Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A 130 NM Generation Logic Technology Featuring 70nm Transistors, Dual VT Transistors and 6 Layers of Interconnects
A 130 NM Generation Logic Technology Featuring 70nm Transistors, Dual VT Transistors and 6 Layers of Interconnects
S . Tyagi, M. Alavi’,, R. Bigwood, T. Bramblett, J. Brandenburg, W. Chen, B. Crew, M. Hussein, P. Jacob, C. Kenyon, C. Lo,
B. Mcintyre, Z. Ma, P. Moon, P. Nguyen, L. Rumaner, R. Schweinfurth, S. Sivakumar, M. Stettler*, S.Thompson, B. Tufts, J. Xu,
S . Yang and M. Bohr
Portland Technology Development, * TCAD,’ QRE, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR 97124, USA.
23.3.1
0-7803-6438-4/00/$10.00 02000 IEEE IEDM 00-567
threshold voltages are made by selectively adjusting well 100 m V N for high Vt devices and 110 m V N for low Vt
doses. The transistor characteristics are shown in Figs. 3 and 4 device. For the PMOS device the measured DIBL is 100 m V N
for high and low threshold devices respectively. Saturation
drive currents for high Vt devices at Ioff value of 10 d P m , 1.Er02
are 1.03 mNPm for NMOS and 0.5 mNPm for PMOS. For 1.E03
low Vt devices the Ioff is 100 d P m , and the currents are 1.17 1.Er04
h
1.E05
1.2 2 1.Ero6
PMOS I NMOS W
n 1.507
1.o I
1.Er08
50.8
k 0.6
E
W
n 0.4
vgs= 1.1 lE-09
t
l.E-10 >
-1.3
\I/
0.0 1.3
c(
VGS (v)
0.2
for high Vt device and 130 m V N for low Vt device.
0.0 Fig. 6 Low Vt subthreshold characteristics.
-1.3 1.3 The NMOS and PMOS drive current vs. off current
characteristicsare shown in Fig. 7 for both the high and low Vt
devices. These are the best Ion-Ioff characteristics reported to
mNPm for NMOS and 0.6 mNPm for PMOS.
1 .E06
1.E-07
%
3 1.508
-
0
1.SO9
-1.3 1.3 0 1.5
23.3.2
568-IEDM 00
The threshold voltage roll-off characteristics are shown in
Fig. 8 and 9 for high and low Vt devices respectively. Optimal
Halo and well engineering gives Vt roll off of less than 100
mV for the target 70 nm devices. This is achieved by using the
halo to boost the average well doping for shorter gate length
devices. This reduces the magnitude of Vt roll off due to short
channel effects.
0.60 , 1
Interconnects
Chip performance is increasingly limited by the RC
delay of the interconnect as the transistor delay progressively
50 60 70 80 90 100
Gate Length (nm) decreases while the narrower lines and space actually
increase the delay associated with interconnects [2]. Using
Fig. 8 Hi Vt threshold voltages vs. gate length. copper interconnects helps reduce this effect. This process
technology uses dual damascene copper to reduce the
-5 1
0.60
0.40
Vd, = 0.05V
NMOS
resistances of the interconnects. Fluorinated SiO, (FSG) is
used as inter-level dielectric (ILD) to reduce the dielectric
& constant, the dielectric constant k is measured to be 3.6. Fig.
-9 0.20 11 is a cross-section SEM image showing the dual damascene
interconnects.
=3 -0.20
0.00
$
c.
-0.40
-0.60
50 60 70 80 90 100
Gate Length (nm)
Fig. 9 Low Vt threshold voltages vs. gate length.
23.3.3
lEDM 00-569
minimum pitch of each metal layer and compared to earlier The SRAM performance is measured using its Fmax.
results from 18Onm technologies using AI [3] and Cu [4]. The Fig. 15 shows the schmoo plot for the SRAM, i.e. the Fmax
present technology exhibits 30% lower sheet resistance at the is shown as a function of voltage. The tester capability
same metal pitch due to the use of Cu with high aspect ratios. presently limits the Fmax measurement to 1.6GHz. As is seen
The total line capacitance is 230 fF/mm for M1 to M5 and in Fig. 15, at 1.3V the SRAM operates at clock period of
slightly higher for M6. 0.625" or Fmax of 1.6Ghz.
80
60
40
L
20 +-*O A A o
L
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 Fig. 14 Top down SEM of the 2.45 pm2 6-T SRAM bit cell on
Pitch (nm)
left and the 2.09 pm2 6-T SRAM on right.
Fig. 12 Sheet resistance as a function of layer pitch.
1.4 - .6 W z at 1.3
To benchmark the performance of interconnects, Fig. 13 1.3 .
shows the RC delay in picoseconds per millimeter of wire.
Data for each metal layer is shown as a function of the
minimum pitch at that layer. For a given pitch, 40%
reduction in RC is achieved by using Cu interconnects and
FSG ILD.
140
120 [ 4 this work: Cu I 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Access Time (ns)
Fig. 15 Fmax schmoo plot for 16Mbit SRAM.
Conclusion
A 130 nm generation logic technology has been
demonstrated with low power high performance transistors.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 Excellent interconnect performance is achieved by using 6
Pitch (nm) layers of dual damascene Cu with FSG' dielectrics. The
Fig. 13 RC delay for a wire length of Imm as a function of layer technology performance capabilities are demonstrated with
pitch. ring oscillator delays of 7 ps/stage and with a 18 Mbit SRAM
SRAM Yield and Performance operating at 1.6 MHz.
A 18 Mbit CMOS SRAM [5] was shrunk to technology
design rules, the shrunk die size is 103 mm2. This SRAM is Acknowledgement
used as a yield and reliability test vehicle during the process The authors would like to thank Intel logic technology
development and to test and refine the SRAM cell and development groups of integration/device/LYA, lithography,
support circuitry to be used in logic products. The technology etch, diffusion, thin films, polish, novel device, LTD design,
features enable a 2.45 pm2 6-T SRAM cell (1.4 pm x 1.75 m sort and test, TEM/SIMS Lab of Oregon, TCAD, and QRE.
P )
without the using a local interconnect layer. Array specific
design rules allow a smaller 2.09 pm2 6-T SRAM cell (1.23 pm References
[ I ] T. Ghani et. al, IEDM Tech. Digest, pp 415-419 (1999).
x 1.69 pm), this is the densest reported cell to date. Fig. 14 [2] M. Bohr. IEDM Tech. Digest, pp 241-244, (1995).
shows a top down SEM of the active areas and polysilicon gate [3] S. Yang et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., pp. 197-200, (1998).
for both these cells. The SRAM die yield is equivalent to [4] S . Crowder et. al. VLSI Tech. Symp. Digest, pp 105-106 (1999).
past technologies at this point of time relative to ramping in [5] C. Zhao et. al, ISSCC. pp200, (1999).
high volume manufacturing.
23.3.4
570-IEDM 00