Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamic Response of RC Frame Building Using Base Isolators
Dynamic Response of RC Frame Building Using Base Isolators
GUIDED BY,
B S JAYASHANKAR BABU
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, PREMKUMAR M K
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL 4th sem, M.Tech,
ENGINEERING. CAD structures,
PESCE.
INTRODUCTION
Earthquakes cause inertia forces proportional to the product of the building
mass and the ground accelerations.
Due to this mass asymmetry in building center of mass is shifted from
center of stiffness causing eccentricity. As this eccentricity increases, torsion
in building also increases.
As the ground accelerations increases, the strength of the building must be
increased to avoid structural damage.
It is not practical to continue to increase the strength of the building
indefinitely.
Base isolation is one of the most widely accepted techniques to protect
structures and to mitigate the risk to life and property from strong
earthquakes.
OBJECTIVES
To find out the response of 14 storey RC bare frame with and without base
isolator (i.e., Mode period, displacement, acceleration, base shear, storey
drift) by response spectrum analysis. Numerical modelling and analysis are
carried out using finite element based software ETABS.
To study the response of base isolated building using lead rubber bearing
and sliding bearing system for bare frame of symmetric model using time
history analysis of El Centro earthquake data.
To compare the performance of RC bare frame having plan and elevation
irregularities with and without base isolator.
Study of isolation system variations and isolation system hysteresis in case
of lead rubber bearing (LRB) and PTFE system.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Bill Robinson et al. (1993), have written a book called seismic isolation for
designers and structural engineers. This book gives total insight into the
practical methods of construction of seismically isolated buildings. The
different types of isolation devices and their properties are discussed here.
W h Robinson (1997), describes the principles of seismic isolation and discuss
some of the isolation systems available before giving some examples of the
application of seismic isolation to structure in new Zealand.
M Kikuchi and S Kamamato (2007), presents an analytical model for lead-
rubber bearing to predict bearing force-displacement behavior under extremely
large deformations.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Kaab mohamed zohair (2011), presented the use of the base isolation device
LRB (lead rubber bearing) allows the control of the deformation which are
localized on this last, and also allows carrying out a satisfactory compromise
between the reduction of the seismic forces and the increase in the
deformations of the base isolation.
Kelly et al., studied the effectiveness of seismic base isolation in controlling
the deformations in prefabricated concrete structures. When utilized in
prefabricated concrete structures seismic base isolation has the potential to
reduce the ductility demand from these structures under seismic loading.
BASE ISOLATION:
Base isolation is a passive vibration control system.
The goal of base isolation is to reduce the energy that is transferred
from the ground motion to the structure.
EFFECTS OF DUCTILITY
Leads to higher floor accelerations.
Damage to structural components, which may not be repairable.
TYPES OF ISOLATOR
Lead rubber bearing (LRB)
Flat sliding bearing (PTFE)
COMPONENTS OF LRB
COMPONENTS OF PTFE
1 1.4801 3.0809
2 1.4316 3.0526
3 1.4284 2.9881
RESPONSE OF SYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED BASE AND
LRB BASE ISOLATED BUILDING
Floor level vs. lateral displacements graph Floor level vs. storey drift graph
RESPONSE OF SYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED BASE AND
LRB BASE ISOLATED BUILDING
Floor level vs. acceleration graph Floor level vs. storey shear graph
MODE PERIODS OF THE FIXED BASE AND PTFE BASE
ISOLATED BUILDING
Mode number Fixed base mode period Base isolated mode period
(Ts) (Tb)
1 1.4801 2.5505
2 1.4316 2.5329
3 1.4284 2.4816
RESPONSE OF SYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED BASE AND
PTFE BASE ISOLATED BUILDING
Floor level vs. Lateral displacements graph floor level vs. Storey drift graph
RESPONSE OF SYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED BASE AND
PTFE BASE ISOLATED BUILDING
Floor level vs. Acceleration graph Floor level vs. Storey shear graph
PLAN ASYMMETRY
1 1.4830 1.4729
2 1.4230 1.3597
3 1.3894 1.2579
RESPONSE OF PLAN ASYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED
BASE BUILDING
Floor level vs. Lateral displacement graph Floor level vs. Storey drift graph
RESPONSE OF PLAN ASYMMETRIC MODEL OF FIXED
BASE BUILDING
Floor level vs. Acceleration graph Floor level vs. Storey shear graph
ELEVATION ASYMMETRY
El CENTRO GRAPH
0.4
0.3
ACCELERATION (m/s2)
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
TIME (sec)
TIME HISTORY RESPONSE
Elastic
stiffness
Yield stiffness
Deformation
ISOLATION SYSTEM HYSTERESIS
ISOLATION SYSTEM HYSTERESIS
FUTURE SCOPE OF STUDY