Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Powerpapers Diabetic Management
Powerpapers Diabetic Management
Diabetic Management
important public health issue. The rate of diabetes is rapidly increasing throughout the world.
The care and treatment of diabetes takes up a great deal of public and private medical resources,
particularly in developing nations. The Caribbean has been chosen as the focus for this research.
Narayan et al (2006) estimated that as of 2003, 19,026 people in Latin America and the
Caribbean were afflicted with this disease. It is estimated that by 2025, over 36,000 people in
Latin America and the Caribbean will have diabetes, rising from 6.0% in 2003 to 7.8% in 2025.
Worldwide, in 2003, the prevalence of diabetes was 5.1% for people between the ages of 20 and
79 (Narayan et al., 2006). The direct medical costs for this region for diabetes related medical
expenses were $8,676 US million in 2003 alone. In 2001, there were 163,000 deaths in Latin
America and the Caribbean related to diabetes. The Disability-adjusted years in 2001 reached
Background
The costs of diabetes in the developing world were the highest in Latin America and the
Caribbean. Diabetes lowers the quality of life among the afflicted persons. Coupled with the
already low standard of living, the need is high to alleviate this disease in the Caribbean area as
much as possible. This study will explore whether or not women’s likelihood of wearing
Methods
selected randomly from the female patients who have received nursing education on the need to
wear appropriate footwear. The sample will be a convenience sampling and participants will be
chosen randomly until a minimum of 20 patients have agreed to come to the focus group. It is
anticipated that out of 20, 15 will actually attend. However, if the larger number attends, that is
acceptable.
The data will be collected using note taking by the moderator. The session will also be
tape-recorded directly onto a laptop for review later by the researcher. Informed consent by
One of the most devastating side effects of diabetes is the diabetic foot syndrome
(Chandalia et al., 2008; Price, 2004). Bus et al. (2011) pointed out that foot ulcerations are one of
the most prevalant of the long-term complications of diabetes, and can lead to infection and
amputation. Viswanathan et al. (2004) suggested that diabetic patients who have already had
ulcers or amputations are at particular risk for ulceration, infection, and amputation. Further, as
the foot alters depending on the dynamics of the foot and its injuries, joint deformities can
develop, and new ulcers can form (Viswanathan et al., 2004). The issue is so critical that
Maciejewski et al. (2004) reported that preventing the formation of foot ulcers should be one of
the major clinical objectives in the care of diabetes. Maciejewski et al. (2004) cite a study by
Pecoraro et al. (1990) which showed that in the US, 68% of all amputations were related to
diabetes. Efforts to prevent ulcers can help avoid other serious side effects that would reduce the
Diabetic Management 4
quality of life for patients and would increase the overall health costs of the patient, and thus the
In 2004, Price reported that there had been few studies which really investigated quality
of life of patients of diabetes who had suffered foot complications. It is clear that amputation can
have a drastic impact on anyone’s life; without feet, or with the unbalance that results from
partial amputation, the ability to ambulate becomes a real concern. The inability to ambulate can
interfere not only with the patient’s social life (Boutoille et al., 2008; Narayan, 2006) but with
their general physical limitations. Further, with obesity so concurrent with obesity that the
combination is sometimes call ‘diabesity’ (Farag & Gaballa, 2011), patients can ill afford to have
physical limitations that preclude getting regular physical exercise. Finally, Willrich (2005) and
Boutoille et al., (2008) both suggested that quality of life may be as low for groups that develop
Chandalia et al. (2008) asserted that the majority of the symptoms relating to diabetic
foot syndrome are preventable and relate to patient knowledge and to improper footwear.
Chandalia et al. (2008) suggest that patients are typically not educated as to how to properly care
for their feet or how to control their diabetes. In addition, the habit in India is to go barefoot
indoors, with a significant number of Indians going barefoot outdoors. When Indians visit
relgious shrines, they are also likely to go barefoot (Chandalia et al., 2008). The authors assert
that in India (as well as other hot climates, which would include the Caribbean), hot pavement
Other factors that may contribute to injury include style of shoes (in India, pointed), the
lack of socks, lack of straps, and exposed heels and toes (Chandalia et al., 2008). Chandalia et al.
(2008) suggested that corns, calluses, foot fissures, deformities, and nail abnormalities were all
Diabetic Management 5
precursors of further problems that could be expected to occur if the feet did not receive better
care. One of the methods of care involves utilizing better footware. However, for many years, the
asumption has been made that good diabetic footwear is ‘ugly’ and that diabetic footwear that is
not ugly is unlikely to be good (Boulton & Jude, 2004). Although it seems at first glance to be a
facetious concern, that footwear may be ‘ugly’, the presumption was made that patients would
not wear ugly footwear, thus condeming themselves to wearing footwear that was bad for
Boulton and Jude (2004) argue that there is abumdant anecdotal evidence that bad, or low
quality, footwear contributes to the development of toe ulcers and foot lesions, ut little empirical
evidence. One European study suggested that bad footwear contributed to 21% of all foot uclers.
In studies where the patients were actually given footwear, they were only worn 22% of the time,
because patients believed they were ugly. The authors suggest that a deeper issue is whether or
not therapeutic footwear can really prevent development of food ulcers (assuming of course tha
thtey are worn). Boulton and Jude (2004) conclude that as of the time of the article, there was no
real evidence that therapeutic footwear, even if worn, would make a difference in outcome. They
Viswanathan et al.’s 2004 study of 241 diabetic patients concluded that therapeutic
footwear is useful in reducing the numbers of new ulcers and by inference the rate of amputation
in the diabetic community. This group of patients was studied for 9 months and utilized a control
group to ensure that differences in results came from footwear. Maciejewski et al. (2004)
concluded after a literature study that emphasis should be placed on decreasing incidents that
might lead to foot ulcers, on an individual basis rather than a universal recommendation.
Ullbrecht et al., 2004 reported that it was important for patients to wear their therapeutic shoes,
Diabetic Management 6
but that there was at that point no real way to determine which type of footwear would serve best
for any given foot and patient characteristic. Bus et al. (2011) studied plantar pressure in diabetic
patients and concluded that in-shoe plantar pressure was an accurate tool to evaluate footwear
quality and improve outcome, while Price (2004) merely suggested that patients who received
orthotic treatment had a better outcome overall. Chandalia et al. (2008) studied patients who used
sturdy shoes and compared them to patients who utilized open toed and heeled shoes, and
concluded that the sturdier shoe brought better outcomes; they did not study any use of orthotic
shoes.
Actis et al. (2008) reported that “There is evidence that appropriate footwear is an
important factor in the prevention of foot pain in otherwise healthy people or foot ulcers in
people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy” (p. 363) but did not provide evidence of this.
Instead, they studied the design of orthotics and orthotic inserts and concluded that insertion of a
set of plastizote plugs under the foot’s impact area would be of greatest efficacy to the patient.
Four shoe insole models were produced from measurements of the pressure the patient put on the
shoes. The results showed that using soft localized plugs inserted into the insole would reduce
peak plantar pressure in the metartarsal region of the foot. However, the team suggested that
additional testing be conducted to study the results of plug usage when the skin had already
Search Strategy
Research strategy involved the use of medical literature data bases. Initial search was
conducted on the terms <diabetes> and <foot care>. Subsequent searches included the terms
<stress>, <pressure>, <shoes>, <amputation> and <hot>. Of the articles that resulted from these
Diabetic Management 7
searches in various combinations, 12 articles were in the final group selected for inclusion in the
Conceptual Framework
This exploratory research will investigate whether adult diabetic female patients who
have received education in the necessity of adequate footwear seem to be more likely to wear
‘sturdy’ shoes such as running shoes with modified insoles, or whether they are likely to
Will adult women who have received education in the necessity of adequate footwear
seem to be likely to wear sturdy shoes, such as running shoes with specially modified insoles, or
will they be likely to continue to wear higher fashion shoes during casual wear?
Fifteen to 20 adult female patients who have received patient education in the need to
wear appropriate footwear will be selected for participation in a focus group which will meet to
discuss diabetes and footwear selections. The discussion will revolve around shoes, diabetes,
shoe styles, personal needs, and desires regarding shoes. The aim will be to determine if
educating diabetic women in the need to protect their feet will help them make the decision to
put form over fashion. At the end of the focus group the women will be asked if their opinion of
wearing appropriate shoes changed after receiving education on the need to wear the shoes.
Methodology
Study Design
The study will be an exploratory design with a population of 15-20 female participants
selected from the treatment population. The sampling will be a convenience sampling from the
group of female patients aged 20-79. Patients will be selected at random from the group of
Diabetic Management 8
female adult patients who have received appropriate education on the need to maintain adequate
footwear. Patients will be selected until 20 female patients have agreed to participate in the focus
group. Fifteen patients will be required to attend in order to have the group.
Data Collection
Data will be collected during the focus group. The moderator will take notes and will
record the session on the laptop. Reliability is not a consideration with this method of study. The
exploratory nature of the study is intended to gather data to suggest future study. As a result,
Data analysis will be textual analysis based on participant responses and recorded
responses, as well as the participant’s answer as to whether or not the education changed their
minds about wearing less appropriate shoes. The aggregate responses to this question will be
compared to the textual analysis. The limitation of the study is that it will be limited to a small
group in a limited practice. However, exploratory studies are intended to suggest other avenues
Ethical Considerations
Participants will be given informed consent letters and asked to sign an agreement. No
one will be physically hurt during this research. Ethical considerations revolve around privacy.
All documentation, including recordings, will be kept locked up except when the researcher is
using them, and no information will be recognizable on an individual basis or linked with a name
or medical record.
Diabetic Management 9
The researcher will use a laptop and a room for the focus group that is already available
to her. Healthy snacks and drinks for the focus group are expected to cost $50. Copying/printing
costs are expected to be approximately $25. No other expenses are expected except the
References
Actis, R. V. Ventura, L., Lott, D., Smith, K., Commean, P., Hastings, M., & Mueller, M. (2008).
Multi-plug insole design to reduce peak plantar pressure on the diabetic foot during
Boulton, A. &. & Jude, E. (2004). Therapeutic footwear in diabetes: The good, the bad, and the
Boutoille, D. F., Feraille, A., Maulaz, D., & Drempf, M. (2008). Quality of life with diabetes-
Bus, S., Haspels, R., & Busch-Westbroek, T. (2011). Evaluation and optimization of therapeutic
footwear for neuropathic diabetic foot patients using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis.
Chandalia, H., Singh, D., Kapoor, V., Chandalia, S, & Lamba, P. (2008). Footwear and foot care
knowledge as risk factors for foot problems in Indian diabetics. Int J Diab Dev Ctries,
28(4), 109-113.
Farag, Y., & Gaballa, M. (2011). Diabesity: An overview of a rising epidemic. Nephrology,
Maciejewski, M., Reiber, G., Smith, D., Wallace, C., Hayes, S., & Boyko, E. (2004).
27(7), 1774-1782.
Narayan, K., Zhang, P., Kanaya, A., Williams, D., Engelgau, M., Imperatore, G., &
Price, P. (2004). The diabetic foot: Quality of life. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 39(Suppl 2),
S129-S131.
Ullbrecht, J., Cavanagh, R., & Caputo (2004). Foot problems in diabetes: An overview. Clinical
Viswanathan, V., Madhavan, S., Gnanasundaram, S., Gopalakrishna, G., Das, B., Rajasekar, S.,
& Ramachandran, A. (2004). Effectiveness of different types of footwear insoles for the
Willrich, A., Pinzur, M., McNeil, M., Juknelis, D., & Lavery, L. (2005). Health related quality of
life, cognitive function, and depression in diabetic patients with foot ulcer or amputation.
Appendices
Do you feel like you learned anything new about care of your feet in the
Would you wear running shoes with special inserts, for casual wear?
Did learning about footware in your education session make you more likely to
Consent Forms
Diabetic Management 13
References
(Narayan, 2006)
(Bus, 2011)
(Maciejewski, 2004)
(Viswanathan, 2004)