Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literary Review
Literary Review
Briana Ancalmo
English Composition II
Professor Hellmers
March 16 2021
Literary Review
The extinction of animals has been an issue for thousands of years and it is sad to see
how many animals are gone. It is hard to know that many of the animals seen today may be gone
in the future and it’s hard to see all the animals who have already gone extinct. The extinction of
animals is a tragic event, but do they affect their environment? Also, how many and what
animals are on the endangered species list in North America and what would happen to their
Animal endangerment has been going on for many years, and so has the protection of
these animals. In 1903 the first National Wildlife Refuge at Pelican Island, Florida which was
established by Theodore Roosevelt. Later on the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969
expanded on the 1966 act which created a list of animals who are threatened with worldwide
extinction. Then in 1973 the Act was strengthened and expanded to include plants as well as
Weather an animal is overpopulated, extinct or invasive they have a drastic effect on the
environment around them and their ecosystems. Animals as small as bees influence the
environment around by pollinating flowers and other plants and birds and bats eat fruits and then
poop out seeds which help grow more plants. Keeping animals from becoming
important. (Akcakaya). This is so important because plants and animals depend on each other for
Ancalmo Page 2
survival. By eliminating a factor in the ecosystem (an animal or a plant) it can cause a cascade
and mess up the ecosystem (Bove). The loss of animals effects ecosystems all over the globe and
can alter microbe-driven processes as well. (Burkepile and Thurber). For example, something as
small as clams going extinct animals who eat them will leave the area to find another source of
food. When these animals leaves the predators of them will eventually leave to because they will
The United States has been working to get animals off the endangered list and help
restore what was lost with their depleted population. One animal that has had a significant
comeback is the wolf, especially in Yellowstone National Park. In the early 20th century many
wolves were killed in the United States. Without them elk populations grew which caused the
loss of many willow trees and riparian plants. As a side effect song birds were losing their food
which threatened their survival and increased the amount of mosquitos (which songbirds were
normally able to keep in check) (Bove). It became so bad that in the early 1970s there was no
evidence of wolves. Thankfully since then the Endangered Species Act allowed wolves to be
reintroduced. The reintroduction began in 1944, when they began to move wolves from Canada
into Yellowstone (Guz). Although the reintroduction of wolves has been positive, there still are
not nearly as many as there used to be which means they may not be fully completing their
Loosing animals in a habitat has a negative effect, but so does having an too many of one
animal. Different kinds of beetles are fatal for certain trees and if they are not kept in check by
others animals their effects can be devastating. For example the native mountain beetles are
killing white pine trees in Yellowstone along with the nonnative white pine blister rust. These
two factors have cause these trees to decrease rapidly and there are only about 80% of them are
Ancalmo Page 3
dead or dying. These trees are an important part of a grizzly bear’s diet and without these trees
they may never make a full recovery (Mcnamee). Another problem with the overpopulation of
animals could be the bark beetles. If woodpeckers continue to lose their habitats they won’t be
able to keep these beetles in check and the beetles could end up causing the mortality of many
trees in forests.
Extinction of animals is always an issue, but there are contradicting ideas of if it’s worse
to lose an animal or have too many animals in one area. For example, in Yellowstone elk and
deer population have surpassed the capacity of the park and because of this they have eaten
almost all the aspen and willow tress leaving non for the beavers, whose population is declining.
Even after their population has gone down the aspen and willows have not been recovering at a
steady rate meaning the beavers still have limited to no food. (Guz). However other scientists
argue that the loss of elk has caused more problems, especially with the abundance of soil
microbial communities. The loss of these microbial communities most likely caused the 70%
increase in nitrogen mineralization rate. So the loss of Elk not only affects the ecosystem above
ground, it also affects the below ground. (Burkepile and Thurber) Although both statements
come from credible sources, the second one by Deron Burkepile and Rebecca Thurber is more
accurate. That source has many other resources from scientific research to back their
information. Jackie Guz is knowledgeable in her area of research, but she is still only a grad
student.
causes them to have misconceptions about its affects. For example, in the 1800s many predators,
including wolves, were hunted to near extinction in the US because they were seen as dangerous
and a threat to people and their livestock. (Guz). Today people know this is a problem because
Ancalmo Page 4
eliminating these predators has negative effects on the ecosystem. Another misconception is the
definition of animal recovery. Many species are listed as recovered despite the fact that their
population is remaining the same or even decreasing during their recovery. Also, many animals
are said to be recovered despite the fact that they are not preforming their ecological functions.
Functional or recovered species should be defined as species who can perform their ecological
roles (Akcakaya). Despite the fact that these two articles address misconceptions they are still
credible. Mr. Akcakaya is a professor of ecology and evolution and Jackie Guz a graduate
Animals affect their environment weather they are a large predator or a small beetle. The
loss animals has a negative effect on their ecosystem and can cause it to become unbalanced and
destroyed. It is important for people to learn about these animals and not only focus on getting
them off the endangered list, but also make sure their ecological functions are being performed
properly.
Ancalmo Page 5
Work Cited
Akcakaya, H. Resit. "To Save Species from Extinction, We Must Consider More than Just
Numbers." Gale Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2021. Gale In Context: Opposing
Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/JZLXDW483240263/OVIC?u=dayt30401&sid=OVIC&xid
=fcec3d0a. Accessed 4 Mar. 2021. Originally published as "To Save Species from Extinction,
We Must Consider More than Just Numbers," In These Times, 17 Nov. 2019
Bove, Jennifer. “Why It Matters When Species Go Extinct.” Treehugger, Datdash Publishing, 11 Mar.
2021, www.treehugger.com/why-it-matters-when-species-go-extinct-1182006.
Burkepile, Deron E., and Rebecca Vega Thurber. “Long Arm of Species Loss: How Will Defaunation
Disrupt Ecosystems Down to the Microbial Scale?” BioScience, vol. 69, no. 6, June 2019, pp.
Guz, Jackie. “Bring Back the Beavers to Yellowstone National Park.” ThoughtCo, Dotdash Publishing,
Mcnamee, Thomas. "Dooming Yellowstone's Grizzlies." New York Times, 15 July 2017, p.
Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A498557180/OVIC?u=dayt30401&sid=OVIC&xid=41c570
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/Endangered Species Program. “Endangered Species Act: A History of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973: Timeline.” Official Web Page of the U S Fish and Wildlife