Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Braun ICCE 2002
Braun ICCE 2002
cos filter
Downsampling
roll-off bandwidth Decision device
& Diff. decoder Derandomizer FEC decoder
α = 0.25 200 kHz D1 Demapping
α = 0.3 400 kHz D2
I 800 kHz D3 QPSK on 1+x +x
5 6 RS ( x, x – 2t )
Re-
1 MHz D4 sampling x = 18…255
14 15
input Q 1.6 MHz D5 16-QAM off 1+x +x t = 0…10 output
signal D6 signal
2 MHz
3.2 MHz D7
4 MHz D8
FU Functional
select path Unit
according to Carrier Timing
set of parameters Signal Unique Pre- recovery recovery
NCO & &
detector word amble
tracking tracking
select channel Real valued signal
to the different standards. channels. This conversion is possible with few restric-
tions concerning frequency allocation [7]. All restrictions
Important signal processing elements in Fig. 2 are:
are consistent with the standards. If this structure is used,
• Channel selection: downconversion of the radio frequen- the computational amount can be decreased.
cy spectrum by means of a numerically controlled oscil-
lator (NCO). 6 CONCLUSIONS
• Matched filter FU for all possible roll-off factors and We have investigated new architectures for headends in
bandwidths. CATV networks with advanced digital signal processing.
• Downsampling. The flexible Software Headend was designed to handle
• Signal detector to detect the arrival of an upstream burst. multiple standards on a single hardware platform. The ar-
chitecture of the Software Headend was presented and sub-
• Carrier and timing recovery plus tracking units.
divided into modules and functional units. Starting from
• Resampling unit to select optimum sampling instant. this architecture, the three different classes Modular Soft-
• FUs for symbol decision, demapping, differential decod- ware Headend, Parallel Software Headend and FFT-based
ing and derandomization. Software Headend were outlined.
• Forward error correction (FEC).
REFERENCES
5 CLASSIFICATION OF SOFTWARE [1] ETSI standard EN 300 429 v1.2.1, "Framing structure, chan-
HEADENDS nel coding and modulation for cable systems," Apr. 1998.
To cover the complete frequency range in upstream direc- [2] ETSI standard ES 200 800 v1.2.1, "DVB interaction channel
for Cable TV distribution systems," Apr. 2000.
tion, the Software Headends are classified into:
[3] DOCSIS Radio Frequency Interface Specification, version
• The Modular Software Headend architecture that mani- 1.0: SP-RFI-I05, Nov. 1999, version 1.1: SP-RFIv1.1-I06,
folds the single channel structure N times to support N Dec. 2000.
upstream channels. All signal processing elements for
[4] ETSI standard ES 201 488 v1.1.1, "DOCSIS Radio Frequen-
one upstream channel are grouped into a module. cy Interface Specification," Nov. 2000.
• The Parallel Software Headend architecture that associ- [5] J. Mitola, "The software radio architecture," IEEE Commun.
ates a module with a FU. Only one implementation of Mag., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 26-38, May 1995.
each FU is required in this case, resulting in less hardware
[6] J. Mitola, "Software radio architecture," Wiley, 2000.
amount but significantly faster circuits.
[7] J. Wang, "Study of demultiplexing for communications in the
• The FFT-based Software Headend that incorporates a
return channel of CATV," Internal report, Institute of Tele-
fast Fourier transform (FFT) to separate the upstream communications, University of Stuttgart, Jun. 2000.