Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Accepted Manuscript

The effect of foot reflexology and back massage on hemodialysis patients' fatigue and
sleep quality

Kevser Sevgi Unal, Reva Balci Akpinar

PII: S1744-3881(16)30049-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.06.004
Reference: CTCP 665

To appear in: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Received Date: 5 April 2016


Revised Date: 15 June 2016
Accepted Date: 15 June 2016

Please cite this article as: Unal KS, Balci Akpinar R, The effect of foot reflexology and back massage on
hemodialysis patients' fatigue and sleep quality, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (2016),
doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.06.004.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

TITLE PAGE

THE EFFECT OF FOOT REFLEXOLOGY AND BACK MASSAGE ON


HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS’ FATIGUE AND SLEEP QUALITY

PT
Running Head: Reflexology and back massage for fatigue and sleep

RI
U SC
Kevser Sevgi UNAL
AN
Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, School of Health, Osmaniye/TURKEY
Phone: +90 442 2312214
M

E-mail address: Kevser-Sevgi@hotmail.com


D
TE

Reva BALCI AKPINAR *

Atatürk University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzurum / TURKEY


EP

Phone: +90 442 2312214


Fax : +90 442 2360969
E-mail address: reva@atauni.edu.tr
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of foot reflexology and

back massage on optimizing the sleep quality and reducing the fatigue of hemodialysis

patients.

PT
Methods: The study includes 105 volunteer patients who were registered at a private

dialysis clinic and were receiving hemodialysis treatment. Foot reflexology and back

RI
massage were administered to the patients two times a week for four weeks. The Visual

SC
Analogue Scale for Fatigue and the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index were used to collect

data.

U
Results: The differences between the pretest and posttest score averages of the patients on
AN
the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue and the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index were

statistically significant (p<0.001).


M

Conclusion: Foot reflexology and back massage were shown to improve the sleep quality
D

and reduce the fatigue of hemodialysis patients. Compared to back massage, foot
TE

reflexology was determined to be more effective.

Keywords: back massage, fatigue, hemodialysis, nursing, foot reflexology, sleep quality
EP

1. Introduction
C

Hemodialysis patients experience fatigue due to a variety of reasons, including the


AC

accumulation of metabolic waste in the body, fluid-electrolyte imbalances, abnormal

energy expenditure, inappetence, anemia and depression. As this feeling of fatigue tends to

persist even after resting and is difficult to prevent. Fatigue and sleeplessness negatively

affect patients' work, leisure activities, nutritional habits, sexual lives and relationships

with family and friends [1-4]. It has been reported that between 50% and 83% of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

hemodialysis patients experience sleep disorders [1,2], and that between 7% and 92.5%

experience fatigue [1,3,4].

Controlling the sleeplessness and fatigue experienced by hemodialysis patients

requires a multidisciplinary approach, one in which nurses play a particularly important

PT
role in eliminating or mitigating these complaints. Included among the complementary

practices nurses use to overcome problems with sleeplessness and fatigue are massage,

RI
aromatherapy and music therapy [5]. Massage is included in the Nursing Intervention

SC
Classification and is a simple and noninvasive method for ensuring relaxation [5].

Involving the palpation of soft tissue and muscles, massage is therapeutic touch that leads

U
to both physical and mental relaxation and is capable of generating energy transmission
AN
between the practitioner and the subject, and therefore can be used to help patients

overcome sleep problems [6,7]. Field et al. (2007) reported that back massage resulted in
M

reduced pain, anxiety and sleep disorders and improved their participants' moods by
D

relaxing them [8].


TE

Reflexology is defined as: “A technique for helping to normalize body functions by

applying the hands to reflex points in the hands, feet and ears that are related to the entire
EP

body’s glands, organs and parts” [9-11]. In reflexology, which is the stimulation of neural

pathways, reflex areas are stimulated using the fingers in order to transmit nerve impulses,
C

restore proper flow of the blood stream and maintain the homeostasis of the body. More
AC

particularly, foot reflexology is a pressure technique applied to the nerve endings in feet.

The effects of reflexology on subjects have been demonstrated in various clinical trials

[11-14,16-24,25]. Studies have shown that reflexology reduces anxiety [12], nausea and

vomiting [16,23], pain [17,18,24], sleeplessness [17,18,21] and fatigue [18-20,22-24]. In

one particular study conducted on patients with chronic renal failure and hemodialysis

3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

patients, reflexology was shown to have positive effects on cramps, fatigue, emotions and

the immune system [20]. In the literature review, no studies, however, were found that

compare the effects of foot reflexology and back massage on hemodialysis patients.

This study, therefore, analyzes the effects of foot reflexology and back massage on

PT
the fatigue and sleep quality of hemodialysis patients.

2. Methodology

RI
The data for this randomized, controlled, experimental study were collected

SC
between January, 2014 and February, 2015.

2.1. Population

U
The study population consisted of 200 patients registered at a private dialysis center
AN
in Turkey. Of these 200 patients, 90 were excluded from the study for failure to meet the

inclusion criteria, leaving 110 patients for participation in the study. The patients were
M

randomly assigned to three groups: the foot reflexology group (n=36), the back massage
D

group (n=37) and the control group (n=37). From the 110 patients, a total of 105 patients
TE

(35 patients per group) reached the end of the study, with one patient in the foot

reflexology group and two patients in the back massage group having withdrawn from the
EP

study, and two patients in the control group having left the dialysis center.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria


C

The inclusion criteria for participation in the study involved patients between the
AC

ages of 18 and 60 who received hemodialysis therapy twice a week, who did not have any

communication problems.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Patients with skin lesions, open foot wounds, malignant diseases, thrombosis, or

bleeding disorders were excluded from the study [9,10,26,27].

4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2.4. Data Collection Tools

Demographic data were collected with a Patient Information Form, which included

input on the age, gender and other features related to the patient, the Visual Analogue

Scale for Fatigue (VASF) and the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

PT
VASF: This scale, developed by Lee et al. (1991), features 18 items. The 1st, 2nd,

3rd, 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, and 18th items form the fatigue

RI
subscale, while the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th items form the energy subscale [28]. The

SC
scale uses a 10 centimeter line, where extremely positive statements constitute one end and

extremely negative statements the other end. The most positive and negative statements on

U
the fatigue subscale are scored 0 and 10, respectively, with the reverse being true for the
AN
energy subscale. In other words, the items on the fatigue subscale and the energy subscale

are ordered from the most positive to the most negative and vice versa, respectively. A
M

high score on the fatigue subscale and a low score on the energy subscale indicate severe

fatigue. The VASF scale was translated into Turkish by Yurtsever and Bedük in 2003 [3].
D
TE

In the Turkish version, the Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficient was found to be

0.90 for the fatigue subscale and 0.74 for the energy subscale [3].
EP

PSQI: The PSQI, developed by Buysse et al. (1989), is used to evaluate sleep

quality [29]. Answers to this scale are made according to the patient’s sleeping experience
C

within the last month. The scale comprises 19 self-rated questions, and these 19 items are
AC

grouped into 7 component scores (Subjective Sleep Quality, Sleep Latency, Sleep

Duration, Sleep Efficiency, Sleep Disturbance, Hypnotic Medication Use, Daytime

Dysfunction). Each item is given a score between 0 and 3, and the total score on the 7

subscales yields the PSQI score. Total PSQI scores range between 0 and 21, where a PSQI

score higher than 5 indicates poor sleep quality. The reliability coefficient of the original

5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

scale is 0.83 [29], while the scale translated into Turkish by Ağargün et al. (1996) has a

Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 0.80 [30].

2.5. Intervention

The VASF and the PSQI were administered to the patients as a pretest immediately

PT
before they were taken to hemodialysis. Foot reflexology, back massage and tests were

administered by the researcher in a 22°C, completely quiet room, which was equipped with

RI
an examination couch to conduct the massages.

SC
The foot reflexology group was given foot reflexology two days a week for four

weeks (a total of 8 sessions). The patients were first asked to remove their socks (if any)

U
and then placed in either sitting or lying position, before proceeding to administration of
AN
foot reflexology for 30 minutes, 15 minutes for each foot. Three to five drops of baby oil

were applied at room temperature to facilitate the massage [9,10].


M

Particular attention should be given to avoiding applying the baby oil in large
D

amounts, as it is thought to decrease the amount of pressure. Foot reflexology begins with
TE

relaxation exercises, which involve thumb, finger and squeezing movements and rubbing

and patting actions. The application of foot reflexology is performed in a top to down
EP

manner, where the actual massage starts on the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, brain and

pineal body points of the big toe, followed by massage on the medulla spinalis body point,
C

which is located on the area stretching from the big toe to the middle of the back side of
AC

the heel. Pressure is then applied to the solar plexus, after which reflexology techniques are

applied to all of the areas corresponding to the nerve projections on the feet. The foot

reflexology ends with the performance of the same relaxation exercises mentioned above

[9,10].

6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The back massage group was given back massages two days a week for four weeks

(a total of 8 sessions). The patients were asked to lie down on whichever side they felt

most comfortable and were then given a back massage for 30 minutes. Three to five drops

of baby oil, applied at room temperature, were used to reduce friction during the massage.

PT
The effleurage, petrissage and friction styles of massage were performed [27].

After completion of the back massage and foot reflexology sessions, the VASF and

RI
the PSQI were administered to both groups as a posttest. The control group did not receive

SC
foot reflexology or back massage but was administered the posttest at the end of the fourth

week. Foot reflexology, back massage and tests were administered before the patients were

U
taken to hemodialysis (Figure 1).
AN
2.6. Data Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows. Averages and
M

percentages were used for analysis of descriptive features, while the t-test was performed
D

for dependent groups in intragroup comparisons and the ANOVA for intergroup
TE

comparisons.

Ethical Considerations
EP

The approval of the Atatürk University Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics

Committee and the written permission of the relevant dialysis center were obtained prior to
C

conducting the study. After being informed about the study, the written and oral consent of
AC

the patients was obtained.

3. Results

Among all the patients in the study, 47.6% were females, 52.4% were males and

their average age was 54.33±12.96. No statistically significant difference was found

7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

between the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, the results of which indicate

that the groups included in the study were homogeneous (Table 1).

Table 2 shows that the pretest fatigue score averages of the foot reflexology, back

massage and control groups were 82.46±22.27, 80.31±15.74 and 74.54±22.52,

PT
respectively. The difference between the fatigue score averages of the groups was not

statistically significant (p>0.05). The posttest fatigue score averages of the foot

RI
reflexology, back massage and control groups were 58.51±18.81, 70.77±16.05, and

SC
80.74±21.11, respectively. The differences between the posttest fatigue score averages and

between the pretest and posttest fatigue score averages of the groups were statistically

U
significant (p<0.001).
AN
The pretest energy score averages of the foot reflexology, back massage and

control groups were 21.37±9.05, 22.63±7.55 and 24.97±7.99, respectively. The difference
M

between these averages was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The posttest energy score
D

averages of the foot reflexology, back massage and control groups were 28.74±6.67,

24.20±7.35 and 21.97±7.98, respectively. The difference between these averages was
TE

statistically significant (p>0.001). The intragroup comparison of the pretest and posttest
EP

score averages showed a statistically significant difference in the foot reflexology group

(p<0.001), back massage group (p<0.05) and control group (p<0.05) (Table 2).
C

The PSQI pretest score averages of the foot reflexology, back massage and control
AC

groups were 11.09±3.18, 10.59±2.11, 9.20±2.42, respectively, while the PSQI posttest

score averages of these groups were 5.54±2.15, 8.34±2.39 and 11.8±2.47, respectively.

The difference between the PSQI pretest and posttest score averages within the groups and

the difference between the posttest score averages of the groups were statistically

significant (p<0.001), (Table 2).

8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

4. Discussion

The pretest fatigue score averages of the foot reflexology, back massage and

control groups indicated that the patients had high levels of fatigue. Fatigue develops in

hemodialysis patients who have chronic renal failure due to a variety of reasons, including

PT
the accumulation of metabolic waste in the body, abnormal energy expenditure,

inappetence or anemia [3,4]. Yurtsever [3] found that 92.5% of hemodialysis patients

RI
experience fatigue. Other studies [6,31,32] conducted on this subject have also confirmed

SC
the experience of fatigue in these patients (Table 1).

The fact that there were no significant differences between the pretest fatigue score

U
averages of the groups (p>0.05) shows that the groups’ fatigue levels were homogeneous.
AN
The lower posttest score average of the foot reflexology group on fatigue and energy

suggests that foot reflexology reduced their fatigue and increased their energy (p<0.001)
M

(Table 2). In the study conducted by Özdemir et al. (2013), it was found that reflexology
D

reduced the fatigue level of hemodialysis patients [20]. Other studies in the literature show
TE

that [19,22-24] reflexology also reduced fatigue in other patient groups. In the studies

conducted by Won [19] with chemotherapy patients, by Polat [22] with COPD patients, by
EP

Özdelikara [23] with breast cancer patients and by Doğan [24] with multiple sclerosis

patients, reflexology was found to reduce fatigue considerably. The findings of the present
C

study are similar to those found in the literature [9,10,13,14,19,20,22-24].


AC

The posttest score average of the back massage group on fatigue and energy

suggests that back massage reduced their fatigue and increased their energy (p<0.001)

(Table 2). Back massage stimulates the receptors on the skin, relieves the muscles and

dilates arterioles, thereby relaxing tired muscles. It is well-known that massage is able to

reduce cortisol levels and to increase serotonin and dopamine levels [33]. The decrease in

9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

the fatigue level and the increase in the energy level of the back massage group can be

explained by the facts that dopamine increases energy levels and that serotonin promotes

relaxation. Hasankhani et al. (2013) also demonstrated that back massage reduced fatigue

in hemodialysis patients [34]. The posttest score averages of the reflexology group was

PT
lower in terms of fatigue and higher in terms of energy than those of the back massage

group. In addition to supporting the theories of reflexology, these findings suggest that

RI
reflexology reduces fatigue levels and increases energy levels more effectively than back

SC
massage.

The intragroup comparison of the fatigue score average of the control group

U
indicated a significant increase in their fatigue score average. This shows that their fatigue
AN
levels were increasing over time. Moreover, previous studies [3,35,36] have shown that

quality of life fell and fatigue levels rose as the duration of dialysis increased. The present
M

study found that the groups had homogeneous PSQI pretest score averages, which were
D

higher than 9 for all groups (Table 2). A total score of 5 or higher on the PSQI indicates

poor sleep quality [30]. Therefore, the pretest findings revealed that the hemodialysis
TE

patients had poor sleep quality. The poor sleep quality of hemodialysis patients is caused
EP

by factors such as the limitations in life, metabolic changes resulting from the disease,

pain, diet, fatigue, cramps, metabolic acidosis, peripheral neuropathy, emotional problems
C

and longer exposure to uremic toxins [37]. In patients with chronic renal failure, abnormal
AC

cellular interleukin production may cause somnolence, and the removal of these substances

from the body through dialysis may lead to insomnia or sleep disorders. Some studies have

indicated that patients receiving dialysis due to chronic renal failure experience more sleep

problems than healthy individuals [1,38]. Neda et al. (2005) reported that 67.7% of the

hemodialysis patients in their study had poor sleep quality [39].

10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In this study, the lower score average of the foot reflexology group on the PSQI

shows that the reflexology was effective in improving sleep quality. Similar studies have

also found reflexology to significantly increase sleep quality [17,18,21]. For example,

Hughes et al. (2009) reported that the increase in the duration of patients’ sleep led to an

PT
increase in their perceived sleep levels [25]. The decrease in the PSQI score average of the

back massage group indicates that back massage is also effective in increasing sleep

RI
quality. Back massage is considered to generate a therapeutic effect on the subject and to

SC
reduce cortisol, norepinephrine and epinephrine levels by stimulating the sympathetic

nervous system, thereby increasing patients' sleep quality by virtue of the physical and

U
psychological relaxation it provides [33]. Yaman [7] and Çınar [40] also found that back
AN
massages given to elderly people with poor sleep quality before they went to bed increased

their sleep quality. The PSQI posttest score average of the back massage group was lower
M

than that of the control group, a finding which also serves to indicate that back massage is
D

effective at increasing sleep quality. The lower PSQI posttest score average of the foot
TE

reflexology group than that of both the back massage group and the control group

(p<0.001) suggests that foot reflexology increases sleep quality more effectively than back
EP

massage (Table 2).

Limitations of the Study


C

The results can only be generalized for hemodialysis patients, since this study was
AC

limited to this patient group alone. The study’s most significant limitation, however, is that

other factors that might affect the patients' fatigue and sleep status were not controlled.

5. Conclusion

This study has shown that both foot reflexology and back massage reduce fatigue

and increase energy levels and sleep quality. Foot reflexology, however was found to be

11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

more effective than back massage. It is suggested that foot reflexology be used to reduce

the fatigue and sleep problems experienced by hemodialysis patients. Back massage, which

is a simple and easily applied intervention, should also be used to reduce the fatigue and

sleep problems of hemodialysis patients.

PT
Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

RI
Acknowledgments

SC
This research was approved as a doctoral thesis of Kevser Sevgi Unal by Ataturk

University Institute of Health Sciences and presented at the ENDA&WANS Congress held

U
in Hannover, Germany between October 14-17, 2015. The authors would like to thank all
AN
the patients who participated in this study.

References
M

[1] Merlino G, Gigli GL, Valente M, Sleep disturbances in dialysis patients, Journal of
D

Nephrology. 2008;13:66-70
TE

[2] Solak Y, Atalay H, Kan S, Kaynar M, Bodur S, Yeksan M, Turk S, Effects of sildenafil

and vardenafil treatments on sleep quality and depression in hemodialysis patients with
EP

erectile dysfunction, Intenational Journal Impotence Research. 2011;23:27-31.

[3] Yurtsever S, Bedük T, Evaluation of fatigue on hemodialysis patients, Journal of


C

Nursing Research and Development. 2003;2(5): 3-12 [Turkish].


AC

[4] Jhamb M,Weisbord SD, Steel JL, Unruh M, Fatigue in patients receiving maintenance

dialysis, American Journal of Kidney Disease. 2008: 353-65.

[5] Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, Nursing Interventions Classification

(NIC), 5th ed., St. Louis Missouri Mosby Elsevier, 2008.

12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[6] Soyman Z, The effects of the massage on the tiredness of hemodialysis patients. Thesis

for Master degree, Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Health Sciences; 2009

[Turkish].

[7] Yaman S, Examine the effect of back massage with lavender oil on the sleep quality of

PT
old people. Thesis for Master degree, Fırat University Institute of Health Sciences;

2009 [Turkish].

RI
[8] Field T, Hernandez RM, Diego M, Fraser M, Lower back pain and sleep disturbance are

SC
reduced following massage therapy, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.

2007; 11(2): 141-145.

U
[9] Tabur H, Başaran E, Introduction to Reflexology, 2nd ed., Ezgi Publishing, İzmir, 2008.
AN
[10] Wilhelm AZ, Step-by-step Health: Reflexology, 1st ed., Dharma Publishing, İstanbul,

2009.
M

[11] Nakamarua T, Miurab N, Fukushimab A, Kawashimab R, Somatotopical relationships


D

between cortical activity and reflex areas in reflexology: A functional magnetic


TE

resonance imaging study, Neurosci Lett. 2008; 448(1): 6–9.

[12] Nesami BM, Shorofi SA, Zargar N, Sohrabi M, Baradari AG, Khalilian A, The effects
EP

of foot reflexology massage on anxiety in patients following coronary artery bypass graft
C

surgery: A randomized controlled trial, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.


AC

2014; 20: 42-47

[13] Wang MY, Tsai PS, Lee PH, The efficacy of reflexology: systematic review, J Adv

Nurs. 2008;62(5): 512.

[14] Pullen ML, Reflexology, International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2002;8: 481-488.

[15] Korkan EA, Uyar M, An Evidence-based approach to pain control, Acibadem

University Journal of Health Sciences. 2014; 5(1): 9-14.

13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[16] Yang JH, The effects of foot reflexology on nausea, vomiting and fatigue of breast

cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2005;35(1):

177-185.

[17] Park JW, Yoo HR, Lee HS, Effects of foot reflex zone massage on patients’ pain and

PT
sleep satisfaction following mastectomy, J Korean Acad Soc Home Care Nurs. 2006;13:

54-60.

RI
[18] Lee J, Han M, Chung Y, Kim J, Choi J, Effects of foot reflexology on fatigue, sleep

SC
and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011; 41(6):

821-833.

U
[19] Won JS, Jeong IS, Kim JS, Kim KS, Effect of foot reflexology on vital signs, fatigue
AN
and mood in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, Journal of Korean Academy of

Fundamentals of Nursing. 2002;9(1): 16-26.


M

[20] Özdemir G, Ovayolu N, Ovayolu Ö, The effect of reflexology hemodialysis patients


D

with fatigue, pain and cramps, Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19(3): 265-73.
TE

[21] Song RH, Kim DH, The effects of foot reflexion massage on sleep disturbance,

depression disorder and the physiological index of the elderly, Taehan Kanho Hakhoe
EP

Chi. 2006;36(1):15-24.

[22] Polat H, The effect of reflexology on dyspnea and tiredness of patient with chronic
C

obstructive pulmonary disease. Thesis for Doctorate degree, Ataturk University Institute
AC

of Health Sciences; 2013 [Turkish].

[23] Özdelikara A, The effect of reflexology on fatigue, nausea, vomiting in the patients

with breast cancer as result of chemotherapy. Thesis for Doctorate degree, Ataturk

University Institute of Health Sciences; 2013 [Turkish].

14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[24] Doğan DH, The effect of reflexology on the pain, fatigue and life quality of multiple

sclerosis patient. Thesis for Doctorate degree, Ataturk University Institute of Health

Sciences; 2015 [Turkish].

[25] Hughes CM, Cullough M, Bradbury L, Hume D, Quinn F, Mc Donough S,

PT
Acupuncture and reflexology for insomnia: A feasibility study, Acupunct Med.

2009;27(4): 163-168.

RI
[26] Field TM, Massage Therapy. In: Essentials of Complementary and Alternative

SC
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott Williams& Wilkins 1999.

[27] Madenci E, Classical massage, Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation.

2007;53(2): 58-61 [Turkish].


U
AN
[28] Lee KA, Hicks G, Nino-Mucia G, Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue,

Psychiatry Research. 1991;36(3): 291-298


M

[29] Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ, The Pittsburgh Sleep
D

Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research, Psychiatry
TE

Research. 1989; 28(2): 193-213.

[30] Ağargün MY, Kara H, Anlar Ö, The Validity and reliability of Pittsburgh Sleep
EP

Quality Index, Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;7(2): 107-115 [Turkish].

[31] Barrett BJ, Vavasour HM, Major A, Clinical and psychological correlates of somatic
C
AC

symtoms in patients on dialysis, Nephron. 1990;55(1): 10-15.

[32] Laupacis A, Muirhead N, Keown P, Wong C, A disease-specific questionnaire for

assessing quality of life in patients on hemodialysis, Nephron. 1992;60(3): 302-306.

[33] Field T, Hermandez Reif M, Diego M, Schanberg S, Kuhn C, Cortisol decrease and

serotonin and dopamine increase following massage therapy, Int J Neurosci. 2005;115

(10): 1397-413.

15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[34] Hasankhani H, Ghaderi F, Lakdizaji S, Nahamin M, The effect of the slow-stroke back

massage on fatigue of dialyzed patients, Intl Res J of Appl Basic Sci. 2013; 4(10):

3004-8.

[35] Acaray A, Pınar R, The evaluation of the quality of life in chronic hemodialysis

PT
patients, Journal of Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing. 2004;8(1): 1-11

[Turkish].

RI
[36] Jhamb M, Weisbord SD, Steel JL, Unruh M, Fatigue in patients receiving maintenance

SC
dialysis, Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(2): 353-65.

[37] Koch BC, Nagtegaal JE, Kerkhof GA, ter Wee PM, Circadian sleep-wake rhythm

U
disturbances in end-stage renal disease, Nat Rev Nephrol. 2009;5(7):407-16.
AN
[38] Çölbay M, Yüksel Ş, Acartürk G, Karaman O, Unlü M, Evaluation of the hemodialysis

patient with Pittsburgh sleep quality index, Tuberk Toraks. 2007;55(2): 167-173.
M

[39] Neda K, Bumblyte IA, Razukeviciene L, Sleep disorders and quality of life in patients
D

on hemodialysis, Medicina Kaunas Journal. 2005;41(1): 69-74.


TE

[40] Çınar Ş, The investigation of the impact of back massage on sleep at elderly residing in

rest home. Thesis for Master degree, Ege University Institute of Health Sciences; 2004
EP

[Turkish].
C
AC

16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients

RG* MG* CG* Total

Characteristics X±SD X±SD X±SD X±SD Significance Test

Average Age (year) 51.74±12.29 53.89±13.18 57.37±13.12 54.33±12.96 F=1.706 p=0.187

Average Height (cm) 166.11±9.39 161.51±10.09 157.86±20.07 161.83±14.33 F=3.033 p=0.053

PT
Average Weight (kg) 76.29±13.95 72.91±12.80 70.40±13.62 73.20±13.55 F=1.684 p=0.191

RI
Gender n % n % n % n %

Female 16 45.7 19 54.3 15 42.9 50 47.6 χ2 =0.993

SC
Male 19 54.3 16 45.7 20 57.1 55 52.4 p=0.609

Marital Status

Married 26 74.3 27 77.1

U
28 80.0 81 77.1 χ2 =1.274
AN
Single 9 25.7 8 22.9 7 20.0 24 22.8 p=0.866

* RG: Foot Reflexology Group, MG:Back Massage Group, CG:Control Group


M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons of the patients' fatigue and sleep quality score

averages

RG MG CG RG-MG-CG RG-MG RG-CG MG-CG

Pretest 82.46±22.2 80.31±15.7 74.54±22.5 F=1.407 t=0.465 t=1.478 t=1.243


FATIGUE

p=0.250 p=0.643 p=0.144 p=0.218

PT
Posttest 58.51±18.8 70.77±16.0 80.74±21.1 F=12.314 t=-2,933 t=-4.651 t=-2.224

RI
p=0.000 p=0.005 p=0.000 p=0.029

p 0.000 0.000 0.026

SC
t 10.448 5.615 -2.327

Pretest 21.37±9.05 22.63±7.5 24.97±7.9 F=1.729 t=-0.631 t=-1.765 t=-1.261

U
ENERGY

p=0.183 p=0.530 p=0.082 p=0.212


AN
Posttest 28.74±6.6 24.20±7.3 21.97±7.9 F=7.709 t=2.707 t=3.852 t=1.215

p=0.001 p=0.009 p=0.000 p=0.229


M

p 0.000 0.018 0.002

t -6.256 -2.483 3.434


D

Pretest 11.09±3.18 10.59±2.11 9.20±2.42 F=5.065 t=0.619 t=2.788 t=2.735


TE

p=0.008 p=0.538 p=0.007 p=0.008


PSQI

Posttest 5.54±2.15 8.34±2.39 11.88±2.47 F=63.621 t=-5.159 t=11.38 t=-6.051


EP

p=0.000 p=0.000 p=0.000 p=0.000


C

p 0.000 0.000 0.000


AC

t 13.634 4.884 -7.234


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Hemodialysis Patients (N=200)
Patients included in this study (n=105)

PT
Foot Reflexology Group/RG Back Massage Group/MG Control Group/CG

RI
(n: 35) (n: 35) (n: 35)

SC
Pretest

U
Patient Information Form
PSQI
AN
VASF
M
D

RG MG CG
Hemodialysis patients were Hemodialysis patients were
TE

Neither reflexology nor


given foot reflexology for 30 given back massage for 30 back massage were given.
minutes, twice a week for 4 minutes, twice a week for 4
weeks (a total of 8 sessions). weeks (a total of 8
EP

sessions).
C
AC

Posttest Posttest Posttest


(after 4 weeks) (after 4 weeks) (after 4 weeks)
PSQI PSQI PSQI
VASF VASF VASF

Figure 1. Study Scheme


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights

• The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of foot reflexology and back

massage at optimizing the sleep quality and reducing the fatigue of hemodialysis

patients.

PT
• Foot reflexology and back massage improved the sleep quality and reduced the

fatigue of hemodialysis patients.

RI
• Foot reflexology is more effective than back massage for sleep quality and fatigue.

U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

You might also like