representing more
than 8000 meeting
man-days

1st complete MPP


available and
submitted prior to 1st
Flight
Page 73
Maintenance Program Development
The MRBR process
has demonstrated added value and efficiency

Is adapted to the operators’ needs and constraints

Permanently evolves to remain adapted and efficient

Potential consequences of reduced operator participation


Initial program not validated by global operations

Future program changes won’t be driven by operators

Less sharing of in-service experience

Without Operator’s active participation the MRB process may die!


Risk of a more-conservative Maintenance Program
Page 74
Maintenance Program Development

Even before the start of the MRBR process Maintenance Engineers get
involved in Aircraft design development

Page 75
Example: A350 V&V
Maintenance Program Development

Information is available on line and/or on physical media (DVD)

On Line access available via AirbusWorld

Page 76
Maintenance Program Development

Access to MRBR

“Maintenance & Engineering” Page

Page 77
Maintenance Program Development

Access to MRBR

“Prepare Maintenance
Prepare Maintenance Program”

Page 78
Maintenance Program Development

Access to MRBR

Review Airbus Maintenance Requirements

Access MRB Report and associated compliance documents

Page 79
Maintenance Program Development

Access to MRBR
MRB Reports available in PDF version and MS XLS (tables)

Page 80

You might also like