1 s2.0 S0974694313003599 Main

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jopr

Original Article

Phytochemicals and antioxidants in leaf extracts of


Ginkgo biloba with reference to location, seasonal
variation and solvent system

Priyanka Sati a, Anita Pandey a,*, Sandeep Rawat a, Anju Rani b


a
Biotechnological Applications, G. B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal,
Almora 263 643, Uttarakhand, India
b
Department of Biotechnology, Graphic Era University, Dehradun 248002, Uttarakhand, India

article info abstract

Article history: Aims: To determine the influence of location, seasonal variation and solvent system in
Received 24 June 2013 production of phytochemicals and antioxidants from ginkgo leaves.
Accepted 3 September 2013 Methods: Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity in ginkgo leaf
Available online 25 September 2013 extracts were estimated spectrophotometrically. Factorial analysis was performed to
correlate the influence of location, season and solvent on production of phytochemicals
Keywords: and antioxidants.
Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo) Results: Total phenolic and flavonoid contents as well as the antioxidants were estimated
Phytochemicals maximum in autumn. Among solvents, acetone/water extracts gave best results for
Phenolics phenolic and flavonoid contents while methanolic extracts were best for antioxidants.
Antioxidants Phenolic content, the predominant indicator of phytochemicals, showed significant cor-
Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) relation with antioxidant activity.
Conclusion: Factorial analysis among location, season and solvent with respect to the
phytochemicals and antioxidants, was found to be statistically significant. Presence of
phytochemicals along with the protective feature in the form of antioxidants is indicative
of the importance of this species in pharmacological industry.
Copyright ª 2013, JPR Solutions; Published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights
reserved.

1. Introduction food and pharmacological industry.2 Factors, such as


geographic location, age of the plant, season, associated
Medicinal plants are known potential source of many microflora, nutritional status, and environmental stress are
phenolic compounds and antioxidants. Among these, poly- known to influence the secondary metabolite profile of a
phenols in particular, have been recognized for antioxidant particular plant species. Seasonal variation in trees, for
activity and many other health benefits.1 Phenolic and fla- example from dormant to active phase, brings progressive
vonoids, as natural antioxidants and free radical scavengers, changes in traits like production of phytochemicals.3 Be-
have involved substantial interest due to their importance in sides, optimization of methods with respect to solvent

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ91 5962 241041; fax: þ91 5962 241150.
E-mail addresses: anita@gbpihed.nic.in, anitapandey333@gmail.com (A. Pandey).
0974-6943/$ e see front matter Copyright ª 2013, JPR Solutions; Published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopr.2013.09.001
j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9 805

system is important for determination or extraction of the


phytochemicals from any plant species.
A 70 ME EA n-B AW WE

60
Ginkgo biloba L. (family Ginkgoaceae), commonly known
50
as living fossil, harbors many beneficial medicinal proper-

mg/g dw
40
ties. Traditionally, it has been used on an extensive basis,
30
either as food or medicinal component, almost all over the
20
world. The leaf extract of ginkgo contains pharmaceutically
10
imperative flavonoids, glycosides and ginkgolides which
0
expand blood flow, act as antioxidant and mainly used as GB1 GB2 GB3 GB4 GB5 GB1 GB2 GB3 GB4 GB5
memory enhancer and anti-vertigo.4 The present study is Total phenolic content Total falvonoid content
focused on the evaluation of phytochemicals and antioxi-
dants in leaf extracts of ginkgo along with the factorial B 12
analysis among locations  seasons, seasons  solvents and
10
locations  solvents.
8

mg/g dw
6
2. Materials and methods
4

2
2.1. Plant material
0
GB1 GB2 GB3 GB4 GB5 GB1 GB2 GB3 GB4 GB5 GB1 GB2 GB3 GB4 GB5
Ginkgo leaves were collected in three seasons from five
ABTS DPPH FRAP
different locations referred as GB1 (Kalika, Almora), GB2
(Chaubatia, Almora), GB3 (Snow view, Nainital), GB4 (High Fig. 1 e Phytochemicals and antioxidants in ginkgo leaf
court, Nainital) and GB5 (Glenthorn, Nainital) in Uttarakhand, extracts at different locations. (A) total phenolic and
India.5 The leaves, dried at room temperature, were grounded flavonoid contents, and (B) antioxidant activity (ABTS,
to fine powder and stored at 4  C for further analysis. DPPH, FRAP).

2.2. Preparation of extracts


assay was conducted in triplicates. The value for each sample
Dried leaf powder (10 g) was mixed with 25 ml methanol (ME), was calculated as the mean  SD. Factorial analysis of vari-
ethyl acetate (EA), n-butanol (n-B), acetone/water (AW) (3:2) ance and significant difference among means were tested by
and water (aqueous/WE), separately. The leaf extract was two way ANOVA in replication. Correlation coefficients were
stirred continuously for 24 h and then filtered. The filtrate was calculated using Microsoft Excel 2007.
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant, was
stored at 4  C prior to use (within 2 days).

2.3. Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid


contents

Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were determined by


FolineCiocalteu’s and aluminum chloride calorimetric
methods, respectively6,7 following quantification on the basis of
standard curve of gallic acid and quercetin. Results are presented
in milligrams (mg) gallic acid (GAE) and quercetin (QE) equiva-
lent, respectively, per gram of leaf sample on dry weight basis.

2.4. Determination of antioxidant activity (radical


scavenging (ABTS), antiradical (DPPH) and reducing power
(FRAP) assays)

Total antioxidant activity was measured by ABTS, DPPH and


FRAP assays following methods of Cai et al8 and Amarowicz
et al9,10 Standard curve of a range of concentrations of ascorbic
acid was prepared for quantification of antioxidant potential.
Results were expressed in milligram (mg) ascorbic acid equiv-
alent (AAE) per gram of leaf sample on dry weight basis.

2.5. Statistical analysis Fig. 2 e Phytochemicals and antioxidants in ginkgo leaf


extracts in different seasons. (A) total phenolic and
Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents and flavonoid contents, and (B) antioxidant activity (ABTS,
antioxidant capacity by ABTS, DPPH and reducing power DPPH, FRAP).
806 j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9

extracts of GB3 and GB4, respectively. In WE, maximum con-


A 60 Spring Rainy Autumn
tent was for GB4 and minimum for GB1. GB3 gave maximum
50 value for n-B and GB5 for EA for total phenolic content
40 (Fig. 1A). Total flavonoids were higher in GB3 in ME and n-B,
mg/g dw

30 respectively, in comparison to GB2 and GB4. Higher flavonoid


content was in EA for GB4 and in WE for GB5 (Fig. 1A). Anti-
20
oxidant activity in ABTS was higher in ME and WE for GB2,
10
respectively. Subsequently, GB1 gave higher antioxidant ac-
0
tivity in EA and AW, respectively, while GB3 showed
ME EA n-B AW WE ME EA n-B AW WE
Total phenolic content Total falvonoid content
maximum antioxidants in n-B. Based on DPPH assay, GB3
exhibited highest values for antioxidants in n-B, AW and WE,
B 12 respectively. For GB1 and GB5, highest values were recorded in
EA and ME, respectively. In FRAP assay, GB5 showed higher
10
activity in AW and WE, respectively; GB3 in n-B; GB2 in EA and
8 GB1 in ME (Fig. 1B).
mg/g dw

6 Variations in phytochemicals arise due to the specific


4
environmental conditions, including both biotic and
abiotic.11,12 Generally, with increase in altitude, environ-
2
mental conditions such as UV radiation, temperature, rainfall,
0
moisture, etc., changes occur rapidly. The biochemicals
ME EA n-B AW WE ME EA n-B AW WE ME EA n-B AW WE
ABTS DPPH FRAP
measured in ginkgo leaf extracts, in the present study, are on
the higher side as compared to the earlier reports from other
Fig. 3 e Phytochemicals and antioxidants in ginkgo leaf countries.13,14 The 5 locations in the present study, falling
extracts in different solvents (A) total phenolic and between 1742 and 2260 m altitude representing temperate
flavonoid contents, and (B) antioxidant activity (ABTS, climatic conditions, are likely to be associated with the higher
DPPH, FRAP). contents of phytochemicals and antioxidants. Findings on
production of polyphenols and antioxidants, in respect to
environmental stress, have been linked to the defense
3. Results and discussion mechanism.15

3.1. Phytochemicals and antioxidants in ginkgo leaves 3.2. Phytochemicals and antioxidants in ginkgo leaves
at different locations in different seasons

Significant variations (p < 0.05) were observed in phyto- Total phenolic content in ginkgo leaf extracts varied signifi-
chemicals and antioxidants in leaf extracts of different loca- cantly with respect to season and organic solvent, being
tions in different solvents. In ME and AW, GB2 gave higher maximum in autumn (Fig. 2A). Phenolic content was excep-
phenolic content, while lower values were recorded in EA tionally higher in rainy and spring season in EA and n-B. Total

Table 1 e Analysis of variance for determining effect of solvents, seasons and their interaction with phytochemicals and
antioxidant activity in ginkgo leaf extracts (given as f value).
Location Source of variation df Phytochemicals Antioxidant activity

TPC TFC ABTS DPPH FRAP

GB1 Solvent (S) 4 691,936.67*** 405,216.72*** 90,893.87*** 13,656.23*** 12,737.04***


Season (S) 2 51,039.16*** 8289.85*** 24,412.81*** 3616.33*** 1129.70***
SS 8 53,096.14*** 13,357.34*** 21,752.97*** 993.04*** 491.58***
GB2 Solvent (S) 4 2,025,206.05*** 444,923.81*** 211,154.29*** 28.89*** 4065.47***
Season (S) 2 33,178.64*** 9466.39*** 5331.77*** 3.96*** 48.73***
SS 8 14,617.20*** 10,601.75*** 5790.39*** 12.78*** 36.30***
GB3 Solvent (S) 4 1,031,256.71*** 483,295.95*** 243,030.95*** 20,906.01*** 3732.14***
Season (S) 2 94,933.48*** 16,824.75*** 8065.06*** 4389.47*** 1641.31***
SS 8 116,135.97*** 27,375.31*** 15,780.63*** 910.08*** 595.57***
GB4 Solvent (S) 4 888,494.27*** 593,733.35*** 162,822.13*** 10,388.55*** 77,975.80***
Season (S) 2 44,739.59*** 56,428.10*** 10,839.66*** 808.30*** 3861.01***
SS 8 53,242.26*** 25,616.70*** 3396.54*** 1331.49*** 6377.25***
GB5 Solvent (S) 4 1,195,793.77*** 272,908.46*** 160,479.36*** 10,078.51*** 468,226.40***
Season (S) 2 4423.19*** 12,862.07*** 14,936.57*** 2754.08*** 42,617.60***
SS 8 29,119.36*** 15,369.38*** 21,628.06*** 1519.68*** 24,587.54***

df e degree of freedom; dw e dry weight; TPC e Total phenolic content; TFC e Total flavonoid content; Level of significance: *** e p < 0.001.
j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9 807

Importance of seasonal variation in accumulation of total


Table 2 e Correlation matrix between total phenolic and
flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity in ginkgo phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidants has been
leaves from 5 locations using different assays. recognized. Although a clear and regular trend due to seasonal
variation was not observed in the present study, the total
TPC TFC ABTS DPPH FRAP
phenolic content was relatively higher in autumn. Kobus et al13
TPC 1 reported higher level of polyphenols in October as compared to
TFC 0.737** 1
August. Besides, higher accumulation of phenolic and flavo-
ABTS 0.7167** 0.639** 1
noids during winter is likely to be attributed to the stress con-
DPPH 0.376* 0.1924 0.507** 1
FRAP 0.734** 0.614** 0.639** 0.602** 1 ditions such as temperature and plant growth stage. In general,
the secondary metabolites remain at low level in ginkgo during
TPC e Total phenolic contents; TFC e Total flavonoid contents;
spring and summer which are the initial stages for the growth of
Level of significance: * e p < 0.05; ** e p < 0.01.
shoots and leaves. Afterward, towards autumn and winter, as
the growth and metabolism become slower, the phytochemi-
cals tend to accumulate in higher amounts.
flavonoid content was higher in spring in 3 solvents, AW, WE
and n-B, during rainy season in ME and during autumn in EA
(Fig. 2A). Antioxidant activity performed by three assays 3.3. Optimization of solvent systems for extraction of
showed significant variation with respect to the seasons, phytochemicals and antioxidants
maximum being in ABTS and DPPH in autumn (Fig. 2B). In case
of FRAP, higher activity was recorded during spring followed The optimization experiments conducted for preference of
by autumn (Fig. 2B). solvent revealed that AW was the best solvent for extracting

A 14.0 y = 0.0963x + 6.0404


R² = 0.5128
12.0
10.0
ABTS

8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

B 1.8 y = 0.0104x + 0.5332


1.6 R² = 0.1411
1.4
1.2
DPPH

1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

C
5.0 y = 0.0439x + 0.4705
R² = 0.5384
4.0

3.0
FRAP

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

Total phenolic content

Fig. 4 e Linear relationship between total phenolic contents and antioxidants measured by (A) ABTS (B) DPPH and (C) FRAP
in ginkgo leaf extracts.
808 j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9

phenolic content in all the three seasons; followed by system has also been reported in determination of antimi-
ME > WE > n-B > EA. Similarly, total flavonoid content was crobial activity5 in ginkgo leaf extracts.
recorded highest in AW during rainy and autumn followed by Among the three assays used for determination of anti-
ME during spring (Fig. 3A). Different solvent systems also oxidant activity in the present study, ABTS gave best results
influenced the extraction of antioxidant activity in different followed by DPPH and FRAP. ABTS is soluble in both aqueous
seasons. Antioxidant activity measured by ABTS assay was and organic solvents and having reducing properties of 2, 2-
highest in ME in rainy and autumn and in WE in spring. In azinobis-(3-ethylbenzoline sulphonate) radical, in which the
DPPH assay, the activity was recorded highest in WE in all the antioxidant activity can be précised due to the hydrophilic and
seasons. Also, the reducing power assay showed higher anti- lipophilic nature of the compound. DPPH, possessing ability to
oxidant activity in AW during all the seasons (Fig. 3B). Facto- get dissolved only in organic solvent, ethanol in particular,
rial analysis exhibited that the solvents and seasons can be predicted as an imperative restriction while inter-
individually and their interaction significantly (p < 0.001) preting the role of hydrophilic antioxidants. Previous studies
influenced the accumulation of phytochemicals and antioxi- have also indicated the merits of using ABTS assay in
dant activity (Table 1). The best results obtained for extraction assessing antioxidant potential of plant extracts.18 With re-
of phytochemicals and antioxidants in AW and ME are in line gard to the FRAP, the antioxidants reduce the ferric ion/ferri-
with the earlier reports.13,16 Phenolic compounds are often cyanide complex to the ferrous form, the Perl’s Prussian blue
linked with other biomolecules, such as polysaccharides, complex. The reducing power is related to the presence of the
proteins, etc., therefore, an appropriate solvent system is compounds, which apply their action by flouting the free
required for their extraction. Polarity of different solvents is radical chain through donating hydrogen atom compounds.19
likely to have significant consequence on polyphenolic con- The reducing power of extracts prepared from ginkgo leaves
tent and antioxidant activity as well.17 Importance of solvent has been reported.20

A 14.0 y = 0.1713x + 6.5087


R² = 0.4082
12.0
10.0
8.0
ABTS

6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

B 1.8 y = 0.0107x + 0.6841


1.6 R² = 0.037
1.4
1.2
DPPH

1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

C 5.0 y = 0.0733x + 0.7463


4.5 R² = 0.3766
4.0
3.5
3.0
FRAP

2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

Total flavonoid content

Fig. 5 e Linear relationship between total flavonoid contents and antioxidants measured by (A) ABTS (B) DPPH and (C) FRAP
in ginkgo leaf extracts.
j o u r n a l o f p h a r m a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 8 0 4 e8 0 9 809

3.4. Correlations among total phenolic and flavonoid 4. van Beek TA, Montoro P. Chemical analysis and quality
contents and antioxidant activity control of Ginkgo biloba leaves, extracts and
phytopharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216:2002e2032.
5. Sati P, Pandey A, Palni LMS. Antimicrobial potential of leaf
Correlation matrix exhibited significant positive relationship
extracts of Ginkgo biloba L., growing in Uttarakhand, India.
between total phenolic and flavonoid contents and the antiox- Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2012;35:201e206.
idant activity performed by all the three assays (Table 2). Linear 6. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of
regression analysis revealed that total phenolic content con- total phenol and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants
tributes 14.1e51.2% of radical scavenging property (r2 ¼ 0.141 for by means of FolineCiocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol.
DPPH and 0.512 for ABTS) and 53.8% of reducing property 1999;299:152e178.
7. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total
(r2 ¼ 0.538) (Fig. 4AeC). Likewise, total flavonoid content con-
flavonoid content in propolis by two comparative colorimetric
tributes 3.7e40% of radical scavenging property (r2 ¼ 0.037 for
methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10:178e182.
DPPH and 0.408 for ABTS) and 37% of reducing property 8. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and
(r2 ¼ 0.376) (Fig. 5AeC). Similar findings have been reported in phenolic compounds in 112 traditional Chinese medicinal
other Himalayan species as well where total phenolic content plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004;75:2157e2184.
and antioxidant activity correlate positively.18 9. Amarowicz R, Naczk M, Shahidi F. Antioxidant activity of
crude tannins of canola and rapeseed hulls. J Am Oil Chemists’
Soc. 2000;77:957e961.
10. Amarowicz R, Pegg RB, Rahimi-Moghddam P, Barl B, Weil JA.
4. Conclusion Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of
selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food Chem.
The IHR harbors plethora of medicinal plants. While the nat- 2004;84:551e562.
ural habitat of ginkgo is in China, Japan, and Korea, some 11. Ellnain-Wojtaszek M, Kruczyn  ski Z, Kasprzak J. Investigation
established trees have been reported from the hilly areas of of free radical scavenging activity of Gingko biloba L. leaves.
IHR, maximum being in the state of Uttarakhand. Ginkgo Fitoterapia. 2003;74:1e6.
12. Kaur P, Chaudhary A, Singh RD, Prasad GRP, Singh B. Spatial
possesses high amounts of phenolic contents and high levels
and temporal variation of secondary metabolite profiles in
of gallic acid equivalents. Ginkgo trees, being in limited num- Ginkgo biloba leaves. Chem Biodiversity. 2012;9:409e417.
ber and growing under low temperature climatic conditions, 13. Kobus J, Flaczyk E, Siger A, Kalucka MK, Korczak J, Pegg RB.
extend opportunity to make use of these trees for under- Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of extracts of
standing the physiological aspects, such as accumulation of ginkgo leaves. European J Lipid Sci Technol. 2009;111:1150e1160.
phytochemicals, production of antimicrobials, with emphasis 14. Maltas E, Vural HC, Yildiz S. Antioxidant activity and fatty
acid composition of Ginkgo biloba from Turkey. J Food Biochem.
on propagation and conservation of the species.5,21,22,23
2011;35:803e818.
15. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, et al. How plants cope with
water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot.
Conflicts of interest 2002;89:907e916.
16. Maltas E, Yildiz S. Evaluation of phytochemicals and
All authors have none to declare. antioxidant activity of Ginkgo biloba from Turkey.
Pharmacologia. 2012;3:113e120.
17. Sultana B, Anwar F, Ashraf M. Effect of extraction solvent/
technique on the antioxidant activity of selected medicinal
Acknowledgments plant extracts. Molecules. 2009;14:2167e2180.
18. Rawat S, Bhatt ID, Rawal RS. Total phenolic compounds and
Director, GB Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and antioxidant potential of Hedychium spicatum Butch. Ham. Ex D.
Don in west Himalaya, India. J Food Compost Anal.
Development, Almora, is gratefully acknowledged for
2011;24:574e579.
extending the facilities. Council of Scientific and Industrial 19. Chu Y, Chang C, Hsu H. Flavonoid content of several
Research and Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of vegetables and their antioxidant activity. J Sci Food Agricul.
India are thanked for financial support. 2000;80:561e566.
20. Stefanovits-Bányai É, Szentmihályi K, Hegedu SA, et al. Metal
ion and antioxidant alterations in leaves between different
references sexes of Ginkgo biloba L. Life Sci. 2006;78:1049e1056.
21. Kumar A, Singh S, Pandey A. General microflora, arbuscular
mycorrhizal colonization and occurrence of endophytes in
rhizosphere of two age groups of Ginkgo biloba L. of Indian
1. Pandey KB, Rizvi S. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants
central Himalaya. Ind J Microbiol. 2009;49:134e141.
in human health and disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev.
22. Pandey A, Singh S, Kumar A, Malviya MK, Rinu K. Isolation of
2009;2:270e278.
an endophytic plant growth promoting bacterium
2. Fiamegos YC, Nanos CG, Vervoort J, Stalikas CD. Analytical
Pseudomonas sp. strain gb3 (MTCC 9476) from Ginkgo biloba L.,
procedure for the in-vial derivatization-extraction of phenolic
growing in temperate Himalaya. Natl Acad Sci Lett.
acids and flavonoids in methanolic and aqueous plant
2009;32:83e88.
extracts followed by gas chromatography with mass-selective
23. Sati P, Agnihotri V, Pandey A. Optimization of temperature
detection. J Chromatogr. 2004;1041:11e18.
and time length during post chromatographic derivatization
3. Darrow K, Bowers MD. Phenological and population variation
of TLC separation of ginkgolides and bilobalide standards. J
in iridoid glycosides of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae).
Planar Chromatogr. 2013 (in press).
Biochem Syst Ecol. 1997;25:1e11.

You might also like