STRUCTURED E.A.G.L.E.

TEMPLATE FOR REVIEW JOURNAL ARTICLE

TITLE

AUTHORS INFORMATION

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

1. BACKGROUND PROBLEM

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. ABOUT SELECTED RQ-CONSTRUCT

3.1 ABOUT SUB-THEME 1 (POD 1)

3.2 ABOUT SUB-THEME 2 (POD 2)

3.3 ABOUT SUB-THEME 3 (POD 3)

4. DISCUSSIONS

3.1 ABOUT SUB-THEME 1 (POD 4)

4.2 ABOUT SUB-THEME 2 (POD 5)

4.3 ABOUT SUB-THEME 3 (POD 6)

4.4 ABOUT SUB-THEME 3 (POD 7, 8, 9)

5. CONCLUSIONS

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

7. REFERENCES
 EXPANDED STRUCTURED E.A.G.L.E. TEMPLATE FOR
JOURNAL ARTICLE
TITLE [What is the “title” from your E.A.G.L.E. Table?]
 
AUTHORS: [Who are the major contributors in descending order?]
Affiliations [What are the organizations of affiliations]
 
ABSTRACT
[Copy E.A.G.L.E. Research Abstract]
 
KEYWORDS
[What are your RQ CONSTRUCT and SUB-RQ CONSTRUCTS?]

1 BACKGROUND PROBLEM
[General information about WHO CONSTRUCT. Elaboration on PROBLEM STATEMENT]

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

“This study conducted a literature survey on selected topics under [title of RQ CONSTRUCT].
These keywords were identified using Ibrahim’s (2008, 2011) research question’s construct
(or RQ Construct) categorization technique for identifying 3 different RQ Constructs
—“WHO”, “WHAT” and “HOW”—in formulating a main research question. Ibrahim defines
“WHO” construct as the element used or impacted by a research, “WHAT” construct as the
information required to solve a research problem, and “HOW” construct as the action or
impact on the element or information of the research. This study covers [list of titles for Sub-
RQ CONSTRUCTS] under [title of RQ CONSTRUCT]. For each topic, this paper will present the
major works by prior scholars, how their works could support future studies, and what
aspects need to be enhanced for each selected topic. The outcomes of this exercise would
produce a synthesized summary for each topic. Then, the paper will discuss the cross-
analysis, integrated possibilities, and prioritize the synthesized information gearing towards
high probable solutions that could satisfy the [NEED of problem statement] and present the
resulting key summaries presented in the “POD (Point of Departure) Tree Diagram” from
“Templates for Thinking” (Ibrahim & Mustafa Kamal, 2018). This paper concludes with a
discussion on potential integrated solutions for future development of a theoretical
model/framework for supporting [PURPOSE of problem statement].

3. RQ CONSTRUCT [state selected RQ-Construct]

Introduction about [state Sub-Themes 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3]
 
3.1 Sub-Theme 1 [state name of Sub-Theme 1]
Introduction to Sub-Theme 1
What is it about?
What are the Strengths?
What are the Weaknesses?
Conclusion of your POD 1 

3.2 Sub-Theme 2 [state name of Sub-Theme 2]

Introduction to Sub-Theme 2
What is it about?
What are the Strengths?
 What are the Weaknesses?
Conclusion of your POD 2 

3.3 Sub-Theme 3 [state name of Sub-Theme 3]

Introduction to Sub-Theme 3
What is it about?
What are the Strengths?
What are the Weaknesses?
Conclusion of your POD 4 

4. DISCUSSIONS

INTRODUCTION ABOUT DISCUSSION SECTION.

Introduce how you plan to analyse the results from Sub-Themes 3.1 to 3.3.

ANALYSIS of Level 3 POD 4

[Analyse and discuss how POD 1 and POD 2 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is your recommendation to solve your research need?]

ANALYSIS of Level 3 POD 5

[Analyse and discuss how POD 2 and POD 3 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is your recommendation to solve your research need?]

ANALYSIS of Level 3 POD 6

[Analyse and discuss how POD 3 and POD 1 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is your recommendation to solve your research need?]

5. CONCLUSIONS

Conclusion of Level 4 Discussion POD 7

[Analyse and discuss how POD 4 and POD 5 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is your recommendation to solve your research need?]

Conclusion of Level 4 Discussion POD 8 6]

[Analyse and discuss how POD 5 and POD 6 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is your recommendation to solve your research need?]

Conclusion of Level 4 Discussion POD 9

[Analyse and discuss how POD 7 and POD 8 can be merged or omitted in order to solve your
research need. What are the strengths and weaknesses when the PODs are combined? What
is the final recommendation to solve your research need?]

Benefits and significance of study.

Recommendations for future studies.

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
“This study is part of the first author’s PhD thesis at [name of university]. It is
partially sponsored by [name of sponsor].”

7. REFERENCES
1. Ibrahim, R. (2008). Setting Up a Research Question for Determining the
Research Methodology. ALAM CIPTA, Intl. J. on Sustainable Tropical Design
Research and Practice, Vol. 3 (1): 69-72.

2. Ibrahim, R. (2011). Demystifying the Arduous Doctoral Journey: The Eagle

Vision of a Research Proposal. Electronic Journal of Business Research
Methods, 9(2): 130-140.

3. Ibrahim, R., & Mustafa Kamal, R. (2018). Templates for Thinking. Unpublished
Literary. Copyright MYIPO LY2018002437.