The Pontifical and Royal

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
Espana, Manila

Second Year, Second Semester 2016-2017

DESIGN 4 – MAJOR PLATE NO. 2

Guadalupe Multimodal Transport Terminal

TIMELINE:
Launching Date: March 6-11, 2017
Submission of Research Work: March 20-25, 2017
Submission Date: April 18-22, 2017
Mode of Presentation: Individual, Manual Drawing, Pen and ink

PROJECT BRIEF:

Transportation is a locality's lifeline. It brings people to school or work, leisure or recreation. It

conveys goods to the marketplace then to our own homes to enrich and sustain us. We need access
to the entire area and so transit is essential. Keep in mind, though, that every transit trip begins and
ends with a walk. Multimodal transport system is the use of several modes of movement from one
area to another in a certain amount of time in a single trip. This includes walking, cycling,
automobile and mass transit, among others.

The “general theory of walkability” by urban planner Jeff Speck is these four ideas that should
simultaneously work together: proper reason to walk, the walk has to be and feel safe, it has to be
comfortable, and the walk has to be interesting (Speck, 2013). Such mindset could be applied to all
nodes that take one from origin to destination. The main objective in public transport and road
network management is safeguarding social welfare. It is interesting to note, as well, that developed
countries have a complex transit system so successful that those with the luxury to own cars opt to
use public transport.

Metro Manila covers such massive land area and bears notoriety in traffic congestion and
inconvenient mass transport systems. With sprawling development across those sixteen cities,
residents must travel far and wide to get to school or work. The infrastructure may exist but the
organization is lacking so most choose to travel by means of private vehicle. The cost may be high,
and the length of travel extensive, but it is undoubtedly easier than the blistering walk from loading
bays or transport terminals far apart, the transfer of vehicles multiple times at hazardous areas,
mind-numbing, if not frightening, routes one must tolerate before reaching their destination.

The local government in partnership with a private enterprise has this, Guadalupe Multimodal
Transport Terminal, as one of its many endeavors in their socio-economic growth aspirations
following the Eco2 Cities Initiative by World Bank.

DESIGN 4 Page 1 of 9
 The specific term eco city, in use since the early 1970s, has been loosely used to
refer to cities that adopt any combination of environmentally progressive
measures, such as achieving a greater percentage of green space for residents,
constructing a pedestrian- and transit-friendly transportation system, or requiring
buildings to become more energy efficient.
Eco2 refers not only to a fusion of economic and ecological strategies, but to a step
forward in the long path toward a complete and lasting approach to sustainable
development. (World Bank, 2010)

Offering commute as more appealing and convenient to the public could improve the different
aspects of one’s life significantly; ease in mobility for all should be a priority in any local- and nation-
wide plan for its comprehensive effects not only to the society, environment, and economy. The
multimodal transport terminal is a noteworthy strategy for a thriving community architecture that
could endure for generations to come.

PROJECT GOAL:
To be able to contribute to the general order of a community through architecture

PROJECT OBJECTIVES:

1. To provide a well-planned multimodal terminal facility and related public spaces that
will help ease traffic, promote commute and pedestrian-friendly communities;
2. To promote a transit-oriented development through spaces and designs that enhance the
travelling public’s experience seeking to apply Green Architecture more; and
3. To integrate innovations in the way people move and use spaces, forward-looking on
how one travels using various modes of transportation; unimpeded by the current
surroundings of the location.

PROJECT SITE:

Makati is a vibrant city with diverse types of people engaging in a myriad of activities, several transit
modes are available but hardly taken advantage of. The proposed site is along J.P. Rizal Avenue with
the Pasig River Ferry Terminal Guadalupe Station just across the avenue and the Metro Rail Transit
(MRT) Guadalupe Station approximately 200 meters to the West on Epifanio Delos Santos Avenue.

It is on a long stretch of road that links the Central Business District of Makati to the booming
progressive city of Taguig and the highly residential cities of Mandaluyong and Pasig, with Ortigas
Center an unrecognized success in mixed-development. The demand for an efficient and
straightforward public transportation system is undeniable as people cross these boundaries
everyday, possibly numerous instances in a less than 24 hours.

Located amidst the informal settlers along the creek at Barangay Cembo in Makati, remember that
the clients aim to develop the neighborhood, uplifting the community through space and design.
Kindly refer to Figure 1 for the technical details of the proposed site for your reference.

DESIGN 4 Page 2 of 9
 Technical details of the proposed site with
approximately 5,000 square meters lot area:

Point 1: 40.0 meters West

Point 2: 73.0 meters North
Point 3: 3.0 meters 69.19 degrees Northwest
Point 4: 50.0 meters 6.18 degrees Northwest
Point 5: 6.0 meters 83.82 degrees Northeast
Point 6: 15.0 meters 11.27 degrees Northwest
Point 7: 14.0 meters 78.73 degrees Northeast
Point 8: 60.0 meters 30.5 degrees Southeast
Point 9 to Point 1

Figure 1 – PROPOSED SITE

DESIGN OBJECTIVES & DESIGN CONCEPT:

Formulate your own Design Objectives and Design Concept based on your Design
Philosophy.

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:

1. Lobby
1.1. Reception
1.2. Information counter
1.3. Ticketing or booking area/fare payment systems
1.4. Public lounge
2. Public Utility Vehicles facilities
2.1. Jeepney loading/unloading area
2.2. Jeepney waiting area
2.3. Utility Van (UV Express) loading/unloading area
2.4. Utility Van (UV Express) waiting area
2.5. Taxi/Grab/Uber vehicle loading/unloading area
2.6. Taxi/Grab/Uber vehicle waiting area
2.7. Pasig River Ferry Terminal Guadalupe Station connector

DESIGN 4 Page 3 of 9
 2.8. MRT Guadalupe Station connector
3. Rentable amenities
3.1. Commercial spaces
3.2. Individual/Personal storage areas
3.3. Bike storage area
3.4. Shower lounge
4. Administration area
4.1. Satellite offices for public transit operators
4.2. Accounting/Finance area
4.3. Managers area
4.4. General work area
4.5. Conference Room
4.6. Engineering area
4.7. Staff lounge and lockers
5. Clinic
6. Canteen
7. Service bays (quick service for vehicles)
8. Building Core & MEPF spaces
9. Other areas you find necessary for this type of project

The Building Core serves all users of the building, usually includes public toilets, ventilation shafts,
electrical distribution, elevator shafts, and stairwells. The Clients would like to maximize open
spaces on the site, enrich the community through space and design.

RESEARCH REQUIREMENT:

Supplemental research is required for this project, the content of which are as follows:
I. General transport terminal design information
II. Design and planning codes/standards for Terminal facilities
III. At least 2 local and 2 foreign case studies
IV. Historical development of the public transport of the Metro and local transport plans
V. Other vital information the researchers would like to add
Bibliography/References

Research requirement shall be conducted and submitted individually or by a pair. Prepare the final
output in A3 paper (landscape format) with body text size no bigger than 14 pt Arial or Times New
Roman. Make sure there is a balance of narrative and illustrative content, and the layout of the
pages is easy to read. Provide a title page, with clear acetate front cover. Staple or ring bound.
Submission date is within the week of March 20-25, 2017.

DRAWING REQUIREMENTS:

1. Concept Sheet which must contain the following: Major Plate title, Specific Name of the Project,
Project Brief, Explanation of the Design Philosophy with your Design Concept, Design Objectives,
illustrated explanation of your design solutions, discussion of Theory of Architecture principles
of design used, design considerations and other articulations to express your thoughts about
your final output (such as but not limited to behavior analysis, space program, matrix, bubble
diagram, traffic analysis, diagrammatic flow patterns, site analysis, orientation considerations:
views, wind, solar angles, among others).
2. Site Development Plan, scale 1:300 mts., rendered
3. Floor Plan/s, scale 1:200 mts., rendered.
4. Two (2) Site Elevations, scale 1:200 mts., rendered.

DESIGN 4 Page 4 of 9
 5. Two (2) Site Sections, scale 1:200 mts., rendered.
6. Fully-rendered Interior Perspective of any vital area of the project WITH ENTOURAGE
7. Fully-rendered Exterior Perspectives WITH ENTOURAGE using the largest possible scale.

Note:
1.) The scale indicated above is the estimated BEST POSSIBLE SCALE to be used for the said drawing
requirements. If you have concerns regarding the drawing scale (i.e. too small or too big), kindly confer with your
Design professor. Adjustment of drawing scale will be allowed for as long as it will not compromise the legibility
of the drawings.
2.) All items above shall be drawn on 20” x 30” tracing or specialty paper.

DETAILED SCHEDULE:

Week Inclusive Dates Activities

9 Mar. 06 – 11, 2017 LAUNCHING OF MAJOR PLATE NO. 2
Research Works, Esquisse

10 Mar. 13 – 18, 2017 PRELIMINARY EXAM WEEK

Drafting Works, Esquisse

11 Mar. 20 – 25, 2017 STUDIO WORKS

Individual Consultation of Developing Designs
Submission of Research Work
12 Mar. 27 – Apr. 01, 2017 STUDIO WORKS/ SUBMISSION OF RESEARCH WORK
Individual Consultation of Developing Designs

13 Apr. 03 – 08, 2017 STUDIO WORKS

Individual Consultation of final Site Development Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations,
Sections, Perspectives, Concept Sheets
Apr. 10 – 15, 2017 EASTER BREAK
Finalization works

14 Apr. 17 – 22, 2017 SUBMISSION OF MAJOR PLATE NO. 2 (First Meeting)

Apr. 17 (end of Easter Break) LAUNCHING OF MINOR PLATE NO. 3 (Second Meeting)
Research Works, Esquisse

References:
Speck, J. (2013, October). Jeff Speck: 4 ways to make a city more walkable [Video file]. Retrieved from
https://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_speck_4_ways_to_make_a_city_more_walkable#t-1105272
Suzuki, Hiroaki; Dastur, Arish; Moffatt, Sebastian; Yabuki, Nanae; Maruyama, Hinako. (2010). Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities. World Bank.
World Bank.

Acknowledgement:
Conceptual Diagram of Architectural Design Major Plate Undertaking as prepared by Ar. Andrea Amador based on the suggestion of the participants of
the July 28, 2016 Joint Architectural Design-Prof Prac Clusters Faculty Workshop.

For further info, please get in touch with our Design Cluster Coordinators:
Arch. ANDREA RUIZA AMADOR – Coordinator for Design 2
Arch. CLARISSA LORENZO – Coordinator for Design 4
Arch. RINO FERNANDEZ – Coordinator for Design 6
Arch. JONATHAN MANALAD – Design Cluster Chair, Coordinator for Design 8
Email: arkidesigncluster@gmail.com, SMS: 0917-8780622

Prepared by: Noted by:

AR. CLARISSA M. LORENZO AR. JONATHAN V. MANALAD

DESIGN 4 Page 5 of 9
Design 3-4 Coordinator Cluster Head for Architectural Design

DESIGN 4 Page 6 of 9
DESIGN 4 Page 7 of 9
 The Pontifical and Royal
UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
Espana, Manila

GRADING PROTOCOL FOR ARCHITECTURAL

DESIGN COURSES IN OBE MODE

General
1. The course facilitators will exert every effort to assist the students enrolled in the course.
Encouragement and motivation shall be extended to everyone.
2. The course facilitators shall set the exact date and time for the submission of the plates
(major plates, minor plates, research works, among others) as prescribed by the Design
Cluster in its general calendar. The students are enjoined to properly observe these
deadlines.

Submission:
3. The deadline set by the course facilitators is final. No extension will be given,
except for the following cases:
a. Sickness or accident of the student that will require confinement;
b. Death in the family up to the second degree of affinity (child, parent, brother,
sister, grandparents) or consanguinity (spouse, parent-in-law).
c. Others that the course facilitator or the Design Cluster may deem as highly valid or
very reasonable.
The course facilitator or the Design Cluster may require certificate as a proof of the
above-stated cases.

4. Under the cases above (a, b or c), the student is given another 7 calendar days to submit
from the day he/she reported back to class. If he/she complies, it will not be treated as a
late plate and therefore the work shall be assessed accordingly. If he submits beyond the
prescribed due date, it is treated as a late plate.

5. All late plates shall follow the PASS or FAIL rule detailed in Item 9 below.

6. If a student does not submit the plate, it will automatically be considered FAIL and will
receive a grade of 50.00

7. The College recognizes that there are students who can prepare quality works ahead of
time. A student therefore may submit a plate earlier than the deadline. The plate will be
similarly evaluated as detailed in Item no. 8 below.
a. There are no extra credits for submitting early.
b. In the true spirit of OBE, he/ she may then proceed in doing the initial research for
the next major plate / activity as a way to advance to the next activity.
c. The student, in spite of early submittal, is still required to attend the remaining
class meetings prior to the actual submission of the plate.

DESIGN 4 Page 8 of 9
Assessment:
8. The course facilitators will then assess the work submitted within 7 – 14 calendar days
based on the following:
a. The work, finished or not finished, is assessed according to the standard grading
rubrics from the Design Cluster.
b. Should the student pass, the grade that he receives is final. Following the rubrics,
it may be between 75.00 to 100.00
c. Should the student fail, the grade that he receives may be between 50.00 to 74.99
d. No rounding off of the grade is allowed at any time.

9. If a student fails, he/she has the option to resubmit the plate, by enhancing the
corrections mentioned by the course facilitator.
a. The work may be resubmitted anytime within the given semester.
b. A resubmitted plate will follow the PASS or FAIL rule. The standard grading
rubrics will not be used anymore for resubmitted works. If the resubmitted work has, at the
minimum, met the general objectives of the plate according to the assessment of the course
facilitator, it will receive a maximum grade of 75.00 (or Pass). If the resubmitted work, even
at the bare minimum, still has not met the objectives of the plate, it will receive a grade of
50.00 (or Fail).
This may be repeated in unlimited number of times within the term.

10. All concerns regarding this grading protocol shall be referred to the Design Cluster.

DESIGN 4 Page 9 of 9