Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Class Pakistan
Social Class Pakistan
Social Class Pakistan
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to The Pakistan Development Review.
http://www.jstor.org
of Pakistan:An Attempt
Social Structure
at DevelopingSomeConcepts
Sabeeha Hafeez*
II. RATIONALE
The above propositions in the formof a modelarepresented forfourreasons.
a
Firstly, conceptual framework was desired about the social of Pakistan
structure
and the directionof social changetakingplace. Secondly,concepts wereneededto
studythe normsof social classesin Pakistan. At best,some studiesconductedby
economistslike Naseem [13] and Talat [1] , forinstance,have assessedthe magni-
tude and degreeof poverty,notwho the poor are. Whatare theirnormsor value
orientations?Whatare the normsof othersocial classes? Do the poor sharethe
normsof othersocial classesor do theypossesstheirown norms? Furthermore,
these studiesindicatethat "an excessiveconcernwithoverallinequalityof income
may conceal importantfactorswhich tend to widen or equalize the incomein-
equalitiesat a disaggregated level" [13] . Whatare thosefactors?Thirdly,it was
intendedto make a further contribution to the theoreticalunderstanding of social
structureand the social stratification process. The existingliterature deals with
social stratificationas a distributive process,establishedbases of social classes,
social statusin society,theirmeasures,explanationsand relationships amongsocial
classesand social statusgroupsand the rate and magnitude mobilityfromone
of
*Director intheWomen's
ofResearch Government
Division, Islamabad.
ofPakistan,
III. METHODOLOGY
The methodology used forformulating propositionsin thispaperis inductive.
Data frommicrostudies,observations and experiencewiththePakistanisocietyare
organizedby meansof simplelogic to formulatethe conceptsin the propositions
which,of course,need to be operationalized
and testedon diversesamplesof people
fromvarioussocioeconomic backgrounds.
PropositionI
(That Pakistansocietyis characterizedby social stratification
whichis com-
pensatoryin nature.)
It is assumedin Pakistanthat the two processesof social stratification -
compensatory -
and distributive existparallelto each other. Littleor no research
has beendoneon eitherof thetwoin Pakistan.
Social stratification
as a compensatoryprocessis unfoldedin termsof the
following basicassumptions:
of compensation
Indicators
of socialstatusas highon:
Justification
- Power
- Privilege
- Prestige
Process
as a Compensatory
Figure1. Levelsof Social Stratification
PropositionII
(That thecompensatory overtheyearshasgiven
processof socialstratification
riseto status-centric
valueorientation.)
(See Fig.2.)
MODEL
v
ARTIFICIAL MIDDLE
CLASS AND OTHER
NORMS
Figure2
Embourgeoisement
Embourgeoisement of theworkingclassperhapsis the onlyconceptavailable
in the social scientificliteraturewhichcomes closerto some meaningsof status-
centricorientations.Diverseenquiriesduringthe 1950-1960 decadeseemedto lend
supportto the thesisof embourgeoisement of some sectorsof the Britishworking
class. Thischange was assessed in terms of an impressive improvement in theliving
standardsof manual workersas measuredby betterhousing,increasein home
ownership and possessionof domesticequipments suchas thewashingmachine,T.V.
and car,and changein standardof livingwas accompaniedby changesin normsand
styleof life. "Theirworksituationand experiencewerenot typicalof thatof the
middleclass,howeveraffluent theymightbe. The richmanualworkers havenothing
to do withsocialrelations.Theyareconcernedwithmoneyonly" [12] .
But the concept of embourgeoisement is limitedto the ways or meansby
whichthe workingclass gainsmaterialstatus. Status-centric phenomenon, is all-
pervasive all
inthesociety;it is sharedby socialclasses. Stability of claim to enhance
powerby thosein highstatuswhichmanifests itselfin variedformsis one indicator
of status-centricorientation.In themiddleclasstwoemerging trendsindicatestatus-
centricorientation.Firstly,overa decade or so the emerging trend,as indicated
earlier,is to move away from hiredjobs to self as is
-employment, suggested by the
Proposition HI
(That themostsignificantindicatorof status-centric
orientation
is emergence
of theartificial
middleclass whichcan be distinguished
fromtherealmiddleclassin
termsof norms.)(See Fig.3.)
StatusOrientation Status-Centric
Orientation
Upper « » . Upper
ii
Middle i
п.
Middle
Lower I Artificial
< Lower
Figure3
л s $ s s-
&
О
1 ^ os m о
« 2 S S 3
« * *> ^
jj
á ò 2 S-1 5
-1 1
■*
I
z -
"
i « 2 S- ^
I •S
8 ьI
I
о
'E i 2 2 2 £
Im г- ОЧ « *
£ a * s 5 si s
'O CN ^ «O
"SI 1
ss i S 2 I »
I II о .а
О ГЧ О g^
§1
.Sì« о |
4£ g £ ô 2 S 2 Й
& ^*
! S
3
o
00
^
ON
«Л
СО
^.
Г-
°°.
^
с
§
I
5 ro oo oo oo 4|
w
•S S • oo oo oo t^ g
1 Q О ^4 fN СО 00 О
I ï-, O
6 Я8S
O vi
1
О
O
¡a
Él 2
S fi g S«^ P Z
«u<3 ■* ^ 'S
1
g o _ <N СО ÍÜ
еЗ 00 00 00 00 3
« Os On ON On
^
ArtificialMiddle Class
Artificial by the incomelevelcomparableto that
middleclass is characterized
of the realor ideal middleclassbutwithoutcomparablechangesin theireducational
attainments and the natureof occupation2 . Ideal middleclass is characterized
by
distinctoccuptionalboundaries withitsnorms.According to Weber,themiddleclass
includes groupswho have all sortsof property,or marketableabilitiesthrough
trainingand who are in a positionto drawtheirsupportfromthesesources. Ideal
middleclasscanbe distinguished fromartificial
middleclassin termsof thefollowing
norms. Each of thesenormsneedsto be operationalized and measuredon diverse
socio-economic groups.
TableI
Artificial
MiddleClass Ideal Middle Class
2 The
artificialmiddle class is notjust the class of emigrants.Its normsare sharedby those
who have not gone abroad to earn.
Some from the middle class can compete, and competitorsare not
use sponsored mobility for segregated.
protectingthe individualsof their
own class fromsinkinginto lower
class. In the case of sponsored
mobility '4he elite supervisethe
process of accent entry by
sponsorship into a club and their
segregations in favoured institu-
tions" [12]. In this sense artificial
middle class is generated from
withinthe middle class.
8. The artificial middle class sees The middle class sees society as a
society in terms of an individual's kind of ladder and an individual as
illegitimized struggleto accumu- master of his fate in so far as that
late material gains as he is not is decided by his place on it.
successful in gaining status
throughlegitimizedmeans.
9. Presupposes struggle -orientation Presupposes self-disciplineand com-
for quick gains in social status. In mitment to certain career goals. The
the case of overseas workers, in middle class sees the present only in
order to effectivelyfulfilmoney- relation to some futurepersonal goal,
makingmotive, life-style at home to achieve which, plans are con-
and abroad is organized and the sciously formulated and the possibil-
possibilities of present social psy- ities of present gratifications are
chic gratificationsare sacrificed. sacrificed.
Minimal cultural interactionwith
the Westernersis kept because of
the money-saving motive. Fre-
quent visitsto Pakistan are avoid-
ed for the same reason. Living
conditions abroad: perceived
discriminatory treatment and
cultural isolation do not seem to
have any upsettingeffecton them
so long as their earningcapacity
is not interferedwith by any
factors such as above. They
Table II
Status-centric
Orientation StatusOrientation
Hypothesis
In Pakistan,themagnitudeof status-centricnormsis higherthantherateand
magnitudeof legitimizedoccupationalmobility,with the resultthat instantor
middleclass has emergedas a new social structure,
artificial perhapslargerin size
thantheideal or the realmiddleclass. The emergedsocialformationcompeteswith
theidealmiddleclassand posesthreatto itsemergence and growth.
A CriticalIssue
Two incompatible pathsto moveupwardin socialstatusoperateconcurrently.
The one is promotionof educationand employment;the otheris instantaccumula-
tionofwealthstronglydesiredand pursuedbymost.
PolicyImplications*
Competitionforgainsin wealthand incomesis enhancedat the expenseof
of education,particularly
under-utilization in theruralareas.
PolicyConcern
How to decreasethe rateand magnitude of status-centricorientation
or how
to increasetherateand magnitudeof occupationalmobility.
REFERENCES
1. Abbasi, Nasreen,and MohammadIrfan. "SocioeconomicEffectsof Inter-
nationalMigrationon the Families Left Behind". Islamabad: Pakistan
Instituteof DevelopmentEconomics. 1983. (Studiesin Population,Labour
ForceandMigration Project,ReportNo. 7)
2. Alauddin, Talat. "Mass Povertyin Pakistan: A FurtherStudy". Pakistan
Development Review. Vol. XIV, No. 4. Winter1975.
3. Bates, L. Frederick,anc^C. ClydeHarvey. TheStructureof Social Systems.
NewYork: GardnerPress,Inc. 1975. p. 309.
4. Bilquees,Faiz, and ShahnazHamid. "Impact of InternationalMigration on
Womenand ChildrenLeft Behind. A Case of a PunjabiVillage". Islam-
abad: Pakistan Instituteof DevelopmentEconomics. Janaury1981.
(ResearchReportSeries,No. 115)
♦Thereare manyotherpolicy implicationswhichwill call forseparatediscussion.
5. Gould, J., and W. L. Kold. A Dictionary of the Social Sciences. New York:
Free Press. 1964.
6. Hafeez, Sabeeha. "Glimpses into Rural Sind". (In preparationforpublication)
7. Hafeez, Sabeeha. Poverty, VoluntaryOrganizationsand Social Change: A
Study of an Urban Slum in Pakistan. Karachi: Royal Book Company. 1985.
8. Hafeez, Sabeeha. Womenin Industry. Islamabad: Women's Division, Govern-
ment of Pakistan. 1984.
9. Kazim, Ali, and Mohammad Pervez. Psycho -Social Background of Pakistani
Emigrant Workersto the WesternWorld. Islamabad: National Instituteof
Psychology. 1978.
10. Kemal, A. R. "Income Distribution in Pakistan: A Review". Islamabad:
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. 1981. (Research Report
Series,No. 123)
11. Klitgaard, Robert E., Sabeeha Hafeez and Others. Exploring the Neglected.
Karachi: Applied Economics Research Centre, Karachi University. 1975.
(Resarch Report No. 4)
12. Little, John James. Social Stratification:An Introduction. London: George
Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1972.
13. Naseem, S. M. 4<MassPoverty in Pakistan: Some PreliminaryFindings".
PakistanDevelopment Review. Vol. XII, No. 4. Winter1973. p. 325.
14. Overseas Pakistanis Foundation. Left behind Families and Returnees. A
Surveyof Problemsand Proposed Solutions. Vol. I. Islamabad. 1983.
15. Overseas Pakistanis Foundation. Strategyfor Action, District Profiles and
Research Design. Vol.11. Islamabad. 1983.
16. Pakistan. Ministryof Interior,States and FrontierRegions. Census Organiza-
tion. Housing, Economic and Demographic Survey of Pakistan. Islamabad.
1973.
17. Pakistan. Population Census Organization. Census of Pakistan, 1981 (Census
BulletinNo. 8). Islamabad. 1981 .
18. Pervez, Seema. A ContentAnalysis of Text Books and Fictions Popular among
Secondary School Students. Islamabad: National Instituteof Psychology.
1984.
19. Shaheed, Farida. "Migration and its Effects on Women in the Villages of
Provenance". Paper prepared for the InternationalLabour Office Tripartite
Asian Regional Seminar on Rural Development and Women; Mahabaleshwar
(India), April 1981.