Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Damage Fragility Functions For The I-880 Bridge (EDP/DM) : Marc O. Eberhard Michael P. Berry University of Washington
Damage Fragility Functions For The I-880 Bridge (EDP/DM) : Marc O. Eberhard Michael P. Berry University of Washington
Damage Fragility Functions For The I-880 Bridge (EDP/DM) : Marc O. Eberhard Michael P. Berry University of Washington
Marc O. Eberhard
Michael P. Berry
University of Washington
Damage Measures
Superstructures Joints
Spalling Cracking
Restrainer yielding or Spalling
pullout Buckling
Unseating Anchorage loss
Abutments Columns
Approach settlement Flexural damage
Spalling Shear damage
Backwall failure Splice deterioration
High-Strength
Threaded Rod Cross-Head
P/(Agf’c)
Hammerhead
D
Reference Column
db
Test
North-South
L
Strong Wall
Strong Floor
∆bb/L (%)
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
L/D ρt_eff
15 15
∆bb/L (%)
∆bb/L (%)
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 10 20 30 40
P/Agf’c dbfy/f’c
Trends in Rectangular Columns
15 15
∆bb/L (%)
∆bb/L (%)
10 10
/ L (%)
/ L (%)
bb
bb
∆
∆
5 5
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
L/D L/D
ρt_eff
ρ
eff
15 15
∆bb/L (%)
10
∆bb/L (%) 10
∆ / L (%)
/ L (%)
bb
bb
5 5
0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 10 20 30 40
P/Agf’c
P/f ,c A g
dbfy/f’c
db fy / D
Model Accuracy
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
∆
bb
/ ∆ bb calc ⇒ ∆
demand
/ ∆ bb calc
⇒ ∆calc_BB/L = 5.1 %
∆calc_SP/L = 2.0 %
0.8
0.6
0.4
Cover Spalling
Bar Buckling
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
∆ / L (%)
demand
80%
r eff = 0.03
60%
r eff = 0.06
40%
r eff = 0.09
0.12
20%
0.18
0%
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Drift Ratio, %
∆demand/L(%)
ρt_eff = D
db ke
{ Target(∆demand /∆calc)
-1
3.25 (1 – P/Agf’c)(1+0.1*L/D)
}
Applications: Column Design
0.20
P/Agf'c = 60%
Effective Confinement Ratio
0.16
50% 40%
ACI 318-02 Eq. 21-2
0.12
30%
20%
0.08 10%
P/Agf'c = 0%
0.04
0.00
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Drift Ratio, %
PEER 2004 Annual Meeting (spiral-reinforced, 5% prob., L/D = 3.5, D/db = 1/14)
Current Work