Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jula Creech-Rhetorical Analysis
Jula Creech-Rhetorical Analysis
Jula Creech
Mrs. Maciulewicz
English 1101
6 November 2020
Risk Taking
Kashfia Rahman, a young high school student in South Dakota, dedicated her time to
study and experiment why teenagers are higher risk takers than toddlers and adults. Her purpose
was to find out why teenagers take bigger risks and then how those risks affect their brains.
Kashfia does her own experiments on her fellow classmates, held right in her school library with
the help of her geography teacher. Her findings were astonishing and even helped her to win first
prize in the ISEF (International Science and Engineering Fair). She was able to successfully
come to many conclusions about her research. Including being able to understand how our
emotions can be affected by risk taking. Kashfia's use of ethos towards her teacher and others
throughout the speech is greatly used. She also uses pathos to help describe how the brain is
affected by risk taking and logos is very successful in explaining her findings and how she got to
them.
Towards the beginning and ending of her speech, Kashfia uses ethos to show how she is
not the only one to be credited for her findings. To be able to start her experiments and studies,
she needed the help from a teacher. In Kashfia’s speech she states, “My enthusiastic geography
becoming my mentor to sign necessary paperwork” (Rahman 00:04:53-00:04:57). She uses the
word ‘necessary’ here, implying that without her teacher none of her research would have been
possible, therefore proving that she is not the only one to be credited for what she discovered.
Creech 2
Not only did her geography teacher help get her experiment started by signing paperwork, but he
also helped to set everything up. He even helped to sort through some of the data that she
Kashfia also does this in a similar way at the end of her speech. She gives credit to those
hosting and working at the ISEF. These experienced adults were able to help her better
understand her findings and what they mean. In her speech she says, “I was able to present my
research to experts in neuroscience and psychology and garner valuable feedback” (Rahman
00:09:24-00:09:26). Now this doesn’t necessarily mean these people helped in her experiment,
but they certainly helped her better understand what her findings meant and what she could do
with this newfound information. In Kashfia’s mind, that was worth some amount of credibility
because she openly thanked them for their contributions in her speech.
The component of pathos also played an immense role in this speech. Kashfia didn’t
necessarily use her own experiences to appeal to the audience's emotions. Rather she used
examples from teenagers that would appeal to the ages of 13 to 18. Kashfia found out that when
teens are first introduced to high risks, like drinking at a party, they are less likely to take the
risk. However, the more and more a teenager has that risk in front of them, the more likely they
are to start taking that risk every time they have the opportunity. She also found out that the
emotional range of teenagers differ depending on their risk taking abilities. “And the results
showed that habituation to risk-taking could actually change a teen's brain by altering their
emotional levels” (Rahman 00:05:27-00:05:31). Teens who take more and higher risks tend to
have a lower emotional range. They lower the ability to feel fear, which causes their emotional
range to shrink. While on the other hand, teens who don’t take as many risks have a wider
emotional range. This is because they are still able to feel the fear that is associated with risk
Creech 3
taking. “However, the more they were exposed to the risks through the simulator, the less fearful,
guilty and stressed they became. This caused a situation in which they were no longer able to feel
Logos, or logic, is best used in Kashfia’s speech through understanding how she came to
her findings and what exactly they mean. She found real world answers through a computerized
decision making simulation. Kashfia had 86 of her fellow students take a computerized test to
measure their risk taking behaviors. The results that she found are similar, if not completely
accurate, to the ones that people would face during real world situations. “This meant that I had
00:07:09-00:07:11). Kashfia was also able to properly measure her classmates emotions
throughout the process. Her classmates took the same test numerous times over the course of 3
days to ensure the most accurate feedback. “A control panel on the EEG headset measured their
various emotional responses: like attention, interest, excitement, frustration, guilt, stress levels
and relaxation. They also rated their emotions on well-validated emotion-measuring scales”
(Rahman 00:06:5300:-07:08).
success because she was able to give credibility to those who helped with her experiment
through ethos, she appealed to the viewers by using pathos so they could relate to real world risk
taking problems, and logos was used throughout the speech to help those better understand what
her experiment was and how she got to her conclusions. Overall, Kashifia’s speech was very
insightful on how teenagers are prone to risk taking and how their emotional state is affected by
it. She was able to successfully conduct experiments on fellow students and came to many
conclusions on why some teens are higher risk takers than others. Along with discovering how
Creech 4
risk taking first starts with a teenager and how their emotions can differ depending on the amount
of risks they take. As Kashfia says at the end of her speech, “The more risks I took, the more
Works Cited
2019,
www.ted.com/talks/kashfia_rahman_how_risk_taking_changes_a_teenager_s_brain
/transcript?language=en.