Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhetorical Analysis Enc 1102 Renel Marcelus 1
Rhetorical Analysis Enc 1102 Renel Marcelus 1
Dr. Guenzel
ENC 1102
3/31/2021
knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning'' is a scholarly article published
on PLOS One, a peer-reviewed journal site, and was written by Ahmed Alsoufi, Ali Alsuyihili,
and 19 other people. Ahmed Alsoufi and many of the authors, except a few, are affiliated with
Faculties of Medicine at their respective universities in Libya. Each of the authors play a role in
the creation of this article because of their backgrounds; whether that be data curation, analysis,
or writing/reviewing. Their backgrounds helped them to create this article as they are people who
work for the universities where they collected the data from. On top of that, many of the authors
either work for a medical faculty at a university in Libya or a hospital; this will allow them to ask
the proper questions to the medical students that they will survey as they are familiar with the
This article was written to “provide an overview of the situation experienced by medical
students during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and
practices of medical students regarding electronic medical education” (Alsoufi, et al.). Their
intended audience was most likely both medical students and university officials. The article is
intended for university officials because includes statistics for medical students’ knowledge,
attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. It’s most likely that these statistics can help
university officials to make good changes/accommodations for the education of their medical
Marcelus 2
students in Libya. The medical students are an intended audience for this because they’re what
the whole article is about. As for the outside context of the article, Covid-19 has caused “most
medical schools [in Libya to be] suspended” (Alsoufi, et al.). In the source, it is stated that
Libya’s civil war and financial crisis “has affected the country’s infrastructure” (Alsoufi, et al.).
Consequently, Libya’s situation called for the authors to make this article to determine the
The authors of this article do not allow for opinions to be made, just for observations
made by logic. The reason being is because they want to observe the statistics that they conjured
up from their medical students. So anything stated in the article will be considered as fact or
observation in the limits of the Libyan country. Their evidence for their analysis is also
convincing. They surveyed 3,348 valid medical students in Libya making their data credible.
This article was written, reviewed, and edited by 21 different people who have backgrounds that
aid them in the making of this article. It’s also listed as a scholarly article which gives it more
credibility. The authors used an extensive list of statistics to make sure that there were little to no
mistakes in their analysis of the data. One of the many statistics they used was Spearman’s rank
knowledge to e-learning (Alsoufi, et al.). For more evidence of little to no bias within the article,
they stated in the section listed “funding” under the abstract that “[the] research did not receive
any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Therefore, the funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to
publish, or preparation of the manuscript” (Alsoufi, et al.). They also received ethical approval
“from the Bioethics Committee at the Biotechnology Research Center of Ministry of Higher
Marcelus 3
Education and Scientific Research in Libya” and prior consent from the participants of the
This article is structured formally, starting with an abstract that talks about, in summary,
what the article is about. Then it includes the introduction, methods, results, discussion,
supporting information, acknowledgments, and references. The methods and results are a major
component of this article; it also provides more validity to the authors as they discuss how they
achieved their statistics and results. The visual graphs included within the article are very
persuasive as they are used to display the statistics that were gained for the making of this article.
Throughout the article, a Toulmin model of argumentation was being used. Claims are being
made by the authors that Covid-19 has an impact on medical education, whether that be the
medical students’ performance or mental attitude towards the situation. The “grounds” or
evidence for this claim is the survey that they gave to medical students who were willing to
participate. Within that survey, they asked a multitude of things such as their gender, age,
financial status, medical education, experience with online learning, etc. The evidence
“warrants”, or backs up, the claim by quite literally showing the impacts of Covid-19 on medical
students’ education with peer-reviewed statistics. The rebuttal, however, is the fact that the data
is taken from medical students in Libya, where the country is not in a situation that can be
considered normal worldwide. Libya, at the time of the research, was in a civil war and with
political unrest. This caused many problems for the citizens, including the medical students
themselves. Because of this situation, it can be said that this article is not a proper representation
residents. This article can be used in the research project to list out a lot of the negatives and
Marcelus 4
positives that a medical student might be going through during the Covid-19 pandemic, such as
not being able to receive proper training for a procedure that’s usually taught in person, etc. The
data from the graphs alone will help to engage many arguments within the research. This source
will, however, not be the primary basis of my research. This is because my research is going to
be based on generalizing the situation for medical students across the world; and the article was
written in Libya, which, as discussed earlier, is going through a civil war and political unrest.
These factors can result in a much different experience for medical students in Libya than what
would be considered the norm for medical students around the world.
Some of the data obtained in the article are the medical students’ “medical education
status during the pandemic, such as their work status, types of educational activities conducted,
how COVID-19 affected their career plan…. [and] a mental health assessment that measured
[their] levels of anxiety and depression” (Alsoufi, et al.). These results will help to provide a
view of the negative or positive effects of Covid-19 on medical students. Furthermore, the article
discusses the results of the data. One of the observations that they made was that “2,879 (86%)
[of medical students] reported that their medical school had suspended clinical training and
laboratory skills training” (Alsoufi, et al.). Although discretion will need to be taken, data such
as this will be provided as evidence to help back up claims of medical students throughout the
world having their training and in-person laboratories suspended within the research project.
Within the discussion of the article, the authors talk about how the medical students “were
concerned about how e-learning could be applied to provide clinical experience, especially in the
final year of medical school, which depends heavily on bedside teaching” (Alsoufi, et al.). They
also talk about the financial and mental states of the students. Most of the information from this
article is very insightful about the impact of Covid-19 on medical students, even if it was data
Marcelus 5
taken from Libya during its second civil war. This data can be backed with other sources from
the research paper to provide a proper insight into Covid-19’s impact on medical students.
Work Cited:
Marcelus 6