Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENG Quiz 3 Critical Reading
ENG Quiz 3 Critical Reading
Nim :
Kelas :C
QUIZ 3
1. Now place the passage in its context and answer the following questions:
a. When was it written?
This article was written on Monday, November 4th 2013 at 10:00 AM
b. What was going on in Indonesia at this time that could have affected the
author’s views and ideas?
Because of the corruption cases in Indonesia are uncovered
c. Who wrote the article?
He is Hendi Yogi Prabowo
d. Where is he from?
He is from Yogyakarta
e. What is his educational background?
His educational background is forensic Accounting
f. Are there refrences in the text that are quite specific to that writer’s context,
or is the writer trying to be more general or universal in his approach?
The writer is trying to be more general in his approach
g. Record your impressions of the points or arguments made in the text.
It is needed because it can help resolve corruption cases more quickly
h. What is informing your reaction and thoughts?
It is so helpful
i. What information are you drawing on?
In my opinion forensic accounting is difficult job, because we must really
understand the problem, open minded, and be able to analyze properly in problem
solving
j. And how do you approach the reading of the text in order to make sense of
it?
I understand this article use Skimming, scanning, and logical techniques in critical
reading
2. Make questions using the 5 WH and HOW about the content of the passage?
What: What is served by forensic accountants?
Forensic accountants offer various services such as antifraud consultations,
antifraud system designs, antitrust, divorce, bankruptcy, insurance claims,
royalty audits, counterterrorist financing and expert witnessing
Who: Who is released the second investigation report about the hambalang
corruption case?
the investigation report is released by Supreme Audit Agency (BPK)
Where: Where the author continue his master degree in forensic accounting?
In Wollongong university, Autralia
How: How do you think about common people about the forensic accounting?
They think that the forensic accounting is only antifraud
Paragraph 2 : Many people think that forensic accounting only study antifraud
Paragraph 9 : Some forensic accountants can enter all information about the
investigation in their investigative report
Paragraph 10 : The fact that many fraud investigations, the relevance of the
information gathered may not be immediately known
Paragraph 13 : The research show that high SDO groups will be more prone to
corruption than those with low SDOs.
Paragraph 14 : The belief that dominance makes people in high positions mistakenly
think that they are entitled everything
Paragraph 16 : An organization with a high SDO commonly has high fraud risk
Summary :
Corruption cases in Indonesia more increasing, makes forensic accounting
courses in University also increased. Many people think that forensic accounting only
study antifraud. but in fact, Forensic Accountants offer a much wider range of
services in the various sector. Bank are now required to have an antifraud strategy to
minimize fraud risk in their organization. Some people work in the bank must
understand the basics of forensic accounting although they don’t have an accounting
backgrounds. Some forensic accountants can enter all information about the
investigation in their investigative report.The research show that high SDO groups
will be more prone to corruption than those with low SDOs. An organization with a
high SDO commonly has high fraud risk. A Forensic accountant needs to gain an
understanding of the interactions with each other in social network. Social network
analysis to determine who in the network has the highest betweenness centrality. The
principle of fraud investigations is concerned. Therefore, Forensic accounting is an
extremely broad field, which is not suitable for those with closed minds or faint
hearts.
4. Identify the claims that are being made and the support used to back up the claims
a. Is the argument well reasoned?
Yes, the argument is well reasoned because the author presents reason that can
understood by other people
b. Is the evidence connected to the claim being made?
The evidence connected to the claim being made is the studies found that high
SDO groups will be more prone to corruption than those with low SDOs.
c. Are they convinced by the arguments the author is making? Why or why
not?
Yes, they convinced by the arguments of the author because the author also
explain based on his experience make the readers more trust his argument.
5. Find another article about forensic accounting from any reliable source