Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Book Review 3 Roberts1990
Book Review 3 Roberts1990
Book Review 3 Roberts1990
they provide the most complete documentation of the fleet lists of the
seven firms. This book is surely a useful and indispensable contribu-
tion to the study of modern Chinese maritime history.
All but one of the ten essays in this volume have appeared elsewhere.
They are not arranged in the order in which they were written,
however, and instead begin with a chapter first published in 1974 on
"Strategic Uses of the Sea--Patterns and Options." The next three
chapters discuss various aspects of what Professor Reynolds calls the
"thalassocracies," that is, the maritime states of Minoa from 1600-1400
B.c., Athens in the fifth century B.C., Venice and Florence from 1200
to 1500, Great Britain from 1650-1900, and the United States. Four
chapters are devoted to the national, or maritime, strategies used by
these countries (particularly the United States) against their continen-
tal enemies. In two separate essays the author also examines the
strategies used by Japan ("The Continental State upon the Sea:
Imperial Japan") and the Soviet Union ("Eight Centuries of Continen-
tal Strategy: Imperial and Soviet Russia.") The latter was written
expressly for this book, although it was finished before Mikhail
Gorbachev came to power and does not discuss any of the startling
changes which have subsequently taken place in the world.
All of these articles reflect Reynolds's aspirations to write a
universal history that will "build upon the crude beginnings of [Alfred
Thayer] Mahan's essay" The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1680-
1783 (p. 74). Reynolds alludes to some of the shortcomings of Mahan's
work as a historian in a 1971 essay on "Captain Mahan, Thalassocratic
Determinist." These faults notwithstanding, the author boldly proclaims
Mahan to have been "a major historical philosopher" who should be
classed with the likes of Burkhardt, Dilthey, Neitzsche, Freud,
Spengler, and "his fellow countrymen Turner and Beard, whose...sub-
ject matter, American history, was much narrower than Mahan's" (p.
67).
Downloaded from ijh.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 2, 2015
Book Reviews 303
Downloaded from ijh.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 2, 2015
304 International Journal of Maritime History
argument that the citizens of maritime states are on the whole freer,
more creative, and more individualistic than people who live inland.
The fullest expression of Reynolds's views regarding "thalas-
socracies" can be found in his sweeping Command of the Sea: The
History and Strategy of Maritime Empires (New York, 1974). Indeed,
the first chapter of History and the Sea originally appeared there. The
author has since modified some of his ideas, particularly the belief that
during much of the nineteenth century the United States was a
continental power which closely resembled France. He does not
dispute the subordinate status of the U.S. Navy in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries. In chapter five, "Reconsidering American
Strategic History and Doctrines," however, he argues that "the
overriding strategic fact throughout American history down to World
War II ...is that the first line of national defense lay not in America's
Army or Navy but rather in the British Navy" (p. 112). To me this
chapter is in many ways the most rewarding in the book. Reynolds
exaggerates the role played by the Royal Navy in the nineteenth
century, but he makes two important points in this essay that anyone
who studies the armed forces would do well to consider. Military
historians often focus on a country's dominant service to the virtual
exclusion of its other armed forces. As the author clearly demonstrates
in this essay, such an approach can give a misleading picture of
national strategy and policy. Reynolds also shows in this and other
chapters that scholars who wish to understand a country's strategic
history must broaden their horizons and pay more careful attention to
enemy as well as allied plans and actions. In short, military historians
must become practitioners of comparative history, much as Reynolds
did two decades ago.
Downloaded from ijh.sagepub.com at Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan / Royal Institute of Technology on July 2, 2015