Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mangae
Mangae
Contents
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3
HISTORY OF THE COMPANY ''SAMSUNG''....................................................................3
MARKET STRUCTURES AND COMPETITION.................................................................4
PERFECT COMPETITION........................................................................................... 4
MONOPOLY.............................................................................................................. 4
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION................................................................................. 4
OLIGOPOLY.............................................................................................................. 5
MARKET STRUCTURE OF SAMSUNG............................................................................5
INTERDEPENDENCE................................................................................................. 5
BARRIERS TO ENTRY................................................................................................ 6
PREVIOUS MARKET STRUCTURE OF SAMSUNG...........................................................6
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.................................................................................... 6
CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................. 7
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 8
INTRODUCTION
MONOPOLY
At the other extreme is monopoly, which comprise only one firm in the industry and
hence that has no competition within the industry. Only single firm can supply a
service or good and that firm can charge the prices it requires, since customers
have no alternatives and it is difficult for market competitors to enter the market
place (Mussa and Rosen, 1978).
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION
Another market structure involves monopolistic competition which have a lot
of firm's competition and there is also a freedom for a new firm in order to
enter and to exit the industry (Parenti, 2017).
OLIGOPOLY
Oligopoly, when there are few firm's competition and an entry of new firm is
highly restricted. It involves small numbers of firms, none of which can keep
the others to have remarkable influence (Mazzeo, 2002).
Mutual dependence with each other are shown when firms are within an
oligopoly. If there is a firm that changes the specifications and prices of its
product, the sales of its rivals will be highly affected. A slight move will also
make by the rivals in order to overcome the effect on their prices. As
Samsung is operating in oligopoly. In the past time, there was a price war
occurred in between Samsung and Apple. It was started when apple Inc.
given out $128 discounts for trade customers in order to purchase an iPhone
4 (Bostic, 2013). Apple countered by Samsung's move when it provides 15%
refund on the selection of Samsung galaxy products. As the rival's moves
were countered by Samsung, it clearly shows an interdependence between
both the firms as the change in price by one firm caused its rival to make a
move.
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
There are also barriers to entry are shown in oligopoly of Samsung working in
smart phone industry. The main barriers to entry is indicated as the brand
loyalty. As Brand Loyalty within an oligopoly plays a vital role because the
firms that are eager to enter the industry would definitely have to compete
with the other firms that are already running out their products in the
industry. Costumers have to play a role in order to choose their desired
operating systems according to their choices. As an Android OS among
Samsung are the top customer choices in a previous year since the products
have shown remarkable sales in Android operated devices.
The oligopoly is more likely to maximize profits, the barriers to entry are
high- and very high in the case as well, it has the ability to fix prices.
Samsung firm in oligopoly is highly profitable, when the prices of
smartphones are lower by one firm, the demand will highly increase and
ultimately profit will also increase. Samsung is able to launch a huge labor
force for many things from assembly of products towards research and
development of new ways to market, design and ultimately sell it to
customer’s base.
The mobile phone market is very condensed since the starts of the informational
era which initiates around the 90s. The first leading mobile phone company was
Nokia. It monopolized the phones market industry – Android than can be installed in
Samsung mobile phones easily.
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
CONCLUSION
To conclude the report, Samsung is one of the largest company all over the
world. Samsung is running its products excellently and continuously
launching new and useful products. Samsung sales network in 61 different
countries. Samsung always launch its latest phones. The Galaxy 7 which is
launched by Samsung is a particular product which is well designed and
innovative that it allows Samsung to become one of the most important
sellers of mobile phones all over the world. This is because the dominant
share of the brand ''Samsung'' give directions towards its main objectives.
The market structure in which Samsung operates previously is monopoly as
it involves only one firm and that firm can supply good or can change the
prices on their products, it demands. As monopoly breakdown into oligopoly
which includes few firms that are competing with each other as Samsung,
one of the largest company is competing with Apple Inc. Oligopoly market
structure also includes interdependence and barriers to supply. Barriers to
supply mainly involves brand loyalty. Samsung currently holds about 57% of
total market share.
REFERENCES
1. Quelch, J.A. and Harrington, A., 2009. Samsung Electronics Company:
global marketing operations. Harvard Business School.
2. Sabat, H.K., 2002. The evolving mobile wireless value chain and
market structure. Telecommunications policy, 26(9-10), pp.505-535.
3. Ram, Qasim, iz, M. M., Rizwan, M., Aslam, F. and Khurshid, A., 2014.
The Comparative Analysis of the Factors Effecting Brand Loyalty
towards Samsung Products. Journal of Sociological Research, 5(1),
pp.327-349.
4. Finn, M.G., 2000. Perfect competition and the effects of energy price
increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit and banking,
pp.400-416.
7. Mussa, M. and Rosen, S., 1978. Monopoly and product quality. Journal
of Economic theory, 18(2), pp.301-317.
9. Neto, A.R., Abrita, M.B. and Parré, J.L., 2017. THE INDUSTRY OF MOBILE
PHONE DEVICES IN THE 2000s: ANALYSIS OF APPLE, NOKIA AND
SAMSUNG INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE BASED ON THE GAME THEORY.
GEOFRONTER, 1(3)
10. Sharma, S.D., 2004. Government intervention or market liberalization:
The Korean financial crisis as a case of market failure. Progress in
Development Studies, 4(1), pp.47-57.
13. Vergara, R.A.G., 2012. Samsung electronics and apple, inc.: A study in
contrast in vertical integration in the 21st century. Am Int J Contemp
Res, 2(9).